WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Addressing climate change through environmental assessment tools in planning processes: international practices and perspectives for Niger


par Moussa LAMINE
Technishe Universitat Dresden/ Centre For International Postgraduate School of Environmental Management (CIPSEM) - Diploma  2017
  

précédent sommaire

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

Conclusions

Nowadays, incorporating CC considerations in Environmental Assessment is largely recognised as a way for determining whether PPP are consistent with legal framework CC policies and international commitments and initiatives to manage GHG emissions but also a mean to assist proponents in using best practices that adapt to possible CC impacts, such as changes in the frequency or intensity of extreme weather events, increases in mean temperatures or altered precipitation patterns and amounts. This paper

25

discussed on how CC issues are addressed worldwide through environmental impacts assessment (EIA) and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in planning processes with a focus on the European Union legislations in order to identify perspectives for Niger. It also compared the current EIA legislation in EU and Niger to identify differences, and similarities related to CC mainstreaming in EIA in order to learn lessons and to propose some ways of improvement. The assessment of the two legislations revealed that while the EU Directive made provisions about the assessment of the impacts of the projects on CC as well as the vulnerability of the projects to CC, the Niger's EIA procedure follows the traditional approach of undertaking EIAs, which only focuses on the assessment of the impacts of proposed projects or activity on the environment. Moreover, CC mainstreaming is not sufficiently considered in the SEA Directive as the directive does not provide a well-established methodology and specific guidance for determining CC impacts and Niger EA legislation does not have any provision about SEA procedure.

It emerged from this study the need for an establishment of clear defined legal provision on SEA incorporating CC and a revision of Ordonnance 97-001 of 10 January 1997 on the institutionalisation of environmental impact assessments and its implementing decrees 2000-397 and 2000-398 to not only incorporate CC in the EIA procedure but also clarifying the scope of the EIA, categorising projects according to their scope and nature, improving the coordination mechanism of the EIA procedure, public participation and financing of environmental monitoring.

Recommendations

The following recommendations are proposed to the ministry in charge of the environment of Niger.

1. Update the EIA legislation which shall provide clearly defined criteria and checklists for screening and scoping environmental impacts to ensure identification of the significant CC impacts on the proposed project or activity in line with the other national legislations on CC.

2. As mainstreaming CC in EIA procedure is a new concept for many practitioners, establishment of clear criteria governing the qualification, skills, knowledge and experience which must be possessed by persons conducting EIA and government experts who review and assess EIAs procedure and reports. This approach may be used to ensure that persons conducting EIAs and assessing CC impacts possess the requisite qualification, skills, knowledge and experience on CC and adaptation policies and measures.

3. Elaborate and submit to government a new SEA bill taking into account CC and its implementing decrees regarding the administrative procedure and types of plans and programs subject to SEA.

4. Provide a clear mechanism of public participation in addressing CC and its effects and developing adequate responses in EIA and SEA procedures as required by UNFCCC (Article 6 (a) (iii)).

26

ACTION PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

For the above-mentioned recommendations to be effective, it is important to define the different stakeholders and their responsibilities for the implementation of the actions. The proponent of the project for the revision of Ordonnance 97-001 on EIA and its implementing decrees and the proposal of a new draft bill on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) taking into account the CC dimension, will be the ministry in charge of the environment which has under its responsibility the Bureau of Environmental Evaluation and Impact Assessment (BEEIA):

However, there are also other key stakeholders such as the General Directorate of Environment and Sustainable Development (DGEDD), the National Council of Environment for Sustainable Development (CNEDD), other sectorial ministries, the Technical Committee for Verification and Evaluation of Texts (COTEVET) of the General Secretariat of the Government, parliamentarians members of the Environment and Rural Development Commission and civil society (NGOs and Consultancy firms) working in the field of environment and environmental assessment.

It is also important to recall that the review and drafting of legislative and regulatory texts require the involvement of experts in this field, in particular environmental assessment experts and jurists, and is mainly conditioned by the availability of the necessary financial resources to achieve the assigned objectives. Therefore, the recruitment of a consultant for the revision and elaboration of these texts is essential. With regard to financial resources, the State's budget and other partners of the ministry in charge of environment are the potential sources of funding for this project.

Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders

1. Bureau of Environmental Evaluation and Impact Assessment (BEEIA)

The BEEIA, which will serve as the institutional anchorage of the initiative, in collaboration with the DGEDD and the CNEDD will be responsible for the elaboration of the terms of references for the study, the recruitment of the consultant and follow-up of all actions in order to achieve the implementation of these recommendations.

2. Sectorial Ministries and Civil Society

Sectorial ministries and civil society will be involved in data collection for inputs, drafting of texts and also during pre-validation of elaborated texts by the consultant at a workshop to be organized for the occasion.

3. Technical Committee for Verification and Evaluation of Texts (COTEVET)

This committee housed in the General Secretariat of the Government has an important role to play in this project because it is responsible for verifying and evaluating the conformity of all bills or decrees with the constitution and other laws of the Republic before passing them to the government for adoption. In this

27

project, they will be sensitised about the need to integrate the climate dimension into the environmental assessment tools and the deficiencies hitherto found in the implementation of the existing texts.

4. Members of the Environment and Rural Development Commission

These parliamentarians will be sensitized on the ins and outs of these draft texts and the integration of the CC dimension in the environmental assessment tools so that they defend and facilitate their adoption by the National Assembly.

The Different Actions to be carried out:

The table 2 below gives details of the actions to be taken, the responsibilities of the stakeholders for the implementation and the risks.

28

Table 2: Actions to be carried out for the Implementation of the Recommendations

Actions

Responsables of actions

Risks

1. Elaboration draft texts by the
consultant

Consultant

- Administrative slowness

- lack of interest of the targeted actors

-lack of financial resources to carry out the actions

-mismatched schedule with the parliamentarians agenda

2. Two-day pooling workshop to collect
comments on draft texts

BEEIA/DGEDD/CNEDD

 

Consultant

 

BEEIA/DGEDD/CNEDD

 

BEEIA/DGEDD/CNEDD

 
 
 
 

BEEIA/DGEDD/CNEDD

 

29

References:

Agrawala,S., A.Kramer, G. Prudent-Richard et al. (2010): Incorporating CC impacts and adaptation in Environmental Impact Assessments: Opportunities and Challenges. OECD Environmental Working Paper No. 24, OECD Publishing, (c) OECD. doi: 10.1787/5km959r3jcmw-en.

André, P., B. Enserink, D. Connor and P. Croal (2006): Public Participation International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No 4. Fargo, USA: International Association for Impact Assessment.

CEAA-Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2003): Incorporating CC Considerations in Environmental Assessment: General Guidance for Practitioners. Published by the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on CC and Environmental Assessment. Catalogue No. En106-50/2003E-PDF ISBN 0-662-35454-0. Available on www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca

CARICOM-Caribbean Community et al. (2004): Adapting to a changing climate in the Caribbean and South Pacific regions. Guide to the integration of CC adaptation into the environmental impact assessment process. Caribbean community secretariat, Adapting to CC in the Caribbean Project.

Chaker, A., K. El-Fadl, L. Chamas, and B. Hatjian (2005): A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (2006) 15- 56. Available online on www.sciencedirect.com.

Cherp, A (2001): Environmental assessment in countries in transition: Evolution in a changing context. Journal of Environmental Management (2001) 62, 357-374 doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0438. Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com.

Cissé, H (2013): Intégration de la biodiversité dans l'évaluation environnementale stratégique des aménagements dans le bassin fluvial du programme kandaji au Niger. Thèse présentée comme exigence partielle du doctorat en sciences de l'environnement. Université du Québec à Montréal. 352 pages.

Cissé, H (2016): Intégration de la Biodiversité dans les évaluations environnementales au Niger. Journée mondiale de la Biodiversité, Mai 2016. Présentation Powerpoint du Bureau d'Évaluation Environnementale et des Études d'Impact, Ministère de l'Environnement et du Développement Durable.

CNEDD-Conseil de l'Environnement pour un Développement Durable (2006) : Programme d'Action National pour l'Adaptation aux changements climatiques .90 pages

Dalal-Clayton, B., and B. Sadler (1999): Strategic environmental assessment: a rapidly evolving approach. International Institute for Environment and Development. Environmental planning issues no. 18, 1999.13 pages.

