WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Project selection and management in international development organisations

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Landry Iragi Mugaruka
University of Hertfordshire - MSc. Project Management 2014
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

5.3 Programme and Project Selection Framework

Based on the discussion in the literature review and the findings on the current practices in the five selected International Development Organisations, the following Programme/Project Portfolio Management Framework is being proposed:

48

Global Organisational Strategy

PSC

Selection and Prioritization

Project Identification

Management and Monitoring

Country Strategy

Need

Assessment

Evaluation

PT & PSC

PT

PSC: Programme Selection Committee

PT: Programme Team

Figure 6 Proposed Framework for Programme Selection and Management

Needs' Assessment: This first stage is concerned with the assessment of a country's needs which will be used when developing the country's strategy.

Country Strategy: this stage is concerned with the development of the country's strategy based on the needs identified during the needs' assessment phase and the demand in the country.

Project Identification: this stage will consist of a pre-screening and a screening process. Programme and project proposals will be reviewed to ensure that they are in line with the country's strategy (pre-screening) before they are matched to one of the strategic buckets identified when developing the country's strategy (screening).

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

49

Proposals that are not aligned with the country's strategy will be rejected and those that are aligned to the strategy and fit one of the strategic buckets will be carried forward to the next phase.

Selection and Prioritization: during this stage, programmes and projects will be scored and ranked using the weighted Scoring Model developed for the framework. Programmes and projects with the highest scores will then be carried forward to the next phase which is the implementation.

The Programme Selection Committee will be responsible for the above four phases.

Project Identification

- Pre-screening - Screening

Selection and Prioritization

- Scoring - Ranking

Figure 7 Phases 1 and 2 of the proposed framework

Management and Monitoring: this phase is concerned with the implementation of the programmes and projects under the supervision of the Programme Team. The RAID Log of each individual programme or project will be updated throughout its implementation and status reports will also be prepared periodically. It is during this phase that programme and project activities will be broken down into manageable work packages to facilitate planning. Programmes and projects will go through their normal life cycle until they are completed.

Evaluation: during this phase, the programmes and projects outputs and outcomes will be reviewed and evaluated in contrast to what was initially planned and lessons learnt report will be produced. This evaluation phase will also be used to capture

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

50

stakeholders' satisfaction. The evaluation phase will be under the supervision of both the Programme Selection Committee and Programme Team.

Management & Monitoring

- Progress Reports - RAID Log

Evaluation

- Final Report

- Lessons Learnt Report

- Stakeholder's satisfaction

Figure 8 Phases 3 and 4 of the proposed framework

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

51

6. Conclusion

6.1 How is Project Portfolio Selection applied within an Organisation

This research has shown that Project Portfolio Management links an organisation's strategic goals and objectives to its project selection process through the use of tools and techniques that ensure that the selected projects or group of projects are aligned with the organisation's strategy. To align an organisation's strategy to its programme or project selection process, project portfolio management advocates the establishment of a management team that will be responsible for the identification, screening, selection and ranking of programmes and projects that will be implemented. By doing so, organisations can be assured that only the right mix of programmes and projects are selected.

6.2 What is the nature of International Development Organisations as opposed to traditional Organisations

This research has shown that International Development Organisations aim to improve the well-being of populations directly or indirectly through programmes and projects. They therefore must adopt a programme/project selection framework that not only support their strategies but also put cost-effectiveness at its forefront. The findings revealed that there is no universal framework that is used by all International Development Organisations but that they all develop a framework that helps them implement their strategies, suits their needs and make it easier for them to track changes occurring throughout the implementation of programmes and projects while at the same time making it possible to learn important lessons that will help improve their organisational processes. As opposed to traditional organisations, development organisations rely on non-financial models when ranking and prioritizing projects. The use of non-financial models also results from the humanitarian nature of these organisations.

