|
WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY IN AFRICA
|
|
RESEARCH TITLE
$
Impact of Foreign Aid on Rwanda's Socio-Economic
Development as guided by Millennium Development Goal (MDG)
1 «Eradication of extreme poverty and hunger»: The
case of Gasabo District
R R By
R
Claire Marie Michele MUKARUTESI
Reg. No:WSS0401090004
R
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
IN
PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MASTER
OF
SCIENCE IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DEGREE (MDS)
R R
R R
R
HARARE, ZIMBABWE, 2011
|
|
DECLARATION
I hereby certify that this thesis entitled
«The impact of Foreign Aid on Rwanda's socioeconomic
Development as guided by Millennium Development Goal 1» is
entirely my own work, except where stated otherwise, and that it has not been
submitted for any other degree or professional qualification.
Claire Marie Michele MUKARUTESI May 2011
RELEASED FORM
Name of Author: Claire Marie Michele
MUKARUTESI
Title of project: The impact of Foreign Aid
on Rwanda?s Socio-Economic Development as guided by Millennium Development Goal
(MDG) 1 «Eradication of extreme poverty and hunger»: The case of
Gasabo District.
Programme for which project was presented:
Master of Science in Development Studies Degree
Year granted: 2011
Permission is hereby granted to the Women?s University in
Africa library to produce single copies of this project and to lend or sell
such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. The
author reserves other publication rights and neither the project printed or
otherwise reproduced without the author?s written permission.
Signed:
Permanent Address: A2 Ramis Court, Kileleshwa,
Nairobi-Kenya
APPROVAL FORM
The undersigned certify that they have read and recommended to
the Women?s University in Africa for acceptance, a project entitled, «The
impact of Foreign Aid on Rwanda?s SocioEconomic Development as Guided by
Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 1 - Eradication of extreme poverty and
hunger»: The case of Gasabo District, submitted by Claire Marie
Michele MUKARUTESI in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the
Master of Science Degree in Development Studies.
.................................................................
SUPERVISOR
................................................................................................
PROGRAMME COORDINATOR
.........................................................................
EXTERNAL EXAMINER DATE:
DEDICATION
This research is dedicated to my husband Maurice A. KAMANZI,
my children Rita Gloria O. IHIRWE, Omer Herve GANZA and Pedro ISHIMWE KAMANZI
for bearing up with me when I could not be there for them, you are the epitome
of God?s faithfulness in my life, I LOVE YOU GUYS!!!
My profound gratitude goes to all people who immensely
contributed to the success of this study. All the assistance and support given
is highly appreciated. May God bless you.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First and foremost, I would like to thank the God Almighty,
for creating the human being that I am, that He cares for and protects so
dearly.
This thesis to be what it is, it could not have been possible
without the input of a huge number of people. Many people within government
departments, civil society organisations and academic institutions in Rwanda
and Zimbabwe, gave up enormous amounts of time to assist me in gathering data,
in establishing contacts and in working through my ideas. This research was
made possible by the collaboration of so many staff in Rwanda?s Ministry of
Finance and Economic Planning, Ministry of Local Government, Gasabo District
and Donor Community in Rwanda, please accept my gratitude. My gratitude goes to
all respondents from the research areas, for participating and sharing their
experiences. I would particularly like to thank the Management of Rwanda
Development Bank-BRD for allowing me to conduct my research into the
Institution.
I would like to extend my profound gratitude to my supervisor,
Mr O. Nyaude for his patience and commitment in assisting me in shaping an
idea, and an aspiration into reality. Without your encouragement, constructive
criticism, and academic prowess, this project would have been done properly.
Many thanks go to the Women?s University in Africa, to the Faculty of Social
Science, Department of Development Studies.
Throughout this research my husband Maurice KAMANZI has given
me just the right mix of encouragement and criticism at all the right times, I
do not have words to appreciate your invaluable input I am indebted to you for
that; My children Rita Gloria O IHIRWE K., Omer Herve GANZA K., Pedro ISHIMWE
KAMANZI, Thank for your understanding, support and love during this strenuous
period- I love you more for that!!!
Finally, I want to thank my Mother, brother, Sisters and
friends Vedaste Kalima and Immacullee Nyiraminani, who have encouraged me
throughout this process. Without your support and your constant faith in me
this research would never have happened.
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to investigate and assess the
impact of foreign aid on Rwanda?s socioeconomic development as guided by
Millennium Development Goal (MDG1) To eradicate extreme poverty and
hunger?. The study was undertaken with selected respondents drawn from Gasabo
District of the Kigali City in the Republic of Rwanda (a
developing nation in East Africa).
Both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were
used. Data were collected by means
of interviews, observational schedules, documentary
analysis procedures, questionnaires and Focus Group Discussion (FGDs) schedules
from a total of one hundred and fifty (150) respondents. Nine (9) of these were
Heads of departments/administrators. The study found that the majority of the
respondents perceived foreign aid as pivotal in promoting socio-economic
development of any given developing country. The eradication of poverty
in society was viewed as a worthwhile undertaking and helps address
socio-economic problems. They hailed the need to understand the scope of MDGs
and its need to be included in the various Rwandan curriculum
However the study established that there are mixed feelings
with regard the impact of foreign
aid, its challenges and prospects in general in light of
the need to fight the global poverty within the confines of MDGs. They felt
that the knowledge of MDGs must be a central component of Rwanda?s
civic/citizenship education in order to develop a common understanding of the
quest to eradicate poverty and spearhead all-encompassing development. The
study concludes that foreign aid is at the core of successfully eradicating
extreme poverty and hunger, though it must be received with some caution as a
number of donor agencies will end up politicizing the concept
thus attaching strings and conditionalities to
beneficiaries/recipients.
The study recommends that there is great need to expose
citizens to issues relating to foreign aid,
poverty alleviation and development discourse pupils at a
tender age. The study further
recommends the intensification of the training programmes for
citizens to be able to handle the
issues linked to aid. Furthermore research is recommended in
this seemingly grey area in line with the dynamic aspect of development and
education respectively.
