CONTENT
IN MEMORIAM
II
DEDICATION
III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
IV
ACRONYMS
V
ABSTRACT
VI
RESUME
VII
INTRODUCTION
1
CHAPTER ONE: LITERATURE REVIEW
6
I. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
6
I.1. Local leadership empowerment
6
I.2. Chieftaincy
8
II.THEORIES
9
II.1. Local government in Democratic Republic of
the Congo
10
II.2. Empowering local leadership
12
III. HYPOTHESES BUILDING ON THE RESEARCH TOPIC
18
CHAPTER TWO: METHODOLOGY
25
I. DEFINITION OF THE POPULATION
25
II. SAMPLING TECHNIQUE AND DATA COLLECTION
25
II.1.The qualitative technique
25
II.2. The snowball technique
26
II.3. The questionnaire
26
II.4. Measuring variables
27
III. MODEL SPECIFICATION OF WILLINGNESS TO PAY
30
IV. DATA PROCESSING TECHNIQUE
32
CHAPTER THREE: RESULT PRESENTING AND
INTERPRETATION
33
I. GENERAL FEATURES OF NOTABLES
33
II. RELATED ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATE OF THE MODEL
37
II.2. Determinants of WTP towards Ngweshe local
leaders
37
II.3. Discussion and social implication of
findings
40
CONCLUSION
44
REFERENCES
45
CONTENT
53
APPENDIX
54
APPENDIX
Appendix 1: FACTOR ANALYSIS ON HOUSEHOLD ASSETS
KMO and Bartlett's Test
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
|
,857
|
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
|
Approx. Chi-Square
|
3709,154
|
Df
|
231
|
Sig.
|
,000
|
Communalities
|
|
Initial
|
Extraction
|
Num_house
|
1,000
|
,777
|
Num_bed
|
1,000
|
,868
|
Num_cupboard
|
1,000
|
,821
|
Num_armchair
|
1,000
|
,758
|
Num_table
|
1,000
|
,880
|
Num_vehicle
|
1,000
|
,673
|
Num_motorb
|
1,000
|
,671
|
Num_computer
|
1,000
|
,783
|
Num_televis
|
1,000
|
,902
|
Num_radio
|
1,000
|
,464
|
Num_teleph
|
1,000
|
,522
|
Num_generat
|
1,000
|
,686
|
Num_freezer
|
1,000
|
,926
|
Num_Iron
|
1,000
|
,863
|
Num_cooker
|
1,000
|
,854
|
Num_solarpan
|
1,000
|
,801
|
Num_clipper
|
1,000
|
,704
|
Num_washbasi
|
1,000
|
,592
|
Num_wardrobe
|
1,000
|
,644
|
Num_sewingma
|
1,000
|
,481
|
Num_parcel
|
1,000
|
,425
|
Num_cow
|
1,000
|
,690
|
|
Appendix 2 : CORRELATION MATRIX OF VARIABLES
Appendsix 3: OUTCOME OF THE QUALITATIVE SURVEY
Working on "willingness to pay of the notability for local
leadership empowerment in Ngweshe", seven questions have been asked to 25
considered notables around Bukavu town. These questions mainly aimed at
assessing three features viewed to identify local leaders, their work, and
their supporters. Those questions are enumerated below:
1. What do you think about local leadership in Ngweshe
2. Who are those leaders?
3. What do you think about their work?
4. Do they contribute to local development?
5. How do you hope to help them?
6. Who are supposed to support them?
7. Do you think that groups of mutualities can help them?
· If yes, how much can you annually contribute when
supporting a developmental project?
· If not, what is the reason that causes people not to
contribute?
Results
1. Answering the first question regarding notables' thought
about local leadership in the chiefdom, it is observable that these notables
don't yet trust in local leadership. The truth is that they have supported that
local leaders have surrendered their mission and live today in town rather than
remaining near rural folks. Thus, a respondent has supposed that leadership
doesn't exist in Ngweshe. The chiefdom is ruled throughout "power of attorney"
held by some individuals living in the countryside. Another aspect noticed by
one of respondents was that local chieftaincy was influential in the society
through soil ownership. But currently their power and influence are facing
resistance of a new generation of wealth owners. There is in other ways a kind
of transfers of leadership from traditional chieftaince to current means
holders.
2. Notables mainly consider as local leaders in their native
chiefdom, all those people belonging to traditional and cultural chieftaincy:
the Mwami (King and chief of the chiefdom), chiefs of groupings, of Localities;
and many other kinds of individuals who exercise a certain influence on rural
lives.They thus are religious leaders, leader of schools, hospitals, and
influential economic agents.
