Ministry of Higher Education Scientific Research and
Technology University of Manouba Faculty of Letters, Arts and
Humanities Department of English
«Globality» in the Global
Textbook:
Principles and Applicability
Thesis Submitted for Partial Fulfillment of Master Degree
Prepared by Mimoun Melliti
Supervised by Dr. Faiza Derbel
September 2010
Abstract
This study aims at exploring the issue of
«globality» in global coursebooks as manifested in investing features
of connectedness, avoiding inappropriacy, and preserving inclusivity. In order
to do this exploration, two research methods, content analysis and the
questionnaire, were adopted. The content of an example of global coursebooks,
Headway Intermediate (Soars & Soars, 2003), in addition to the
perception of 251 of its users at Bourguiba Institute for Living Languages in
Tunis (IBLV), were investigated. The results obtained revealed that
«globality», in terms of connectedness, inappropriacy, and
inclusivity is partial in Headway Intermediate (Soars & Soars,
2003) as learners' perceptions of it do not map with the content in the
coursebook. This study raises questions about the suitability of global
coursebooks to globally diverse learners and reveals the necessity of taking
measures in the direction of localising the content of EFL coursebooks.
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the following
people without whom this work would not have been completed.
First, I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor Dr. Faiza
Derbel for her endless support throughout all the stages of working on the
thesis.
Second, I am grateful to my mother Habiba, my father Youssef, my
brother Wahid, all my sisters, and my fiancé Besma Msekni for their
confidence, patience, and support.
Third, I would like to thank Dr. Michael Fennell from Jenin
University for reading and commenting on a preliminary version of this thesis.
His comments have been very illuminating.
Fourth, I am thankful to my colleagues Nizar ben Ali and Houcem
Jouini for their assistance with collecting the questionnaires.
Finally, I am indebted to 3rd year students,
teachers, and the administrative staff at IBLV in Tunis for their cooperation,
especially Mrs. Hayet Toukebri, for facilitating access to the participants.
Table of contents
Abstract i
Acknowledgments ii
Table of contents iii
List of acronyms and abbreviations viii
List of tables ix
List of figures x
Chapter One: Introduction
|
.1
|
1.1 Background to the study
|
1
|
1.2. Terminology
|
7
|
1.2.1. The global coursebook
|
.7
|
1.2.2. «Globality»