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figures
Figure 2.1 : Aid Coordination Architecture in Rwanda
Figure 3.1 : New Administrative Map of Gasabo District
Figure 4.1 : Gendered perceptions on poverty as Rwanda?s threat
to socio-economic development
Figure 4.2 : Perceptions of the impact of Foreign Aid on the
Rwandan economy Figure 4.3 : Gendered perceptions of Foreign Aid and
dependency
Figure 4.4 : Knowledge of the existence of MDGs in Rwanda Figure
4.5 : Ranking of MDGs according to priority
Figure 4.6 : Rating of Poverty Eradication Strategies
Figure 4.7 : Perceptions of beneficiaries of Foreign Aid in
Rwanda
Figure 4.8 : Relations of the Government of Rwanda and the Donor
Community Figure 4.9 : Beneficiaries of Donor Community from 2000-2009
Figure 4.10: Challenges with regards to Implementation of MDGs
Figure 4.11: Ranking Rwanda?s main Resources in order of importance Figure
4.12: Composition of External Resources
Tables
Table 3.1 : Sampling Systems
Table 4.1 : Views on whether poverty is a threat to Rwanda?s
socio-economic development by organizations
Table 4.2 : Views on whether poverty has functional benefits to
society
Table 4.3 : Views on whether Foreign Aid creates dependency on
Rwanda by Organization Table 4.4 : SustainabilIIVERIEIRTJUQE$ I3EtQE5
Zto31?sE
Socio-economic development
Table 4.5 : Availability of technical challenges with regards
to implementation of MDGs
Table 4.6 : Data gathered using interview methods
Table 4.7 : Documentary Analysis Procedures
Table 4.8 : NGOs/2010 registered in Gasabo District
Table 4.9 : Estimates of different budgetary sources
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 : Map of Rwanda
Appendix 2 : Approval letter from WUA, BRD and Letter from DFID
Appendix 3 : Rwanda Development Partners by Sector
Appendix 4 : Coordination Questionnaires, Interview and FGDs
ACRONYMS
AfDB African Development Bank
BRD Rwanda Development Bank
BS Budget Support
BSHG Budget Support Harmonisation Group
BTC Belgian Technical Cooperation
CBEP Capacity Building and Employment
Promotion
CDF Common Development Fund (Rwanda)
CEPEX Central Bureau for Public Investments and
External Funding (Rwanda)
DAD Development Assistance Database
DCPETA Decentralization, Citizen Participation,
Empowerment, Transparency and
Accountability
DDLR Donor Division of labour in Rwanda
DFID Department for International Development
(UK)
DPM Development Partners Meeting
DPAF Donor Performance Assessment framework
DRC Democratic Republic of Congo [Zaire until
1997]
EC European Commission
EDPRS Economic Development Poverty Reduction
Strategy
EICV Integral survey on conditions of living
within families
ESAP Economic Structural Adjustment Programme
ESF Economic Support Fund
EU European Union
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation (UN)
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FGD Focus Group Discussion
FHHs Female Headed Households
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GNP Gross National Product
GoR Government of Rwanda
HARPP Harmonisation and Alignment in Rwanda of
Projects and Programmes
HDI Human Development Index
HDR Human Development Report
HIPC Heavily Indebted Poor Countries
Initiative
HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome
ICT Information and Communications Technology
IDA International Development Association (World
Bank)
IFIs International Financial Institutions
IMF International Monetary Fund
IRC International Rescue Committee
JAF Joint Action Forum
JRLO Justice, Reconciliation, Law and Order
LDC Less Developed Countries
MDCs More Developed Counties
MDGs Millennium Development Goals
MINECOFIN Ministry of Finance and Economic
Planning (Rwanda)
MINALOC Ministry of Local Government
MoU Memorandum (Memoranda) of Understanding
MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework
NGO(s) Non-governmental organisation
ODA Official development Assistance
ODI Overseas Development Institute
OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development
OECD-DAC Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development -
Development Assistance Committee
OFDA Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance
OPEC Organization of Petroleum-Exporting
Countries
Org. Organization
PAS Poverty Assessment Study (Zimbabwe)
PD Paris Declaration
PDD District Development Plan
PFM Public Financial Management (Rwanda)
PRS Poverty Reduction Strategy
PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
PRS-PR Poverty Reduction Strategy Progress
Report
RGPH General Registration of the Population and
Housing
RPF Rwanda Patriotic Front
RWACOM Rwanda
RwF Rwandan Francs
SADC Southern African Development Cooperation
SAP Structural Adjustment Programme(s)
SBS Sector Budget Support
SIDA Swedish International Development
Cooperation Agency
SMEs Small and Medium Enterprises
SORWATOM Societe Rwandaise de Tomates
SPPMD Strategic Planning and Poverty Monitoring
Department (Minecofin)
SPSS Strategic Programme of Social Science
UK United Kingdom
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNFEM United Nations Development Fund for
Women
UNICEF 8 cEId NIINWLEIAIMME und
UNWFP United Nations World Food Program
USA United States of America
USAID United States Agency for International
Development
UTEXRWA Usine de Textile au Rwanda
VUP Vision Umurenge Programme
WB World Bank
WHO World Health Progamme
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION ii
RELEASED FORM iii
APPROVAL FORM iv
DEDICATION v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi
ABSTRACT vii
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES viii
LIST OF APPENDICES x
ACRONYMS xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiv
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1
1.1 Background to the Study 2
1.2 Statement of the Problem 10
1.3 Research Questions 11
1.4 Objectives of the Study 11
1.5 Assumptions of the Study 12
1.6 Significance and Justification of the Study 13
1.7 Definition of key terms 15
1.8 Delimitation of the Study 16
1.9 Limitations of the study 17
1.10 Organisation of the Study 18
1.11 Chapter summary 19
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 20
2.0 Introduction 20
2.1 Theoretical Frameworks 20
2.2 Conceptualizing aid, development, poverty and hunger 32
2.3 History of Foreign Aid in Rwandan Economy 38
2.3.1 Aid Effectiveness in Rwanda 40
2.3.2 The Politics of Official Development Assistance on Rwanda
42
2.3.3 The World Bank and UNDP Poverty Indicators-Indices 43
2.4 Foreign Aid and Economic Development in LDCs 47
2.4.1 General Global Trends 47
2.4.2 Foreign Aid and Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa
51
2.4.3 Challenges Experienced by Government in Making External
Aid Effective 54
2.5 Implications of Literature Review 56
2.6 Chapter summary 58
CHAPTER TRHEE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 59
3.0 Introduction 59
3.1 Research Design 59
3.1.1 Research Design - An overview 59
3.1.2 Exploratory and Descriptive Phases of the Research Project
60
3.1.3 An overview of the existing situation of the Gasabo
District as the case study 61
3.1.4 Sources of Data 63
3.1.5 Types of data 63
3.1.6 Target Population, Sampling and Sampling Procedures 64
3.2 Data gathering instruments 66
3.2.1 An Overview 66
3.2.2 Structured in-depth Interviews 67
3.2.3 The Questionnaire method 68
3.2.4 Focussed Group Discussions 69
3.2.5 Documentary analysis/content analysis procedures 70
3.2.6 Observational schedules (Participant and non-participant
observation) 71
3.3 Data presentation and analysis 71
3.4 Chapter summary 72
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS
73
4.0 Introduction 73
4.1 Discussion of questionnaire findings 74
4.1.1 Questionnaire Administration 74
4.1.2 Quali-Quantitative Analysis of Questionnaire Data 74
4.1.3 Overall synthesis of findings from the questionnaire 91
4.2 Qualitative Analysis of Findings 91
4.2.1 Interview data from administrators 92
4.2.2 Data from Observational schedules 100
4.2.3 Documentary Analysis Procedures 104
CHAPTER FIVE: 110
SUMMARIES, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 110
5.0 Introduction 110
5.1 Summary of the major findings 111
5.2 Conclusion of the study 113
5.3 Recommendations for this study 114
REFERENCES 116
ELECTONIC RESOURCES 125
APPENDICES 126
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The instrumental role of foreign aid on Rwanda?s socio-economic
development has always been
a topical subject of debate am ong scholars, intellectuals,
social scientists and developmentalists
respectively. On one extrem e end, it is argued that foreign aid
is not necessary whereas on the
As such, the attainment of the prime goal of the so-called
Millennium Development Goals (MDG 1) «To eradicate extreme poverty
and hunger» largely hinges on the foreign support Rwanda may
happen to receive from various corners of the world. What it entails is that
the
relativity nature of development may generate m ixed feelings to
the extent that people may fail
to arrive at a universal agreement with regard the best way to
attain socio-economic
development.
However, it is the conviction of this study to move a strong
motion that Rwanda?s socioeconomic development entirely depends on the
magnitude at which various stakeholders join hands and aim at eradicating or
seeking the
optimum ways to ameliorate poverty in society. It is therefore
the focus of this study to make a scholarly inquiry into this seemingly grey
area and
ascertain the best possible w ays and strategies to adopt as
Rwanda embarks on this critical voyage (poverty eradication).
Against this background, it follow s that there is great need to
establish the viable strategies upon
which poverty can be reduced. One fundamental strategy lies in
marrying foreign aid with the available strategies linked to MDGs.
According to World Bank and International Monetary Fund
(WB-IMF, 2002) recommendations, one of the ways of realizing this goal is
provision of aid to less developed countries (LDCs) by more developed countries
(MDCs). Such aid is supported by WB & IMF - directed economic structural
adjustment programs. One may underscore the fact that the various programmes
will be tailor-made to focus on specific developmental targets hence attainment
of socio-economic development in some way.
