WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Panmobilism and optimism in teilhardian humanism

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Denis Ghislain MBESSA
Université de Yaoundé I - D.E.A 2009
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

2.2.4.1. Omega: the unity of the multiple

The notion of creative union is central to Teilhard de Chardin's entire system of thought. In effect, here lies the basis of his consideration of @Panmobilism'. Creative union is the theory that leads us to such a collectivisation of humankind, what he calls Hominisation as he says:

The coalescence of elements and the coalescence of stems, the spherical geometry of the earth and psychical curvature of the mind harmonising to counterbalance the individual and the collective forces of dispersion in the world and to impose unification - there at last we find the spring and secret of hominisation.2

Individual forces and even collective forces of dispersal are being harmonised through the gathering of the elements of the earth in order to bring forth unification which is finally the work of Hominisation.

From such a metaphysical framework, Teilhard de Chardin laid the foundation of the Civilization of the Universal, the Pan-human-mobilism, where the problem of the One and the Many was considered in terms of real men and women. As he says:

I find that the one great problem of the one and the manifold is rapidly beginning to emerge from the over-metaphysical context in which I used to state it and look for its solutions. I can now see more clearly that its urgency and its difficulties must be expressed in terms of real men and women.3

I Id.

2 Ibid., p. 243.

3 Pierre Teilhard de Chardin in Cuénot, C., Teilhard de Chardin, London, I965, p. 377.

Pan- human-mobilism is a convergence that synthesizes the One and the Many. More than this, in Teilhardian metaphysics, however, love in unifying, ultra-personalizes. Thus Teilhard de Chardin's Cosmo-mysticism falls in line with the demands of established Christian mysticism and this was the core of his own spiritual life.

If evolution progresses, it must progress along the lines of this increased personalization, that is, it must culminate in Omega Point.I Even as a cell is more than the sum of its molecules, or a plant more than the sum of its cells, so too is Omega more than the sum of its persons. Teilhard de Chardin catalogues four necessary and novel attributes of this Omega Point:2

I. Actuality: Omega is neither an ideal nor a potential, but is rather, 'present' and 'real'. Though it arises out of the Noosphere, it has its own ontological reality like consciousness which arose out of the biosphere but has its own reality.

2. Irreversibility: Each of the thresholds we have encountered has proven to be irreversible, a once for all event that may be destroyed but cannot be undone. For example, thought can be destroyed if humanity destroys itself, but will not be undone apart from such a cataclysm. Omega however, escapes from even the potential of destruction by escaping totally from the forces of decay. Because of this it inspires hope and action and leads us to deduce a third attribute:

3. Autonomy: Omega is the terminus of evolution, the point on the top of the pyramid of space and time. As such, it transcends both space and time. We saw radial energy progressively gaining increased liberation from tangential decay. At Omega Point, tangential energy is shed completely. Though the earth will, in keeping with entropy, one day perish, the Omega Point will not.

I See appendix I and appendix II.

2 Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, The Phenomenon of Man, New York, I959, pp. 267-272.

Teilhard de Chardin says: "Omega must be independent of the collapse of the forces with which evolution is woven."'

4. Transcendence: Looked at from the historical process, Omega "only reveals half of itself,» says Teilhard de Chardin. "While being the last term of its series it is also outside all series. Not only does it crown, but it closes."2 Escaping time and space, Omega is able to be simultaneously present at all times and at all spaces. Here is the great secret of evolution, long hidden but now revealed: Omega is the Prime Mover ahead.3 The radial energy of evolution, what we have learned is really love, has been all along the attraction of Point Omega.

The stability of the universe is not found in ever smaller units but in the highest and most complex of phenomena: in life, in consciousness, in Omega. Omega finally transcends and unifies the whole universe; it "escapes from entropy and does so more and more.»4

Because Omega has actuality humanity will not just unite in Omega, but will unite with Omega and so will humanity achieve its own liberation from entropy.5

Teilhard de Chardin is in love with the concept of Omega, his tone switching to one of hushed reverence and sensual delight when he speaks of it. For him actually, Omega was more than a concept; it was, in fact, personal, a someone, and as a someone, it could be loved. Omega is the personalization of the whole universe, the spiritual face of the world. As the combination of both the universal and the personal, it is the

I Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Op. cit., p.270.

2 Id.

3 Ibid., p. 27I. We note here that the concept of Prime Mover is given to us by Aristotle in his Metaphysics.

4 Id.

5 Ibid., pp.27I-272. Teilhard de Chardin describes how, once the critical point of reflection was crossed, a polar shift occurred. The reflexive center is able to center itself in Omega which makes death into something entirely new. "By death, in the animal, the radial is reabsorbed into the Teilhard tangential, while in man it escapes and is liberated from it. It escapes from entropy by turning back to Omega: the Hominisation of death itself."

60 fulfillment of the Spirit of the earth anticipated in Noo genesis. And, for, Teilhard de Chardin, it was still more.

In the epilogue to The Phenomenon of Man as well as in a host of other essays, Teilhard de Chardin equates Omega with Christ. He believed that he arrived at the personal Omega without deviating from his strictly phenomenological approach to reality. However, in his epilogue, Teilhard de Chardin cannot help but connect this vision with his own Christianity. In Teilhard's mind, the different spheres of knowledge: science, mysticism, philosophy, religion taken to their utmost, meet in this one point of God-Omega. In inquiry as in cosmic evolution, "Everything that rises must converge."' The equation of Omega with Christ has the effect of christifying the whole universe. The entire evolutionary event can be imagined as a cone: Cosmo genesis blending into biogenesis blending into anthropo genesis blending into Noo genesis and finally Christo genesis reaching its peak at Omega.2 Bernard TOWERS comments:

Superimposed, then, on what Teilhard called the Noosphere, there is the beginning of the Christosphere. `Christogenesis' is the process through which all men will come to share in, to form part of, the Mystical Body of Christ. And men will bring with them all the rest of that world of nature in which our human nature is inextricably bound up. Christogenesis constitutes the last stage of the evolutionary process.3

2.2.4.2. Cosmogenesis and Noogenesis

The universe is a totum in which each element is positively weaved with all the others. Man does not live in a world already arranged, but in a world which is in transformation, in progress. Commenting Teilhard de Chardin, Claude CUENOT says that this vision of the world is what is considered as Cosmogenesis:

I Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, The Future of Man, New York, I964, p. I92.