Hallegatte S., F. Lecocq, and C. De Perthuis (2011): Designing CC adaptation policies: an economic framework. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 1-39.

Thomas, B. F., C. Wood, and C. Jones (2002): Policy, plan, and programme environmental assessment in England, the Netherlands, and Germany: practice and prospects. Journal: Environment and Planning B:

IAIA-International Association for Impact Assessment (2009): What Is Impact Assessment? 4 pages. Available at https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/What_is_IA_web.pdf.

IFAD-International Fund for Agricultural Development (2013): Niger, Évaluation Environnementale et des Changements Climatiques pour la préparation du Programme d'Options Stratégiques pour le Pays 20132018 du FIDA. Rapport principal. 53 pages.

INS-NIGER -Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (2014): le Niger en Chiffres 2014. 84 pages.

Larsen, S., L. Kørnøv, P. Driscoll (2013): Avoiding CC uncertainties in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 43 (2013) 144-150.

Sánchez, L.; and Croal (2012): Environmental impact assessment, from Rio-92 to Rio+20 and beyond. Ambient. soc. vol.15 no.3 São Paulo Sept./Dec. 2012. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2012000300004.

MESU/DD-Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Salubrité Urbaine et du Développement Durable (2015): Contribution Prévue Determinee au niveau National du Niger (CPDN/INDC). 17 pages.

OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010): Strategic environmental assessment and adaptation to CC. DAC Network on Environment and Development Co-operation (ENVIRONET). Available at www.oecd.org/dac/environment-development/42025733.pdf.

OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015): Agriculture and Climate Change. Trade and Agriculture Directorate. 6 pages. Available at www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/agriculture-climate-change-september-2015.pdf.

Ogbonna,C. U., and E. Albrecht (2015): Strategic Environmental Assessment as a Tool to Integrate CC Adaptation: A Perspective for Nigeria. Published: 1 January 2015 by Springer in Handbook of CC Adaptation Handbook of CC Adaptation pp 1239-1260; doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_14.

Ohsawa, T and P., Duinker (2014): Climate-change mitigation in Canadian environmental impact assessments, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32:3, 222-233, DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2014.913761.

Sadler, B (1996) : Étude internationale sur l'efficacité de l'évaluation environnementale. Rapport final. L'évaluation environnementale dans un monde en évolution. Evaluer la pratique pour améliorer le rendement. 317 pages.

Suzaul-Islam, MD., and Z. Yanrong (2016): Strategic Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Development: CC Perspective. J Earth Sci Clim. Change 7: 379. doi: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000379

Planning and Design 2002, volume 29, pages 159 -172. Available on http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/b2787

UNCEA -Nations Unies, Commission Economique pour l'Afrique (2015) : Profil de Pays Niger .42 pages.

UNDP-United Nations Development Programme (2013): Sustainable Wetland Management in the Face of Climate Risks in Niger: The Case of La Mare de Tabalak. New York, NY: UNDP BCPR.

UNDP-United Nations Development Programme (2012): Mainstreaming CC in National Development Processes and UN Country Programming: A guide to assist UN Country Teams in integrating CC risks and opportunities. United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA. 36 pages.

Weiland, U (2010): Strategic Environmental Assessment in Germany -- Practice and open questions. University of Leipzig, Institute of Geography. Johannisallee 19a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (2010) 211-217.

World Bank (1999) : Manuel opérationnel de la Banque Mondiale, Politiques Opérationnelles PO 4.01. Janvier 1999, Page 8.

Other sources:

Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of certain plans and programs on the Environment. Available at

Directive 2014/52/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment

Niger Ordinance 97-001 on Institutionalization of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of January 10th, 1997.

Decree N°2000-397/PRN/ME/LCD of 20th October 2000 on EIA administrative procedure in Niger

Decree 2000-369 / PRN / ME / LCD of 12 October 2000 on the responsibilities, organization and functioning of the BEEIA;

Decree 2000-398 / PRN / ME / LCD of 20 October 2000 determining the list of activities, works and planning documents for which environmental impact assessments are required.

précédent sommaire






La Quadrature du Net

Ligue des droits de l'homme