The pivotal or multi-million dollar question that arises then
is: to what extent can such conditional aid contribute to the
socio-economic development of the host country in the long run? And to
answer this question, one needs to remember what Mushi (1982:09) says about
positive aid: that «aid is developmental only if it lays the foundation
for its future rejection». That is to say aid is only truly useful if in
the long run it promises and guarantees self-reliance and economic
self-sustenance to the beneficiary. Otherwise if aid creates perpetual
dependence then it is not useful at all in the first place. Thus, the dynamic
views associated with foreign aid will eventually make it perceived at varying
degrees of usefulness particularly in developing nations.
1.1 Background to the Study
In Rwanda aid has been coming from various quarters, chief
among them United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and World Bank (WB)
following the genocide. Against this backdrop, the purpose was partly to assist
with reconstruction and also to eradicate poverty and hunger, the latter being
done under the auspices of the MDGs. This study therefore, seeks to
assess whether such aid has a positive or negative impact on the
Rwanda?s socio-economic development by focusing on the particular case of
Gasabo District.
Millennium Development Goal Number 1 clearly states that the
primary spirit behind all millennium development goals is to: eradicate
extreme poverty and hunger
(
www.developmentgoals.org).
R eduction of global poverty and hunger lies at the core of the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The target is to reduce by
half the proportion of
people living on less than US$1 a day in low and middle income
countries - from 28 percent in 1990 to 14 percent in 2015, and halve the
proportion of people who suffer from hunger during the same period (ibid).
It may seem that the twenty-five year time-frame has elapsed without any
This however will negatively impact on the entire
socio-economic development of Rwanda, hence the need to investigate the
circumstances surrounding the present phenomena. One may observe that, to date
twenty years have passed without any material indication of success. Only five
years rem ain and yet the possibility of achieving this is still a far cry.
Over the years, foreign
aid has been fuelled by both political and economic m otivations
of the ruling classes in the western donor nations. A classic example is the
United States of America Foreign Aid, the
Marshall Plan [1948-1951] that was aimed at rehabilitating the
shattered economies of Western
Europe, at the same tim e containing the international spread of
communism. When the balance
of Cold War interests shifted from Europe to the World in the
mid-1950s, the policy of containment embodied in the U.S. aid program dictated
a shift in emphasis toward political economic and military support for
«friendly» less developed nations especially those considered
geographically strategic (Todaro, 1983).
Against this backdrop, it follows that the rationale for
foreign aid in general should not be perceived from a lay person?s perspective,
thus it requires some introspection of some sort. Those who offer assistance
primarily consider their chances of benefiting latter even if they commit
themselves to some mammoth task as evidenced in the commitment to eradicate
poverty. In all cases, during the socialist, colonial and post-colonial periods
donor aid was meant to chart the course of globalization and the interests of
global financiers; and this makes donor aid suspicious: whether it really stirs
sustainable development or it simply serves the economic and political
interests of the donor at the expense of host countries. This prompts the need
to find out whether poverty alleviation intervention programmes initiated by
the more developed countries (MDCs) in LDCs are really addressing the needs of
the deserving neediest or not.
Various studies have been carried out around the globe about
whether donors are angels of mercy or doom. As already been alluded to, aid has
been given to LDCs in the spirit of the eight MDGs which can be summarized as
to:
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
Achieve universal primary education
Promote gender equality and empower women
Reduce child mortality
Improve maternal health
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases
Ensure environmental sustainability
Develop a global partnership for development (Todaro, 2006:
24)
From the summary, it can be argued that all the other goals
are essentially subordinate and play a complementary role to MDG 1. It follows
that all other goals have a bearing to MDG 1 in one way or the other, implying
that to achieve the target of Goal 1 progress has to be made on the other goals
as well. The irony that global studies have established regarding the
attainment of poverty reduction, however, is that not much progress has been
made. Foreign aid on the other side greatly increases the patronage power of
recipient governments. As Bauer (2008) notes, "The great increase in the prizes
of political power has been a major factor in the frequency and intensity of
political conflict in contemporary Africa and in the rest of the less developed
world, than developmental response. In this respect, foreign aid may be accused
of meddling with the recipient nation?s political issues hence a detrimental
aspect from the sceptics viewpoint. Sceptics are always conscious of their
sovereignty.
UNDP, (2003), advances that in the 1990s income poverty
increased in 37 countries while hunger multiplied in 21 countries. One may
underscore the fact that this cardinal admission with regard the prevalence of
poverty and hunger justifies the great need for foreign aid in countries like
Rwanda. The poorest region in the world, sub-Saharan Africa has the worst
affected countries, seconded by Latin America (ibid). Ethiopia, Rwanda,
Burundi, Botswana, Kenya and Mozambique fall into this category. They have all
been destinations of foreign aid as guided by MDGs. The period under which MDGs
for poverty reduction have been evaluated in Rwanda has been repositioned from
1990 to 2000 following the traumatic upheaval of the 1994 genocide. According
to IRIN News, (2006) initial progress was very slow with 57% of the population
remaining below the national poverty line, assessed in terms of food needs and
non-food essentials.
In that year alone, 37% of the population survived on an
income insufficient to provide the minimum calorie requirement of MDG 1; and
Rwanda experienced one of the highest levels of extreme poverty in the world.
To this effect, the correlation between the existence of peace and the
subsequent attainment of positive development in a nation is largely evidenced
as the so-called genocide had grave and detrimental effects on socio-economic
development; hence the capacity of Rwanda as a sole nation without foreign aid
became hazy. To make matters worse, neither of these poverty rates had fallen
by more than a few points since 2000, despite strong headlines on economic
growth in the media (ibid). Indeed, the Gini coefficient1 measure of
inequality increased over that period from 0.47 to 0.51, a relatively high rate
for East Africa (ibid).
The implication is that the rewards of growth were not
reaching rural households, where 90% of poverty in Rwanda is located. This fact
abides in spite of the optimistic view that points to the stable political
environment and the availability of generous development aid of the order of
$50 per capita per annum coupled with the rewards of a significant debt relief
that was issued in 2005 (ibid). The fact that the threat of hunger and poverty
are far from over is not even waived by the bumper harvest of 2008 which fended
off the worst global food price crisis. Of course the
gRheaQPeQ.117Fia.113iQly17FRQhi A17A.1aRQg
17FRQhiF.1iRQ17iQ17i.1A17F13S13Fi.1v17.1R17.1a13QAIRaP 17.1Ke 17FRoQ.1ailA17
IRa.1oQeA. 17$ 17FlD13a17IRFoA 17RQ1713FFRPSUAKIQ1170 ' * 171
17iA1713a.11Fo113.1ed17iQ171.5 Z 13Qd13lA17( FRQRPiF 17 Development Poverty
Reduction Strategy (EDPRS) 2008 - 2012 and in its strategic Vision 2020, which
sets out the goal of advancing to middle income status by relying less on
unskilled agriculture but more on knowledge-based services such as tourism
(UNDP/HDRRwanda, 2007).
1
The Gini Coefficient measures how concentrated incomes are
among the population of an economy: the higher the Gini, the more
concentrated
incomes are among a few people. The Gini ranges between 0
(indicating income is distributed equally between all people) and 1 (indicating
all income in the economy accrues to one person).
The EDPRS results and policy matrix is organised around the 3
EDPRS flagship programs which have been aligned to the three clusters: The
economic cluster which covers the Macro Economic and Financial sector and
the economic sectors of Agriculture, Infrastructure (Energy, Transport),
Private Sector development as well as Environment and Natural Resources
management. The Social cluster covers Health, Education,
Social Protection, Water and Sanitation, and Youth; And Governance
cluster covers the following sector working groups: Public Financial
Management (PFM), Justice, Reconciliation, Law and Order (JRLO),
Decentralization, Citizen Participation, Empowerment, Transparency and
Accountability (DCPETA), and Capacity Building and Employment Promotion
(CBEP).
