1.2 RESEARCH PROBLEM
Our concern on this work is centered on the relationship
between Niger as a colony and France as colonial master during Seyni
Kountché's regime. We are going to look at the following:
Political relations
Economic relations
Diplomatic relations
Military relations
1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In a project of this nature, the fundamental questions are
those of consistency and validity. These questions are important because
without making the research meet the required standard, the effort could not be
said to have made possible the growth of knowledge. It is against this
background that content analysis will be used in this work. Secondary data
resources are used from libraries; relevant literature in the form of
textbooks, journals, magazines, newspapers and articles will be used. Internet
(websites) and speeches will be also used. They will ask specific questions
about political, economic, diplomatic and military interactions between the two
(2) countries.
However, due to the biased nature of these journals, effort
will be made to bring out the salient truth in such issues.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE AND JUSTIFICATION
FOR THE STUDY
The significance of this study stems not only from the
difference of factors between the two (2) states, but also from the
non-divergence and diversity. Through our study cannot be meaningful without
mentioning the importance of the difference of factors, yet our emphasis would
be to study the achievements and the failures towards the aspects in their
bilateral relations in diverse directions and policies. The period of the study
commences from General Seyni Kountché's regime, which was from 1974 to
1987 in its relations with France.
Moreover, it is a study of very friendly partners. It will
also explain why future foreign policies need to be formulated.
1.5 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
For the purpose of fostering proper understanding and critical
analysis in relations to the foreign policy of Niger to France under General
Seyni Kountché (1974-1987), it is deemed necessary to use the
underdevelopment and Dependency Theory. This could be attributed to the fact
that the theory explains better the nature of the Nigerien relations with
France as it metropolis as well as other developing countries in the
contemporary international system.
This further explains the fact that an economy to the extent
is dependent that it's position and relation to other economies in the global
system, makes it incapable of auto centric development. All the post-colonial
economies and all its relations in general were heavily dependent by the
criteria of this definition8.
The concept of «dependency» coined by Brazilian
sociologist, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, (later President of Brazil) helps to
link those who are beneficiaries of development with those who make the
decision. Dependency simply states that crucial economic decisions are made not
by countries that are being ?developed» but by foreigners whose interests
are carefully safeguarded. Foreigners (westerners) use their economic powers to
buy political power in the countries that they penetrate. This could mean
political pressure by the imperialist metropolis or even military intervention.
This collusion between alien economic and political power distorts both the
economy and the policy of the dependent countries9. In terms of
underdevelopment, the theoretical postulation b Walter Rodney has it that
underdevelopment is not the absence of development but it makes sense only as a
way of comparing levels of development. Underdevelopment is very much tied to
the fact that human social development has been uneven and from a strictly
economic viewpoint some human groups have advanced further producing more and
becoming more wealthy10.
|