|
7
|
1.2.3. Inclusivity
|
8
|
1.2.4. Inappropriacy
|
8
|
1.2.5. Connectedness
|
8
|
1.3. Research aims
|
.9
|
1.4. Research questions
|
.9
|
1.5. Methodology
|
10
|
1.6. Organisation of the thesis
|
11
|
Conclusion
|
12
|
Chapter Two: Literature Review .13
2.0. Introduction 13
2.1. Evolution of English textbooks 13
2.1.1. Early textbooks of English: 1530-1870 13
2.1.2. Early 20th century English textbooks 16
2.1.3. Global coursebooks 17
2.1.3.1. A globalised content . 19
2.1.3.2. Defining connectedness 20
2.1.3.3. Connectedness in coursebooks .21
2.2. The value attached to ELT coursebooks 23
2.2.1. The advantages of coursebooks .24
2.2.2. The disadvantages of coursebooks 27
2.3. Culture in the global coursebook 33
2.3.1. Defining culture 33
2.3.2. Cultural appropriacy .34
2.3.2.1. Defining inappropriacy 35
2.3.2.2. On avoiding inappropriacy in global coursebooks 36
2.3.3. Investing target language culture in ELT coursebooks .
..37
2.4. The issue of representation in ELT textbooks 42
2.4.1. Defining «inclusivity» .......44
2.4.2. Explanations of inclusivity 44
2.4.2.1. Objective explanations ...44
2.4.2.2. Ideological explanations 45
2.4.3. Attempts of preserving inclusivity 48
2.4.4. Unresolved issues 51
Conclusion 53
Chapter Three: Methodology of the study
|
. 55
|
3.0. Introduction
|
55
|
3.1. Organisation of the study
|
.55
|
3.2. Research methods
|
56
|
3.2.1. The quantitative / qualitative debate
|
..56
|
3.2.2. The content analysis
|
..57
|
3.2.3. The questionnaire
|
60
|
3.3. Methodology of content analysis .
|
61
|
3.3.1. Procedures of analysing the content
|
. 61
|
3.3.2. Data handling
|
67
|
3.4. Questionnaire used in the study
|
68
|
3.4.1. Description of the questionnaire
|
68
|
3.4.2. The participants
|
71
|
3.4.3. Data collection
|
72
|
3.4.4. Data handling
|
73
|
Conclusion
|
74
|
Chapter Four: Discussion of findings of content analysis
..
|
75
|
4.0. Introduction
|
.75
|
4.1. The limits of inclusivity in representation .......
|
75
|
4.1.1. On gender balance ....
|
75
|
4.1.2. On racial balance ...
|
81
|
4.2. The global coursebook and cultural inappropriacy
|
89
|
4.2.1. Controversial topics avoided ....
|
89
|
4.2.2. Controversial topics treated with caution ..91
4.2.3. Controversial topics mentioned .92
4.3. The global coursebook and global connectedness 99
4.3.1. Leisure activities 99
4.3.2. The language issue . 103
4.3.3. Global connectivity 105
Conclusion 106
Chapter Five: Analysis and discussion of questionnaire
data
|
.108
|
5.0. Introduction
|
108
|
5.1. Learners' perception of connectedness
|
108
|
5.1.1. Learners' perception of topics
|
108
|
5.1.2. Learners' perception of language varieties
|
111
|
5.1.3. Perception of the coursebook's connectedness potential
|
112
|
5.2. Learners' perception of inappropriacy
|
114
|
5.2.1. Appropriate issues for learners
|
116
|
5.2.2. Inappropriate issues for learners .
|
119
|
5.3. Learners' perception of inclusivity
|
122
|
5.3.1. Cultural inclusivity
|
..122
|
5.3.1.1. `High' cultures
|
123
|
5.3.1.2. `Low' cultures
|
125
|
5.3.2. The inclusivity of learners' individual lives
|
126
|
5.3.2.1. High closeness
|
.128
|
5.3.2.2. Medium closeness
|
129
|
5.3.2.3. Low closeness
Conclusion
Chapter Six: Conclusion
|
130
.132
. 134
|
6.0. Introduction
|
134
|
6.1. Major findings
|
134
|
6.2. Contribution of the study
|
135
|
6.3. Limitations of the study
|
136
|
6.4. Suggestions for further research
|
.136
|
6.5. Recommendations
|
...137
|
References
Appendix A: Questionnaire for learners
|
|
|
|
139
149
|
|
Appendix
|
B:
|
The
|
women
number,
|
the
|
roles,
|
and
|
the
|
topics
..
|
related
150
|
to
|
Appendix
|
C:
|
The men
|
number,
|
the
|
roles
|
and
|
the
.
|
topics
|
related
151
|
to
|
Appendix
|
D:
|
The
|
Whites
number,
|
the
|
roles,
|
and
|
the
|
topics
|
related
152
|
to
|
Appendix
|
E:
|
The
|
number,
|
the
|
roles,
|
and
|
the
|
topics
|
related
|
to
|
|
Blacks .....153
Appendix F: The number, the roles, and the topics related
to the Asians ....154
Appendix G: The numbers, the roles, and the topics
related to diverse
characters ..155
Appendix H: Controversial topics in the coursebook
156
List of acronyms and abbreviations
B: Baccalaureate
BE: Business English
EFL: English as a Foreign Language ELT: English Language Teaching
ESL: English as a Second Language ET: English for tourism
FL : Foreign Language
GE: General English
H/I: Headway Intermediate (Soars & Soars, 2003)
I.B.L.V: Bourguiba Institute of Living Languages
L : Licence
L1 culture: First Language culture
L2 culture: Second Language culture M: Maitrise
OMR: Out of marriage relationships O: Other
PARSNIP: politics, Alcohol, Religion, Sex, Narcotics, Isms, and
Pork SE: Scientific English
List of Tables
Table 1: Numbers of new textbooks, by phase and skill,
1530-1870 (Michael, 1993, p.
