II.5.3. Determination of Nitric Oxide level
Principle: This is based on the reaction of
diazotization described by Griess in 1879. It describes the
chemical reaction between sulphanilamide and naphtylethylenediamine
dihydrochloride (NED) under acidic conditions (phosphoric acid). Sulphanilamide
and NED compete for nitrite in the Griess reaction. This reagent detects
NO2- in a variety of biological and experimental liquid
samples such as plasma, serum, urine and tissue culture. This system detects
the nitrite formed which is one of the primary stable and non volatile
compounds from degradation of nitric oxide in biological mediums
(Manish et al., 2006).
Reagents: N-1-naphtylethylene dichloride
diamine (NED)
· Sulphanilamide: 1% sulphanilamide in 5% orthophosphoric
acid
· Standard nitrite: 0.1M of sodium nitrite in distilled
water.
A solution of sulphanilamide and dichloro N-1-naphtylethylene
diamine was prepared and allowed for 15-30 minutes at room temperature.
Procedure: In 100 uL of sample, 100 uL of
sulphanilamide solution was added and pre-incubated for 5-10 minutes at room
temperature while protected from light. After pre-incubation, 100 uL of
dichloro N-1-naphtylethylene diamine was added and incubated for 5-10 minutes
at room temperature and protected from light.
The presence of a purple/mangenta colour is an indicator of
the presence of nitrite formed.
The absorbance was read at 540nm. (å (reactivity) =
39500M-1CM-1)
II.6. Statistical analysis
SPSS program: version 10.0 for Windows was used and
the results presented as mean #177; SEM. Differences between means were done by
a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc test using Tamhane
and LSD. Values of p< 0.05 were taken to imply statistical significance.
CHAPTER III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
III.1.Results
III.1.1. Yield of extraction and phytochemical screening
The results of the extraction are represented on the table XII
below.
Table XII: Yield
of extraction
|
Twigs
|
Twigs
|
Fruit
|
Fruit
|
solvent
|
Ethanol:water(1:1)
|
Ethanol
|
Ethanol
|
Ethanol:water(1:1)
|
% yield
|
7.28
|
5.66
|
2.78
|
7.21
|
Two solvent system were used for the extraction of the fruits
and twigs of F. ovata which where ethanolic and hydroethanolic solvent
systems. The above results show that the hydroethanolic solvent gave higher
yield than the ethanolic solvent for extraction of the fruits and twigs.
The result of phytochemical screening are represented on table
XIII below
Table XIII: The
phytochemical screening results.
|
Alkaloids
|
Saponins
|
Flavonoids
|
Tannins
|
Phlobatannins
|
Glycosides
|
Phenols
|
FOEF
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
FOET
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
FOHF
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
FOHT
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
FOEF= Ficus ovata ethanolic fruits; FOET= Ficus ovata
ethanolic twigs; FOHF= Ficus ovata hydroethanolic fruits; FOHT= Ficus
ovata hydroethanolic twigs
Generally, extracts of fruits and twigs of Ficus
ovata contain groups of bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, glycosides,
saponins, and polyphenols such as flavonoids, tannins and phenols.
Phlobatannins were absent in the fruit extracts of Ficus ovata and
alkaloids where absent in ethanolic fruits.
|