3. While they are opportunists as deems one respondent, all
respondents have supported that their role is guiding, orienting, working with
the population, being its reporter, bear difficulties in interest of their
population. They have as well in their charge to be justice promoters and
regulate disputes in the community. They should be objective by avoiding
mismanaging or abandon to realize what folks wait from them. Notwithstanding,
it is recognized that retro-cession is allowed to entities even though they
aren't altogether delivered. That is, the Mwami uses that amount without any
control. What can lose trust of notables into local leadership in the chiefdom.
Respondents have suggested tooling the local civil society so as governance
takes another take-off within local leaders.
4. As for their contribution to developing the Ngweshe
chiefdom, respondents diverge on leaders' intention and orientation. In fact
some notables have asseverated that local leaders do not work in interest of
folks while others assume that some of rural leaders perfectly fulfill their
work in their entities. However, they notice that the mainstream of local
leaders is not educated and consequently have some limits which prevent them
from introducing new improving policies and actions. In a nutshell, only a few
leaders are implicated in development action.
5. Their answer on the way to help local leaders is mostly
building their capacity, being close to them, help to understand the current
context and the global evolution of the region. Also, encourage stakeholders
(local leaders, local folks,etc.) to adopt participatory budget in the entity
so as they boost development schemes. Here, responsible of the civil society
mainly and the whole population have in their attribution to monitor their
actions. However, an individual has said that there is no way to help local
leaders because they even embezzle remitted retrocession. What shows that all
individual may not will to pay as a result of trust lose.
6. Several interventions at different level are requisite.
Primarily, local leaders shall count on their own population through levy
collection even though rural citizens are pauperized, State leaders at national
and provincial level, NGO, Universities,natives living outer the chiefdom,
organizations, etc. Inquired individuals have estimated the variability of
their support amount to local leaders regarding each scheme taking into account
its collective utility and budget needed.
7.Despite that an individual assumed that he cannot contribute
for empowering local leadership, noticing their behavior of living in town
rather than being in rural area and the fact that they embezzle amounts allowed
to rural development, others have asserted to pay between 50 and USD 1500.
Appendix: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
My name is Romeo MUNGUAKONKWA, a student in license in rural
economics at the Catholic university of Bukavu. This survey is realized with
the purpose to fulfill our graduate paper carried on Willingness to
pay of the notability for local leadership empowerment in
Ngweshe. It aims to assess the level to which the rural
notability dwelling in Bukavu would be ready to fund their local leaders (rural
authorities) in their home chiefdom so as developmental projects can be
undertaken under them. Given that we provide you the maximum confidentiality on
data you're going to provide us, we beg you to provide your uninfluenced
answers as an inherent contribution to this research.
N° questionnaire
|
Date
|
Grouping of origin
|
Starting time
|
Ending time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module 1. CARACTERISTIQUES SOCIOECONOMIQUES DU NOTABLE
ET DE SON MENAGE
1. Age
|
|
2. household size
|
|
3. Sex 0. Male 1. Female
|
|
4. Marital status:
1. Single [ ] 2. Married [ ] 3. Divorced [
] 4. widow [ ]
|
|
5. Level of study
1. none 2. Primary 3. Secondary 4. Academic
|
|
6. Religion
1. Catholic 2. Protestant 3. Muslim 4. Kimbanguist 5.
Other
|
|
7. From when do you live in Bukavu ?
|
|
8. what is your status in the household?
1. head 2. Spouse 3. Other
|
|
8. Do you belong to a mutual or an association? 1. Yes
2. No
|
|
9. If yes, which duration has it taken?
|
|
10. Do you permanently access to water in your household?
1. Yes 2. No
|
|
12. Do you permanently access to electricity in your
household? 1. Yes 2. No
|
|
13. Accommodation
1. Durable 2. Semi-durable 3. Shelf 4. Mire 5. Other
|
|
14. Dwelling place
1. Ibanda. 2. Kadutu. 3. Bagira
|
|
15. If you are married, what is your spouse's educational
level
1. none 2. Primary 3. Secondary 4. Academic
|
|
16. what is his/her profession?
1. Unemployed 2. Salaried 3. Mercantile 4. Farmer 5. craft
6. Other
|
|
Income
|
Resource approach
|
1.
|
What is your monthly income?
|
........................
|
2.
|
What is your spouse's monthly income
|
........................
|
3.
|
If there are other active members in your household, what is
their monthly income?
|
........................
|
Expenditure approach
|
What are your household's alimentary and no alimentary
expenditure?
|
Monthly expenditure in USD
1. Food +beverage .................
2. Transport .................
3. Communication .................
4. Cloths and footwear.................
5. Cosmetic products and bath soap .................
6. washing soap .................
