WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Le système financier face au développement économique de la RDC de 1980 à  2013. Quelle efficacité du système financier ?

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Justin ABUDI
Université Catholique du Congo - Licence 2016
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

ANNEXES

BASE DES DONNEES

Année

DPT

INST

PFN

PIBHB

TXINFL

CDRT

1980

0,672

1

7,901

613,644

36,8

0,0041

1981

0,583

1

8,807

612,006

40,9

0,0044

1982

0,700

1

10,783

594,009

35,3

0,0045

1983

0,482

0

72,372

587,424

100,8

0,0062

1984

1,012

0

6,618

604,202

33,4

0,0130

1985

0,771

0

6,897

590,935

26,5

0,0160

1986

0,928

0

8,066

601,881

32,8

0,0153

1987

1,535

0

8,784

600,599

99,5

0,0189

1988

3,142

0

10,565

585,571

121,5

0,0155

1989

1,417

1

8,519

559,760

95,8

0,0385

1990

0,788

1

12,890

505,049

233,2

0,1175

1991

0,396

1

15,214

445,366

3644,9

0,0197

1992

0,301

1

15,843

383,046

2989,6

0,0031

1993

0,770

1

30,679

318,545

4651,7

0,0048

1994

0,000

1

8,401

294,950

9796,9

0,0031

1995

0,166

0

6,741

287,301

370,3

3,1386

1996

0,236

1

7,450

276,232

693

1,4515

1997

0,093

0

4,200

254,085

13,7

0,6058

1998

1,009

1

8,460

243,992

134,8

9,8398

1999

0,000

0

7,550

227,881

483,7

0,0000

2000

0,105

1

15,177

206,567

511,2

0,8800

2001

0,166

0

4,844

196,502

135,1

0,7392

2002

0,115

0

4,857

196,252

15,8

0,0311

2003

0,109

0

5,416

200,775

4,4

0,0142

2004

0,634

1

8,095

207,547

9

0,0978

2005

0,261

1

7,780

213,310

21,5

0,2893

2006

0,524

0

9,981

217,535

18,2

4,5116

2007

0,885

0

12,280

223,780

9,9

5,4085

2008

1,509

0

15,076

230,119

27,6

9,1708

2009

1,084

1

16,366

229,142

53,4

6,0565

2010

0,809

0

16,364

237,572

9,8

6,8236

2011

1,135

1

16,029

245,869

15,4

8,4213

2012

0,622

1

16,935

255,208

2,7

6,2969

2013

0,744

0

15,630

268,277

1,03

7,1271

ANNEXES

A. STATIONNARITE

A.1. Pibhb

Null Hypothesis: PIBHB has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend

 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

 0.656093

 0.9993

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-4.262735

 
 

5% level

 

-3.552973

 
 

10% level

 

-3.209642

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(PIBHB)

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 20:58

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 2 34

 
 

Included observations: 33 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PIBHB(-1)

0.032181

0.049050

0.656093

0.5168

C

-45.92640

31.73640

-1.447121

0.1582

@TREND(1)

1.394878

0.851608

1.637935

0.1119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.165915

Mean dependent var

-10.46566

Adjusted R-squared

0.110309

S.D. dependent var

22.05590

S.E. of regression

20.80388

Akaike info criterion

8.994665

Sum squared resid

12984.05

Schwarz criterion

9.130711

Log likelihood

-145.4120

Hannan-Quinn criter.

9.040440

F-statistic

2.983771

Durbin-Watson stat

0.512607

Prob(F-statistic)

0.065790

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Null Hypothesis: D(PIBHB) has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend

 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-2.185354

 0.4812

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-4.273277

 
 

5% level

 

-3.557759

 
 

10% level

 

-3.212361

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(PIBHB,2)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 20:58

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 3 34

 
 

Included observations: 32 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

D(PIBHB(-1))

-0.261721

0.119761

-2.185354

0.0371

C

-9.741193

6.043473

-1.611854

0.1178

@TREND(1)

0.415384

0.280787

1.479360

0.1498

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.155336

Mean dependent var

0.459607

Adjusted R-squared

0.097083

S.D. dependent var

14.41126

S.E. of regression

13.69386

Akaike info criterion

8.160832

Sum squared resid

5438.130

Schwarz criterion

8.298244

Log likelihood

-127.5733

Hannan-Quinn criter.

8.206380

F-statistic

2.666584

Durbin-Watson stat

1.898732

Prob(F-statistic)

0.086481

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Null Hypothesis: D(PIBHB,2) has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend

 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-5.834472

 0.0002

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-4.284580

 
 

5% level

 

-3.562882

 
 

10% level

 

-3.215267

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(PIBHB,3)

 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 20:58

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 4 34

 
 

Included observations: 31 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

D(PIBHB(-1),2)

-1.080072

0.185119

-5.834472

0.0000

C

-1.172044

5.974613

-0.196171

0.8459

@TREND(1)

0.122363

0.298013

0.410595

0.6845

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.549320

Mean dependent var

0.648049

Adjusted R-squared

0.517129

S.D. dependent var

21.20126

S.E. of regression

14.73253

Akaike info criterion

8.309759

Sum squared resid

6077.332

Schwarz criterion

8.448532

Log likelihood

-125.8013

Hannan-Quinn criter.

