ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS INCENTIVES ON
MATERNAL AND NEWBORN HEALTH SERVICES PERFORMANCE,
IN RWINKWAVU DISTRICT HOSPITAL,
KAYONZA DISTRICT, RWANDA
NDANGURURA DENYS
MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH
AUGUST, 2015
ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS INCENTIVES ON
MATERNAL AND NEWBORN HEALTH SERVICES PERFORMANCE,
IN RWINKWAVU DISTRICT HOSPITAL,
KAYONZA DISTRICT, RWANDA
NDANGURURA DENYS
11/MPH/KA/G/050
A Thesis Submitted to Bugema University in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Public Health
AUGUST, 2015
ACCEPTANCE SHEET
This thesis entitled «ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY
HEALTH WORKERS INCENTIVES ON MATERNAL AND NEWBORN HEALTH SERVICES PERFORMANCE,
IN RWINKWAVU DISTRICT HOSPITAL, KAYONZA DISTRICT, RWANDA .»
Prepared and submitted by NDANGURURA DENYS in partial
fulfilment of the requirements of MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, is
hereby accepted.
Beth Sigue, PhD
Paul Katamba, PhD
Member, Advisory Committee Member, Advisory Committee
_______________________
_____________________
Date Signed Date Signed
Sylvia T. Callender-Carter, Dr PH
Chairperson, Advisory Committee
__________________________
Date Signed
Assoc. Prof. Nazarius M. Tumwesigye
Jaji Kahinde, MBA
Member, External Examining Committee Member, Internal
Examining Committee
________________________
______________________
Date Signed Date Signed
Accepted as partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree
of MASTER PUBLIC HEALTH, Bugema University
Sylvia T. Callender Carter, Dr PH
Chairperson, Department of Public Health
_____________________
Date Signed
Paul Katamba, PhD
Dean, School of Graduate Studies
_____________________
Date Signed
DECLARATION
I, NDANGURURA Denys, hereby, declare that the thesis entitled
«Assessment of Community Health Workers Incentives on Improving
Maternal and Newborn Health Services, Case Study of Rwinkwavu District Hospital
in Kayonza District, Rwanda», is my personal
original work and to the best of my knowledge, it has not been submitted, in
part or in a whole, for any degree in any university.
Signature--------------------------------
NDANGURURA Denys
Date------------------------------------
DEDICATION
With love, this thesis is dedicated to my beloved family for
their love, care and support during my studies. To all friends and relatives
who contributed to this research.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
The writer was born September 10th, 1983 in Nzige
Sector, Rwamagana District in Eastern Province of Rwanda. He is born to Mr.
Andre NDANGUZA and Madeleine KAMAHE. He completed his primary school at Akanzu
Primary School, Rwamagana district. In 1996, he joined APEGA secondary school
where he completed O' level. Then after from 2000 to 2003 he completed his
studies from the school of Agriculture and Veterinry in Veterinary studies. In
September 2003, he joined the Universté Ouvrte/Campus de Goma in RDC and
in 2006, he got the advanced Diploma in General Nursing then after in the same
institution from 2006 to 2008 he completed his undergraduate studies in Public
Health getting a bachelor degree in Public Health. He then worked at Rwinkwavu
district hospital as a nurse then after he worked in the same institution as
the professional in charge of Community Health Program from 2007 to 2014. He is
now a District Coordinator for Rwanda Family Health Project, a USAID funded
project working with Rwanda through the Ministry of Health to improve family
health services. In January 2012, he joined the school of graduate school at
Bugema University, a Chartered Seventh Day Adventist Higher learning
Institution for Master degree in Public Health at Bugema university, Kampala,
Uganda which he completed in July 2015.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I must convey my deepest appreciation to my chief
supervisor Dr Sylvia Callender -Carter and my supervisors Dr. Beth Sigue and
Dr. Paul Katamba, who gave me valuable guidance, support. Also the
encouragement from Dr. Rhoda Kayongo and Dr. Moses Kayongo the good will from
the initial to the final stage of helping me to develop an understanding of
this paper. Your advice has played by Stephan S. Kizza. is an outstanding role
in shaping this paper. Your comments and observations were vital inputs which
enabled me to improve this paper.
It is a pleasure to express my gratitude to my colleagues for
helping me and sharing experiences and discussing courses.
My special thanks to my wife, sons, parents, brothers and
sisters for their priceless support.
May God bless all of you!
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF TABLES
x
LIST OF FIGURES
xi
LIST OF APPENDICES
xii
LIST OF ABREVIATION
xiii
ABSTRACT
xiv
CHAPTER ONE
1
INTRODUCTION
1
Background of the Study
1
Statement of the Problem
3
Research Questions
5
General Objective
6
Specific Objectives
6
Hypothesis
6
Significance of the Study
6
Scope of the Study
7
Limitation of Study
8
Theoretical Framework
9
Conceptual Framework
10
Operational Definitions of Terms
10
CHAPTER TWO
13
LITERATURE REVIEW
13
The Context of Community Health Workers
13
Community Health Workers' Incentives in Rwanda
15
Provision of Equipment
18
Compensating CHWs and Perdiem as an Incentive
20
Membership in CHW's Cooperatives
22
Maternal and New Born Health Services
23
PAGE
Relationship between CHWs Incentive and Improve
Maternal and Newborn Health
24
Summary of Identified Gaps
25
CHAPTER THREE
28
METHODOLOGY
28
Population of Study
28
Sample Size
28
Sampling Procedure
29
Research Instruments
30
Validity
30
Reliability
31
Data Collection Procedure
31
Data Analysis
32
CHAPTER FOUR
33
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
33
Demographic Characteristics of Research
Participants
33
Level of Community Health Workers incentives
36
Relationship between CHW's Incentives and
Performance of Maternal and Newborn Health Services
40
CHWs Financial Incentives on Performance of MNH
41
Membership in CHWs Cooperatives on Performance of
MNH
42
CHAPTER FIVE
44
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
44
Summary
44
Conclusion
46
Recommendation
47
REFERENCES
48
APPEND ICES
52
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
PAGE
Table 1: Showing Incentives and Desincentives
CHWs
23
Table 2: The Number of Population Sample
29
Table 3: Social-Demographic Characteristics of
Respondents
34
Table 4: Level of Community Health Workers
incentives
37
Table 5: Level of Maternal and Newborn Health
Service
39
Table 6: Logistic Regression of Community Health
Workers Related incentives and Performance Maternal - Newborn Health Services
in the Study Area
41
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
PAGE
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
10
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX
PAGE
Appendix 1: Questionnaire
52
Appendix 2: Data Collection Letter
55
Appendix 3: Acceptance Collection Letter
56
Appendix 4: Geographical Map of Rwinkwavu District
Hospital
57
Appendix 5: Map of Rwanda Showing Kayonza District
where Located Rwinkwavu District Hospital in South
58
LIST OF ABREVIATION
CBHPP: Community Based Hygiene Promotion Program
CBNP: Community Based Nutrition Program
CHC: Community Hygiene Club
CHWs: Community Health Workers
DHS: Demography and Health Survey
HC: Health Center
ICCM: Community Case Management
IMCI: Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses
KMC: Kangulo Mother Care
MCHIP: Maternal Child Health Integrated Program
MGDs: Millennium Development Goal
MMR: Maternal Mortality rate
MNHC: Maternal and New Borne Health Care
MOH: Ministry of Health
MUAC: Measurement Upper Arm Circumference
PBF: Performance Based Financing
RUTF: Ready to use Therapeutic Food
SAM: Severe and Acute Malnutrition
UNICEF: United the Nation of Child Fund
USAID: United States Agency of International development
WHO: World Health Organization
WFP: World Food Program
ABSTRACT
Denys NDANGURURA, School of Graduated Studies, Bugema University,
July, 2015. Thesis title; «ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
WORKERS INCENTIVES ON MATERNAL AND NEWBORN HEALTH SERVICES IN RWINKWAVU
DISTRICT HOSPITAL, KAYONZA DISTRICT, RWAND''A.
Chief Supervisor: Sylvia Callender -Carter, Dr.
PH
The study was carried out on assessment of Community Health
Workers Incentives on Maternal and newborn health services performance. The
sample size was 236 CHWs in charge of MNH distributed in eight health centers
of Rwinkwavu district hospital catchment area. To determine the demographic
characteristics of respondent, the researcher used descriptive statistics. It
revealed that the majority of them 125(53.2%) are those in the age range of 36
to 50 years. All respondents are women that are why when you look at gender
236(100%) were women. The marital status shows that the married are the
predominant among other represented by 168 (71.1%). The level of education the
majority of respondents 151(64.0%) have is primary. Most of the CHWs in charge
of MNH are agro-farmers 193(81.8%) distributed as cultivators 91(38.6%),
farmers 55(23.3%) and the farmers-cultivators represented 47(19.9%). The level
of CHWs incentives was showed a low mean and standard deviation ( =1.75; SD = 0.82). The results on MNH services performance the study was
showed a moderate mean and standard deviation of ( = 3.04; SD = 1.26).
