WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Impact des crédits a l'économie sur l'inflation et la croissance au Bénin

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Brice Houeton & Thierry Ahouanvoedo
Ecole nationale d'économie appliquée et de management - Ingénieur statisticien économiste 2004
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

Annexe 1 : Trajectoires des séries du modèle

0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1

 
 

75 80 85 90 95 00

INFL

300
250
200
150
100
50
0

 
 

75 80 85 90 95 00

CE

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40

 
 

75 80 85 90 95 00

INVTOTR

1000 800 600 400 200

 
 

75 80 85 90 95 00

PIBR

1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0

 
 

75 80 85 90 95 00

TXCHANGE

Annexe 2 : Base de données des estimations

Année

CE

INFL

PIBR

INVTOTR

TXCHANGE10

1972

10.4

3,5%

271.5

88.50

276.02

1973

12.7

4,7%

277.7

78.00

261.22

1974

16.5

30,8%

256.7

97.80

256.05

1975

32.4

0,4%

268

97.90

235.42

1976

32.1

13,5%

279.4

70.70

222.22

1977

37.6

5,2%

295.3

68.0

224.27

1978

45.1

5,9%

303.5

62.90

248.49

1979

59.4

14,1%

318.6

91.50

235.25

1980

85.0

14,4%

353.4

88.60

209.00

1981

87.0

15,8%

373.9

100.5

201.00

1982

125.9

22,3%

423.2

116.8

225.80

1983

132.0

4,6%

404.8

70.10

287.40

1984

129.0

2,0%

436.9

55.8

336.25

1985

145.5

-6,9%

469.8

74.00

417.37

1986

132.6

-1,5%

479.9

70.70

479.60

1987

124.8

0,8%

472.7

67.00

378.05

1988

137.8

1,9%

488.9

76.10

322.75

1989

103.4

1,8%

474.9

56.10

267.00

1990

102.1

1,6%

490.1

69.60

302.95

1991

85.8

0,7%

513.4

75.20

289.40

1992

69.4

3,3%

533.8

79.30

256.45

1993

46.6

1,1%

553.2

79.20

259.00

1994

76.0

33,6%

577.4

106.60

275.32

1995

81.4

15,5%

604.2

126.70

294.77

1996

102.4

6,6%

639.7

112.40

354.60

1997

71.7

4,7%

676.1

130.80

490.00

1998

100.1

5,5%

406.8

133.10

523.70

1999

161.7

1,4%

740.0

145.60

598.81

2000

194.0

3,3%

782.6

152.80

562.21

2001

192.8

3,1%

822.1

163.30

652.95

2002

222.2

2,5%

874.4

176.60 704.95

2003

293.8

1,5%

922.3

188.20 744.31

Source : INSAE, SFI, BCEAO

10 Dollar /CFA

Annexe 3 : Test de normalité de Jarque Bera

 

CE

LCE

INFL

PIBR

LPIBR

INVTOTR

LINVTOTR

TXCHANGE

LTXCHANGE

Mean

101.53

4.37

0.06

493.28

6.13

99.08

4.54

387.27

5.84

Median

93.55

4.53

0.03

473.80

6.16

88.55

4.48

288.40

5.66

Maximum

293.80

5.68

0.33

922.30

6.83

188.20

5.24

1354.60

7.21

Minimum

10.40

2.34

-0.05

256.70

5.55

55.80

4.02

201.00

5.30

Std. Dev.

64.22

0.79

0.09

186.17

0.37

36.01

0.34

234.76

0.46

Skewness

0.90

-0.93

1.60

0.71

0.10

0.95

0.48

2.45

1.14

Kurtosis

3.94

3.44

5.11

2.66

2.08

2.91

2.19

10.07

3.71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jarque-Bera

5.59

4.90

19.59

2.81

1.18

4.87

2.09

98.69

7.60

Probability

0.06

0.08

0.0056

0.25

0.55

0.09

0.35

0.00

0.02

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Observations

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

Toutes les séries sont normales et lognormales sur la période 1972 à 2003 à l'exception du taux de change (Txchange) et du taux d'inflation (INFL).

Annexe 4 : Résultats des tests de racine unitaire sur les variables Annexe 4.1 : Test ADF sur CE

ADF Test Statistic -2.002848 1% Critical Value* -2.6453

5% Critical Value -1.9530

10% Critical Value -1.6218

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(CE,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 06/30/04 Time: 10:36

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(CE(-1)) -0.562520 0.280860 -2.002848 0.0553

D(CE(-1),2) -0.132425 0.224057 -0.591033 0.5594

R-squared 0.270013 Mean dependent var 2.337931

Adjusted R-squared 0.242977 S.D. dependent var 29.49625

S.E. of regression 25.66383 Akaike info criterion 9.394514

Sum squared resid 17783.07 Schwarz criterion 9.488810

Log likelihood -134.2205 F-statistic 9.986975

Durbin-Watson stat 1.831873 Prob(F-statistic) 0.003866

ADF Test Statistic -2.620080 1% Critical Value* -2.6453

5% Critical Value -1.9530

10% Critical Value -1.6218

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LCE,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 06/30/04 Time: 10:41

