ANNEXE II.4-MODÈLE À CORRECTION
D'ERREUR
Tableeau II.4.1 : output du
modèle à correction d'erreur à la
Hendry
Dependent Variable: DLTCHOM
|
|
|
Method: Least Squares
|
|
|
Date: 11/30/13 Time: 15:28
|
|
|
Sample (adjusted): 1991 2011
|
|
|
Included observations: 21 after adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
Std. Error
|
t-Statistic
|
Prob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
2.294032
|
0.798374
|
2.873380
|
0.0105
|
DLTINFL
|
0.034941
|
0.014358
|
2.433581
|
0.0263
|
LTCHOM(-1)
|
-0.607449
|
0.208458
|
-2.914011
|
0.0097
|
LTINFL(-1)
|
0.030208
|
0.012376
|
2.440922
|
0.0259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-squared
|
0.488296
|
Mean dependent var
|
-0.001099
|
Adjusted R-squared
|
0.397995
|
S.D. dependent var
|
0.121653
|
S.E. of regression
|
0.094389
|
Akaike info criterion
|
-1.713136
|
Sum squared resid
|
0.151459
|
Schwarz criterion
|
-1.514180
|
Log likelihood
|
21.98793
|
Hannan-Quinn criter.
|
-1.669958
|
F-statistic
|
5.407440
|
Durbin-Watson stat
|
1.953585
|
Prob(F-statistic)
|
0.008490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEXE II.5- VALIDATION DU MODÈLE
Figure II.5.1 : output du test de
normalité des résidus de Jarque-Bera
Tableau II.5.2 : output du test
d'hétéroscédasticité de White
Heteroskedasticity Test: White
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-statistic
|
1.348344
|
Prob. F(9,11)
|
0.3151
|
Obs*R-squared
|
11.01517
|
Prob. Chi-Square(9)
|
0.2747
|
Scaled explained SS
|
8.384707
|
Prob. Chi-Square(9)
|
0.4959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sTest Equation:
|
|
|
|
Dependent Variable: RESID^2
|
|
|
Method: Least Squares
|
|
|
Date: 01/05/14 Time: 14:36
|
|
|
Sample: 1991 2011
|
|
|
Included observations: 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
Std. Error
|
t-Statistic
|
Prob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
-4.933231
|
4.072778
|
-1.211269
|
0.2512
|
DLTINFL
|
0.184123
|
0.084852
|
2.169928
|
0.0528
|
DLTINFL^2
|
-0.002509
|
0.001373
|
-1.827245
|
0.0949
|
DLTINFL*LTCHOM(-1)
|
-0.045266
|
0.021978
|
-2.059628
|
0.0639
|
DLTINFL*LTINFL(-1)
|
-0.000440
|
0.001482
|
-0.296938
|
0.7720
|
LTCHOM(-1)
|
2.567833
|
2.083548
|
1.232433
|
0.2435
|
LTCHOM(-1)^2
|
-0.336292
|
0.267122
|
-1.258943
|
0.2341
|
LTCHOM(-1)*LTINFL(-1)
|
0.023616
|
0.019846
|
1.189934
|
0.2591
|
LTINFL(-1)
|
-0.072201
|
0.071348
|
-1.011960
|
0.3333
|
LTINFL(-1)^2
|
-0.001880
|
0.001067
|
-1.762703
|
0.1057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-squared
|
0.524532
|
Mean dependent var
|
0.007212
|
Adjusted R-squared
|
0.135512
|
S.D. dependent var
|
0.011264
|
S.E. of regression
|
0.010473
|
Akaike info criterion
|
-5.974227
|
Sum squared resid
|
0.001207
|
Schwarz criterion
|
-5.476836
|
Log likelihood
|
72.72939
|
Hannan-Quinn criter.