Logistic regression was used to establish influence of CHWs
incentives on performance of them in MNH services. CHWs financial incentives to
be high are about 3 times as likely to perform in maternal and newborn health
services (P=0.012, (1.26-6.26),UR=2.808) however result indicate that being a
member of CHWs cooperative is not a significant predictor of performance of
CHWs in MNH services(P>0.05
The study recommends reviewing the system of CHWs performance
based financing system on equal opportunity and strong monitoring and
evaluation based on mentorship of CHWs cooperatives.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Globally community based intervention true CHWs is in urgent
need to improve health of women and children, particularly in areas of Africa,
where Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5 are most lagging. This
requires strong community engagement and formal investments in national health
systems, especially for those least likely to be reached through current
national health strategies, such as those in rural communities. Community
Health Workers (CHWs) have been internationally recognized for their notable
success in reducing morbidity and averting mortality in mothers, newborns and
children. CHWs are most effective when supported by a clinically skilled health
workforce, particularly for maternal care, and deployed within the context of
an appropriately financed primary health care system. However, CHWs have also
notably proven crucial in settings where the overall primary health care system
is weak, particularly in improving child and neonatal health. They also
represent a strategic solution to address the growing realization that
shortages of highly skilled health workers will not meet the growing demand of
the rural population. As a result, the need to systematically and
professionally train lay community members to be a part of the health workforce
has emerged not simply as a stop-gap measure, but as a core component of
primary health care systems in low resource settings, Prabhjot Singh (2011).
A National Roadmap to Accelerate the Reduction of Maternal and
Infant Mortality was adopted by the Rwandan Ministry of Health in 2008. The
roadmap outlines approaches to reducing maternal and newborn mortality, and
includes strategies for improving the quality of the facility based primary and
referral care, the availability of Kangaroo mother care (KMC) and the
availability of community-based services for women during pregnancy and in the
post-natal period.
According to the Roadmap builds on the National Reproductive
Health Policy and the National Child Health Policy (2008), and the Strategic
Plan for Acceleration of Child Survival (2008-2012), all program activities are
implemented in the context of the Economic Development and Poverty Reduction
Strategy of Rwanda (EDPRS 2008-2012) and the National Health Sector Strategic
Plan (Rwanda HSSPII 2009-2012).
General approaches to implementing community-based
activities are outlined in the National Community Health Policy of Rwanda
(2007). The health system in Rwanda is decentralized to the district level.
The country is divided into 4 provinces and the City of Kigali, 30 districts,
416 sectors, around 9,000 cells and 15,000 Imidugudu (villages). A system of
community-based health insurance in the form of mutual health insurance was
established in 1996. Since 2006 Rwanda has implemented a Performance Based
Financing (PBF) model to provide incentives to facility-and community-based
health workers. The PBF approach provides quarterly remuneration to health
workers based on performance measured by defined indicators (MOH Rwanda,
2012).
In order to improve the performance of CHWs and
obtain good results on agreed upon indicators especially the maternal and
infant mortality, payments are made when proof of an agreed level of
performance is attained. Every month at the Health Center level data is
collected from reports on indicators and entered into a web-based database
(SisCom). The Sector Steering Committee oversees the evaluation of different
indicators during a quarterly meeting and approves the payment to the CHW
Cooperatives. This quarterly C-PBF accompanied with monthly top ups and
trainings are the major and in some cases the sole incentives provided to CHWs
as a motivation to achieve their different and important tasks (MOH, Rwanda
2009).
Statement of the Problem
Community health workers (CHWs) are
increasingly recognized as a critical link in improving access to services and
achieving the health-related Millennium Development Goals. Given the financial
and human resources constraints in developing countries, CHWs are expected to
do more without necessarily receiving the needed support to do their jobs well.
How much can be expected of CHWs before work overload and reduced
organizational support negatively affect their productivity, the quality of
services, and in turn the effectiveness of the community-based programs that
rely on them.
Even if the MOH provides different incentives like monthly top
up, Community PBF, Trainings, Provision of materials and equipment's to
Community Health Workers in order to improve the service they gave in maternal
and newborn health services, the objectives of MOH are not yet achieved:
According to the DHS (2010), report indicated the persistent
high maternal mortality rate where out of 100,000 women that gave birth 476
deaths occurred within 42 days. According to MDGs this indicator must be
reduced to 268/100,000 by 2015. Where the evolution of this indicator was:
· 2000:1071/100.00 lives birth (DHS 2000)
· 2005:785/100.000 lives birth (IDHS2005)
· 2008:540/100.000 lives birth (Rwanda HMIS 2008)
· 2010: 476/100.000 lives birth (RDHS2010)
· 2015: 210/100.000 lives birth (DHS 2014/2015)
In 2008, with the introduction of community based maternal
and newborn health implemented by motivated CHWs in charge of maternal and
newborn health up to now we are observing the improvement in maternal health
where the current statistics shows 210/100,000 lives birth (Rwanda, DHS
2014/2015) and our study is assessing if there a contribution of CHWs in charge
of MNH on improving maternal and newborn health services. Rwanda is observing
also an improvement in fertility ration where 6.1(DHS2005), 5.5(RIDHS200-2008),
4.6(DHS2010) and 4.2(DHS2014/2015) since the past ten years. Birth occurred in
health facilities by skilled provider have been improved in last fifteen years
from 27% in 2000 to 91% in 2015. The figures before 2008 and after 2008 with an
introduction of community based maternal and newborn health implemented by
motivated CHWs in charge of maternal and newborn health shows 27% (RDHS2000),
28% (RDHS2005), 45% (RIDHS2007-2008), 69% (RDHS2010) and currently 91%
(RDHS2014-2015).
By 2015, Millennium Development Goal 5 (MDG 5) sets a target
of 75 percent reduction in maternal mortality, from 400/100,000 live births to
100/100,000 between the 1990 baseline and 2015. Although progress has fallen
short of achieving this MDG by 2015, every region of the world has made
important gains, and globally, maternal mortality has fallen by 45 percent over
the past two decades (WHO, 2014).
In April 2014, the World Health Organization, Maternal Health
Task Force, United Nations Population Fund, USAID and the Maternal Child Health
Integrated Program, and representatives from 30 countries agreed on a global
target for a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of less than 70/100,000 live births
by 2030, with no single country having an MMR greater than 140. This will
require that we collectively build on past efforts, accelerate progress and
ensure strong political commitment from all stakeholders (WHO, 2014).
Research Questions
The study attempted to answer the following
questions.
1 What is the Socio-demographic characteristic of community
health worker in charge of maternal and newborn health?
2. What are the community health workers in charge of maternal
and newborn health incentives?
3. What is the level of maternal and newborn health services?
4. Is there a significant influence between Community Health
Worker's incentives on performance of maternal and newborn health services?
General Objective
The general objective was to assess the relationship between CHWs
in charge of MNH incentives to performance of maternal and newborn health services.
Specific Objectives
1. To determine the demographic characteristics of respondent
CHW's in charge of maternal and newborn health.
2. To determine the level of CHW's in charge of maternal and
newborn health incentives.
3. To determine the level of performance of maternal and
newborn health services.
4. To establish the relationship between CHW's in charge of
maternal and newborn health incentives and performance maternal and newborn
health services.
Hypothesis
There is no relationship between CHWs in charge of MNH
incentives and performance maternal and newborn health services.
Significance of the Study
The study is significant to the community, CHWs and health
providers within Rwinkwavu District Hospital. The overall health sector
(Ministry of Health, NGOs and the Rwandese Government) will be benefit from the
results in Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Rwanda.
CHWs: The findings of this study will help
Community Health Workers to actively participate in maternal and newborn health
improvement and they will be aware at which level they contribute in that
improvement referring to the incentives they receive from different partners.
Public: The public will benefit from this
research because the improved maternal and newborn health services will
contribute to the reduction of maternal and newborn mortality rate with social
economic growth.
Policy Makers and Government: The findings
will promote leaders of Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Kayonza District, Ministry
of Health and NGOs to advocacate the way of incentivizing CHWs which may
promote income generating activities of CHWs cooperatives and sustainability of
the program. It will make recommendations to the district, Ministry of Health
and partners involved in national maternal and newborn health to improve their
policies and guidelines.
Researchers: The findings will stimulate the
interest of other researchers to carry out more empirical studies in order to
set up strategies to improve maternal and newborn health with the greater way
of incentivizing the CHWs in charge of maternal and newborn health.
Scope of the Study
Rwinkwavu District
hospital catchment area is located in Kayonza District in the Eastern Province
of Rwanda. It is boarded by the Gahini and Mwiri Sectors of Kayonza District in
the north, Kirehe and Ngoma District in south, United Republic of Tanzania in
the East and Rwamagana District in the West. It has 8 administrative sectors, 8
health centers, 33 cells, 251 villages dispatched on a surface of 64.5 square
kilometers and the population of 194248 (Rwanda
HMIS, 2015).
The study was conducted in its 8 health centers which are
Rwinkwavu, Cyarubare, Ndego, Nyamirama,Kabarondo, Karama, Rutare and Ruramira
health centers. The research was concentrated on CHWs in charge of maternal
and newborn health incentives and improvement of maternal and newborn health
services that that was accomplished from January, 2015 to July, 2015 (Rwanda
HMIS, 2015).
Limitation of Study
The major limitation of
this study was the unwillingness of some respondents to give true information
during data collection as it was intended to investigate the contribution of
incentives they receive on improvement of services they deliver to mothers and
newborns. Probing and encouragement was done by the researcher to divulge the necessary information to
respondents.
The findings from this
study was arguably limited by the fact that the study cannot claim to be truly
nationally representative because the study was conducted to CHWs in charge of
maternal and newborn health of only one district hospital among 46 district
hospitals country wide.
Theoretical Framework
The study was based on Maslow's Theory of Human Motivation.
This framework will contain aspects of other psychological theories of
motivation, corporate management models, and volunteer management models.
Applying Maslow's theory to existing corporate management models were
established the theory's relevance to management structures. Because volunteer
work differs from corporate work, the Theory of Human Motivation was adapted to
non-paid, volunteer work.
