0.4. CHOICE AND INTEREST OF THE SUBJECT
The justification of this study lies primarily in the
comparative analysis of the economic costs relating to the care of paludism on
the effective expenditure of the households against this disease.
The choice of the subject of research is judicious, insofar as
the variation of the household expenses, due to the income per capita of
inhabitant who is difficult to determine, can negatively influence the quality
of care of health.Moreover, nonthe urbanization, erosions, the holes, water
stagnated, the localization on the hill of the district where our choice is
carried are projecting facts of our study.
0.5. DELIMITATION OF THE SUBJECT
December 2010;period of reproduction of the anophèles
because large rains.
Compared to space, our study relates to only households which
suffered from paludism which lives with district MBUKU in the commune of
KISENSO.
0.6. GROUNDWORK OF WORK
Except, the introduction and the conclusion, work is divided
into three chapters. The first door on the general information; the second
speaks about the policy and of the system of health in RDC and third is devoted
to the empirical checking of the cost of the care of health against
paludism.
| 
