WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

The Child's First-self identification as "I"


par Francky Manegabe Balol'ebwami
ISP/Bukavu - Licencié 2004
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

GENERAL CONCLUSION

This work has attempted to answer the question when all children do learn first self-identification. Since a child grows up to recognize himself by means of language, it is language that proves that a man has matured. This is to say that the child's physical growth goes along with his language development. For this reason, chapter one of this work has discussed the child's development, including both his physique and his language.

The second chapter, on the other hand, tried to verify whether all children aged from two years can learn to identify themselves as " mie, nie, I " etc.

It is true that children of the same age, born and living in the same area and using the same language may not learn particles of this language, for example " I " at the same level. That is why we were glad to discover that all the children aged 2 : 00 could not identify themselves as individuals. This automatically made us reject our hypothesis ; that is all children aged from two years can identify themselves as unique, saying " mie huyu " (This is me).

The reasons can be that first, some children earn lower social life. They are disadvantaged to learn from the world as much as advantaged children. They have no access to concrete materials which can help as tools to refer to for learning language. Secondly, there are some other children who have been victims of diseases which may have affected their language development.

Finally, some others may have been able to produce this " I " but because they do not want to collaborate with us, they do not talk.

As one looks at the language progress of these children and their attitudes towards the researcher's investigation , some pedagogical conclusions can be drawn.

· The encouragement of only one word learning as well as only one short answer at the early stage is recommended.

· The correction of the child's shortcomings should rather be a help to his language than a threat.

· The use of concrete materials as visual aids is an important tool for language learning.

· The treatment of children in their individualities is very important. This is because children are not the same since each one has his own abilities.

· The age is an important factor to language learning. It should not fit if a one year-old child was imposed to learn a two-word utterance as if he was aged 2 : 00. Accorlingly, it should not be expected to a 1 : 00 to learn this " I " because he has not reached the appropriate age for it yet.

What we hope we have done is, so far, only a tip of an iceberg. We recognize

that this work having its shortcomings, we call, therefore, for replication of a research study with different data collection procedures and a different research design so as to obtain mere convincing evidence for the results we came to. The researcher we welcome may for example investigate much on the effect of " I " in the child's language learning or on his self-image.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. BOOKS

1. Alatis, J.E et al. (1981) The Second Language Classroom : Directions for the

1980's. New York: Oxford University Press.

2. Alby, N. et al. (1976) L'Univers de la Famille, Vol. 2. Paris: Hachette.

3. Clark, H.H. and Clark, E.V. (1977) Psychology and Language : An Introduction to

Psycholinguistics. New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

4. Chomsky, N. (1976) Reflections on Language. Fontana : Collins

5. Encyclopedia Universalis (1968), Vol 6. Paris : Elastomères.

6. Freud, S. (1966) Cinq Leçons sur la Psychanalyse. Paris : Payot.

7. Halliday, M.A.K. (1979) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of

Language and Meaning. New York: Edward Arnold.

8. Longman Dictionary of contemporary English. (1995) London: Longman Group Ltd.

9. Markel, N.N. (1969) Psycholinguistics. An Introduction to the study of Speech

and Personality. London: Dorsey.

10. Moore, T.E. (1973) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language.

New York:Academic Press.

11. Nasr, R.T. (1978) The Essentials of Linguistic Science. London: Longman

12. Romaine, S. (1951) The Language of Children and Adolescents. Blackwell: Oxford.

13. Weeks, T.E. (1979) Born to Talk Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

B. UNPUBLISHED THESIS AND UNPUBLISHED LECTURE NOTES

14. HABASIKIYAKE,M. (2003) " Writing Exercises " (4th Year of English), ISP/Bukavu

15. ________________ (2003) " Research Seminar (4th Year of English), ISP/Bukavu.

16. Kamanyula, K. (1987) " Life of Bukavu School Teen-Agers : A Descriptive Essay "

(3rd year research paper), ISP/BUKAVU.

17. KAMBALE, M.B. (2003) " Special Topics in English Linguistics " (Part 1). (4 th

Year of English), ISP/Bukavu.

18. _______________ (2004) " Applied Linguistics " (Part 2). (5 th Year of English),

ISP/BUKAVU

19. MUKE, Z. (2003) " Cours de Statistique Inferentielle ".

1ère Licence, ISP / Bukavu

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Je voudrais vivre pour étudier, non pas étudier pour vivre"   Francis Bacon