The framework was applied to major areas of existing CHW
programs in order to review the incentives, and ultimately, the incentives in
place. The goal of incentive structures should be to motivate CHWs to complete
their tasks effectively, while ensuring that they will stay committed with the
intervention. Motivation can be achieved in many ways, either extrinsically or
intrinsically. In analyzing an intervention, it is important to distinguish the
types of incentives motivating CHWs in charge of maternal and newborn health,
because they reflect the sustainability of the
program that can contribute to an improvement of maternal and newborn
health.
Conceptual Framework
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
Maternal and newborn Health Services
performance
o Percentage per target
Community Health Workers Incentives
o Financial incentives of CHWs
o Non-financial incentives of CHWs' (equipment and materials)
o Membership in CHW's cooperatives
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
Operational Definitions of
Terms
Community PBF: is mechanism of CHWs
motivation through their performance based financing. Payments made when proof
of the agreed level of performance, Community PBF guide details management at
different levels, the Sector Steering Committee oversees the implementation and
approves payment to the CHW Cooperative. Indicators entered at HC level into
web-based database after quarterly approval by committee with feedback.
This was measured by analyzing the level of agreement from one
to four meaning that: strongly agree (SA) = 4, agree (A) = 3, strondly disagree
(SD) = 2 then disagree (DA) = 1.
Provision of Equipment and Materials: The
community health workers in charge of maternal and newborn health are provided
with different tools and materials from government of Rwanda and different
partners local and international those help them to accomplish their tasks
those are bags, umbrella, timer, thermometer, balance, mobile phone, rain cost,
register for information recording, reporting register and the register for the
in reproductive age and pregnancy women. This was measured by analyzing the
level of agreement from one to four meaning that: strongly agree (SA ) =
4,agree (A) = 3, strongly disagree (SD) = 2 then disagree (DA) = 1.
CHWs Monthly Perdiem: This amount most of the
time paid by partners to strengthen the self-motivation based on monthly home
visits, daily accompaniment & key maternal health activities, timely
completion of a monthly report. This was measured by analyzing the level of
agreement from one to four meaning that: strongly agree (SA) = 4, agree (A) =
3, strongly disagree (SD) = 2 then disagree (DA) = 1.
Income Generation for Membership in CHW's
Cooperatives: All CHWs are organized in cooperatives and everyone is
supposed to benefit income generation from cooperative project. This was
measured by analyzing the level of agreement from one to four meaning that:
strongly agree (SA) = 4, agree (A) = 3, strongly disagree (SD) = 2 then
disagree (DA) = 1.
Maternal and Newborn Health Services: are the
tasks the CHWs in charge of maternal and newborn health are assigned to
accomplish. Those are almost 12 indicators seen in this research questionnaire.
The respondents gave the number then the surveyors made percentage after the
mean of measuring scare was calculated.
This variable was be measured using the scale as
follow:6=81-100% interpreted as high or very good performance, 5 = 61-80%
interpreted as good performance, 4 = 41-60 % interpreted as moderate or neuter
performance , 3 = 20-40% interpreted as low or poor performance, 2 = less than
20% very poor performance then after 1 is interpreted as not any activity
accomplished.
.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
The Context of Community Health
Workers
The global policy of providing primary level care was
initiated with the declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978s. The countries signatory to
Alma Ata declaration considered the establishment of CHW program as synonym
with Primary Health Care approach (Mburu, 1994; Sringernyuang Hongvivatana,
& Pradabmuk, 1995). Thus in many developing countries PHC approach was seen
as a mass production activity for training CHWs in 1980s (Matomora, 1989).
During these processes the voluntary health workers or CHWs were identified as
the third workforce of «Human resource for Health» (Sein, 2006).
Following this approach CHWs introduced to provide PHC in 1980s are still
providing care in the remote and inaccessible parts of the world (WHO, 2006a).
The CHWs have evolved with community based healthcare
programme and have been strengthened by the PHC approach. However, the
conception and practice of CHWs have varied enormously across countries,
conditioned by their aspirations and economic capacity. This review identified
seven critical factors that influence the overall performance of CHWs which are
discussed in this section. In discussing these issues, our aim is to (a)
highlight certain empirical knowledge and (b) point out, if any, gaps in the
design, implementation and performance of CHWs(Prasad BM, Muraleedharan
VR2007).The above review highlights several aspects to be kept in mind in
designing and implementing effective CHW schemes. The review emphatically shows
that (a) the selection of CHWs from the communities that they serve and (b)
population-coverage and the range of services offered at the community levels
are vital in the design of effective CHW schemes. It should be noted that
smaller the population coverage, the more integrated and intensive the service
offered by the CHWs(Prasad BM, Muraleedharan VR2007).
Despite advances in reaching remote communities, there are
many opportunities for improvement and expansion of CHW programs, especially
related to the development of new tools and evidence-based policy to
«guide global health policy and implementation.» This is where the
One Million Community Health Workers (1mCHW) Campaign comes into play. By
coordinating existing CHW programs with African governments, and making it
clear where the core interests of local and global organizations fit into
national frameworks, 1mCHW is developing the tools necessary to guide CHW
policies. Moreover, 1mCHW is developing an «Operations Room,» an
online dashboard to provide comprehensive information about CHW activities on
the ground. The «Operations Room» will chart progress in different
countries and contain the compiled evidence demanded by the article's authors
to deepen our understanding of CHW programs and of the most effective means of
implementation.We know the plan works: a comprehensive review of CHW literature
conclusively conveys the effectiveness of CHW programs, especially given the
recent access to mobile technologies. 1mCHW will help turn this promising
literature into life-saving results on the ground(One million community health
workers campaign2013).
In the study conducted by USAID (2010) on Community Health
Worker Programs: A Review of Recent Literature, the research concluded that key
components were identified as central to the design and implementation of
functional and sustainable CHW programs: defined job description with specific
tasks or responsibilities for volunteers, recognition and involvement by local
and national government, Community involvement (especially in recruitment and
selection, by making use of existing social structures, consider cultural
appropriateness, address needs of community, etc.), resource availability
(funding, equipment, supplies, job aids, etc.).
Monitoring and evaluation of programs , linkages with formal
health care system training (including refresher trainings), supervision and
feedback, incentives or motivational component and advancement opportunities
which are all similar to this research.
Community Health Workers'
Incentives in Rwanda
Performance-Based Financing is thoroughly embedded in the
Rwandan Health system. It is practiced in health centers and district hospitals
nationwide using common approaches. Ministry of Health Performance-Based
Financing has started at the central ministerial level (Basinga, 2009).
Performance-Based Financing systems are being designed for the
national Community Based Health Insurance system, and for the CDLS. A national
model for Community Performance-Based Financing has been developed, using a
broad consultative process. The model is based on experience gained during the
implementation of the health center and hospital Performance-Based Financing
models, and benefits from a close fit with these models. The purpose of this
Community Performance-Based Financing (PBF) Guide is to document the tools and
processes used in Community PBF. This guide is primarily meant as a background
document for trainers, sector PBF Steering Committee members, and the Community
Health Worker Cooperatives. However, it will be used by all working in the
Rwandan Health System (Basinga, 2009).
The community PBF is not for individual performance
remuneration. The purpose of the incentive is for community health workers to
increase the capital of their cooperatives. The cooperatives on their turn will
then start income generating activities to the benefit of the individual
members. The remuneration of individual community health workers will be from
the profit of the cooperative activities (MOH Rwanda, 2009).
Resource poor countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa,
face many challenges improving maternal health due to financial and human
capital constraints, lack of motivation among health providers and lack of
physical resources. One of the key policies implemented in Rwanda in response
to these issues is Performance Based Financing (MOH Rwanda, 2009).
PBF provides bonus payments to providers for improvements in
performance measured by indicators of specific types of utilization (e.g.
prenatal care) and quality of care. While the approach promises to improve
health system performance, there is little rigorous evidence of its
effectiveness, especially in low-income settings.
This study examines the impact of the incentives in the
Rwandan PBF scheme on prenatal care utilization, the structure and process
quality of prenatal care, institutional delivery, and modern contraceptive use.
The analysis uses data produced from a prospective quasi-experimental design
nested within the program's rollout. The rollout was implemented in two phases:
in 2006, 86 facilities (treatments) in rural areas enrolled in the PBF, and
another 79 facilities (control) enrolled two years later.
In order to isolate the incentive effect from the resource
effects, the control facilities were compensated by increasing their
traditional budgets with an amount equal to the average PBF payments to the
treatment facilities. Baseline and end line data were collected from all of the
facilities and a random sample of 14 households in each facility's catchment
area.
Using a different approach, PBF had a large and significant
impact on the quality of prenatal care measured by process indicators of the
clinical content of care and deliveries in facilities. However, no such effect
was found on prenatal care visits or on the use of modern contraceptives (MOH,
Rwanda2009).
The results provide evidence to support the hypothesis that
financial performance incentives can improve both the use and quality of
maternal health services. Policy recommendations include increasing incentives
for prenatal care service, complementary training to increase quality and
combining PBF with a demand-side intervention such as conditional cash transfer
involving community health workers (Basinga, 2009).
In the study conducted by JSI (2009), on the ''Non-financial
incentives for voluntary community health workers'' they concluded the
following: Community acceptance for voluntary CHWs and their own attitudes to
their work is generally positive. Nevertheless, continual efforts to enhance
recognition and understanding of their voluntary work in the community are
needed to maintain their morale. Their work was also found to be very `doable'
and expectations from them quite clear. The teaching materials and the support
provided to them by HEWs in the form of monthly meetings and work visits can be
further strengthened however.