|
-5.866281
|
F-statistic
|
1.348344
|
Durbin-Watson stat
|
1.748279
|
Prob(F-statistic)
|
0.315095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tableau II.5.3 : output
du test de RESET de Ramsey
Ramsey RESET Test:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-statistic
|
3.497862
|
Prob. F(1,16)
|
0.0799
|
Log likelihood ratio
|
4.152038
|
Prob. Chi-Square(1)
|
0.0416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Equation:
|
|
|
|
Dependent Variable: DLTCHOM
|
|
|
Method: Least Squares
|
|
|
Date: 11/30/13 Time: 15:32
|
|
|
Sample: 1991 2011
|
|
|
Included observations: 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
Std. Error
|
t-Statistic
|
Prob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
2.586407
|
0.761697
|
3.395584
|
0.0037
|
DLTINFL
|
0.026323
|
0.014177
|
1.856798
|
0.0818
|
LTCHOM(-1)
|
-0.685352
|
0.199055
|
-3.443034
|
0.0033
|
LTINFL(-1)
|
0.041327
|
0.012995
|
3.180130
|
0.0058
|
FITTED^2
|
-5.152058
|
2.754733
|
-1.870257
|
0.0799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-squared
|
0.580094
|
Mean dependent var
|
-0.001099
|
Adjusted R-squared
|
0.475118
|
S.D. dependent var
|
0.121653
|
S.E. of regression
|
0.088136
|
Akaike info criterion
|
-1.815614
|
Sum squared resid
|
0.124287
|
Schwarz criterion
|
-1.566919
|
Log likelihood
|
24.06395
|
Hannan-Quinn criter.
|
-1.761641
|
F-statistic
|
5.525945
|
Durbin-Watson stat
|
1.801644
|
Prob(F-statistic)
|
0.005452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tableau II.5.4 : output du test LM
de Breusch-Godfrey
Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-statistic
|
1.756087
|
Prob. F(2,15)
|
0.2064
|
Obs*R-squared
|
3.984171
|
Prob. Chi-Square(2)
|
0.1364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Equation:
|
|
|
|
Dependent Variable: RESID
|
|
|
Method: Least Squares
|
|
|
Date: 11/30/13 Time: 15:34
|
|
|
Sample: 1991 2011
|
|
|
Included observations: 21
|
|
|
Presample missing value lagged residuals set to
zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
Std. Error
|
t-Statistic
|
Prob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
-3.124822
|
1.969509
|
-1.586599
|
0.1335
|
DLTINFL
|
0.002738
|
0.015616
|
0.175359
|
0.8631
|
LTCHOM(-1)
|
0.816679
|
0.514333
|
1.587840
|
0.1332
|
LTINFL(-1)
|
-0.030661
|
0.021128
|
-1.451234
|
0.1673
|
RESID(-1)
|
-0.972394
|
0.590712
|
-1.646139
|
0.1205
|
RESID(-2)
|
-0.501630
|
0.308301
|
-1.627076
|
0.1245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-squared
|
0.189722
|
Mean dependent var
|
-5.76E-16
|
Adjusted R-squared
|
-0.080370
|
S.D. dependent var
|
0.087023
|
S.E. of regression
|
0.090452
|
Akaike info criterion
|
-1.733039
|
Sum squared resid
|
0.122723
|
Schwarz criterion
|
-1.434604
|
Log likelihood
|
24.19690
|
Hannan-Quinn criter.
|
-1.668271
|
F-statistic
|
0.702435
|
Durbin-Watson stat
|
1.968940
|
Prob(F-statistic)
|
0.630278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure II.5.2 : output du test CUSUM
Figure II.5.3 : output du test
CUSUMSQ
Tableau II.6 : les données
utilisées pour l'estimation
Année
|
Taux de chômage
|
Taux d'inflation
|
1990
|
52,6
|
874,5
|
1991
|
49,4
|
2641,9
|
1992
|
56,3
|
2989,6
|
1993
|
68,7
|
4651,7
|
1994
|
67
|
9796,9
|
1995
|
69,2
|
370,3
|
1996
|
62,8
|
693
|
1997
|
53,6
|
13,7
|
1998
|
57,2
|
134,8
|
1999
|
64,2
|
483,7
|
2000
|
66,9
|
511,2
|
2001
|
49
|
135,1
|
2002
|
49,1
|
15,8
|
2003
|
48,5
|
4,4
|
2004
|
45,4
|
9,8
|
2005
|
49,4
|
21,3
|
2006
|
48,2
|
18,2
|
2007
|
47,2
|
9,96
|
2008
|
53,2
|
27,57
|
2009
|
60,8
|
53,4
|
2010
|
50,1
|
9,8
|
2011
|
51,4
|
23,4
|
Source: Banque Centrale Du Congo, Rapports Annuels (2009, 2010 et
2011) et Condencés des Informations Statistiques (2007).
Graphique II.3- Ajustement entre l'inflation et le
chômage
|
|