8.354996

F-statistic

17.06417

Durbin-Watson stat

1.927870

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000014

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Null Hypothesis: DPT has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant

 
 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-3.056490

 0.0400

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-3.646342

 
 

5% level

 

-2.954021

 
 

10% level

 

-2.615817

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 

A.2. Depot

Null Hypothesis: DPT has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant

 
 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-3.056490

 0.0400

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-3.646342

 
 

5% level

 

-2.954021

 
 

10% level

 

-2.615817

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(DPT)

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 21:00

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 2 34

 
 

Included observations: 33 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DPT(-1)

-0.463212

0.151550

-3.056490

0.0046

C

0.324465

0.140031

2.317090

0.0273

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.231573

Mean dependent var

0.002206

Adjusted R-squared

0.206785

S.D. dependent var

0.594396

S.E. of regression

0.529385

Akaike info criterion

1.624490

Sum squared resid

8.687702

Schwarz criterion

1.715188

Log likelihood

-24.80409

Hannan-Quinn criter.

1.655007

F-statistic

9.342131

Durbin-Watson stat

2.019304

Prob(F-statistic)

0.004581

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A.3. Profondeur financière

Null Hypothesis: PFN has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend

 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-5.565672

 0.0004

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-4.262735

 
 

5% level

 

-3.552973

 
 

10% level

 

-3.209642

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(PFN)

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 21:01

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 2 34

 
 

Included observations: 33 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PFN(-1)

-1.013296

0.182062

-5.565672

0.0000

C

15.73148

5.148519

3.055535

0.0047

@TREND(1)

-0.160320

0.224923

-0.712780

0.4815

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.508027

Mean dependent var

0.234211

Adjusted R-squared

0.475229

S.D. dependent var

16.86156

S.E. of regression

12.21470

Akaike info criterion

7.929665

Sum squared resid

4475.967

Schwarz criterion

8.065711

Log likelihood

-127.8395

Hannan-Quinn criter.

7.975441

F-statistic

15.48947

Durbin-Watson stat

2.008222

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000024

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


A.4. Taux d'inflation

Null Hypothesis: TXINFL has a unit root

 

Exogenous: None

 
 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-3.159252

 0.0025

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-2.634731

 
 

5% level

 

-1.951000

 
 

10% level

 

-1.610907

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(TXINFL)

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 21:51

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 2 35

 
 

Included observations: 34 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

TXINFL(-1)

-0.464428

0.147006

-3.159252

0.0034

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.232216

Mean dependent var

-1.045294

Adjusted R-squared

0.232216

S.D. dependent var

1992.873

S.E. of regression

1746.220

Akaike info criterion

17.79727

Sum squared resid

1.01E+08

Schwarz criterion

17.84216

Log likelihood

-301.5535

Hannan-Quinn criter.

17.81257

Durbin-Watson stat

2.166439

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A.5. Investissement (INV)

Null Hypothesis: D(INV) has a unit root

 

Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend

 

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=0)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

t-Statistic

  Prob.*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic

-4.643400

 0.0041

Test critical values:

1% level

 

-4.273277

 
 

5% level

 

-3.557759

 
 

10% level

 

-3.212361

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

B. COINTEGRATION

B.1. Détermination du lag optimal

VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria

 
 
 

Endogenous variables: DDPIBHB DINV DPT CDRT TXINFL PFN 

 

Exogenous variables: C 

 
 
 

Date: 06/17/16 Time: 19:42

 
 
 

Sample: 1 35

 
 
 
 

Included observations: 29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Lag

LogL

LR

FPE

AIC

SC

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

0

-650.9959

NA 

 1.92e+12

 45.31006

  45.59295*

1

-604.6929

 70.25289

 1.00e+12

 44.59951

 46.57973

2

-574.6654

 33.13379

 2.15e+12

 45.01141

 48.68896

3

-500.6830

  51.02237*

  4.88e+11*

  42.39193*

 47.76682

 
 
 
 
 
 

B.2. Analyse de la causalité par le test de granger

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 21:05

Sample: 1 35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Null Hypothesis:

Obs

F-Statistic

Prob. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 DPT does not Granger Cause DDPIBHB

 31

 5.08979

0.0321

 DDPIBHB does not Granger Cause DPT

 0.02370

0.8788

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PFN does not Granger Cause DDPIBHB

 31

 6.67955

0.0153

 DDPIBHB does not Granger Cause PFN

 2.89365

0.1000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 TXINFL does not Granger Cause DDPIBHB

 31

 5.48367

0.0265

 DDPIBHB does not Granger Cause TXINFL

 5.87536

0.0221

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 INST does not Granger Cause DDPIBHB

