|
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
|
School for Advanced Legal Studies
Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa
|
DEPARTEMENT OF PUBLIC LAW
THE RIGHT TO LEGAL AID AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: A
RWANDAN PERSPECTIVE, PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES
Research dissertation presented for the approval of Senate in
fulfilment of part of the requirements for the Degree of Master?s of Laws in
International Law. The other part of the requirements for this degree was
completion of a programme of courses.
By Jean de Dieu SIKULIBO
Student number: SKLJEA001
DEGREE: LL.M
SUPERVISOR: A/Professor Danwood M. CHIRWA
I do hereby declare that I have read and understood the
regulations governing submission of a Master of Laws dissertation, including
those relating to length and plagiarism, as contained in the rules of this
university, and that this dissertation conforms to those regulations.
10 February 2010
i
DECLARATION
I, Jean de Dieu SIKULIBO, do hereby declare that this minor
dissertation submitted for the degree of Master of Laws at the University of
Cape Town has not previously been submitted by me at this or any other
University, that it is my own work and that all sources and all referenced
material in it have been acknowledged.
Jean de Dieu SIKULIBO
ii
DEDICATION
To God for taking me this far in my academic career
To my family for their constant care for me, support and
motivation To my fiancée Yvonne for her unwavering love
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many people have helped me in this work, including those who
have not been aware of their contribution. My discussions with some students at
the University of Cape Town and sometimes their heated arguments helped me to
appreciate the complexity and multidimensional nature of the subject.
Others have contributed in more tangible ways. Above all, I
owe a debt of gratitude to Professor Danwood M. Chirwa for taking time from his
busy schedule to supervise this thesis. His invaluable scholarly advice and
willingness to share the vast knowledge he has in this area coupled with
comprehensive critiques of the various drafts, meticulous attention to detail,
painstaking editing and constant support were all invaluable to the completion
of this thesis.
I am also greatly indebted to a number of colleagues and
friends who were generous enough to read the last draft of my thesis and make
helpful comments. In addition to Mr Ray Mungoshi, I should mention Ms Yetunde
Adenike Aiyedun and Ms Kweka J. Gift. To all of them I would like to express my
deep appreciation for their comments and criticisms, which led to some
important revisions.
The financial assistance of the Government of Rwanda through
the Student Financing Agency of Rwanda (SFAR) is also acknowledged.
Last but not the least, I have come to realise that family and
friends provide the essential basis for coping effectively with diverse
challenges of our times. Accordingly, I will never forget the friendship of
those who were close to me during my stay in Cape Town, especially my loving
family members. Also, my fiancée Yvonne has always been an unfailing
source of strength.
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS
ACHPR : African Charter on Human and Peoples? Rights
Afr Hum Rts L J : African Human Rights Law Journal
AU : African Union
DIHR : Danish Institute for Human Rights
EAC : East African Community
ECHR : European Court on Human Rights
EDPRS : Economic Development and Poverty Reduction
Strategy
EHRC : European Human Rights Committee
EU : European Union
GA Res. : General Assembly Resolution(s)
ICCPR : International Covenant on Civil and political rights
ICESCR : International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural rights
ICJ : International Court of Justice
Int?l Hum Rts Rep : International Human Rights Report
Inter-Am CHR : Inter-American Court of Human Rights
NGO : Non Governmental Organisation
OJ : Official Journal
OAS : Organisation of American States
OAU : Organisation of African Unity
OCD : Office of Consultation and Defense
UCT : University of Cape Town
UDHR : Universal Declaration of Human Rights
UN : United Nations
UNHRC : United Nations Human Rights Committee
USA : Unites States of America
vi
ABSTRACT
Justice is a continuum that begins from the pronouncements and
substance of the law to the different stages and forms of its enforcement.
There are operational problems that are associated with these phenomena. Thus,
the technical nature of the law and its procedure combine to compound the
problem of accessing justice. This dissertation examines the concept of legal
aid as an important factor in realising access to justice in Rwanda. This is a
right embodied in international human rights instruments. A legal framework
that does not afford citizens the legal aid services as regulated by these
instruments is in effect occasioning them injustice. The relationship of an
efficient and effective legal aid system to access to justice for the poor is
therefore obvious.