In spite of all this exuberant optimism by the Government,
most observers consider that the MDGs target of halving poverty by 2015 is very
unlikely to be achieved. There are signs that decentralization of government
structures has not progressed as quickly as hoped, and yet this is an important
factor in implementing poverty reduction programmes. On the other hand, the
government continues to depend on aid for no less than 49% of its 2010 budget
(ibid); and this leaves one wondering how far dependence on aid will take
Rwanda?s socio-economic development.
In 2004, the Government of Rwanda (GoR) was dependent upon
international development assistance to the tune of almost 50% of its overall
budget, and over 80% of its development budget. It was receiving over $350
million a year in aid from over 30 bilateral and multilateral donors and a wide
range of non-governmental organisations. (Hayman, 2006)
From a dependency theory point of view, this has an impact
particularly on the direction of development since the donors may pursue their
own socio-political agendas that may filter some ripple effects on the overall
economic growth within Rwanda. National policies and programmes aimed at
promoting economic growth, social welfare and political change were heavily
influenced by external actors: foreign technical assistants were bolstering
weak internal capacity within government institutions; policy consultants and
advisors were flying in and out of Rwanda?s capital city, Kigali, to help with
the preparation of policy papers and evaluations; a sizable community of
expatriate aid workers was present throughout the country. All this
necessitates the need to evaluate the far-reaching consequences of aid to
Rwanda. (Hayman, 2005).
In Kenya and Tanzania, the Swedish aid on rural development
had a positive impact in raising the standards of the poor. To this effect, it
would follow that socio-economic development within these nations was
registered. Radetzki in Word Bank (2005:258) maintains that in Tanzania,
Swedish has provided support for industrial forest planting and care,
sawmilling and related activities, technical assistance and village
afforestation and this began in mid 1969. One may argues that deforestation was
a major challenge which if not controlled could have costed the country to the
extent that it was going to be difficult to fight poverty. Poverty alleviation
is thus central in order to realise full socio-economic development at all
cost. Radetzki in Word Bank (2005:258) further posits that in Kenya soil
conservation was successful due to aid from Sweden. In this context, it would
follow that there is great need to conserve soil if sustainable agricultural
production that fight poverty is to be realised. Howell (2003:418) is of the
view that foreign aid from British to Agriculture in Kenya enhanced
agricultural research. To this effect, it follows that the impact of foreign
aid had positive impact on productivity.
Through research new conventional agricultural practices that
are geared towards effective fight against poverty are introduced. Johnston,
Hobenand Jaeger (2001:279) report that USA foreign aid support to sub-Saharan
Africa registered socio-economic development in that the economic aid has been
provided for primary development programmes, food aid, and budgetary support
under the Economic Support Fund (ESF) as «security supporting
assistance». One may observe that, such foreign aid was quite instrumental
in aiding to effective and sustainable socioeconomic development. In proposing
effective mechanisms for the provision of foreign aid, Lele and Jain (2001:579)
on their analysis of aid to African agriculture, argue that «donors should
ensure that their assistance programmes in individual countries successfully
combine a long term development strategy with the more pragmatic considerations
of day to day economic development. To this end, it follows that, such
strategies if intertwined with aid provision will effective anchor
socio-economic development of a given nation.
In narrating and tracing the impact of foreign aid and its
subsequent role in fighting poverty, Tsikata in Devarajan, Dollar and Holmgrain
(2001:47) maintain that «From a state of economic collapse, Ghana?s
economy rebounded with sustained economic growth during the first decade of the
reform. This stellar performance was accompanied by an exponentional increase
in aid inflows from both bilateral and multilateral sources. Against this
backdrop, it would follow that the introduction of foreign aid enhanced some
economic growth, thus socio-economic development is promoted. In a related
study, by Molmgrein (2001:101) of Uganda, it was noted that aid in various
forms helped to support the generation and implementation of the policy reforms
and Uganda. One may suggest that the various policy reforms may have some
bearing on the alleviation of poverty at all cost. In this context aid is
perceived to be part of development,
hence the need to have it as nations become geared for the
collective effort to fight the global poverty. Similarly, in Zambia, Parkner
(2001:1020) reports that aid was pivotal in promoting equitable socio-economic
development in the area of agriculture, infrastructure, health and education.
One may underscore the fact that if all these areas are funded it follows that
the impact of global poverty will be minimised at all cost. As Seers (1988),
would argue that development entails eradication of inequality, poverty and
unemployment. In advancing debates on the impact of aid to African countries,
Dambisa Moyo (2002) presents an argument that sometimes aid in Africa is not
working and proposed other mechanisms in order to remove or demystify the issue
of aid being classified as «Dead Aid».
To this end this brings us to the relativity nature of foreign
aid as put forward by the interactionist view that various subjective meanings
are attached to social phenomenon (Ritzer, 1996).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Poverty has been regarded as a social problem that has
significantly affected a magnitude of people across cultures. To this end,
heated debates have been generated with regards the possible and viable ways of
eradicating the problem. However, foreign aid has been proposed as an ultimate
solution that can in turn propel the developmental proper shaft in the
socio-economic horizons. The problem has thus arisen in the legitimacy aspects
with regards the efficacy of foreign aid in enhancing, facilitating or
propelling as well as promoting socio-economic development particularly through
the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger to zero levels.
Rwanda has an increase in the depth of poverty in its several
areas and a deterioration of living conditions at the bottom of the income
distribution. As a consequence of rising inequality, Rwanda could have
exhausted its ability to reduce poverty rates through economic growth alone.
Growing inequality is not only an obstacle to poverty reduction and sustainable
economic growth; it could also undermine social peace. The problem would thus
be stated: Does foreign
aid have an impact in fighting SRY7TVIQ5EKuCI7TIEC5
FRCs7117CtlyESTRPRt7ISZEC5aVIRFIR-
economic development?
1.3 Research Questions
This study seeks to answer or address the following key research
questions:
1.3.1 What is the effect of poverty and hunger
on Rwanda?s socio-economic development?
1.3.2 Does foreign aid enhance Rwanda?s
socio-economic development?
1.3.3 Do citizens of Rwanda appreciate the
introduction of MDGs as guiding principles for poverty alleviation?
1.3.4 How effective are Rwanda?s strategic
policies on poverty reduction?
1.3.5 How sustainable is foreign-donor
assistance towards the reduction of
poverty and hunger; and how do the beneficiaries evaluate the
impact of such foreign aid on the local and national socio-economic
development?
1.4 Objectives of the Study
The study seeks to:
1.4.1 Assess the extent of poverty in Rwanda in
general and in Gasabo District in particular following the adoption of MDGs.
1.4.2 Examine the causal relationship between
foreign aid and Rwanda?s socioeconomic development.
1.4.3 Evaluate the effectiveness of Rwanda?s
poverty reduction policies and
strategies against its adoption of MDGs framework through foreign
aid. 1.4.4 Establish strategies for both donor community and
Rwanda for sustainable
development through poverty reduction.
1.5 Assumptions of the Study
The study is guided by the following assumptions:
1.5.1 Poverty and hunger has a number of effects
on Rwanda? socio economic development
1.5.2 Citizen of Rwanda appreciate MDGs at
different levels
1.5.3 Foreign aid might enhance Rwanda
socio-economic development
1.5.4 If effective policies and legislatives are
introduced to combat poverty, Rwanda?s socio-economic development will be
attained
1.5.5 If foreign aid assists Rwanda in its
poverty program alleviation, there will be sustainable development.