The motivations of voluntary CHWs, in terms of their reasons
for being involved in their work and the benefits they expected, were strongly
characterized by their desire to promote health in their community including
themselves and their families. Steps taken to enhance their efficacy in this
regard will therefore have a positive impact on their motivation levels.
Volunteers were also strongly motivated by the responsibility and acceptance
they received from the community, as well as the recognition, respect,
credibility and political status they have gained. Conversely, they were
sometimes discouraged by misunderstanding of their voluntary role on the part
of the community. VCHWs can therefore be further motivated by promoting
community understanding and recognition of their work. Their aspirations for
learning and employment opportunities can also be considered in relation to
ways of sustaining volunteerism.
Provision of Equipment
The community health workers are provided with different tools
and materials from government of Rwanda and different partners local and
international witch help them to accomplish their tasks. They have Arthemeter
Lumefatrin (Primo) for treatment of Malaria and rapid diagnosis test (RDT) to
confirm Malaria; they have amoxicillin for pneumonia with a timer to count
respiratory frequency, zinc and oral rehydration solution (ORS) against
diarrhea and RUTF for malnutrition.
There are equipped also with monitoring and evaluation tools
for data recording and reporting with innovation of Rapid SMS with cell phones
for tracking the first 1,000 days of life, preventing unnecessary mother and
new born death in Rwanda. They have also boots, torches and radios. The cell
coordinator has bicycles, MOH, Rwanda (2011).
Community health workers need access to the proper equipment
and supplies to deliver expected services. This requires procurement of
supplies on a regular basis to avoid any substantial stock out periods.
Community must be equipped with a steady stock out of supplies and commodities
needed for their day to day operations.
Community health workers also need materials to support their
mobility, with reliable and safe transportation between households (such as an
umbrella or bicycles as appropriate in a given context) and backpacks for
supplies (Lehmann et al. 2007).
Community health training and deployment without immediate
continuous and reliable supplies to accomplish task is inefficient demotivating
and damaging to community health workers credibility (Lehmann et al. 2007).
Therefore, a functional community health workers system
requires a robust supply management chain, with a keen eye to transport and
drug supply, as well as reliable supply chains for all other equipment required
by community health workers to perform their job functions. Reliable and
sustainable supply chain systems are a challenge for large scale primary health
care and community health programs in general (WHO, 2010).
In Pakistan, each lady health worker should have a supply kit
that includes contraceptives and essential drugs in order to perform her work.
These community health workers are resupplied each month at their local clinics
(Muhamood et al. 2010).
A research conducted in Rwanda on community based provision of
family planning services revealed that one of the major barriers mentioned by
CHWs and supervisors was the difficulty of keeping all the required materials
in stock. CHWs reported that since they receive only 2 - 3 units of each method
of family planning that they sometimes quickly ran out of stock. CHWs often
live far from the HC that resupplies them. CHWs are required to go to the HC to
retrieve commodities and consumables but they are not given a means of
transport (Rwanda Ministry of Health, 2011).
In Zambia, a large community health worker program in Kalabo
District almost completely collapsed. Key reasons identified were a shortage of
drugs and community health workers' selection criteria. Furthermore, the
authors found that the community members in charge of CHWs selection knew
little about selection criteria. Further quality of supervision was poor and in
50% cases nonexistent (Stekelenburg et al. 2003).
Compensating CHWs and
Perdiem as an Incentive
This an amount most of the time paid by partners to
strengthen the self motivation based on monthly home visits, daily
accompaniment and key maternal health activities, timely completion of a
monthly report form and participation at monthly training. This perdiem is
between10 to 20$ depending on performance of community health workers
qualitatively and quantitatively (MOH, Rwanda 2011).
Compensating CHWs has a number of important benefits for both
the health care program and the communities it serves. First payment for
meaningful work provides a needed income for those in resource limited
setting.
Secondly, compensating CHWs can strengthen their roles as an
essential member of the clinical team, thereby creating a stronger bridge
between the community to the clinic or hospital based setting. Third, payment
particularly when it is a fair wage and paid on time can serve as a source of
motivation for CHWs in performing their work reliably and effectively. Fourth,
payment can also increase the amount of time CHWs are available on a weekly
basis, can prevent turnover, and can promote program consistency.
Finally, investment in CHWs can potentially increase uptake in
medical services, promoting adherence to HIV and TB medication and resulting in
long term improved health outcomes in the community (MOH, Rwanda 2011).
Compensation structures will vary by country and
program. Find out whether there are labor regulations that affect compensation
in addition to any minimum or maximum wage requirements or other regulations,
when budgeting for the CHWs program. Some programs either choose to or are
mandated to cap salaries at the same level as those paid to schoolteachers or
other civil servants. In some contexts, CHWs are paid a baseline salary and are
then given an incentive bonus for each sick community member they see. In other
places, CHWs receive compensation through a cooperative, whose members pool
their funds to support it and equal control over its operation. Additionally
many systems involve performance based financing, in which CHWs receive
compensation following the completion of certain responsibilities such as
monthly home visits or the accurate collection of household data (MOH, Rwanda
2011).
CHWs who have a higher skill level, such as those that work
with patients with MDR/TB may receive a higher monthly salary compared with
CHWs who are responsible for more general outreach (MOH, Rwanda 2011).
In Haiti, women's health workers are compensated
more than the typical CHW due to the greater knowledge base necessary to carry
out their work. When planning a compensation structure, consider if and how
CHWs will be paid , whether or not they will receive bonuses, top - up, or
other financial incentives. If CHWs receive payment, determine how much they
will receive and the schedule of payment (Healthy villages 2002). Types of
payment may include: money for meals, transportation, income from the sales of
products, monthly stipend, monthly salary, performance based financing, cash
for task, access to membership in a cooperative (Healthy villages 2002).
Membership in CHW's
Cooperatives
CHWs cooperatives membership: All CHWs organized are in
cooperatives to ensure income generation and accountability of expected
results. Community PBF payments used for cooperative income generating projects
include: poultry, cattle/goat/pig rearing, crop farming, basket making, etc
that improves performance of CHWs by motivating them to rise agreed upon
performance indicators, the payments made when proof of the agreed level of
performance. The Sector Steering Committee oversees the implementation and
approves payment to the CHW Cooperative (MOH, Rwanda, 2011).
The study done by Havard School (2011), on CHWs in Zambia
entetle'' incentives design and management it shows incentives and
desincentives summirized in below :
Table 1: Showing Incentives and
Desincentives CHWs
Motivation factors
|
Incentives
|
Disincentives
|
Monetary incentives that motivate CHWs
|
Ø Satisfactory numeration, materials incentives,
financial incentives
Ø Possibility of future payment
|
Ø Inconsistent remuneration
Ø Change in tangible incentives
Ø Inequitable distribution of incentives among different
CHWs
|
Nonmonetary incentives that motivate CWHs
|
ü Community recognition
ü Acquisition of valued skills
ü Personal growth and development
ü Accomplishment
ü Peer support
ü Preferential treatment
ü Clear role
|
ü CHWs from outside of the country
ü Inadequate refresher training
ü Inadequate supervision
ü Lack of respect from HFs a staff
|
Community factors that motivate CHWs
|
ü Community involvement selection
ü Community organizations that support CHWs
ü Community involvement in CHWs training
ü Community information system
|
ü Inappropriate selection of CHWs
ü Lack of community involvement in CHWs selection, training
and support.
|
Factors motivate communities to support and stain CHWs
|
Ø Visible change
Ø Contribution to the community empowering
Ø CHWs associations
Ø Successful referral to health facilities
|
Ø Unclear role and expectation(preventive versus curative
care)
Ø Inappropriate CHWs behavior
Ø Failure to take community need into account
|
Factors that motivate MOH staff to support and sustain
CHWs
|
Ø Policy and legislation to support
Ø Visible change
Ø Government community finding for supervisory
activities
|
Ø Inadequate staff and supply
|
Maternal and New Born
Health Services
Community Health Workers identify and register women of
reproductive age (encourage family planning,), identify pregnant women and
encourage ANC, birth preparedness and facility based deliveries, identify women
and newborns with danger signs and refer them to health facility for care,
accompany women in labor to health facilities, encourage early postnatal
facility checks for both newborns and the mothers and report those activities
by using Use Rapid SMS (MOH, Rwanda 2011).
Relationship between CHWs
Incentive and Improve Maternal and Newborn Health
Working with the community gives
health workers a platform from which to strengthen their relationship with the
community and receive community feedback, as well as a structure for regular
interaction with health facility staff. Community participation is an integral
part of CHWs' incentives. Without involvement, communities lack interest and
expectations, leaving CHWs without a support system we can't achieve MDGs 4 and
for improving maternal and child health (MOH, Malawi, 2014).
The rate of decline in child mortality is too slow in most
African countries to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of reducing
under-five mortality by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015. Effective strategies
to monitor child mortality are needed where accurate vital registration data
are lacking to help governments assess and report on progress in child
survival. They present results from a test of a mortality monitoring approach
based on recording of births and deaths by specially trained community health
workers in Malawi (MOH, Malawi, 2014).
Results from systematic reviews of CHW program confirm that
CHWs provide critical links between rural communities and the formal health
system and have been shown to reduce child morbidity and mortality when
compared to the usual healthcare services (MOH, Sierra Leone 2013).
With appropriate support and sufficient training, CHWs can
potentially play a pivotal role in strengthening health systems in areas with
poor human resources for health. More specifically, they are an important
resource for implementing interventions targeting reductions in neonatal
mortality and tracking women throughout their pregnancy while simultaneously
promoting appropriate maternal and newborn care practices (MOH, Sierra Leone
2013)..