This dissertation examines the Rwandan legal framework in as
far as access to justice through free legal services is concerned by addressing
its prospects and challenges. I argue that, apart from a wide-ranging
legislation on legal aid, a high level of state involvement and the
contribution of the organised legal profession are prerequisites for an
effective legal aid system. I find that there are still a number of
deficiencies in the Rwandan legal framework on legal aid. In addition, there is
insufficient publicly-funded legal aid being channelled via the private legal
profession.
Although some private actors are currently providing some
legal aid to the population of Rwanda, most of their projects are funded by
international donors and the donor approach has been one of supporting ad
hoc, short term programs, rather than adopting a coherent approach aimed
at establishing a permanent legal aid structure. This study also finds that,
due to some of its disadvantages, chances of mounting a successful
comprehensive legal aid scheme based on pro bono work are minimal.
Rwanda, apart from setting up a separate governmental body responsible for
providing the poor with free legal services, should work towards making Access
to Justice Centers more accessible throughout the country to reach the most
needy communities in rural areas.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
iiiiiiiv vivii
1
|
1.1 Theme of the study
|
|
|
1
|
1.2 Historical background to the study
|
|
|
3
|
1.3 Hypothesis of the study
|
|
|
4
|
1.4 Central objectives of the study
|
|
|
5
|
1.5 Rationale for the study
|
|
|
6
|
1.6 Literature review
|
|
|
6
|
1.7 Methodology
|
|
|
8
|
1.8 Structure of the study
|
|
|
8
|
CHAPTER TWO: LEGAL AID AND ACCESS
|
TO
|
JUSTICE
|
IN
|
INTERNATIONAL LAW
|
|
|
10
|
2.1 Introduction
|
|
|
10
|
2.2 The conceptual link between access to justice and legal
aid
|
|
|
11
|
2.3 International law rules on legal aid and access to justice
|
|
|
12
|
2.3.1The implementation of international and regional instruments
in the national legal frameworks 13 2.3.2 Legal obligations on states to
provide legal aid arising from international law
14
2.3.2.1 The ICCPR?s provisions on legal aid 15
2.3.2.2 African instruments 17
2.4 Conclusion 20
CHAPTER THREE: THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING LEGAL AID
IN RWANDA 21
3.1 Introduction 21
3.2 Brief historical background 21
3.3 Rwanda?s legal framework on legal aid 22
3.3.1 Free legal aid under Rwandan laws 24
3.3.2 Legal aid in terms of the Law No 3/97 of 19/3/1997
creating the Bar of
Rwanda 24
3.3.3 Provisions of legal aid by non-state actors in Rwanda 27
3.4 Justice Centers in Rwanda 28
3.5 Conclusion 29
CHAPTER FOUR: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RWANDAN LEGAL
AID SYSTEM IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE 31
4.1 Introduction 31
4.2 Principles for the design of legal aid systems and the
correlation between the
organisation of legal aid and the entire legal system 32
4.2.1 State involvement in legal aid organisation and its funding
32
4.2.2 The contribution of the organized legal profession in
access to justice through
|
legal aid
|
.33
|
4.2.3 Other important aspects of a legal aid system
|
34
|
4.3 Brief critical analysis of the South African legal aid system
|
35
|
4.3.1 Brief overview of the South African legal framework
|
35
|
4.3.1.2 Constitutional protection of the right to legal
representation
|
36
|
4.3.1.3 Methods employed to facilitate access to legal aid in
South Africa
|
37
|
4.3.1.3.1 Brief overview of the operation of the South African
Legal Aid Board
38
4.3.1.3.2 Pro bono and judicare models in South Africa and
lessons learnt 38
4.3.1.3.3 Justice Centers 39
4.4 Critical analysis of the Rwandan legal aid scheme?s models
from a comparative perspective 40
ix
4.4.1 Legal bureaus and lawyers in Rwanda 40
4.4.2 Restrictions of the legal profession 41
4.6 Conclusion 41
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION 43
5.1 Conclusions 43
5.2 The way forward 45
BIBLIOGRAPHY 47
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Theme of the study
Access to justice is essential for any justice system. Access
should not depend on wealth, status, skin colour, gender or religion and
conflict resolving mechanisms must be appropriate to their context1
while remaining true to universal standards of human rights.2 It is
trite that in any domestic legal system, respect and protection of human rights
cannot be fully guaranteed without the availability of effective judicial
remedies. Access to justice is of fundamental importance to the injured
individual and it is an essential component of the system of protection and
enforcement of human rights. While access to justice, as a term of art, has
acquired a variety of meanings it is also used to describe the legal aid for
the needy, without which judicial remedies would be available only to those who
are wealthy.3
Legal aid ensures vulnerable and disadvantaged people are not
denied access to justice because of their inability to pay for it and it
ensures that people accused of crime get a proper defence and a fair hearing.