1.5.6 The overall assumption is therefore
that: The Superpowers (US and its allies) and financial institutions give aid
with inhibiting conditional ties that still determine the nature of development
in LDCs such as Rwanda.
1.6 Significance and Justification of the Study
It is envisaged that this study will tend to immensely benefit
a cluster of beneficiaries among them the Government of Rwanda, Civil society,
the general citizens and other researchers. The Government of Rwanda (GoR) is
the intended primary beneficiary of the findings of this research. It is hoped
that the findings of the study will help put Rwanda into the driver?s seat
and help her devise its development programs and in leading coordination
processes. MINECOFIN (2004).
This research hopes to improve the relationship between Rwanda
and the donor community so that it becomes mutually beneficial rather than
lap-sided as is the case at present. The study shall also motivate and
stimulate other researchers hence they will have the intellectual vigour to
continuously advance scholarship into this seemingly grey area. In parallel to
this diversity amongst donors, the GoR itself responds in different ways to
individual donor agencies, in tune with its own perspectives of them and their
histories in Rwanda, and on the basis of its own strategic interests. This
research seeks to analyse these different perspectives on Rwanda in light of
the international consensus on aid effectiveness. It questions the diversity
amongst donors and the political factors on both the donor and recipient sides
which lie behind the aid relationship.
This study helps in identifying the explicit challenges that
Rwanda faces and strategies that could be designed for its socio-economic
development through Foreign Aid. In particular the research will sensitize the
citizens of Gasabo District to the negative or positive implications of donor
aid so that they deal with donor aid carefully.
This conscientization will help them avoid dependency
syndromes and to indigenize projects including those that are donor-funded. In
a sense they will own their development programs. On the whole, the study will
expose some of the shortcomings of the approaches being currently used by the
institutions such as United Nations Development Program (UNDP), United States
Agency for International Development (USAID), International Monetary Fund IMF,
World Bank (WB) among others to improve the Rwanda socio-economic development.
The general citizens of Rwanda will turn immensely benefit in that they will
have a deeper insight into causes and nature of hunger as well as getting an
enlightenment particularly after interacting with the key findings and
recommendation of this study.
Finally, the choice of the case study in this research is
deliberate - to examine the ultimate impact of foreign aid on the people of
Rwanda. It is both an exploratory and explanatory study which examines whether
or not foreign aid is a blessing or a curse. If it is a blessing, then how best
can it be further localized; if it is otherwise, then what home-grown solutions
can be given in place of foreign aid so that either way socio-economic
development can be realized?
In the final analysis although the results of this study are
confined to Gasabo (Rwanda), the insights into how donor aid can be used
sustainably can certainly be useful to all recipient countries in their
generality. The motivation of this study to the future researchers, it will
reanimate them in depth with the new approaches about the foreign aid and MDGs
in LDCs and will add more knowledge to the existing intellectual studies.
1.7 Definition of key terms
The following terms shall be understood the way they are defined
herein:
1.7.1 Socio-economic development
For the purposes of this study, socio-economic development
entails all development frameworks that may meet the social and economic needs
of the nation and its general citizens as well as assisting them to deal with
their current and future developmental challenges thus leading to attainment of
sustainable development at large.
1.7.2 Impact
For the purposes of this study, impact refers to the instrumental
role a given phenomena has on something be it positive or negative.
1.7.3 Foreign aid
For the purposes of this study, foreign aid shall be perceived
as eternal assistance in kind or cash that is rendered to a developing nation
by another country which can come directly or indirectly through donor
agencies.
1.7.4 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
For the purposes of this study, Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) shall be perceived as quantitative developmental targets that were
adopted by different nations in pursuit of the World Bank (2002)
recommendations aimed at fighting the high prevalence of the so-called global
poverty.
1.7.5 Poverty
For the purposes of this study, poverty shall mean a state of
material and non-material deprivation which may be caused by socio-cultural,
economic or political factors.
1.8 Delimitation of the Study
In terms of peripheral guides, the study was confined to
Gasabo, a district (akarere) of Kigali City, Rwanda.
Its capital is Ndera, a village on the outskirts of the Kigali urban area. The
district also includes large areas of the city itself, including Kacyiru,
Kimihurura, Remera and Kimironko. The district occupies the northern half of
Kigali province, which had its boundaries extended under local government
re-organization in 2006 (MINALOC, 2006). Gasabo includes major suburbs of
Kigali, sections of a ring of hills which surround the city, and some villages
to the north and east of those. Rwanda's wealthiest area, Nyarutarama is also
in the district, as are the Offices of the President (in Kacyiru) and most of
the ministries.
Gasabo district is divided into 15 sectors
(imirenge): Bumbogo, Gatsata, Jali, Gikomero, Gisozi, Jabana,
Kinyinya, Ndera, Nduba, Rusororo, Rutunga, Kacyiru, Kimihurura, Kimironko and
Remera. As such, the results and findings obtained shall be perceived as
representative and generalisable too, to other districts not studied Donor
activities in all these areas will be explored. Both males and females
constituted the respondents in this particular study. The
study of aid in the context of hunger and poverty is broad. Conceptually, this
study is confined to the study of aid, poverty and development politics. It
entails defining foreign aid, poverty and development within the context of
MDGs. It entails exploring the complex dynamics and the politics of aid in
general and in the localized context of Gasabo, Rwanda.
It entails evaluating, competing perceptions of various actors
in the politics of aid and what may be said to constitute aid theory. The
timeframe in which the study is confined is 2000 to 2009. Spatially, the study
is limited to Gasabo District of Rwanda although literature will cover
Sub-Saharan Africa and beyond.
1.9 Limitations of the study
During the course of the study, the researcher experienced a
number of drawbacks which included lack of cooperation from respondents, time
inadequacy and financial constraints in meeting the budgetary requirements of
the study. However, efforts were made to address the constraints. The first
constraint was purely logistical. Given that the study was self-funded; the
researcher is faced serious challenges of financing travel to Rwanda for data
collection as well as financing the training of 10 assistant field
researchers.
The second major constraint was the methodological limitation.
Given that the study is based on a case study approach, it follows that it
inevitably exhibits the limitations of the method. Critics of the case study
believe that the study of a small number of cases can offer no grounds for
establishing reliability or generalizability of findings. This point is valid
when one considers that given the sensitive nature of the research some key
informants within the donor community and government offices may deny the
researcher access to important documents or information and this will lead to
information asymmetry. In light of this, others declined to be interviewed.
Thirdly, time factor was a limiting constraint. The fact that the researcher is
a mother, student and employee made it difficult for her to rationalise the
demands of these roles.
Also related to time was timing. The fact that the research
study took place against the background of genocide and genocide trials meant
that the subjects of research study were in different emotional states, so much
that they could easily provide or offer a political interpretation to the
study. In this case chances were that some sensitive members were not
forthcoming and forthright with their answers as expected. Such a background
threatened the validity of the outcome.
However, to overcome the above limitations there was need for
careful planning ahead of time. The planning should take into account use of
different data collection techniques such as direct observation, in-depth
interviews, questionnaires and focus group discussions in order to improve the
validity of data through methodological triangulation. Communication with
interviewees and questionnaire respondents should be done on time in order to
facilitate meetings. Besides, prior awareness of these limitations should
invoke constant sensitivity to their possibility so that due care is constantly
enforced.
1.10 Organisation of the Study
This study is structured into 5 main/key chapters. The first
one provides the introduction: background to the study, the problem statement,
objectives and the conceptual framework of the study. Chapter two presents a
detailed review of related literature: the main focus is putting into context
the polemics of aid theory in general, in Africa and in Rwanda-Gasabo. The
third chapter describes the methodology: the research design and instruments of
data collection to be used in the collection of data.
The findings of the research are then described, analysed and
collated in chapter four. Chapter five provides a summary of findings as well
as recommendations of the study.
