WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Impact of organizational communication in enhancing work effectiveness in local government entities

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Daniel Ibyimanikora
University of Rwanda - A0 2015
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

2.3.4 Organizational Communication and organization culture

For Driskill (2005:28), Organizational culture may be defined as the knowledge, ideology, values, and rituals that individuals share.

There is not a single organizational culture within organizations, as unique sub-cultures may emerge within organizations according to demographics such as race, gender, sexual orientation, organizational tenure, and membership in a particular work unit or division

According Driskill (2005:33), to the direction of information flow, organizational communication has been trichotomized into downward, upward, and horizontal directions, which depends upon who initiated the communication and who received it. The boss-subordinate transaction through downward or upward communication is probably the most common communicative situation within a work organization.

a) The downward communication: This means the flow of information from superiors to subordinates and it is a dominant channel in accordance with formal communication networks. Garnett (1992:102) identified four roles of downward communication: conveying a vision, communicating to motivate subordinates, providing feedback on subordinates' performance, and assigning tasks and conveying task-related information. Likewise, Katz indicates five types of downward communication, including job instruction, job rationale, procedures and practices, feedback, and indoctrination of goals. In most cases, task-related messages, such as goals, disciplines, orders, policies, and directions, are dominant. (Katz 1966:7)

However, this type of communication can cause message overload to individuals, especially subordinates who usually receive messages, and it leads them to avoid receiving messages from supervisors, senders. The empirically proved the relationship between information overload and organizational satisfaction and performance. He found that perceived information overload is associated with lower performance but higher job satisfaction because filtering means that messages have chances to be changed or distorted during their travel from top to down within an organization due to «number of links in a network, perceptual differences among employees, and lack of trust in a supervisor». O'Reilly (1980:8)

b) The upward communication: this type of communication within an organization is the flows of information from subordinates to superiors. Upward communication is a channel to know «how work is processing, what problems and opportunities subordinates see, what ideas subordinates have for improving performance, what intelligence subordinates gather about what clients and other organizations are doing and what subordinates feel about the agency, their superiors, and their jobs». Garnett (1992:9)

c) The horizontal /lateral communication: Horizontal or lateral communication consists of messages that are transmitted to other individuals on the same rung of the organizational hierarchy. In essence, horizontal or lateral communication occurs when individuals who have roughly the same status interact with one another in an organization. It indicates the lateral exchange of information, which flows in accordance with the functional principle among people on the same level within an organization. Upward and horizontal communications are emphasized for employee satisfaction (Miller, 1999:9).

However, upward communication could be another instrument to control and regulate subordinates, as Shermerhorn, (2005: 10) mentioned: «upward communication keeps higher levels informed about what lower level workers are doing, what their problems are, what suggestions they have for improvements, and how they feel about the organization and their jobs.

External communication processes link multiple organizations and connect the organization to its environment. Organizations exist amidst a complex web of relationships among multiple audiences, which Grunig described as components enabling the environmental sector that controls the allocation of authority (governments, regulatory agencies); the functional sector (suppliers, employees, customers); the normative sector (trade association, professional organizations); and the diffused sector (local community, media). Thus, at the inter-organizational level of research, communication is understood in the network relationship. Grunig (1984:11)

The External communication can also be divided into several types in accordance with the target groups. There are, for instance, external communication types with clients, with private companies, with political parties, with nonprofits, with government agencies, and so on.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Il ne faut pas de tout pour faire un monde. Il faut du bonheur et rien d'autre"   Paul Eluard