Table 13
Performance with graphic organizers - Case
10/Mathematics
|
03/15/04
|
03/16/04
|
03/17/04
|
03/18/04
|
03/19/04
|
03/22/04
|
03/23/04
|
03/24/04
|
03/29/04
|
03/30/04
|
|
%
|
Rat*
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
|
Level of Accuracy in relevant Information
|
90
|
4
|
95
|
4
|
95
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
90
|
4
|
95
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Level of Accuracy in building Connections
|
80
|
4
|
80
|
4
|
85
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
85
|
4
|
85
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Level of Accuracy in integrating new
Information
|
80
|
4
|
80
|
4
|
80
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
80
|
4
|
80
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Level of Independence
|
75
|
3
|
75
|
3
|
75
|
3
|
---
|
---
|
75
|
3
|
75
|
3
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
*Rat = Rating
Performance with Graphic Organizers - Case
11/Mathematics
The performance with graphic organizers by case 11, as shown by
Table 14, was average for Mathematics. Case 8 averages 80% correct responses
with graphic organizers, 70 % correct in building connections among ideas, 70 %
correct in integrating new information, and 59% independence. Case 11averages
59 % independence because after the initial directions were provided, the
student requires extensive cues or prompts to demonstrate skills. Case
11completed 16 activities. Case 8 made some mistakes such as computation,
mixing signs +, - when simplifying expressions). Note that case 8 were absent
for six days as shown by Table 14.
| 