1.11 Chapter summary
This chapter has provided the introduction of the study:
background to the study, the problem statement, objectives and the conceptual
framework of the study, the assumptions to the study, its significance,
delimitations and limitations, and the organisation of the study. The following
chapter is going to review related literature linked to the problem under
study. It shall give an overview of the current situation on Rwanda socio
economic development, policy and practice of both Rwanda and donor
community.
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.0 Introduction
This chapter offers a detailed review of related literature.
It will further trace the history of the problem against a background of
theoretical underpinnings. Ringrose (1986:78) notes that literature review
discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes
information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. A
literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it is
usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis.
The flow of foreign aid to Rwanda has been a subject of discussion especially
following the notorious genocide and its aftermath. To assess the impact of
foreign aid on the socio-economic development of Rwanda, there is need to
review some related literature.
This chapter deals with the conceptual framework of the study,
the theoretical framework, understanding poverty in the context of Millennium
Development Goal number one, impact of foreign aid on poverty alleviation
(global trends and trends in Africa in general and Rwanda in particular).
Finally, the chapter shall further offer implications of the reviewed
literature.
2.1 Theoretical Frameworks
Now that foreign aid, development and poverty have been
explained in broad terms, there is need to analyze some of the contending
theories on the nature of foreign aid. Four theories are hereby selected for
some detailed analysis. To this end, this study is principally informed by four
major theoretical frameworks namely the Modernization Theory, the Dependency
Theory, the
Interactionist Theory and the Feminist Theory. These
contending theories on aid provide various windows by which the impact of
foreign aid on poverty alleviation and economic development can be objectively
assessed.
2.1.1 The Modernization Theory and Foreign Aid
One of the first models used to understand how states and
regions started on the path to economic growth was Rostow?s Modernization
Theory. Analyses of European growth after World War II indicated a fairly rapid
and linear trajectory of economic growth that was built on a simplistic model
of saving and investment. According to Rostow?s analysis, modernization takes
place in a series of five stages characterized as follows:
The traditional society.
Preconditions for take-off into self-sustaining growth such
as increased education, manufacturing, and other forms of capital
development.
Take-off stage occurs when the economic norms become
established at micro, mezzo and macro levels, which lead to
A drive to maturity characterized by economic diversification
and increased standards of living.
The final stage is characterized by mass consumption, which
drives continued production, technological development, and job growth.
(Todaro: 2006: 104)
These stages imply that the rate of growth of GDP is determined
jointly by the national savings ratio and the national capital ratio. More
specifically, it says that in the absence of government control, the growth
rate of national income will be directly related to the savings ratio (ibid).
The
economic logic of this paradigm is simple: in order to grow,
economies must religiously follow the stages; and to achieve the imperatives of
each stage, they must concentrate on savings and local and direct foreign
investment. Rostow assumed the validity of the primary economic model of growth
at the time, the Harrod-Domar growth model (ibid), which was the basis for the
savings + investment = growth formula. While intuitively attractive (to the
capitalist worldview) and empirically supported at the time, it assumed a
linear growth based on the two isolated variables of savings and investment.
While such a trend seemed to be the case in Europe after the world wars,
Europe?s advantage over other regions (such as Southeast Asia and Africa), is
that it already had a pre-existing infrastructure, and a population already
educated in the skills and norms necessary for technologized life. Among other
factors, it ignores hegemonic consequences of having military, political and
economic power at a state/region?s disposal to procure capital external to
itself.
This theory assumes that the «Third World» needs
Western donation in order to advance. Indeed, one may observe that the
discourse of foreign aid is rooted in the Modernization Theory. Modernization
theory understands the «underdeveloped» nations of the world as
traditional societies. At some point in history all societies were
«traditional.» These societies were able to progress to modern social
organization through innovation and technological growth, particularly within a
capitalist system where capital is privately owned. Capitalism encourages the
individual to constantly strive toward improving her product. Growth is
promoted by this push for out-performance, while costs are minimized and
efficiency promoted. Therefore, just as modernization and capitalism push a
nation to modernity, the poverty of the developing nations can be attributed to
their failure to innovate, resulting in technological and therefore economic
deficit, and a consequent inability to modernize. Foreign aid,
understood as a means to improve the conditions of life in underdeveloped
nations, is couched within modernist thought. It is the practical expression of
the theoretical premise that modernized nations are morally obligated to assist
other nations to transition to modernization Todaro (1981). To this effect, the
modernisation theorists would support the idea that third world nations should
always look west in order to develop through coping western models of
development. Foreign aid may thus be perceived as a rescue package for an
affected nation to be freed from hunger and poverty.
This brings us to the major criticisms levelled against the
Modernization Theory mainly by Dependency theorists who include Marxists.
2.1.2 The Dependency Theory and Foreign Aid
The debates among the liberal reformers, the Marxists, and the
world systems theorists have been vigorous and intellectually challenging over
the years. There are still points of serious disagreements among the various
planes of dependency theorists and it is a mistake to think that there is only
one unified theory of dependency. Nonetheless, there are some core propositions
which seem to underlie the analyses of most dependency theorists. Dependency
can be defined as an explanation of the economic development of a state in
terms of the external influences -- political, economic, and cultural-- on
national development policies (Osvaldo Sunkel: 1969: 23). Theotonio Dos Santos
(1971:226) emphasizes the historical dimension of the dependency relationships
in his definition:
[Dependency is]...an historical condition which shapes a
certain structure of the world economy such that it favours some countries to
the detriment of others and limits the development possibilities of the
subordinate economics...a situation in which the economy of a certain group of
countries is conditioned by the development and expansion of another economy,
to which their own is subjected.
There are three common features to these definitions which
most dependency theorists share. First, dependency characterizes the
international system as comprised of two sets of states, variously described as
dominant/dependent, center/periphery or metropolitan/satellite. The dominant
states are the advanced industrial nations in the Organization of Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD). The dependent states are those states of
Latin America, Asia, and Africa which have low per capita GNPs and
which rely heavily on the export of a single commodity for foreign exchange
earnings. Susanne Bodenheimer (1971). Second, both definitions have in common
the assumption that external forces are of singular importance to the economic
activities within the dependent states. These external forces include
multinational corporations, international commodity markets, foreign
assistance, communications, and any other means by which the advanced
industrialized countries can represent their economic interests abroad.
Third, the definitions of dependency all indicate that the
relations between dominant and dependent states are dynamic because the
interactions between the two sets of states tend to not only reinforce but also
intensify the unequal patterns. Moreover, dependency is a very deep-seated
historical process, rooted in the internationalization of capitalism. In short,
dependency theory attempts to explain the present underdeveloped state of many
nations in the world by
examining the patterns of interactions among nations and by
arguing that inequality among nations is an intrinsic part of those
interactions (ibid). Most dependency theorists regard international capitalism
as the motive force behind dependency relationships. Andre Gunder Frank (1972:
3), one of the earliest dependency theorists, is quite clear on this point:
....historical research demonstrates that contemporary
underdevelopment is in large part the historical product of past and continuing
economic and other relations between the satellite underdeveloped and the now
developed metropolitan countries. Furthermore, these relations are an essential
part of the capitalist system on a world scale as a whole.
According to this view, the capitalist system has enforced a
rigid international division of labour which is responsible for the
underdevelopment of many areas of the world. The dependent states supply cheap
minerals, agricultural commodities, and cheap labour, and also serve as the
repositories of surplus capital, obsolescent technologies, and manufactured
goods. These functions orient the economies of the dependent states toward the
outside: money, goods, and services do flow into dependent states, but the
allocation of these resources is determined by the economic interests of the
dominant states, and not by the economic interests of the dependent state. But
before going into the debate on whether aid does encourage dependency and
inefficiency, we need to address a particular misconception: that aid to
developing countries, known as official development assistance (ODA), is an act
of simple generosity towards poor countries in dire need of capital to invest
in education, health, infrastructure, and so forth, and that it comes with no
strings attached. Development assistance is neither value-free nor benevolent.