Their potential however, is hampered by inadequate
supervision, lack of locally relevant incentive systems, loss of motivation,
insufficient recognition and community support, poor connectivity to health
facilities, and knowledge retention problems. Moreover, higher attrition rates
are often observed in programs where CHWs are asked to volunteer.
The motivation of CHWs and the risk of high attrition rates
therefore have important implications for the effectiveness, success, cost,
credibility and continuity of CHW-based programs, (MOH, Sierra Leone 2013).
Summary of Identified
Gaps
We now know that CHWs can play a crucial role in broadening
access and coverage of health services in remote areas and can undertake
actions that lead to improved health outcomes, especially, but not exclusively
in the field of child and maternal health. CHWs represent an important health
resource whose potential in providing and extending a basic health care to
underserved populations must be fully tapped. Despite the experience with
community health workers worldwide, the research gap remains in community
health worker literature especially in terms of Incentives strategies
and maternal and infant mortality improvement (MOH, Rwanda
2011).
Despite the availability of Rwandan community health policy
and strategies there is no study conducted on contribution of CHWs' incentives
on the improvement of maternal and infant health services. The evaluation done
by MOH, Rwanda (2011), where the main objective was to assess the quality of
services provided by the CHWs and their access to necessary supplies. This was
mainly assessing what CHWs do and how they give services but this didn't relate
to the quality of services provided in terms of maternal and infant health with
incentives they get. The study was conducted in the district of Djenné,
Mali by Perez in 2009, concerning the role of community health workers in
improving child health programs which mainly compared the knowledge and
practice between households with and without community health workers.
The researcher mentioned the results in terms of
knowledge/practices the family with CHWs might have but didn't relate the
incentives given to CHWs to their contribution on infant and maternal health
(MOH, Rwanda 2011).
The study conducted by Winch et al., (2001) was assessing the
contribution of CHWs on improvement of health system including drug
availability and the skills of Community Health Workers to assess, classify,
and treat children accurately. This included the three following elements:
improving partnerships between health facilities and services and the
communities they serve, increasing appropriate and accessible care and
information from community-based providers, integrating promotion of key family
practices critical for child health and nutrition but they didn't asses the
relationship between CHWs' incentives and maternal and infant health
improvement.
In all the literature above there is no specific research,
which explains well the assessment of incentives given to CHWs to their
contribution on improving maternal & newborn health. Hence, for the purpose
of this study, the research intends to assess the relationship between CHWs' in
charge of maternal and newborn health incentives on improvement of maternal and
newborn health services. Child health intervention
that warrants considerably more attention, particularly in Africa and South
Asia. (Oxford University Press, 2005).
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
This
Chapter gives the procedure that was used in this research so as to achieve the
set of the study objectives. The researcher adopted cross-sectional survey
design. The researcher adopters both qualitative and quantitative approach. The
researcher also adopted correlational research design to find the relationship
between the two variables.
Population of Study
The study was conducted in eight health centers of Rwinkwavu
District hospital in Kayonza District of Rwanda those are Rwinkwavu, Ndego,
Cyarubare, Nyamirama, Karama, Rutare, Kabarondo and Ruramira health centers.
The total target population of this study was 236 CHWs in charge of MNH working
in HCs catchment areas presented as follow: 38 CHWs from Rwinkwavu, 45 CHWs
from Cyarubare, 27 CHWs from Ndego, 26 CHWs from Nyamirama, 38 CHWs from
Kabarondo, 7 CHWs from Rutare, 28 CHWs from Karama and 27 CHWs from
Ruramira.
Sample
Size
The sample consisted of eight health centers and the selection
was based on the number of CHWs in charge of MNH in health center catchment
area. Considering the number of CHWs in charge of MNH the sample was drawn to
be 236 target population and the sample size calculation is based on the simple
random sampling method because all population was subject of the study; this
was used because it is applicable for academic research and it is more helpful
when data collected for the whole population is available. The sample size in
each health center has been calculated based on proportionate allocation
sampling technique by Kothari (2004). Ni = n .NJ/N.
Where n = sample size of entire target population, NJ = number
of population of each health center and N = total number of target population,
ni = sample size of every health center.
Sampling Procedure
The target population of the study was 236
respondents. Morgan and Krejcie (1970), recommend that if a
researcher has a target population of 236, the sample size for
the study is 236. Therefore the study sample size was
236 respondents, the probability methods gave us simple random
sampling to be applied because the whole population is available and easily
participated in responding to the questionnaire given by the researcher.
Table 2: The Number of
Population Sample
NO
|
Health Centre
|
Total Population
|
Sample size
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Rwinkwavu
|
38
|
n1= 263.38/236 = 38
|
2
|
Cyarubare
|
45
|
n2= 236.45/236 = 45
|
3
|
Ndego
|
27
|
n3 = 236.27/236 = 27
|
4
|
Nyamirama
|
26
|
N4 = 236.26/236 = 26
|
5
|
Ruramira
|
27
|
N5 = 236.27/236 = 27
|
6
|
Kabarondo
|
38
|
n6 = 236.38/236 = 38
|
7
|
Ruatare
|
7
|
N7 = 236.7/236 = 7
|
8
|
Karama
|
28
|
N8 = 236.28/236 = 28
|
TOTAL
|
|
236
|
Source: Rwanda
community HMIS, 2015
Research Instruments
Data
collection was carried out by using a questionnaire; that questionnaire was
designed in English and the researcher translated directly into Kinyarwanda.
The questionnaire is divided into three sections: Section A which includes
Socio- demographic characteristics of respondents, section B is based on the
closed ended question which is in accordance with the second objective by
materials or equipment received and section C is questions related to the third
objective evaluating the rate of accomplishment of target. The objectives one
was measured using descriptive statistics and was interpreted using
percentages. Objectives two and free was measured and interpreted using mean
and standard deviation while objective four was interpreted using simple linear
regression.
Validity
It indicates the extent to which an instrument measures what
it is supposed to measure. Six experts in the field have checked the
questionnaire for the consistency of the items, conciseness, intelligibility
and clarity. The checking of items, consistence, relevance, clarity and
ambiguity; pretesting was done in two health centers that were not part of the
target population.
Their input helped to ensure that the
instrument measured adequately what it is intended to measure. The researcher
used CVR (Content Validity Ratio) where the expert will agree with the items.
The formula to be used is: CVR = (E -N/2) / (N/2)
Where E: number of who rated the object or
person in question; N: total number of expert. CVR can measure
between -1.0 and 1.0. The closer to 1.0 the CVR is, the more essential the
object is considered to be. Conversely, the closer to -1.0 the CVR is, the more
non-essential it is.
The research instrument was valid when the CVR is 0.6 or above
indicated the extent to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to
measure. A supervisor was always consulted for checking the items, consistence,
relevance and clarity.
Reliability
Twenty CHWs from Kabarondo Health center were randomly
selected for testing research instrument, the estimation of reliability will be
ascertained by a pilot testing of the instrument and applying Cronbach's Alpha
coefficient by means of a Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Gal,et
al,2009). Cronbach's Alpha coefficient will be used to measure internal
consistency of the research tool. The instrument are reliable when the results
of twenty respondents give an alpha coefficient of > 0.7 (Gal, et al,
2009).
Data Collection
Procedure
The researcher obtained a letter of introduction from Bugema
University, Graduate school to the Director of Rwinkwavu District Hospital. The
researcher submitted the letter in person to the office of Rwinkwavu District
Hospital Director and upon authorization; the researcher made an appointment
through the community health workers in charge of health center level to
confirm when he could visit to collect data as community health workers
involved in this study live in different areas. The questionnaire was given to
the respondents after ensuring them that the information given will be kept
confidentially and would be used only for academic and research purpose.
The researcher ensured voluntary participation of respondents
to be clearly informed about the objective and benefits of the study, the
confidentiality of records was protected and no name of respondents were asked
during the data collection.
Data Analysis
After a successful data collection exercise, the researcher
coded and entered data, tabulated and interpreted the findings. For
quantitative data, the computer package, SPSS was used to analyze and interpret
the data. Descriptive statistic including frequency and percentage was used to
answer objectives one, the mean and standard deviation was used to answer the
objective two and three. Linear regression logistic was used to analyze the
objectives four that was to establish the influence of incentives on improving
maternal and newborn health services. Descriptive statistics allowed the
researcher to reduce bias and estimate sampling errors and precision of the
estimates derived through statistical calculation. Data collected from the
document analysis was analyzed manually and results were used to supplement and
support the findings from the main instrument.
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presents the result of the study and their
discussion in line with research objectives. This discussion of the study
result was done while comparing the present research findings with those of
previous and recently related research studies. Still in discussing the study
results, the findings were used to answer the research questions from which the
objectives of the study evolved.
Demographic Characteristics
of Research Participants
The first research objective included
236 respondents, and in the course of data collection, the research succeeded
to collect all the questionnaires, that is; there was no questionnaire which
represented an error of omission. Descriptive statistics, mainly frequency and
percentages, were used to analyze data on objective one which was to find out
the demographic characteristics of the respondents in term of age, gender,
marital status, education background and occupation.
The entire respondents were women because in Rwandan community
health policy the CHWs in charge of newborn and maternal health are the women.
The frequency and percentage were meant to establish the most frequently
occurring responses and the least frequently occurring response.
The Table 3 presents the summary of findings, showing the
socio-demographic information of the respondents to the study which demonstrate
age, gender, marital status, education background and occupation in order to
know more information about the improvement of MNH services compared to the
incentives they get.