2 In an interesting twist on the concept of Christo genesis, Teilhard sees the Church as the most significant shoot of the Noosphere, a 'phylum of love' that leads the advance towards Christification, which is identical with the revelation of the mystical body of Christ.

3 Bernard TOWERS, Concerning Teilhard, London, I969, p. 49.

o L'évenement le plus considérable qui se soit déroulé a la surface de la terre, c'est que nous prenons graduellement conscience du fait que le monde est en mouvement. Dans l'ensemble, l'homme avait vécu avec l'idée qu'il appartenait a un systeme déjà tout arrangé oil il se trouvait placé. Or, c'est ce systeme let qui est en train de se mettre en mouvement dans un sens d'organisation. Ce passage d'un monde conçu comme arrangé a un monde conçu comme en voie d'arrangement, c'est le passage d'une vision en cosmos a une vision en cosmogénese. »1

Cosmo genesis is the birth and the development of the Cosmos. In the Teilhardian system, it refers to the primary stage of evolution. At this stage, the universe presents itself in the Biosphere with three important elements: Matter, Energy and Life. The world of beasts, the world of forces, and the world of stones is the Biosphere. The concept of Cosmo genesis brings forth the idea of evolution, transformism. Gradually, the universe is moving towards the Noosphere because evolution in Teilhardian metaphysics is matter serving the spirit. The material world of the Biosphere is gradually developing to reach the Noosphere, a world of complexification of human intelligence.

Teilhard de Chardin believed that in the movement of convergence, there is within us and around us, a continual heightening of consciousness in the universe. The term "Noo genesis" was coined by Teilhard de Chardin. It means the growth or development of consciousness, the coming into being of the Noosphere. Noosphere is defined as the sphere or stage of evolutionary development characterized by the emergence or dominance of consciousness, the mind, and interpersonal relationships. Noo genesis is the birth and development of the Noosphere, a world of high level of

I Claude Cuénot, Teilhard de Chardin, écrivain de toujours, Paris, I938, p. 7I. The most important event which has occurred at the surface of the earth is that gradually, we are becoming conscious of the fact that the world is in progress. Generally, for so long, man has lived with the idea that he was part of a system already arranged and where he just happened to find himself. In fact, it is that system which is in movement in an orderly manner. The passage from the conception that the world is already arranged to the conception that the world is in progress leads us to Cosmo genesis.

62 development of consciousness. For the Jesuit priest, this theory because of the novelty it brings along is not yet established as a stronghold in the scientific field:

For a century and a half the science of physics, preoccupied with analytical researches, was dominated by the idea of the dissipation of energy and the disintegration of matter. Being now called upon by biology to consider the effects of synthesis, it is beginning to perceive that, parallel with the phenomenon of corpuscular disintegration, the Universe historically displays a second process as generalised and fundamental as the first: I mean that of the gradual concentration of its physico-chemical elements in nuclei of increasing complexity, each succeeding stage of material concentration and differentiation being accompanied by a more advanced form of spontaneity and spiritual energy. The outflowing flood of Entropy equalled and offset by the rising tide of a Noogenesis...! The greater and more revolutionary an idea, the more does it encounter resistance at its inception. Despite the number and importance of the facts that it explains, the theory of Noogenesis is still far from having established itself as a stronghold in the scientific field.'

Nevertheless, despite this resistance, Teilhard de Chardin is confident with the fact that the theory of the Noo genesis is going to yield the awaited fruits. The first result is that it will bring about the automatic convergence of the two opposed forms of worship into which the religious impulse of Mankind is divided, namely, those who believe in the world on one hand and those who believe in God on the other.

In effect, after accepting the reality of a Noo genesis, those who believe in this World will find themselves compelled to allow increasing room, in their vision of the future, for values of personalisation and transcendency:

Of Personalisation because a Universe in process of psychic concentration is identical with a Universe that is acquiring a personality. And of transcendency because the ultimate stage of 'cosmic' personalisation, if it is to be supremely coherent and unifying, cannot be conceived otherwise than as emerging at the summit of the elements it super-personalises in uniting them to itself.2

I Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, The Future of Man, New York, I964, p. 78. 2 Ibid., p. 79.

Teilhard de Chardin's vision is a vision of the entire cosmos, matter as well as spirit, ultimately christified.I Omega occurs as a kind of transfiguration: the cataclysmic end of material reality as we presently know it and the birth of Omega, absolute consciousness. Cosmos becomes Christos as the Cartesian dualism of subject/object is left behind once and for all in the ultimate personalization of the universe.2

And so Teilhard de Chardin comes to the end of the drama of evolution, a unified picture of ascent from the first quarks all the way up to the cosmic body of Christ. For him, this vision has become a creed and he sums it up well in the following poem:

I believe that the universe is an evolution.

I believe that evolution proceeds towards spirit.

I believe that spirit is fully realized in a form of personality.

I believe that the supremely personal is the universal Christ.3

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Il faudrait pour le bonheur des états que les philosophes fussent roi ou que les rois fussent philosophes"   Platon