 31

 0.19834

0.6595

 DDPIBHB does not Granger Cause INST

 1.66137

0.2080

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PFN does not Granger Cause DPT

 33

 0.07622

0.7844

 DPT does not Granger Cause PFN

 0.09131

0.7646

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 TXINFL does not Granger Cause DPT

 33

 0.96629

0.3335

 DPT does not Granger Cause TXINFL

 0.14443

0.7066

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 INST does not Granger Cause DPT

 33

 8.02142

0.0082

 DPT does not Granger Cause INST

 0.69650

0.4106

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 TXINFL does not Granger Cause PFN

 33

 0.04314

0.8369

 PFN does not Granger Cause TXINFL

 1.91483

0.1766

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 INST does not Granger Cause PFN

 33

 1.85640

0.1832

 PFN does not Granger Cause INST

 0.11382

0.7382

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 INST does not Granger Cause TXINFL

 33

 1.15297

0.2915

 TXINFL does not Granger Cause INST

 0.00015

0.9902

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


B.3. Estimation par le MCO

Dependent Variable: DDPIBHB

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/17/16 Time: 15:50

 
 

Sample (adjusted): 3 34

 
 

Included observations: 32 after adjustments

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

4.977284

4.928219

1.009956

0.3215

DPT

-4.527171

3.863368

-1.171820

0.2515

PFN

0.048687

0.194444

0.250389

0.8042

TXINFL

0.003344

0.001304

2.564396

0.0162

INST

-9.647416

4.970172

-1.941063

0.0628

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.285685

    Mean dependent var

0.459607

Adjusted R-squared

0.179861

    S.D. dependent var

14.41126

S.E. of regression

13.05106

    Akaike info criterion

8.118216

Sum squared resid

4598.913

    Schwarz criterion

8.347238

Log likelihood

-124.8915

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

8.194131

F-statistic

2.699613

    Durbin-Watson stat

2.646561

Prob(F-statistic)

0.051744

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C. DIAGNOSTIC DU MODEL

C.1. test de normalité des erreurs

C.2. Test d'autocorrelation des erreurs

Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test:

 

F-statistic

0.698757

Prob. F(2,19)

0.5095

Obs*R-squared

2.123933

Prob. Chi-Square(2)

0.3458

 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

2.441063

6.297803

0.387605

0.7026

DDPIBHB(-1)

-0.246184

0.283023

-0.869837

0.3952

DPT

-0.248253

4.662547

-0.053244

0.9581

DPT(-1)

-1.332227

4.314676

-0.308766

0.7609

PFN

-0.033383

0.184562

-0.180877

0.8584

PFN(-1)

-0.003731

0.178686

-0.020879

0.9836

TXINFL

0.000372

0.001587

0.234248

0.8173

TXINFL(-1)

0.000350

0.001538

0.227377

0.8226

INST

0.108599

4.860582

0.022343

0.9824

INST(-1)

-2.869127

6.031770

-0.475669

0.6397

RESID(-1)

0.441810

0.382360

1.155481

0.2622

RESID(-2)

-0.154120

0.287278

-0.536484

0.5979

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


C.3. Test d'hétéroscedasticité

Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

F-statistic

0.483965

Prob. F(9,21)

0.8691

Obs*R-squared

5.325288

Prob. Chi-Square(9)

0.8051

Scaled explained SS

1.742016

Prob. Chi-Square(9)

0.9949

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Test Equation:

 
 
 

Dependent Variable: RESID^2

 
 

Method: Least Squares

 
 

Date: 06/15/16 Time: 21:16

 
 

Sample: 4 34

 
 
 

Included observations: 31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C

81.54419

58.15245

1.402249

0.1755

DDPIBHB(-1)

-0.018286

1.871881

-0.009769

0.9923

DPT

-17.00285

45.37412

-0.374726

0.7116

DPT(-1)

7.173907

40.18486

0.178523

0.8600

PFN

-1.262712

1.782448

-0.708414

0.4865

PFN(-1)

-0.717613

1.742322

-0.411872

0.6846

TXINFL

0.010921

0.014077

0.775828

0.4465

TXINFL(-1)

-0.007789

0.014433

-0.539678

0.5951

INST

34.82321

46.42291

0.750130

0.4615

INST(-1)

33.47325

53.77542

0.622464

0.5403

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

R-squared

0.171783

Mean dependent var

83.30678

Adjusted R-squared

-0.183166

S.D. dependent var

101.1143

S.E. of regression

109.9855

Akaike info criterion

12.49427

Sum squared resid

254033.0

Schwarz criterion

12.95685

Log likelihood

-183.6612

Hannan-Quinn criter.

12.64506

F-statistic

0.483965

Durbin-Watson stat

2.038192

Prob(F-statistic)

0.869074

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


C.4. Test de stabilité du modèle

92

précédent sommaire suivant










Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy



"Tu supportes des injustices; Consoles-toi, le vrai malheur est d'en faire"   Démocrite