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LCE(-1)) -0.622142 0.237451 -2.620080 0.0143

D(LCE(-1),2) -0.231644 0.186956 -1.239026 0.2260

R-squared 0.434940 Mean dependent var 0.000606

Adjusted R-squared 0.414012 S.D. dependent var 0.348408

S.E. of regression 0.266706 Akaike info criterion 0.261130

Sum squared resid 1.920561 Schwarz criterion 0.355426

Log likelihood -1.786378 F-statistic 20.78255

Durbin-Watson stat 1.953016 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000100

ADF Test Statistic -5.761657 1% Critical Value* -4.3082

5% Critical Value -3.5731

10% Critical Value -3.2203

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root. Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(INFL,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/30/04 Time: 08:57

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(INFL(-1)) -1.690054 0.293328 -5.761657 0.0000

D(INFL(-1),2) 0.142197 0.170677 0.833133 0.4127

C -0.028111 0.039434 -0.712866 0.4825

@TREND(1972) 0.001052 0.002083 0.505040 0.6180

R-squared 0.798186 Mean dependent var -0.009032

Adjusted R-squared 0.773968 S.D. dependent var 0.196817

S.E. of regression 0.093572 Akaike info criterion -1.772724

Sum squared resid 0.218894 Schwarz criterion -1.584131

Log likelihood 29.70449 F-statistic 32.95879

Durbin-Watson stat 1.588029 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

ADF Test Statistic -4.262190 1% Critical Value* -2.6453

5% Critical Value -1.9530

10% Critical Value -1.6218

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(INVTOTR,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 06/30/04 Time: 10:52

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(INVTOTR(-1)) -1.177550 0.276278 -4.262190 0.0002

D(INVTOTR(-1),2) 0.136956 0.188760 0.725554 0.4744

R-squared 0.532314 Mean dependent var -0.282759

Adjusted R-squared 0.514993 S.D. dependent var 24.15070

S.E. of regression 16.81914 Akaike info criterion 8.549385

Sum squared resid 7637.857 Schwarz criterion 8.643681

Log likelihood -121.9661 F-statistic 30.73110

Durbin-Watson stat 1.924697 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000007

ADF Test Statistic -4.795380 1% Critical Value* -2.6453

5% Critical Value -1.9530

10% Critical Value -1.6218

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LINVTOTR,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 06/30/04 Time: 10:54

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LINVTOTR(-1)) -1.325067 0.276322 -4.795380 0.0001

D(LINVTOTR(-1),2) 0.204682 0.183792 1.113661 0.2752

R-squared 0.577658 Mean dependent var -0.005607

Adjusted R-squared 0.562016 S.D. dependent var 0.288068

S.E. of regression 0.190644 Akaike info criterion -0.410342

Sum squared resid 0.981323 Schwarz criterion -0.316045

Log likelihood 7.949953 F-statistic 36.92921

Durbin-Watson stat 1.956197 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000002

ADF Test Statistic -6.062526 1% Critical Value* -2.6453

5% Critical Value -1.9530

10% Critical Value -1.6218

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(TXCHANGE,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 06/30/04 Time: 11:02

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(TXCHANGE(-1)) -1.912496 0.315462 -6.062526 0.0000

D(TXCHANGE(-1),2) 0.300607 0.183943 1.634239 0.1138

R-squared 0.758775 Mean dependent var 1.535517

Adjusted R-squared 0.749840 S.D. dependent var 450.1325

S.E. of regression 225.1381 Akaike info criterion 13.73778

Sum squared resid 1368553. Schwarz criterion 13.83207

Log likelihood -197.1978 F-statistic 84.92851

Durbin-Watson stat 2.079233 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

ADF Test Statistic -5.019450 1% Critical Value*

5% Critical Value
10% Critical Value

-4.3082
-3.5731
-3.2203

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

 

Dependent Variable: D(LTXCHANGE,2)

 

Method: Least Squares

 

Date: 06/30/04 Time: 11:14

 

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2003

 

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

 

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

D(LTXCHANGE(-1)) -1.639176 0.326565 -5.019450

0.0000

D(LTXCHANGE(- 0.186831 0.196477 0.950904

0.3508

1),2)

C -0.037723 0.147625 -0.255536

0.8004

@TREND(1972) 0.005621 0.007866 0.714514

0.4815

R-squared 0.701313 Mean dependent var

0.002563

Adjusted R-squared 0.665470 S.D. dependent var

0.605487

S.E. of regression 0.350205 Akaike info criterion

0.866846

Sum squared resid 3.066088 Schwarz criterion

1.055438

Log likelihood -8.569264 F-statistic

19.56653

Durbin-Watson stat 2.021815 Prob(F-statistic)

0.000001

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Des chercheurs qui cherchent on en trouve, des chercheurs qui trouvent, on en cherche !"   Charles de Gaulle