WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Les effets de la politique budgétaire sur la croissance économique en république démocratique du Congo. "Volet dépenses publiques" de 1985 à  2015.

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Reagan Protais MUFAUME MULANGWA
Université de Kinshasa - Diplôme dà¢â‚¬â„¢Etudes Supérieures Spécialisées (DESS) 2016
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Extinction Rebellion
A Niveau

Null Hypothesis: LDFONCT has a unit root

Exogenous: None

 
 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=7)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-0.193296

 0.6082

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-2.644302

 
 

5% level

 

-1.952473

 
 

10% level

 

-1.610211

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(LDFONCT)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 07/26/16 Time: 15:04

 

Sample (adjusted): 1986 2015

 

Included observations: 30 afteradjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LDFONCT(-1)

-0.000545

0.002820

-0.193296

0.8481

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Après différence 1ère

Null Hypothesis: DLDFONCT has a unit root

Exogenous: None

 
 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=7)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-7.631884

 0.0000

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-2.647120

 
 

5% level

 

-1.952910

 
 

10% level

 

-1.610011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(DLDFONCT)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 07/26/16 Time: 15:10

 

Sample (adjusted): 1987 2015

 

Included observations: 29 afteradjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DLDFONCT(-1)

-1.350792

0.176993

-7.631884

0.0000

c) Log Dépenses d'Investissement : Linv

A Niveau

Null Hypothesis: LINV has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant

 
 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=7)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-3.570594

 0.0127

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-3.670170

 
 

5% level

 

-2.963972

 
 

10% level

 

-2.621007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(LINV)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 07/26/16 Time: 15:13

 

Sample (adjusted): 1986 2015

 

Included observations: 30 afteradjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LINV(-1)

-0.622867

0.174444

-3.570594

0.0013

C

1.393495

0.407574

3.419000

0.0019

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

d) Log Corruption

A Niveau

Null Hypothesis: LCORR has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend

 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=7)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-3.132599

 0.1173

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-4.296729

 
 

5% level

 

-3.568379

 
 

10% level

 

-3.218382

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(LCORR)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 08/01/16 Time: 12:27

 

Sample (adjusted): 1986 2015

 

Included observations: 30 afteradjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LCORR(-1)

-0.542481

0.173173

-3.132599

0.0041

C

1.265978

0.408228

3.101156

0.0045

@TREND(1985)

-0.006300

0.002434

-2.588454

0.0153

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Après Différence 1ère

Null Hypothesis: DLCORR has a unit root

 

Exogenous: None

 
 

Lag Length: 1 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=7)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-6.509666

 0.0000

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-2.650145

 
 

5% level

 

-1.953381

 
 

10% level

 

-1.609798

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(DLCORR)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 08/01/16 Time: 12:34

 

Sample (adjusted): 1988 2015

 

Included observations: 28 afteradjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DLCORR(-1)

-1.549590

0.238045

-6.509666

0.0000

D(DLCORR(-1))

0.526313

0.167030

3.151017

0.0041

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

3. ESTIMATION PAR MCO

Modèle I

Dependent Variable: LTXCR

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 10/29/16 Time: 17:29

 

Sample (adjusted): 1987 2015

 

Included observations: 15 afteradjustments

Convergence achievedafter 52 iterations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

0.438497

1.905486

0.230124

0.8231

DLDEXT

-0.156192

0.513394

-0.304234

0.7679

DLDFONCT

-0.050589

0.589856

-0.085765

0.9335

LINV

0.581122

0.737898

0.787537

0.4512

DLCORR

-1.809516

1.144973

-1.580401

0.1485

AR(1)

1.546183

0.578481

2.672834

0.0255

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.458704

    Meandependent var

1.611605

Adjusted R-squared

0.157984

    S.D. dependent var

0.737553

S.E. of regression

0.676790

    Akaike info criterion

2.346262

Sumsquaredresid

4.122397

    Schwarz criterion

2.629482

Log likelihood

-11.59696

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

2.343245

F-statistic

1.525351

    Durbin-Watson stat

1.621474

Prob(F-statistic)

0.273934

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Modèle II

Dependent Variable: LTXCR

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 10/29/16 Time: 17:43

 

Sample (adjusted): 1987 2015

 

Included observations: 15 afteradjustments

Convergence achievedafter 109 iterations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

-971.0400

5082072.