7. Petrol, gas and other energetic springs
.................
8. Water and electricity .................
9. Leisure .................
10. Other monthly expenditure .................
|
Yearly expenditure in USD
11. Fee of medicine and health .................
12. Schooling .................
13. Rent on house .................
14. Credit repayment .................
15. Social expenses .................
16. Journey .................
17. Other yearly expenditure .................
|
Householdassets
Do you possess
|
How many
|
Do you possess
|
How many?
|
House
|
|___|
|
Generating set
|
|___|
|
Bed
|
|___|
|
Freezer
|
|___|
|
Cupboard
|
|___|
|
Iron
|
|___|
|
Armchair
|
|___|
|
Camping stove/ cooker
|
|___|
|
Table
|
|___|
|
Solar panel
|
|___|
|
Vehicle
|
|___|
|
Clipper
|
|___|
|
Motorbike
|
|___|
|
Washbasin
|
|___|
|
Computer
|
|___|
|
Wardrobe
|
|___|
|
Television
|
|___|
|
Sewing machine
|
|___|
|
Radio
|
|___|
|
Parcel
|
|___|
|
Telephone
|
|___|
|
Cow
|
|___|
|
General information on the respondent's
activity
|
1. In which sector is located your primary activity?
1. Agriculture, breeding and fishing [ ] 2. Manufacture
[ ] 3. General trade [ ] 4.Craft [ ]
5. Public sector [ ] 6. NGO [ ] 7. Other [ ]
|
2. What is your status in that sector?
1. Salaried [ ] 2. Independent [ ] 3. Employer [
]
|
3. Is the organization in which you work recorded in formal
sector?
0. No [ ] 1. Yes [ ]
|
4. How many years have you realized in that
sector (activity)?.................
|
5. In how many activities or sectors are you
involved ?.................
|
6. In which sector is located your secondary activity?
1. Agriculture, breeding and fishing [ ] 2. Manufacture
[ ] 3. General Trade [ ] 4.Craft [ ]
5. Public sector [ ] 6. NGO [ ] 7. Other [ ]
|
7. What is your status in that sector?
1. Salaried [ ] 2. Independent [ ] 3. Employer [
]
|
8. Is the organization in which you work recorded in formal
sector?
0. No [ ] 1. Yes [ ]
|
9. How many years have you realized in that sector (activity)?
.................
|
10. For how much do you believe your monthly income from
your primary activity? .................
|
11. For how much do you believe your monthly income from your
secondary activity ?.................
|
Educationalburden
|
1.
|
How many members of your household are schooled?
|
Primary school
|
.........
|
Secondary school
|
.........
|
Primary school
|
.........
|
2.
|
How much do you yearly pay for the education of your
children ?
|
Primary school
|
.........
|
Secondary school
|
.........
|
College/ University
|
.........
|
3.
|
How much do you allocate to educating outer persons ?
|
Primary school
|
.........
|
Secondary school
|
.........
|
College/ University
|
.........
|
4.
|
If school fees fade, will you your contribution towards local
leadership ?
|
1. Yes 2. No
|
|___|
|
5.
|
Do you expect that ulterior returns to schooling of those
you're bearing will improve your contribution?
|
1. Yes 2. No
|
|___|
|
Module 2. WILLINGNESS TO PAY
In the spirit of this work is the intervention of two kinds of
partners, notably local leaders who are ruling at
several level of the rural society and notables
emerging from Ngweshe and leaving in Bukavu. Given that, local leaders are
performers as wants decentralization. But they face a decrease of retrocession.
Regardful to developing your native chiefdom, you are asked this question:
Are you predisposed to improve local leadership for
Ngweshedevelopment ? Yes |___| No |___|
|
Willing to improve local leadership
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
1. You trust local leaders in Ngweshe
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
2. You participate to local development in Ngweshe
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
3. Local development of Ngweshe is your priority
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
4. Local leaders need trainings in management and local
governance
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
5. Development of Ngweshe must be committed by rural local
leaders
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
6. Rural leaders are near folks
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
7. These leaders work for folks' welfare in Ngweshe
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
8. There must be a joint-committee (Notables and local
leaders) to monitor social project fulfillment in Ngweshe
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
9. Your motivation to participate is related to self interest
in Ngweshe rather than collectively born development
|
|___|
|
|___|
|
Social capital
|
1. Is your participation to local leadership reinforcement
tied to your friends' participation? 0. No 1. Yes
|
|
2. If yes, how many participate? .................
|
3. How many people of great notoriety encourage you
participating to developing local leadership?...............
|
4. How many active fellow workers encourage you to contribute?
.................
|
5. Is there any organization or group where members are
encouraged to disburse towards local leadership empowerment in Ngweshe?