Table 3: Social-Demographic
Characteristics of Respondents
Item
|
Categories
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Age
|
15-19
20-35
36-50
51-60
|
2
106
125
3
|
0.8
44.9
53.2
1.3
|
Gender
|
Females
|
100
|
100
|
Marital status
|
Single
Married
Widow/Widower
Divorced
|
7
168
60
1
|
3.0
71.2
25.4
0.4
|
Educational level
|
No-formal Primary
Secondary
Post-secondary
|
1
151
69
14
|
0.8
64.0
29.2
5.9
|
Occupation
|
No job
Farmer
Cultivator
Farmer cultivator
Professional
Trading
|
4
55
91
47
11
28
|
1.7
23.3
38.6
19.9
4.7
11.9
|
Source: Primary data
Age: the findings on age range of CHWs in charge of maternal
and newborn health revealed that the majority of them 125 (53.2%) are those in
age range of 36 to 50 years followed by those of 20 to 35 represented by 106
(44.9%).
Gender: the category of 15 to 15 and 51 to 60 has the lowest
number of respondents as indicated by table 3. All respondents are women that
are why when you look at gender 236 (100%) were women.
Marital status: the marital status in this table shows that
the married are the predominant among other represented by 168 (71.1%) then
widow/Widower 60 (25.4%), one was divorced and 7(3.0) were single.
Education: the level of education was assessed in other to
test the knowledge of the respondents where we have found that the majority of
respondents 151 (64.0%) have primary level education, 69 (29.2) represent those
who have accomplished the secondary school level of education, 14 (5.9%) had
done post-secondary education and only one who had not accomplished the primary
school.
Occupation: most of CHWs in charge of maternal and newborn
health are in agriculture business; where 91(38.6%) are cultivators, 55(23.3%)
are the farmers, 47 (19.9%) are the farmers-cultivators, 28 (11.9%) are
traders, 11 (4.7%) are in professional employment and 4 (1.7%) are reported
jobless.
In this line with the research findings of Global Journal of
health Science (2012), on effect of social-demographic characteristics of CHWs
on performance of home visit during pregnancy where it was ascertained that
there was a significant relationship between age group than other and good
record with tasks performance.
Contrary to my research where the Rwandan Community health
policy put in place only women for follow-up of maternal and newborn health
this research conducted by Global Journal of health Science (2012), shows that
the male have a positive record more than the female while females were more
likely to counsel and enable their clients. That is why they have been choose
by Rwandan government to fill the position of CHWs in charge of maternal and
newborn health than their lower literacy level counterparts. Global Journal of
health Science (2012), concludes by emphasizing on reasons why the
Socio-demographic characteristics of community health workers affect the
performance of home visits in various ways. The study also confirmed that CHWs
with lower literacy levels satisfy and enable their clients effectively. Also
in the study conduct by Bagonza J et all, 2014, they find that females are
performing well.
In this study also, due to the policy in place which
emphasizes that all CHWs must accomplish at least primary school education and
above that is why their level of education mainly indicated 151(64.0%) who
accomplished primary school, 69(29.2%) have a secondary certificate, well as 14
(5.9%) have post-secondary education and only one among all respondents had not
accomplished primary school.
In the study conducted on Community Health Workers: Essential
to Improving Health in Massachusetts; 66% of respondents hold some form of
community college, college or university degree. Of the CHWs, 60% reported
holding some form of degree beyond high school. 19.2% had attended some college
level courses beyond high school. 12.5% hold a high school degree or its
equivalent, and only 4% do not hold a high school degree or its equivalent
(Massachusetts 2005).
Level of Community Health
Workers incentives
In results as indicated in Table 4 in this study involved
three sub variables which are both monetary and non-monetary incentives grouped
in three categories such as: first the community performance based financing
(CPBF) and incentives which they receive every after quarterly evaluation by
sector steering committee.
Secondly, the provision of equipment and materials for
facilitating the accomplishment of their assigned duties, and thirdly,
membership in community health workers cooperatives for income generation with
mentorship for capacity building.
Table 4: Level of Community Health
Workers incentives
Item
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Interpretation
|
Community financial incentives
|
|
|
|
Receiving sufficient salary after monthly target visits
|
1.55
|
0.79
|
Low
|
Receiving incentive of monthly bonus
|
1.93
|
1.05
|
Low
|
Receiving quarterly incentive of BPF
|
1.94
|
0.73
|
Low
|
I receive a bag
|
1.63
|
0.90
|
Low
|
I receive umbrella
|
1.79
|
1.14
|
Very low
|
I receive rain coat
|
3.35
|
0.98
|
High
|
Register book for monthly reporting
|
1.95
|
1.25
|
Low
|
Register book for pregnant women/productive age
|
1.03
|
0.22
|
Very low
|
Register of follow up for pregnancy women
|
1.05
|
0.32
|
Very low
|
Receiving training and follow-up
|
1.28
|
0.71
|
Very low
|
Conducting monthly inventory based on my store card
|
2.39
|
1.35
|
Low
|
Advice to clients (referral) to use health facility
services
|
1.06
|
0.37
|
Very low
|
Aggregate mean and SD
|
1.75
|
0.82
|
Low
|
CHWs' non-financial incentives (equipment and
materials)
|
|
|
|
Timer equipment for respiration count
|
1.19
|
0.65
|
Very low
|
Mobile Phone equipment
|
1.24
|
0.74
|
Very low
|
Thermometer equipment
|
1.20
|
0.69
|
Very low
|
Weighing scale equipment
|
1.09
|
0.48
|
Very low
|
Measurement of upper arm circumference equipment
|
2.35
|
1.48
|
Low
|
Aggregate mean and SD
|
1.41
|
0.81
|
Very low
|
Membership in CHW's cooperatives
|
|
|
|
Receive quarterly supervision from health facility
|
1.45
|
0.78
|
Very low
|
Receive per-diem during the monthly meetings
|
2.71
|
1.08
|
Moderate
|
Member of community health workers' cooperative
|
1.09
|
0.40
|
Very low
|
Receive 30% of quarterly PBF from my cooperative
|
1.45
|
0.79
|
Very low
|
Access loans from my cooperative
|
3.14
|
1.18
|
Moderate
|
Aggregate mean and SD
|
1.97
|
0.85
|
Low
|
Grand Mean
|
1.71
|
0.82
|
Low
|
Source: Primary data
Legend: 1.00-1.49 (Very low); 1,
50-2.49 (Low); 2.50-3.49 (Moderate); 3.50-4.49 (High); 4.50-5.00 (Very
high)
Table 4 therefore, shows the study results on the community
performance based financing (CPBF) and incentives showed that there was low
mean and standard deviation ( = 1.75; SD = 0.82) well as on CHWs' equipment and materials the results
showed a very low mean and standard deviation ( =1.41; SD = 0.81) lastly, membership in community health workers
cooperatives for income generation with mentorship for capacity building the
result showed a low mean and standard deviation ( =1.97; SD=0.85) . The general result on community performance based
financing and other incentives showed also a low mean and standard deviation
( =1.71; SD=0.82).
This is in line with the research findings of WHO Regional
office for Africa (2013), which shows that the total catchment population for
the 31 health centers in 2010 was 720 40814. Of these, 4.1% (29 537) were
expected to be women in need of maternal health services per annum.
The antenatal care indicator (visit before or during 4th month
of pregnancy) was targeted to reach at least 30% of women in 2010 or 738 women
per month.
The indicator on delivery was targeted to achieve 85% of women
delivering in health facilities. The postnatal indicator was targeted to reach
15% of women in 2010.
Level of Maternal and Newborn Health Service
performance
Furthermore, the third object research objective showed in
table 5 was to determine the findings on level of maternal and newborn health
in Rwinkwavu district hospital in Rwanda.
Table 5: Level of Maternal and
Newborn Health Service
Item
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Interpretation
|
Census of women in reproductive age
|
1.57
|
0.92
|
Low
|
Visit 3 times all pregnancy women in the village
|
1.55
|
0.99
|
Low
|
Women visited in first prenatal care visits to homes
|
2.86
|
1.58
|
Moderate
|
Women visited by CHWs during pregnancy
|
2.47
|
1.43
|
Low
|
Women who completed 4 standards ANC
|
3.42
|
1.44
|
Moderate
|
Deliveries at health facilities by health professionals
|
2.60
|
1.68
|
Moderate
|
Home deliveries
|
4.63
|
0.91
|
Very high
|
Home deliveries referred to health facility
|
4.91
|
1.95
|
Very high
|
Women presented in postpartum consultation within
|
4.28
|
1.24
|
High
|
Women vaccinated against tetanus during pregnancy
|
1.72
|
1.14
|
Low
|
Women receive iron for anemia to prevention
|
1.61
|
1.15
|
Low
|
At risk pregnancies referred to health facility
|
4.85
|
0.69
|
Very high
|
Grand mean and SD
|
3.04
|
1.26
|
Moderate
|
Source: Primary data
Legend: 1.00-1.49 (Very low);
1,50-2.49 (Low); 2.50-3.49 (Moderate);3.50-4.49 (High);4.50-5.00 (Very
high)
The result revealed a moderate mean and standard deviation of
( =3.04; SD = 1.26). In the article, `Rwanda's Success in Improving
Maternal Health', strategies that were used to reach the success story of
maternal mortality (a decrease of 77% between 2000 and 2013 in
Rwanda's
maternal mortality ratio currently at 320 deaths per 100,000 live births,
under-5 child mortality reduced by more than 70 percent), Worley (2015),
identified the factors that created this story. Among them were maternal
health as a priority in postwar rebuilding, maternal and child health core of
community-based health insurance, and family planning key to sustained success
in maternal health. However, some challenges were identified among which was
the need for 586 more midwives to reach 95 percent skilled birth attendance.