It is quite fair to say that legal aid to the needy is one of the cornerstones
of a fair and decent society. It provides the framework within which citizens
can enforce their rights and are held accountable for fulfilling their
responsibilities.
It has been said that the one normative justification for legal
aid flows out of the state?s commitment to the rule of law.4 It
should further be noted that it is the duty of the state to
1 It should be noted that even though we may
concede that international law leaves a wide margin of discretion to states in
the administration of justice, nevertheless a general acceptance of such notion
of justice can be evinced from the human rights instruments adopted since 1945
with the establishment of the United Nations.
2 It is worth mentioning that the notion of access
to justice can be found in Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR), GA Res 217A (III), UN Doc A/810 at 71 (1948); in Article 6.1 of
the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms, ETS 5, 213 UNTS 222, entered into force September 3, 1953,
as well as in Article 7.1 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples? Rights,
adopted June 27, 1981, OAU Doc CAB/LEG/67/3 Rev 5, 21 ILM 58 (1982),
entered into force October 21, 1986. It is worthwhile to note also
that while the UDHR itself is not legally binding, some or all of the rights it
mentions are considered to be binding in international customary law. See for
example the case of Filártiga v. Norberto
Peña-Irala (1980) ILM 966, United States of America
Circuit Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit.
3 F Francioni Access to justice as a human
right (2007) New York, Oxford University Press 1.
4 D Dyzehhaus Normative justifications for
the provision of legal aid? in A blueprint for publicly funded legal
services Vol. 2 of the Report of the Ontario Legal Aid Review (1997)
475.
ensure that every individual enjoys his or her right to
justice5 and to fulfil this obligation in part through its legal aid
system. There exists a range of international norms and standards which impose
an obligation on the state to provide legal aid. These norms were articulated
by the international community after 1945 with the establishment of the United
Nations and the development of international human rights law.
It should be noted however that the expression of
legal aid? like access to justice? has no generally
agreed upon meaning. Thus, in its broadest sense, legal aid may be described as
the provision of legal services, usually but not exclusively, by members of the
bar at less than a regular market rate to the client, in order to ensure the
accessibility of these legal services to those who otherwise could not afford
them.6 In other words, legal aid in its common sense refers to the
assistance provided by the society to its weaker members in their effort to
protect their rights and liberties. It thus includes legal advice and
representation by attorneys and advocates before courts or tribunals in both
criminal and civil cases.7
There are two fundamental approaches in which legal aid is
rendered.8 According to the first approach, it is the duty of the
legal profession to provide professional services free of charge to those who
cannot afford to pay for them.9 Lawyers should willingly carry cases
for the needy in exchange for the monopoly they hold over the provision of
professional legal aid services. The second approach is that lawyers should
carry only part of the burden, and that the bulk of the load must be shouldered
by the state.10 As far as the delivery of legal aid services by the
state is concerned, the methods may vary: members of the private profession can
provide legal aid services paid for by the state at a reduced scale, or the
state can provide the services through salaried professionals.
5 V Hennie Legal aid in South Africa:
Making justice reality? (2005) 49 Journal of African Law 54. See also
N Abramowitz Legal aid in South Africa? (1960) 77 South African
Law Journal 351.
6 J Bass et al. Access to justice for a new
century (2005) 33.
7 Even though the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) is silent on the matter of legal aid in civil cases,
it is useful to note that the European Court of Human Rights has extended the
obligation of the state to provide legal aid in civil cases depending on the
particular circumstances of the case. See ECHR in Airey v. Ireland
(1979-80) 2 ECHR 305.
8 See Hennie, supra note 5, 56.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
|