6)
|
14
|
Table 2: A sample of inclusivity tables
|
65
|
Table 3: Table devised to explore inappropriacy
|
66
|
Table 4: Background information of the participants
|
.71
|
Table 5: Referring items related to spiritual beverages in each
unit of the coursebook
|
92
|
Table 6: Leisure activities and their frequency in each unit of
the coursebook...
|
100
|
Table 7: Publishers' success with handling inappropriacy
|
121
|
List of figures
Figure 1: Research flowchart
|
55
|
Figure 2: Themes and methodology for coding content
|
.63
|
Figure 3: Presence of women across units
|
76
|
Figure 4: Presence of men across units .
|
.78
|
Figure 5: Representation of racial minorities
|
.81
|
Figure 6: The presence of the Whites across the units
|
82
|
Figure 7: The presence of the Blacks across the units
|
.84
|
Figure 8: The presence of the Asians across the units
|
85
|
Figure 9: Frequency of mention of leisure activities in the
coursebook
|
101
|
Figure 10: Distribution of global settings in the coursebook
|
105
|
Figure 11: Participants' perception of what should be the kind of
content in the coursebook
|
109
|
Figure 12: Respondents' perception of specificity of topics in
H/I
|
110
|
Figure 13: Preferred language varieties for the respondents
|
.111
|
Figure 14: Respondents' perception of the value of H/I
|
113
|
Figure 15: Respondents' perception of mentioning inappropriate
issues in H/I
|
115
|
Figure 16: Participants' opinion regarding mentioning
inappropriate issues in H/I..116
Figure 17: Respondents' perception of cultures in H/I
|
123
|
Figure 18: Closeness of the content of H/I to learners'
situations
|
.126
|
Figure 19: Reported closeness of the content of H/I to learners
|
127
|
Chapter One: Introduction
The purpose of this introductory chapter is to provide
background to the topic of this study. It will explain the background and
theoretical framework of the study before defining the key terms. Moreover, it
will shed light on the general aims of the research and the research questions.
Finally, this chapter will provide information concerning the methodology used
before clarifying the way the thesis is organised.
1.1 Background to the study
This thesis will explore the extent to which an example of
global coursebooks (i.e. coursebooks produced to be disseminated around the
world) are `global' in terms of being globally inclusive, globally sensitive to
the issue of inappropriacy, and globally investing in what connects people
worldwide. This thesis will also explore the way learners using Headway
Intermediate (Soars & Soars, 2003) perceive its global content.
As outlined above, themes mentioned in previous research will
be explored such as «inclusivity», «inappropriacy» (Gray,
2002), and «connectedness» (Chang, 2003). To do so, this study will
review the issues of globalisation and language teaching especially as
manifested in connectedness, the question of representation and the
implications of inclusivity, and the issue of inappropriacy and the problematic
facts related to it.
It is secret to no one that the spread of English language in
the world has resulted in the promotion of an already important industry for
Anglophone countries and specifically Britain (Howatt, 1984), which is ELT
(Graddol, 2000; Gray, 2002; Crystal, 2003; Derbel, 2004). Apart from the
exportation of English language practitioners (Phillipson, 1992; Pennycook,
1994) to Outer and especially Expanding Circles (Kachru, 1985), Britain
benefited from the exportation of English textbooks (Graddol, 2000; Gray,
2002). Being used in many teaching
situations around the globe, English language textbooks have been
called «global» (Graddol, 2000; Gray, 2002).