Midwives are the ones who train, supervise, and help in
monitoring and the evaluation process of the community health workers, if such
a big number is still lacking in the rural areas, not so different from the
current study, then it could one of the reasons why there was a weak positive
relationship between community performance based financing and other incentives
and maternal and newborne health services in this study.
More so, rural areas are still underserved (Worley, 2015).
Forty percent of women live more than an hour away from a health facility. Even
with the increase in family planning and decline in the total fertility rate,
contraception remains unavailable to or underused by many Rwandans. And nearly
one in every two children under 5 are stunted. The researcher recommends that
rural areas be staffed with the necessary incentives like increase in the
number of midwives to help in the training, supervision and monitoring of
community health workers.
Relationship between CHW's
Incentives and Performance of Maternal and Newborn Health Services
To answer research objectives 4, to establish the influence of
CHW's incentives on performance of maternal and newborn health services
program, data was run by using a logistic regression from Wikipedia is a
statistical test used to find the relationship where the dependent variable
(DV) is categorical. The results are indicated in the tables below with
explanations given in the details.
Table 6: Logistic Regression of
Community Health Workers Related incentives and Performance Maternal - Newborn
Health Services in the Study Area
Predictor
|
Performance of maternal & newborn health services
[frequency (percentage]
|
Odds ratio
|
p
|
95% CI
|
|
Poor
|
Good
|
|
|
|
CHW (BPF) incentives
|
|
|
2.808
|
0.012
|
1.26 - 6.26
|
Low
|
159 (77.6)
|
46 (22.4)
|
|
|
|
High
|
16 (55.2)
|
13 (44.8)
|
|
|
|
CHW's cooperatives Membership
|
|
|
0.838
|
0.592
|
0.44- 1.59
|
Low
|
118 (73.8)
|
42 (26.2)
|
|
|
|
High
|
57 (77.0)
|
17 (23.0)
|
|
|
|
* p < 0.05
Table 6 provides that the p = 0.012, (1.26-6.26), OR = 2.808
for CHWs incentives on performance of MNH services program then also shows the
p > 0.05, (0.44-1.59), OR = 0.838 when we look at CHWs cooperative
membership on performance of MNH services program.
CHWs Financial Incentives
on Performance of MNH
Results in table 6 show that Community Health Workers who
perceive the incentives to be high are about 3times as likely to perform in
maternal and newborn health services program(p = 0.012, (1.26-6.26), OR =
2.808)
These results goes in the same line with the research
conducted by Basics II 2001, on community health workers incentives and
disincentives on how they can affect motivation, retention and sustainability
where they have find that satisfactory remuneration, materials incentives,
financial incentives and possibility of future paid employment as they key
incentives that can motivate CHWs to perform better the tasks assigned to them.
The same way of motivation of CHWs in our study area where they receiving
monthly bonus, performance based financing every quarter and different kinds of
equipments and materials that are supporting them to perform the tasks assigned
to them. In the same study of Basics 2001, they're underlining also the factors
that are demotivating CHWs and that affect directly retention and
sustainability of CHWs those are: inconsistence of remuneration, change in
tangible distribution of incentives among CHWs.
Membership in CHWs
Cooperatives on Performance of MNH
Also results in table 6 indicate that being a member of
community health workers cooperative is not a significant predictor of
performance of maternal and newborn health services program (p > 0.05,
(0.44-1.59), OR = 0.838).
This study goes in the same line of the study conducted by
Gisore, et all 2013) entitled; commonly cited incentives in the community
implementation of the emergency maternal and new borne care study in western
Kenya; a rural area, and thus be able to identify the incentives that could
result in their sustained engagement in the project. Results showed that 769
respondents out of 881 surveys indicated their need for a certain form of
incentive.
For example-monetary allowance, bicycle for transportation,
uniforms for identification, provision of training materials, training in home
based lifesaving skills, first aid kits, training more facilitators and
provision of free medication. In this, respondents felt that if monetary
allowances, improved transportation and some sort of identification were
provided, it would increase their engagement in community maternal and new
borne health services.
Drawing from our results, which indicate that there is a very
low provision of incentives (see table 4); this could be one of the reasons for
the lack of a relationship of maternal and newborn health services community
health workers incentives (CPBF)
Another study examined the perceptions of community members
and experiences of CHWs around promoting maternal and newborn care practices,
and the self-identified factors that influence the performance of CHWs so as to
inform future study design and program implementation.
The results indicated that CHWs are continuously needed in
improving maternal and newborn care and linking families with health services
but the process for building CHW programs needed to be adapted to the local
setting, including the process of training, deployment, supervision, and
motivation within the context of a responsive and available health system.
These results maybe out of the scope of this study because
this study looked at community performance based financing and other
incentives. However, a recommendation can be made that above the financial and
material incentives, CHWs may be motivated to provide better maternal and
newborn health services if CHW programs are adapted to the local setting,
including the process of training, deployment, supervision, and motivation
within the context of a responsive and available health system.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter gives a summary, conclusion and recommendation
generated from the discussed finding and directed to relevant studies. This was
directed from objectives of this research.
Summary
The study was carried out on, `'Assessment on community health
incentives on maternal and newborn health services performance''. The sample of
this study was 236 respondents, the research collected 236 questionnaires.
Quantitative approach was used because of numerical data was applied.
A cross-sectional survey was used as the study aimed to assess
the relationship between community health workers incentives on improved
maternal and newborn health services. In addition the qualitative approach was
applied to describe the collected information from respondents that could that
could not be easily described numerically. Descriptive statistics and advanced
statistics (logistic regression) was used to establish the relationship between
independent and dependent variables.
The general objective of this study was to assess the
relationship between community performance based financing and other incentives
on improving maternal and newborn health services.
The first specific objectives was to determine the demographic
characteristics of respondents; the research used the descriptive statistics;
revealed that the majority of respondents 125 (52.3%) have the age range
between 36to 50. All 236 respondents (100%) are women due to Rwanda community
health policy. The study shows that the married women are the most predominate
among the other respondents represented by 168(71.1%). Most of the respondents
have accomplished the primary education at the rate of 64.0% (151). As
presented in Rwandan DHS (2014/2015) the study respondents revealed that 91
(38.6%) are cultivators, 55 (23.3%) are the farmers then 47 (19.9%) are both
farmers and cultivators with total 193 (81.8%) of agribusiness as their
occupation.
The second objective shows the study result on community
performance based financing and other incentives received by community health
workers. The respondents show low mean and standard deviation ( =1.75; SD = 0.82). The results shows the majority of indicators in low
and very low a part two indicators of per-diem during the monthly meetings and
access loans from CHWs cooperatives shown in moderate.
The third objectives determine the level of improvement of
maternal and newborn health services among respondents revealed a moderate mean
and standard deviation ( = 3.03; SD = 1.26).
The indicator of home deliveries have been improved at a very
high level ( = 4.91) followed by high improvement of consultation within ten day
post-partum by very high mean and standard deviation (( =4.9 1; SD = 1.95).
Logistic regression was used to establish influence of CHWs
incentives on performance of CHWs to accomplish MNH services program. This
shows that CHWs financial incentives to be high are about 3 times as likely to
perform in maternal and newborn health services (p = 0.012, (1.26-6.26) ,OR =
2.808) however result in table 6 indicate that being a member of CHWs
cooperative is not a significant predictor of performance of CHWs in maternal
and newborn health services (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
It was concluded that the level of CHWs who perceive
incentives to be high are about 3 times as likely to perform maternal and new
health services program. It was further concluded that being a member of
community health works cooperative is not a significant predictor of
performance of maternal and newborn health services programs.
Recommendations
Since the results revealed that being a member of community
health workers cooperative is not a significant predictor of performance of
maternal and newborn health services program.
The researcher recommends that the government of Rwanda
through the Ministry of Health should revise the system of community health
workers' cooperatives in four ways:
1. Supporting them in creating their own project for income
generation
2. At the district level, the researcher recommends that they
must serve more as the bridge between central level and decentralized level.
3. Based on this research finding, the researcher recommends
the health centers reinforce the quality and frequency of mentorship of
community health workers cooperative.
4. The researcher recommends also the community health workers
to have ownership on management of their cooperatives.
REFERENCES

Abbatt, F. (2005). Scaling up health and education
workers: community health workers. London, DFID Health Systems
Resource Centre
.
Afsar, H., & Younus, M. (2010). Recommendations to
strengthen the role of lady health workers in the national program for family
planning and primary health care in Pakistan: the health workers
perspective.
Bagonza, J. et all. (2014). Performance of community
health workers in managing Malaria, pneumonia and diarrhea under community case
management in central Uganda.
Baqui, A.H, et al. (2008). Effect of
community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two
service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a
cluster-randomised controlled.
Basinga, Paulin. (2009). Impact of performance -based
financing on the quantity and
quality of maternal health services in
Rwanda , Tulane University.

Bhattacharyya, K, et al.
(2001): Community health worker incentives and
disincentives: how they affect motivation, retention and
sustainability. Arlington, VA, BASICS/USAID.
Bhutta, ZA., Lassi ,ZS. Pariyo G, & Huicho L(2010)
Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health
related Millennium Development Goals: a systematic review, country case
studies, and recommendations for integration into national health systems.
Geneva, WHO/Global Health Workforce Alliance.