It has served and continues to serve the economic, political and strategic
interests of
donor countries. This was particularly so during the Cold War
period. It is even more evident today. (ActionAid, 2005)
So aid is an instrument, not a gift. For many Western
countries and institutions, it plays a key role in their overall strategy to
maintain and even expand their influence in Africa. This is particularly true
for former colonial powers such as France and Britain, which have used aid to
maintain their influence in former colonies, in economic, financial, military
and strategic areas. This type of aid does create dependency and it is intended
to, since its primary objective is to shore up regimes that are
friendly? to Western countries, regardless of the nature of those
regimes. This explains, among other things, why a dictatorial and inept regime
like Mobutu in the former Zaire (DRC) was kept afloat despite the looting of
his country?s resources and the rampant corruption that characterized his
regime. Billions of dollars looted by Mobutu are still stashed in Western banks
while the Congolese people wallow in poverty (ibid).
Moreover, since the start of the debt crisis, aid dependency
has been aggravated by conditions imposed by the IMF and World Bank. Since the
1980s, aid from Western countries has been conditional on recipient countries
implementing policies dictated by these two institutions. One may argue that, a
typical example is the catastrophic ESAP of Zimbabwe in the 1990s. Even aid
from former colonial powers to their former colonies is now conditional on
signing an agreement with the IMF, yet it has become clear that these policies
have done more harm than good. (Government of Zimbabwe 1991)
The dependency on foreign aid has political as well as
economic costs. It is obvious that a country that depends on foreign assistance
for up to 40 per cent of its budget cannot control its own policies. Instead,
as the IMF and World Bank?s structural adjustment programmes show, donors
dictate economic and financial policies, based on their own world view and
interests (HDR-UNDP, 2007). The structural adjustment programmes, imposed by
the IMF and World Bank, are a reflection of that reality. As already indicated
this has worsened the economic crisis and deepened external dependency, while
the conditions attached to such multilateral aid are the principal cause of the
abject poverty affecting more than half of the African population. Against this
background, one may argue that from a dependency theory point of view, the
issue of foreign aid is a form of colonialism (neo-colonialism),hence Third
world nations will remain entirely dependent on first world nations.
On the whole the Modernization and Dependency theories are
macro-theories that evaluate society from a holistic perspective. As such there
is no wonder why all of them fail the test of local contextualization; hence
the need to look at some micro - theories that can explain the politics of aid
at a micro or local level. Two theories have been selected for this balancing
purpose: interactionnism and feminism.
2.1.3 Interactionism and Foreign Aid
Symbolic interactionism is a major sociological perspective
that places emphasis on micro-scale social interaction. Symbolic interactionism
is derived from especially the work of George Herbert Mead. The basic
assumption of interactionism is that people act toward things based on the
meaning those things have for them; and these meanings are derived from social
interaction and modified through interpretation. In other words human beings
are best understood in relation
to their environment. Herbert Blumer (1969) who coined the term
"symbolic interactionism," set out three basic premises of the perspective:
Humans act toward things on the basis of the meanings they
ascribe to those things.
The meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the
social interaction that one has with others and the society.
These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an
interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he/she
encounters.
Blumer, following Mead, claimed that people interact with each
other by interpreting or defining each other's actions instead of merely
reacting to each other's actions. Their response is not made directly to the
actions of one another but instead is based on the meaning which they attach to
such actions. Thus, human interaction is mediated by the use of symbols and
signification, by interpretation, or by ascertaining the meaning of one
another's actions. (Blumer 1962). From this analysis of interactionism one can
note that the Interactionist interpretation of foreign aid depends entirely on
the perceptions of the actors in the aid continuum. These include the donor,
the boundary partners in the middle and the recipient at the end of the
continuum. It goes without saying that the donor knows why he is donating in
the first place; but the point that needs emphasis is that the public can only
be made to know what the donor makes public that is, the donor?s explicit
motives. However, if the donor has hidden agendas, such agendas can only be
guessed by the public, otherwise the ulterior motive remains hidden from the
public sphere and the donor is not likely to disavow his hidden agenda in any
public forum. Nonetheless, even that hidden agenda remains intrinsically part
of the donor?s definition of the aid he releases.
On the other hand, the boundary partners, because they benefit
from the aid process, are likely to accept the donors? definition of aid. They
are most likely to resist any temptation to see aid in any other light than
prescribed by the donor. However, the recipients of aid are likely to interpret
aid differently depending on their varied needs. Those in extreme need may see
aid as none other than benevolent. They hardly see any dangers of dependency
but simply accept the donor as the saviour. On the other hand, those especially
educated recipients who may not be in dire need of such aid or whose political
portfolios are threatened by their subjects? allegiance to new saviours are
likely to treat aid with suspicion. The local intellectuals may take the
suspicion further to attaching such aid with ulterior motives. The point that
needs emphasis, though, is that foreign aid is interpreted differently by
different actors owing to different needs and sensibilities.
2.1.4 Feminism and Foreign Aid
Unlike interactionism, Feminism offers an explanation of how
economic models, policies and budget frameworks and processes have not adopted
a gender perspective, and how this has caused women to bear the brunt of
poverty. The theory deplores that economic models, policies and budgetary
frameworks that are adopted by different African governments and institutions
often ignore the lived realities of women; but that men largely dominate and
control not only the means of production but also economic decision-making.
Most nations in Sub-Saharan Africa have dual economies that consist of both
formal and informal sectors. Men are dominant in the formal sector, while women
dominate the informal and communal sectors. There is a discernible trend in
Sub-Saharan Africa that economic and development policies target the formal
sector, marginalising the informal and communal sector where women mostly
participate.
The Millennium Declaration, signed in September 2000 at the
United Nations? Millennium Summit, commits the member countries «to
promote gender equality and the empowerment of women, as effective ways to
combat poverty, hunger and disease and to stimulate development that is truly
sustainable. (UN, 2000). Accordingly, the greater part of women?s contribution
to the economy is not counted and not truly reflected in national accounts.
Similarly, women?s role in influencing and participating in economic policy
formulation is side lined, leaving them to deal with the impacts of poverty and
marginalisation. (Lucy Makaza-Mazingi, 2009).
The feminisation of poverty is a phenomenon where poverty is
viewed as disproportionately
affecting and impacting on women more than it does on men. The
phenomenon has been linked, firstly, to a perceived increase in the proportion
of female-headed households (FHHs) and, secondly, to a rise of female
participation in low returns urban informal sector activities, particularly in
the context of the 1980s? economic crises and adjustments in sub-Saharan Africa
and some Asian countries. The feminisation of poverty can be viewed from three
distinct standpoints namely (ibid):
|
That women have a higher incidence of poverty than men;
That their poverty is more severe than that of men;
That there is a trend of greater poverty among women particularly
associated with rising
rates of life.
|
This raises questions as to whether Southern Africa can meet
the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) number one: of reducing poverty by half
by 2015. In Zimbabwe, the Poverty Assessment Study Survey-PASS II (2003),
revealed that poverty remains higher among female-headed households than male
headed households. The Botswana women?s NGO forum notes that 55
percent of the population in rural areas in the country earns
income below the poverty line and female-headed households make up 41 percent
of those living in poverty as opposed to 34 percent for male-headed households.
A survey carried out in Zambia revealed that 50 percent of female-headed
households were classified as very poor compared to only 27 percent of the
male-headed households (ANSA, 2006).
A noticeable trend in Southern Africa is the dominance of men
in most of the occupations associated with high responsibility, job security,
dignity, high earning and social status, while women are relegated to the
low-paying jobs thus increasing inequality between women and men. In addition,
the African Development Bank?s (ADB) (2008) Gender Policy notes that
feminisation of poverty is directly related to the absence of economic
opportunities, the lack of access to economic resources (including credit, land
ownership and inheritance), and the lack of access to education and support
services.