Global coursebooks are characterised by their global use
(Canagarajah, 1999; Graddol, 2000; Gray, 2002). Accordingly, they are worth
investigating in terms of content as well as learners' perception of their
content. Analysing the content of coursebooks, research studies could focus on
the linguistic and cultural content (Michael, 1993). Additionally,
investigating learners' perception of global coursebooks, the results of a
questionnaire can be corroborated.
What is meant by the term «globality» is the end
state of the process of the globalisation of a particular item (Schafer, 2007).
Hence, the «globality» of ELT coursebooks is the end state of the
globalisation of these teaching materials not only in terms of themes but also
in terms of distribution. With reference to the «globality» that is
said to be characterising global coursebooks in terms of content (Riches, 1999;
Gray, 2002) and use (Phillipson, 1992; Graddol, 2000), it is important to
investigate the applicability of the generalised cultural content in these
teaching materials (Kilickaya, 2004a; Gray, 2002).
Generalised cultural content is related to coursebook writers'
attempt to invest in general topics that take into consideration including and
being sensitive to international audiences, which results in the sanitisation
of content (Gray, 2002). Investigating the suitability of content for world
audiences is important because globalisation, which is defined as the mutual
social exchange of influence between remote events and ideologies (Giddens,
1990; Derbel & Richards, 2007), affects coursebooks' production and use
(Gray, 2002). Investigating this suitability is what is meant by exploring the
«globality» of the global coursebook.
This study is conducted in the 21st century, where
one hears a lot about globalisation, which is «a fashionable term»
(p. 1) according to Block & Cameron (2002) and a theme that dominates
contemporary discourse and affects the teaching profession according to Derbel
& Richards (2007) including the production and dissemination of ELT
textbooks.
In fact, globalisation, being a force that is continuously
shaping and reshaping human relationships and products (Giddens, 1990), affects
English language teaching in different ways (Derbel & Richards, 2007).
Kubota (2002), for example, describes the way globalisation frames ELT in Japan
representing the discourse of `Kokusaika' (i.e. internationalisation)
characterising teaching, contributing, thus, in the promotion of the
`interconnectedness' marking ELT (Derbel & Richards, 2007). The discourse
of `Kokusaika' (Kubota, 2002) could be seen as an attempt towards the end state
of globalisation, which is «globality». For the Japanese, the
discourse of `Kukusaika' meant the use of a global medium, which is English, to
transmit Japanese culture to the world (ibid).
Additionally, Cameron (2002) stresses the fact that
globalisation influences ELT through framing the kind of communication used by
global users, which is most of the time related to the dominant's varieties and
modes of communication. Accordingly, Kramsch and Thorne (2002), defining
communication as information exchange, highlight the fact that this kind of
communication is manifested in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) theories,
methods, and tasks. Such methods and tasks, according to Block (2002) are not
sufficient to cater for the globally diverse aspects of English language
learning. what is meant by this is that modes of communication are not the same
all over the world while SLA theories assume they are so (ibid).
Globalisation influences also the materials used in ELT (Block
& Cameron, 2002). For instance, Gray (2002) attests that this influence is
manifested in the claims of «globality» that
the publishers of global coursebooks claim in order to
maximise profit. He suggests that, concerning the relationship between
globalisation and ELT materials, the future will be for diversity of these
materials not homogeneity. This prediction entails that the global coursebook
will more and more tend to be glocalised by producing coursebooks that meet the
needs of local users while preserving their connection with the world (Gray,
2002).