Catherine, Mugeni Murasa. ( 20110). Rwanda first
international summit on community health, Rwanda community healthy system
»Evidence to policy « Kigali-Rwanda.
Center for Community health, Massachusetts. (2010).
Community health Worker: essential to improve health in
Massachusetts.
Creanga, A.A, et al. (2007). Does the
delivery of integrated family planning and HIV/AIDS services influence
community-based workers' client loads in Ethiopia? Health
Policy Planning.

Crigler, L. Hill, K., Furth, R., & Bjerregaard, D.
(2011). Community Health Worker Assessment and Improvement Matrix (CHW
AIM): A Toolkit for Improving Community Health Worker Programs and
Services. USAID Health Care Improvement Project, Bethesda,
MD;University Research Co., LLC (URC).
Edward, A. et al. (2007) .
Examining the evidence of under-five mortality reduction in a
community-based program in Gaza, Mozambique. Transactions
of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Gilroy, K.E., & Winch, P. (2006). Management of
sick children by community health workers: intervention models and program
examples. Geneva, WHO/UNICEF.
Gisore, P., Rono,B., Marete, I., Nekesa-Mangeni, J., Tenge,
C., Shipala E, Mabeya H Odhiambo, D., Otieno, K., Bucher, S., Makokha, C.,
Liechty, E., Esamai, F. (2013). Commonly cited incentives in the community
implementation of the emergency maternal and new borne care study in western
Kenya. African Health Sciences, 13(2); 461-468
Glenton, et al. (2010). the female community health
volunteer program in Nepal: Decision makers' perceptions of
volunteerism, payment and other incentives. Social Science & Medicine.
Global Health Work force Alliance (2010). Community
health workers: key messages. Global Consultation on Community
Health Workers, Montreux, Switzerland.
Global experience of community health workers for delivery of
health related Millennium Development Goals: a systematic review,
country case studies, and recommendations for integration into national
health systems (WHO, 2010).
Haines, A, et al (2010). Achieving child
survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers.
Haq, Z. Iqbal Z & Rahman A (2008): Job stress
among community health workers: a multi-method study from Pakistan.
International Journal of Mental Health Systems.
Howard, G., Bogh, C., Goldstein, G., Morgan,J.Pruss, A.Shaw,
R. Teuton, J.(2002)
Healthy villages: A guide for communities and community
health workers Geneva, World Health Organization.
Justice, J. (2003). A Study of the Concept of
Volunteerism: Focus on Community-Based Health Volunteers in Selected Areas
of Nepal.
Kothari, (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and
Techniques.
Krejcie, Robert, V., morgan & Daryle, W. (1970).
Determining sample size for research activities: educational and psychological
measurement.
Kanungo, R. & Mendonca, M. (1994): Introduction:
motivational models in developing
countries. In Work Motivation: models for
developing countries. Sage Publications, New Delhi, India
.
Lehmann, U., & Sanders, D (2007). Community
health workers: what do we know about them? The state of the evidence on
programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using
community health workers. Geneva, WHO Department for Health.
MCHIP/USAID (2013). Integrated Community Case Management
Report.
Mukherjee,J.J & Eustache, E.( 2007) community health
workers as a cornerstone for
Integrating HIV and primary health care. AIDS
Care.
MOH, Rwanda. (2015). Health management of information
systems.
MOH, Rwanda. (2009). Rwanda Community PBF
guidelines.
MOH, Rwanda. (2011) Rwanda ICCM training module.
MOH, Malawi. (2014). Monitoring Child Mortality through
Community Health Worker
Reporting of Births and Deaths.
National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. (2015).
Demographic and health survey.
Mahmood, S, & Ayub M, A. (2010) Accuracy of Primary
Health Care statistics reported
by community based lady health workers in District
Lahore. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.
One million community health workers campaign, (2013). A
Literature Review: The Case for Community Health Workers
Ojofeitimi, E.O, Jinadu, M.K, & Elegbe, I. (1988).
Increasing the productivity of community health workers in rural Nigeria
through supervision. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
Okuga, M., Kemigisa, M., Namutamba, S., Namazzi, G., &
Waiswa, P. (2015). Engaging community health workers in maternal and newborn
care in eastern Uganda.
Oxford University Press (2005) in association with The London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine:
Intervention models for the management of children with signs
of pneumonia or malaria by community health workers.
Palazuelos, D. (2010) . Community participation: who
participates? Who decides? Havard college , Global Health
Review.
Perry, H., Freeman, P., Gupta S, & Rassekh B. M (2009).
Community-Based Primary Health Care Working Group, International Health
Section. How effective is community-based primary health care in improving
the health of children? Summary findings, report to the expert review
panel. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Prabhjot, Singh. (2011). One Million Community Health Workers.
Prasad, B. M & Muraleedharan., V. R (2008). A
review of concepts, practice and policy concerns. CREHS, London.
Stekelenburg, J. Kyanamina S. S &, Wolffers I
(2003). Poor performance of community health workers
in Kalabo District. Zambia Health
Policy.
Strachan, D., (2010). Health focused community based
agents: motivation and incentives.
Swider S (2002). Outcome effectiveness of community
health workers: an integrative
literature review Public
Health Nursing.
UNFPA, 2010. Maternal mortality reduction.
Rwanda.
WHO. 2006. 2006. Working together for health.
Geneva.
WHO. (2010). Global Experience of Community Health Workers
for Delivery of health
related Millenium Development Goals
Global Health Workforce Alliance.
WHO. (2014). Targets and Strategies for Ending Preventable
Maternal Mortality
Worley, H. (2015). Rwanda's Success in
Improving Maternal Health.
APPEND ICES
Appendix 1: Questionnaire
Dear Sir/ Madam, I am a student at Bugema University, Uganda.
I am carrying out a research on «Assessment of community health workers
incentives on improving maternal mortality rate, a case study of Rwinkwavu
district hospital, Kayonza District, Rwanda». The purpose of this
questionnaire is purely academic. I request you to spare a few minutes of your
precious time to answer this questionnaire. Your responses will be treated with
confidentially that they deserve as academic material. I thank you in
anticipation of your cooperation because you aid my research education through
your responses.
Your cooperation will be highly appreciated.
SECTION A: Social - Demographics Characteristics of the
respondents: Please tick ( ) your answer on the following
demographics information
1. Residency
|
Village ..........................
cell.................................... Sector...........................
Health Center................................
|
2. Age
|
15-19 20-35 36-50 51-60
|
2. Gender
|
Male Female
|
3. Marital Status
|
Single Widow/Widower
Married Divorced
|
4. Educational Level
|
No Formal Education Primary
Secondary
Post- Secondary
|
No job Farmer Cultivator
Farming culivator
Professional employment Trading
SECTION B. The CHWs' incentives in charge of
maternal and newborn health
Concept of Community Performance Based Financing (CPBF)
1. CHWs financial incentives
|
SA
|
A
|
SD
|
DA
|
1.1.I receive sufficient salary when I meet the monthly target
visits
|
|
|
|
|
1. 2.I receive the following incentives
|
|
|
|
|
a) Monthly bonus
|
|
|
|
|
b) Quarterly BPF
|
|
|
|
|
2. CHWs non-financial incentives
|
|
|
|
|
a) A bag
|
|
|
|
|
b) Umbrella
|
|
|
|
|
c) Rain coat
|
|
|
|
|
d) Register for monthly reporting
|
|
|
|
|
e) Register for women in reproductive age and pregnancy women
|
|
|
|
|
f) Register of follow up for pregnancy women
|
|
|
|
|
2.I receive training and assistance in community maternal and new
born health
|
|
|
|
|
2.3. I conduct monthly inventory based on my store card
|
|
|
|
|
2.4. I advise clients (referral) to go to use health facility
services
|
|
|
|
|
2.5. I have sufficient equipment to conduct maternal health
services
|
|
|
|
|
a) Timer for respiration count
|
|
|
|
|
b) Mobile Phone
|
|
|
|
|
c) Thermometer
|
|
|
|
|
d) Weighing scale
|
|
|
|
|
e) Measurement of upper arm circumference
|
|
|
|
|
3. Membership in CHWs cooperatives
|
|
|
|
|
3.1. I receive quarterly supervision from health facility
|
|
|
|
|
3.2. I receive perdiem during the monthly meetings
|
|
|
|
|
3.3. I am a member of community health workers' cooperative in my
sector
|
|
|
|
|
3.4. I receive 30% of quarterly PBF from my cooperative
|
|
|
|
|
3.5. I access loans from my cooperative
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION C. What is the level of Maternal
Health Services?
Concept of Maternal and newborn Health Services
|
Actual Total visit
|
Target
|
1.Census of women in reproductive age
|
|
|
2. Visit 3 times all pregnancy women in the village
|
|
|
3. Women visited in first prenatal care visits to homes
|
|
|
4. Women visited by CHWs free times during pregnancy
|
|
|
5. Women who completed 4 standards ANC
|
|
|
6. Deliveries at health facilities by health professionals
|
|
|
7. Home deliveries
|
|
|
8. Home deliveries referred immediately at health facility
|
|
|
9. Women presented in postpartum consultation within 10
days
|
|
|
10.Women vaccinated against tetanus during pregnancy
|
|
|
11.Women who receive iron to prevent anemia during
pregnancy
|
|
|
12. At risk pregnancies referred to health facility
|
|
|
Appendix 2: Data Collection Letter

Appendix 3: Acceptance
Collection Letter

Appendix 4: Geographical
Map of Rwinkwavu District Hospital

Appendix 5: Map of Rwanda
Showing Kayonza District where Located Rwinkwavu District Hospital in
South

|