II.3.1. In the time domain
Time domain analysis is a simpler analysis than spectral
analysis. Measurements in the time domain are produced from arithmetic
calculations. There are two classes: on the one hand, the measurements derived
directly from the normal-to-normal intervals between two beats and, on the
other hand, the measurements derived from the differences of the
normal-to-normal intervals themselves, among the parameters which can be
measured by the analysis in the field of time:
· NN 50: number of successive RR intervals
greater than 50 ms.
· PNN50: NN50 divided by the total
number of intervals that expresses the high frequency variability mainly of
modulated parasympathetic origin.
· RMSSD: square root of the squared
differences of the successive RR intervals (the squared root of the mean of the
sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals) which also
expresses the high frequency variability mainly of parasympathetic origin,
modulated by the breathing. This measurement is preferable to pNN50 and
NN50.
· SDNN: (standard deviation of the RR
interval over the entire recording period, standard deviation of all NN
intervals) which gives information on the overall variability.
25
These indices are therefore a non-invasive method for studying
the cardiac response to stimulation of the autonomic nervous system. They
constitute a global approach to the influence of the autonomic nervous system.
However, some methodological precautions should be emphasized. Many of these
clues depend on the length of the recording. It is therefore necessary to
standardize this length in order to be able to compare these different
parameters. Consequently, it is imperative to only compare these parameters for
an identical recording length (Jourdan.G, 2008).
II.3.2. In the frequency domain
In recent years, the spectral analysis of cardiac
variability, based on the analysis of variations of RR intervals, has become
the reference tool for the study of the dynamic interactions between
parasympathetic and sympathetic controls (Malliani et al. 1991).
Spectral analysis then breaks down a complex signal like heart rate
into its constituents of frequency and quantifies the relative power of these
components (Jourdan.G, 2008).After mathematical processing, a
periodic signal of any shape (such as the heart rate, for example) appears in
fact as the superposition of a sum of sinusoids or elementary oscillations. The
fast Fourier transform allows the mathematical decomposition of a complex
record into its constituent or elementary elements without loss of information.
Each elementary sinusoid is mathematically defined by its amplitude and
frequency. The set of sinusoids then constitutes the spectrum. The resulting
graph shows on the abscissa, a frequency scale (in hertz, Hz) and on the
y-axis, an amplitude scale. It allows the study of different oscillations of
specific frequencies. In humans, the spectrum of the heart rate ranges from 0
to 0.4 Hz and can be divided into 3 areas of interest (on a recording of short
duration, 2 to 5 minutes) or in 4 areas of interest (on a long-term recording,
24 hours) (Anonymous, 1996).
The parameters that can be calculated from the spectral
analysis:
· Total power (ms2): Normal-to-normal interval
variance of the entire record.
· Ultrafast frequencies (ULF): from 0.0001 to 0.003 Hz
(only if 24 hours recording).
· Very low frequencies (VLF): from 0.003 to 0.04 Hz.
· Low Frequencies (LF): 0.04 to 0.15 Hz Oscillation in
this frequency band is known as Traube-Hering waves.
· High frequencies (HF): 0.15 to 0.4 Hz. The oscillation
in this frequency band is known as the Mayer wave.
·
26
VLF (ms2): Power in very low frequencies.
· LF (ms2): Power in the low frequencies.
· HF (ms2): Power in high frequencies.
LF and HF can also be in so-called normalized values, which
corresponds to the power of the frequency band considered divided by the total
power of the spectrum less VLF:
· HF (normalized): HF nu = 100 X HF / (HF + LF).
· LF (normalized): LF nu = 100 X LF / (HF + LF). The
values thus standardized and the LF / HF ratio then make it possible to
quantify, albeit in a simplified way, the sympathetic and vagal contribution to
the variability of the heart rate (Neto et al., 2005).
|