In this context, the notion of connectedness manifested in
what the publishers that Gray (2002) interviewed call constructing bridges
between what is local and what is global, is noticeable in the idea of
«glocalisation, [being] a neologism which attempts to capture
something of the complexity inherent in globalisation by conflating the terms
global and local» (p. 166, italics in original). What Gray (2002) means by
this suggestion is the inclusion of local topics, aspirations, and concerns in
the content of coursebooks in order to motivate the users and avoid possible
resistance. One might add that this that such possible resistance does not only
concern the learners but also the teachers, as clarified by Canagarajah (1999)
and Gray (2002) respectively. While Canagarajah (1999) argues that resistance
can be manifested in learners' distortion of their coursebooks, Gray (2002)
provided evidence that some teachers are not satisfied with the kind of content
that global coursebooks communicate.
Different ELT theorists have considered coursebooks of
paramount importance (Hutchinson and Torres, 1994; Tomlinson, 2001) while
others have warned that coursebooks are not suitable (Allwright, 1982;
Rinvolucri, 1999). Whether a coursebook is `good' or `bad' depends on the angle
from which one looks at it and the kind of content existing in the coursebook.
Hence, what is important is that evaluating coursebooks is a necessity. For
example, Nunan (1991) claimed that the evaluation of coursebooks is the final
stage in its production. For this reason, this study explores the cultural
content in an attempt to
contribute to the literature on the issues related to the extent
to which global coursebooks can be said to have a real «globality» in
themes and in representation.
In fact, coursebooks have been subject to various kinds of
examination. Ellis (1997) differentiates between `predictive evaluation' and
`retrospective evaluation'. While predictive evaluation concerns the decision
of choosing the suitable material, retrospective evaluation focuses on
materials that are already in use. Rea-Dickens (1994) adds to this distinction
the description of the post-use evaluation. She distinguishes between pre-use
evaluation, in-use evaluation, and post-use evaluation.
Nunan (1991) enumerates the different perspectives and angles
from which commercial coursebooks could be evaluated. He adopts the six
perspectives for evaluating materials that Littlejohn and Windeatt (1989)
mentioned:
1. The general or subject knowledge contained in the
materials.
2. Views on the nature and acquisition of knowledge.
3. Views on the nature of language learning.
4. Role relations implicit in materials.
5. Opportunities for the development of cognitive abilities.
6. The value and attitudes inherent in the materials (qtd in
Nunan, 1991, p. 209).
Nunan (1991) comments that such a scheme is modest in the
sense of being more realisable than calls for inviting teachers to «adopt
a critical stance towards the materials' aims, appropriateness, and
utility» (p. 209), as proposed by Breen and Candlin (1987).
Litz (n.d) asserts that recent research studies on coursebook
evaluation are documented to focus on many issues such as «textbook design
and practicality, methodological validity,
the role of textbooks in innovation, the authenticity of
materials in terms of their representation of language, and the appropriateness
of gender representation, subject matter, and cultural components» (p. 2).
As stated by Nunan (1991), «[e]valuating and selecting commercial
materials is not an easy task» (p. 209). It is so because many decisions
need to be taken concerning these two operations like «[matching] the
materials with the goals and objectives of the program, and [ensuring] that
they are consistent with [teachers'] beliefs about the nature of language and
learning, as well as with (...) learners' attitudes, beliefs and
preferences (ibid, italics mine). Therefore, it is essential to evaluate
teaching materials and particularly coursebooks in order to forecast, measure,
or evaluate their suitability for learners around the globe.
Numerous studies have focused on the evaluation of the
cultural content in global coursebooks such as the investigation of
stereotyping (Clarke & Clarke, 1991) and gender representation starting
from the seventies (Hartman & Judd, 1978; Porreca, 1984; Gray, 2002;
Mineshima, 2008).
All of the issues stressed in this background to the study
will be closely dealt with throughout the thesis as they are related to the
issues explored in this study; connectedness, inappropriacy, and
inclusivity.
Hence, this thesis is an attempt to contribute to research on
coursebooks and more specifically on the issue of applicability of global
coursebooks for learners around the world. Additionally, this study attempts to
explore learners' perception of an example of these globally marketed teaching
materials with special emphasis on Tunisian learners. In the following section,
the key terms used in the study will be defined.
|