0. No 1. Yes
|
|
6. If yes, how many are they?
.................
|
7. Do your work managers having influence on your source of
income push you to pool?
0. No 1. Yes
|
|
8. If Yes, why do you accept to pool? 1. Love of chiefdom 2
To persuade them 3. By fear to be fired. 4. Other 5. None
..................................................
|
Willingness to pay
|
Now, some are presented some imaginary scenarios on which your
opinion is needed: local leaders' role being assuring social well-being of
communities and thus local development. Got it the lower penetration of
retrocession funds for developing the
EntitésTerritorialeDécentralisées, among which
Ngweshe chiefdom, the developmental process would decelerate. As well, loses
and challenges would surprisingly raise. Being recognized as notable of the
area, your contribution would help to fill the gap. Thus, you are presented the
following questions to withdraw your strain for financially tooling local
leaders in Ngweshe.
|
1. In order to reinforce local leadership,
are you ready to yearly pay in USD and in accordance to each project an amount
the following amount: 250/ 1000/1500/2000
Yes |___| No |___|
Ø If yes on question (1), are you
ready to pay above the following amounts in USD 350/1100/1700/2800
Yes |___| No |___|
Ø If no on question (1), are you ready
to pay above the following amounts 150/600/900/1200?
Yes |___| No |___|
Ø If you don't admit any bid, then, what is the amount
you would willingly give? .........................................
|
Execution priority of crowdfunded
projects
Seen that your contributions will go through local leaders,
you are just now presented several developmental projects asking you to give
your point of view on their priority. There is no bad
answer; it all depends on your own perception of the priority on their
performance.
|
Here's the meaning of the number suggested by the scale
1= Very low priority 2= low priority 3= neutral
4= Priority 5= very high priority
|
Current level of priority given to the project fields
|
In the future perspective, please express your
wish for priority execution on the projects
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
1. Project aiming at increasing the production of
vegetables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Project aiming at increasing the production of legumins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Project aiming at increasing the production of cereals
(Maize, Sorghum, Rice,...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Project aiming at increase the production of roots
(cassava, Potato, yam, taro,...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Project aiming at increasing animal production (ovine,
porcine, goat, bovine,...) and milk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Project to make sustainable and productive banana
cultivation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Project for sustainability of peace in the chiefdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Project for chiefdom electrification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Water supply project for the needy villages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. For a hospital infrastructure construction Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. For a comfortable six class construction project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. For a project to build a solar power plant per general
hospital in Ngweshe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Project to install a flour mill for the production of
flour in Ngweshe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motivation to participate to the local leadership
empowerment process
|
Here are some propositions relative to facts that
would influence the amount you can be disposed to give for leadership
empowerment in Ngweshe. For each one of them, please express your level of
agreement on the following scale: 1. Very much agree 2. Alright
3. Neutral 4. Disagree 5. Not altogether agree.
There is no bad answer; it all depends on your own encouraging
reasons of participation.
|
Motivation
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
1. I will be ready to participate to collectively financing
local leaders for being a share of those who will have allowed development in
Ngweshe
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I will be ready to participate to collectively financing
local leaders provided that they are transparent
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I would like to participate to collectively financing local
leadership so as peace becomes sustainable in Ngweshe
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I would give funds and my participatory share provided that
it goes through the planning of my ulterior investments in Ngweshe
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I would like to participate provided that those who
embezzle funds come in question before the justice
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. I would like to participate to the process of crowdfunding
towards local leadership in order to rise crops production
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. My contribution to projects targeting development under
local leadership is mainly prompted by my political ambitions in the area
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting Price
|
1.
|
Is there any set amount when contributing in your
organization?
|
1. Yes 2. No
|
2.
|
If yes, what is the monthly set amount?
|
..................
|
3.
|
If no, is it a good policy?
|
1. Yes 2. No
|
4.
|
What is the mean amount you would give after a year?
|
..................
|
Selected grouping for the project
|
1.
|
Do you wish projects undertaken to be first applied in your
home grouping?
|
1. Yes 2. No
|
|___|
|
2.
|
Suppose that you're the policy decider, will you implement the
most important projects in your home grouping rather than others of your
chiefdom?
|
1. Yes 2. No
|
|___|
|
3.
|
If yes (to question 2), what incites you to
pay such an attention to towards your home grouping?
|
1. Community tie
2. Your center of interest
|
|___|
|
We thank you very much for your availability to
contribute to this research fulfillment
|
|