4.5 Marketing Margin Analysis for Agroforestry wood
products
Marketing margins are the differences between prices at two
market levels. Margins represent the price charged by marketing agencies for
all services provided including buying, transportation, storage and processing.
In order to measure marketing margins, data on wood and wood-product prices
were obtained at different stages in the marketing chain. Marketing margins
depend upon the length of the marketing chain and the extent to which the
product is marketed. It was investigated that marketing chain is not so longer;
only three intermediaries were involved in the marketing of agroforestry
products in the study area.
4.5.1 Marketing Costs
Marketing costs consists of the total costs incurred on
marketing of product by each agency. One way of defining costs is all of the
expenses incurred in organizing and carrying out the marketing process. Another
definition is the charges, which are paid for any marketing activity such as,
loading unloading, transportation, market taxes, storage and assembling. The
most important factors which influence marketing costs are distance between
production and consumption market.
4.5.2 Net Margin
The net margin of a specific agency is the net earning, which
it gains after paying all marketing costs. The net profit margin of the
agroforestry producers was calculated on a per 40 kg basis as the sale price of
the wood, less production costs of wood producers. The net profit margins of
collection Local Assembler/Saw-mill/Retailer were calculated as sale price of
wood in the market minus purchase price and marketing costs.
Table 4.2 Marketing Margins of Acacia nilotica
(Babul) Products (Rs per 40 K
Middlemen
|
Products purchased
|
Products sold
|
Price paid
|
Marketing Cost
|
Price received
|
Net Margin
|
Local Assembler
|
Logs from block plantation
|
Mining props, timber & firewood
|
50
|
17
|
83
|
15
|
Logs from
shelterbelt and
scattered trees
|
Mining props, timber & firewood
|
63
|
17
|
88
|
07
|
Contract agent
|
Mining Pit
props
|
Mining Pit props
|
83
|
15
|
103
|
5
|
Saw mill
|
Timber logs
|
Timber
&
firewood
|
103
|
16
|
130
|
11
|
Retailer
|
Firewood
|
Firewood
|
77
|
6
|
92
|
9
|
Table 4.2 presents that average price Rs 50 paid by Local
assembler per 40 kg of wood logs of Acacia nilotica block owner and it
was estimated that Rs 17 was spent as marketing costs, which included cutting,
loading unloading and transportation, from the block plantation price received
Rs 83 per 40 kg, which was weighted average price based on the percentage of
wood products sold by the Local Assembler, his net margin was Rs 15 per 40 kg,
apart from that he also purchased Scattered and Shelterbelts trees and paid
price Rs 63, where he made marketing costs per 40 kg, including cutting,
loading-unloading and transportation Rs 17, and he received price Rs 88 per 40
kg, which was weighted average price of the product sold and thus he took Rs 7
as net margin per 40 kg. Contract agent of mining props purchased props for Rs
83 per 40 kg and sold to coal mine for Rs 103 per 40 kg, where his expenditure
at transportation only, was Rs 15 per 40 kg, thus his net margin was Rs 5 per
40 kg. Saw mill purchased timber logs for Rs 103 per 40 kg, after processing he
sold processed timber (Essyoon, Pawa Takhta/ Phata etc) and fire-wood
(wastage/small pieces) at weighted price of Rs 130 per 40 kg, his marketing
cost, includes transportation only Rs 16 per 40 kg, where net margin took by
saw mill owner was Rs 11 per 40 kg. From findings of field survey the retailer,
that deals with fire-wood only, purchased fire-wood from Local Assembler as
well as from Saw-mill at Rs 77 per 40 kg and sold to restaurants and households
at Rs 92 per 40 kg, where his marketing cost was Rs 6 per 40 kg, thus his net
margin was Rs 9 per 40 kg.
Note that the prices were calculated on average per 40 kg
basis and only explicit costs of each intermediary were calculated, but labor
working, monthly rent as well as investment costs were not calculated.
Table 4.3 Marketing Margins of Eucalyptus
camaldulensis Products (Rs per 40 K
Middlemen
|
Products purchased
|
Products sold
|
Price paid
|
Marketing Cost
|
Price received
|
Net Margin
|
Local Assembler
|
Logs from
shelterbelt and
scattered trees
|
Mining props, timber & firewood
|
61
|
17
|
85
|
7
|
Contract agent
|
Mining Pit
props
|
Mining Pit props
|
83
|
15
|
103
|
5
|
Saw mill
|
Timber logs
|
Timber
&
firewood
|
95
|
16
|
121
|
10
|
Retailer
|
Firewood
|
Firewood
|
77
|
6
|
92
|
9
|
The information on the margins of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
products are presented in Table 4.3. The results show the average price of
Rs 61 per 40 kg was paid by Local Assembler to the Eucalyptus
camaldulensis producer, where he made marketing costs Rs 17 per 40 kg,
that included cutting, loading- unloading and transportation, he received price
Rs 85 per 40 kg, which was weighted average price of the product sold (mining
props, timber and fire-wood), thus his net margin was Rs 7 per 40 kg. Mining
props purchased by contract agent for Rs 83 per 40 kg and sold to coal mine for
Rs 103 per 40 kg, where his expenditure on transportation only, was Rs 15 per
40 kg, thus his net margin calculated was Rs 5 per 40 kg. Saw mill purchased
timber logs from Local Assembler for Rs 103 per 40 kg, after processing saw
mill owner sold processed timber (Beams, Wooden crates, Takhta etc) and
fire-wood (wastage/small pieces) at weighted price of Rs 121 per 40 kg, his
marketing cost, including transportation and processing was Rs 16 per 40 kg,
where net margin took by saw mill owner was Rs 10 per 40 kg. In case of wood
retailer, he dealt with fire-wood only, from findings of field survey the
retailer purchased fire-wood from Local Assembler as well as from Saw-mill at
Rs 77 per
40 kg and sold to bakers, restaurants and households at Rs 92 per
40 kg, where his marketing cost was Rs 6 per 40 kg, thus his net margin was Rs
9 per 40 kg.
Note that the prices were calculated on average per 40 kg
basis and only explicit costs of each intermediary were calculated, but labor
working, monthly rent as well as investment costs were not calculated.
|