6.3 What is the proposed framework for the selection and management of International Development Programmes and Projects

The framework proposed in this dissertation follows Souder (1973)'s criteria for project selection models in that it takes into account an organisation's strategic objectives and its resources, it deals with uncertainties by proposing the use of tools that help identify events that can have a negative impact on the implementation of

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

52

selected programmes and projects (RAID Log), it is flexible in that it can be used by any development organisation, it is easy to understand and use. The framework incorporates the principles of project portfolio management by proposing the establishment of two management teams that will ensure that only programmes and projects that are in line with an organisation's strategy are selected and

implemented. The framework also incorporates some of the key success factors proposed by Diallo and Thuillier (2004) mainly creating learning opportunities and stakeholders' satisfaction therefore making it a good alternative framework for the selection of development programmes and projects.

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

53

7. References

Ahsan, K., & Gunawan, I. (2010). Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 68-78.

Archer, N.P. and Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An Integrated Framework for Project Portfolio Selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (4), 207-216.

Association of Project Management. (2006). APM Body of Knowledge, 5th ed. High Wycombe, UK: Author

Baum,W. C. (1970). The project cycle. Finance and Development, 7(2), 2-13.

Bond, R., & Hulme, D. (1999). Process approaches to development: Theory and Sri Lankan practice. World Development, 27(8), 1339-1358.

Chaffee, Ellen Earle. (1985). Three Models of Strategy. The Academy of Management Review. 10 (1), 89-98.

Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The «Real» Success Factors on Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20 (3), 185-190.

Cooper, R. G. (2005). Portfolio Management for Product Innovation. In Levine, H. A. (eds.) (2005) Project Portfolio Management: A Practical Guide to Selecting Projects, Managing Portfolios and Maximizing Benefit, pp.318-354. USA: Pfeiffer Wiley.

Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1998). Best Practices for Managing R & D Portfolios,Research Technology Management 41, 4: 20-33.

Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Results of an Industry Practices Study. R & D Management, 31 (4), 361-381.

Crawford, P. and Bryce, P. (2003), Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 363-73.

Department for Internation Development. (2011). DFID's Approach to Value for Money (vfm). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmentdata/file/67479/ DFID-approach-value-money.pdf. Last accessed 10th September 2014.

Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T., 2005. The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Executive 19 (1), 147-156.

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

54

Diallo, A. and Thuillier, D. (2004), The success dimensions of international development projects: the perceptions of African project coordinators, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 19-31.

Diallo, A. and Thuillier, D. (2005), The success of international development projects, trust and communication: an African perspective, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 237-52.

Diallo, A., & Thuillier, D. (2004). The success dimensions of international development projects: The perceptions of African project coordinators. International Journal of Project Management, 22(1), 19-31.

Diallo, A., & Thuillier, D. (2005). The success of international development projects, trust and communication: An African perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 23(3), 237-252.

Dye, L. D. & Pennypacker, J. S. (2000). Project Portfolio Management and Managing Multiple Projects: Two Sides of the Same Coin?' Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, September 7-16, 2000. Houston, Texas, USA.

Dye, L.D. and Pennypacker, J.S. (eds.). (1999). Project Portfolio Management: Selecting and prioritizing projects for competitive advantage. West Chester, PA: Center for Business Practices.

Englund, R. L. & Graham, R. J. (1999). From Experience: Linking Projects to Strategy. Journal of Production and Innovation Management, 16 (1), 52-64.

Gardiner, P. D. (2005). Project Management: A Strategic Planning Approach. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ghasemzadeh, F. and Archer, N.P. (2000). Project portfolio selection through decision support. Decision Support Systems. 29 (1), 73-88.

Hermano, V., López-Paredes. A., Martín-Cruz, N. and Pajares, J.. (2013). How to manage international development (ID) projects successfully. Is the PMD Pro1 Guide going to the right direction? International Journal of Project Management. 31 (1), p22-30.

Ika, L. A., & Hodgson, D. (2010). Towards a critical perspective in international development project management. Paper presented at Making Projects Critical 5, Bristol Business School, Bristol, England.

Ika, L. A., Diallo, A., & Thuillier, D. (2010). Project management in the international development industry: the project coordinator's perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(1), 61-93.

55

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

Ika, Lavagnon A. (2012). Project Management for Development in Africa: Why Projects Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It.Project Management Journal. 43 (4), 27-41.

Jankowicz, A.D (2005). Business Research Projects. 4th ed. London: Thomson Learning. p111.

Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2006). Exploring Corporate Strategy. 7th ed. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Khang, Do Ba and Moe, Tun Lin. (2008). Success Criteria and Factors for International Development Projects: A Life-Cycle-Based Framework. Project Management Journal. 39 (1), 72-84.

LaBrosse, Michelle. (2010). Project-Portfolio Management. Employment Relations Today. 37 (2), 75-79.

Landoni, Paolo and Corti, Benedetta. (2011). The Management of International Development Projects: Moving Toward a Standard Approach or Differentiation?. Project Management Journal. 42 (3), 45-61.

Lee, Nick and Lings, Ian (2008). Doing Business Research: A Guide to theory and practice. London: SAGE Publications. p46-75.

Levine, H. A. (2005). Project Portfolio Management: A Practical Guide to Selecting Projects, Managing Portfolios and Maximizing Benefit. USA: Pfeiffer Wiley.

Meredith & Mantel-Jr, (2010). Project Management: A Managerial Approach, 7th edition. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. New York, USA: Free Press.

Morgan, E. P. (1983). The project orthodoxy in development: Re-evaluating the cutting edge. Public Administration and Development, 3(4), 329-339.

Morgan, R.E., Strong, C.A., 2003. Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research 56 (3), 163-176.

Müller, R., Martinsuo,M., and Blomquist, T. (2008). Project portfolio control and portfolio management performance in different contexts. Project Management Journal, 39 (3), pp. 28-42

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

56

NORAD (1995). Guide to Planning and Evaluation NGO Projects, Number 2: Core Elements in Planning Development Assistance, Oslo: NORAD.

NORAD (1999). The Logical Framework Approach (LFA): Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Project Planning.

PMD Pro (2013). A Guide to the PMD Pro Project Management for Development Professionals. London: PM4NGOs.

Ramenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A. and Swartz, E. (1998) Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method, London, Sage.

Rondinelli, D. A. (1976). Why development projects fail: Problems of project management in developing countries. Project Management Quarterly, 7(7), 10-15.

Rosenberg, L.J., Posner, L.D., 1979. The Logical Framework: A Manager's Guide to a Scientific Approach to Design and Evaluation. Practical Concepts, Washington,DC.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007). Research Methods for Business Students. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. p100-128.

Shenhar, A. J. & Wideman, R. M. (1997). Toward a Fundamental Differentiation between Projects. [Accessed on: 16th June 2014] Available at: http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/differentiation/background.htm

Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., Maltz, A.C., (2001). Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning 34 (6), 699-725.

Sommer, R. J. (1999). Portfolio Management for Projects: A New Paradigm. In Dye, L.D. and Pennypacker, J.S. (eds.) (1999) Project Portfolio Management: Selecting and Prioritizing Projects for Competitive Advantage, pp. 55-60. West Chester, PA: Center for Business Practices.

Souder, E. William. (2000). Utility and Perceived Acceptability of R&D Project Selection Models. Management Science. 19 (12), 1384-1394.

Srivannaboon, S. & Milosevic, D. Z. (2006). A Two-Way Influence between Business Strategy and Project Management, International Journal of Project Management, 24(6), 493-505.

Themistocleous, G. and Wearne, S.H. (2000), Project management topic coverage in journals, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 7-11.

Turner, J.R. (1994), Editorial: international project management association global qualification, certification and accreditation, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 109-18.

University Of Hertfordshire (2014)

57

Walker, O.C,J., and Ruekert, R. W. (1987) Marketing's role in the implementation of business strategies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Journal of

Marketing, 51 (3), pp. 15-34

Yelin, K. C. (2005). Linking Strategy and Project Portfolio Management. In Levine, H. A. (eds.) (2005) Project Portfolio Management: A practical guide to selecting

projects, managing portfolios and maximizing benefit, pp. 137-145. USA: Pfeiffer Wiley.

Youker, R. (1999). Managing international development projects: Lessons learned. Project Management Journal, 30(2), 6-7.

Youker, R. (2003). The nature of international development projects. Paper presented at PMI Conference, Baltimore, MD.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"L'imagination est plus importante que le savoir"   Albert Einstein