-0.000191

0.9999

DLDEXT

-0.104211

0.620297

-0.168002

0.8699

LINV

0.166882

1.074690

0.155284

0.8797

DLCORR

-1.783192

1.478344

-1.206209

0.2555

AR(1)

0.999894

0.555995

1.798388

0.1023

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.410395

    Meandependent var

1.611605

Adjusted R-squared

0.174553

    S.D. dependent var

0.737553

S.E. of regression

0.670098

    Akaike info criterion

2.298415

Sumsquaredresid

4.490307

    Schwarz criterion

2.534431

Log likelihood

-12.23811

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

2.295900

F-statistic

1.740127

    Durbin-Watson stat

0.989953

Prob(F-statistic)

0.217464

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Modèle III

Dependent Variable: LTXCR

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 10/31/16 Time: 17:25

 

Sample (adjusted): 1987 2015

 

Included observations: 15 afteradjustments

Convergence achievedafter 10 iterations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

2.030455

0.779553

2.604641

0.0245

DLDEXT

-0.110993

0.497730

-0.222999

0.8276

DLCORR

-1.740160

1.190569

-1.461620

0.1718

AR(1)

1.297455

0.496899

2.611104

0.0242

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.428672

    Meandependent var

1.611605

Adjusted R-squared

0.272855

    S.D. dependent var

0.737553

S.E. of regression

0.628932

    Akaike info criterion

2.133592

Sumsquaredresid

4.351113

    Schwarz criterion

2.322405

Log likelihood

-12.00194

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

2.131581

F-statistic

2.751129

    Durbin-Watson stat

1.125338

Prob(F-statistic)

0.093095

 
 
 


Modèle IV

Dependent Variable: LTXCR

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 10/31/16 Time: 18:20

 

Sample (adjusted): 1987 2015

 

Included observations: 15 afteradjustments

Convergence achievedafter 4 iterations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

2.047845

0.777087

2.635285

0.0218

DLCORR

-1.800103

1.120816

-1.606065

0.1342

AR(1)

1.284825

0.454245

2.828486

0.0152

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.425967

    Meandependent var

1.611605

Adjusted R-squared

0.330295

    S.D. dependent var

0.737553

S.E. of regression

0.603581

    Akaike info criterion

2.004982

Sumsquaredresid

4.371714

    Schwarz criterion

2.146592

Log likelihood

-12.03737

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

2.003474

F-statistic

4.452358

    Durbin-Watson stat

1.234667

Prob(F-statistic)

0.035778

 
 
 

4. ESTIMATION PAR GMM

Modèle I

Dependent Variable: LTXCR

 
 

Method: Generalized Method of Moments

 

Date: 07/30/16 Time: 20:11

 

Sample (adjusted): 1987 2015

 

Included observations: 15 afteradjustments

Sequential 1-step weighting matrix & coefficient iteration

Estimation weighting matrix: HAC (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed

        bandwidth = 3.0000)

 

Standard errors & covariance computed using estimation weighting

        Matrix

 
 

Convergence achievedafter 17 iterations

Instrument specification: DLDEXT DLDFONCT LINV DLCORR

Constant added to instrument list

 

Lagged dependent variable &regressors added to instrument list

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DLDEXT

-0.044811

0.130383

-0.343690

0.7382

DLDFONCT

0.017087

0.124112

0.137676

0.8932

LINV

0.793033

0.087713

9.041265

0.0000

DLCORR

-1.531804

0.712394

-2.150221

0.0570

AR(1)

1.320561

0.356069

3.708725

0.0040

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.434905

    Meandependent var

1.611605

Adjusted R-squared

0.208868

    S.D. dependent var

0.737553

S.E. of regression

0.656021

    Sumsquaredresid

4.303641

Durbin-Watson stat

1.612781

    J-statistic

3.570737

Instrument rank

10

    Prob(J-statistic)

0.612712

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Modèle II

5. TESTS STATISTIQUES

Test de Normalité/ Modèle IV estimé par MCO

Test de Normalité/ Modèle III estimé par GMM

Test d'Homoscédasticité (Test de White)/ Modèle IV estimé par MCO

Heteroskedasticity Test: White

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

F-statistic

40.04501

    Prob. F(2,12)

0.0000

Obs*R-squared

13.04539

    Prob. Chi-Square(2)

0.0015

Scaledexplained SS

13.33007

    Prob. Chi-Square(2)

0.0013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Test Equation:

 
 

Dependent Variable: RESID^2

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 11/07/16 Time: 20:18

 

Sample: 1987 2015

 
 

Included observations: 15

 
 

Collinear test regressors dropped from specification

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

-0.029494

0.076209

-0.387019

0.7055

GRADF_02^2

-1.153875

1.926733

-0.598876

0.5604

GRADF_03^2

1.445558

0.161877

8.929975

0.0000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.869693

    Meandependent var

0.291448

Adjusted R-squared

0.847975

    S.D. dependent var

0.539082

S.E. of regression

0.210190

    Akaike info criterion

-0.104751

Sumsquaredresid

0.530159

    Schwarz criterion

0.036859

Log likelihood

3.785634

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

-0.106260

F-statistic

40.04501

    Durbin-Watson stat

1.267808

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000005

 
 
 


Test de Stabilité (Test de Cusum)/ Modèle IV estimé par MCO

précédent sommaire suivant






Extinction Rebellion





Changeons ce systeme injuste, Soyez votre propre syndic





"Les esprits médiocres condamnent d'ordinaire tout ce qui passe leur portée"   François de la Rochefoucauld