Despite the signing of the 1995 Beijing Declaration, the
action plan on women?s empowerment, and the many declarations and debates on
gender equity in Africa, the women in Southern Africa still reflect the ugly
face of poverty statistics. The recently adopted SADC gender protocol
recognises the feminisation of poverty as one of the threats to the fragile
gains made towards gender equality over the past decade in the areas of law
reform, representation in politics and decision-making, and some strides in
education, with certain African countries reportedly achieving some of the MDGs
on gender- related issues. The traditional discipline of economics, which still
to a large extent implicitly informs the current economic modelling and
discourse in Southern Africa, has relied on a number of critical assumptions
about women and their roles (ibid).
There is now a shared understanding within the development
community that development policies and actions that fail to take gender
inequality into account and fail to address disparities between males and
females will have limited effectiveness and serious cost implications. For
example, a recent study estimates that a country failing to meet the gender
educational target would suffer a deficit in per capita income of 0.1-0.3
percentage points. (Dina Abu-Ghaida and Stephan Klasen, 2002). One may observe
that, by the same token the distribution of foreign aid has been heavily skewed
in favour of men over the years mainly because most donor organisations are
controlled by men who happen to occupy higher positions within these
organizations.
One may argue that to date, women are not considered a human
factor in decisions on aid for economic and social development; hence women and
children remain victims of the poverty trap. Todaro, (1993) is of the view that
development is a multi-dimensional concept which can be realized through
promoting gender equity. Burvic and Gupta, (1994) note that «where women
are targeted with resources it is often assumed that benefits accrue directly
to them and also to their children, to a greater extent than resources targeted
at men.
2.2 Conceptualizing aid, development, poverty and
hunger
Aid is simply the transfer of money, goods and technical
assistance from a donor to a recipient. According to Todaro, [1981], foreign
aid is any official development assistance or "any flow of capital to least
developing countries...» and its objective should be characterized by
"concessional» terms, that is, the interest rate and repayment period for
borrowed capital should be "softer" [less stringent] than commercial terms".
One may observe that, Todaro?s conceptualization of aid in this case takes for
granted that the impact of any such aid is
development; but unfortunately it misses the point that
development is relative. On one dimension, development depends on the
perspective of the beholder; in which case the donor, the recipient of aid and
the independent observer all judge the impact of aid from different angles and
with different sensibilities. Against this background, the Government of Rwanda
and its Development Partners have put in place a number of inter-linked forums
for dialogue on aid coordination at different levels. At the 2006 Government of
Rwanda and Development Partners Meeting, Rwanda?s donors presented a joint
statement of their intent with respect to the implementation of Rwanda?s Aid
Policy and the Paris Declaration. As part of this, donors agreed to adopt the
2010 targets above as individual targets, recognizing that collective
achievements against the Paris targets rely on the efforts of individual
partners. Central to in-country dialogue around aid effectiveness are a number
of key forums that bring together government, donors, civil society and the
private sector at a number of levels:
Figure 2.1: Aid Coordination Architecture in
Rwanda
Source: MINECOFIN, 2007
On another angle one may argue that the concept of aid may be
best understood from a historical perspective. During colonialism, European
colonial powers were concerned with the economic development of the territories
they occupied, hence they often released economic assistance to their proxy
governments in the occupied territories. Whether the beneficiaries of the
assistance were the minority ruling white elite or the majority ruled Africans
was not an issue for serious auditing by aiding cosmopolitan governments.
Mikesell (1983: 1) posits that even after independence «much of their
economic assistance to the new independent states formed after World War II
constituted a continuation of their development and other economic assistance
during the colonial period».
On the other hand, the World Bank charter of 1944 argues that
the Developed Countries had a dual function of promoting the reconstruction of
the war-torn countries, developed and developing, and of promoting economic
development in the less developed countries (ibid). The concept of development
assistance as enshrined in the Articles of Agreement for the World Bank aims at
promoting the flow of private international capital in the form of both loans
and direct investment investments to developing countries (Mikesell 1983). To
this end, from a Utopian perspective, Aid would best be defined as loan, grant
and technical facility advanced by a Donor nation to a Recipient sovereign
state with neither political nor economic motivations but to promote the
reformative and legacy reclamation efforts of the latter [Recipient] through
facilitation of the development of democratic processes and deepening
integration based on principles of mutual cooperation, non-interference and
respect for sovereignty. Nonetheless, political and economic interests have
often overshadowed what has often been projected as purely humanitarian. And
this reality is fore-grounded by the different perceptions of aid by the
Donor and the Recipient; prompting one to proceed with further
clarification of what development (and economic development in particular)
really entails for the two parties? perspectives. Webster?s Dictionary
(1990:248) advances that development means "bringing to more advanced and
effective state or to cause to grow and expand». In this regard, this
classical definition when adjusted to the contemporary debate would be
conceived as an all-encompassing and multi- faceted process characterized by
both qualitative and quantitative changes in the diverse sectors of human
society, namely social, economic, political, cultural, scientific and
technological, environment, that inherently lead to overall improvement of
human and community welfare, as well as deepening of mutuality and cooperation
within and between communities.
From time immemorial, economic development on the other hand
is often taken in a narrower sense as development of infrastructure and
institutions which prop the economy. Such a definition is confined to one or
two variables yet, as a process, development itself is really a complicated,
holistic and complex reality. For this reason social factors are as important
as economic factors in understanding development and this calls for a mutual
conceptualization of the imperatives of the politics of aid for this purpose
which is regrettably missing as the nature of and processes of aid are dictated
by those who offer the aid, hardly with either consultation or local
participation of the intended beneficiaries. This makes the recipient a passive
pawn in the scheme of the aid process. In the final analysis it is the donor
who defines the problem and designs and provides his own solution for a
perceived problem in the recipient; thus the intended resultant development is
logically not that of the recipient but of the donor who also defines the
progress. (Andrew Sikula, 2009).
Hunger and poverty are often the main causes cited by donors
(acting as senior brothers) as the main causes of their humanitarian
intervention.
http://www.worldbank.org/prem/poverty.
These are again defined as crises by the donor, and whether these are priority
one for the beneficiary or secondary to other pressing needs is a question
donors ever address. Everything falls within the blueprint plan of the donor.
Even the way hunger and poverty are defined is equally circumscribed.
Poverty is hunger. Poverty is lack of shelter. Poverty is
being sick and not being able to see [afford medication] the Doctor. Poverty is
not being able to go school and not knowing how to read. Poverty is not having
a job; it is fear of the future, living one day at a time. Poverty is losing a
child to illness brought about by unclean water. Poverty is powerlessness, lack
of representation and freedom (ibid). It is from this understanding of poverty
and hunger that the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were drafted by the
United Nations, the mother institution to the World Bank and International
Monetary Fund. The MDGs took tangible form in the Millennium Declaration of
world leaders in September 2000. The declaration reflects an inspirational
agreement that the global community will unite to eliminate the scourge of
poverty in a finite time frame (Marshall and Keough: 2004:4). In this context,
the Millennium Development Goals? (MDGs), Goal Number 1 is of particular
interest to this study. The goal targets :«To eradicate extreme
poverty and hunger, by halving the proportion of people living on less
than $1 a day and those who suffer from hunger» (Todaro, 2006: 24). One
may observe that, although goal number one is the most explicit about poverty
alleviation, all of them also contribute in part to the overall elimination of
poverty and want in spirit.
Chambers (1983), is of the view that poverty constitutes: lack
of assets (inadequate stocks, food and income), physical weakness and sickness,
isolation, vulnerability to contingencies (insecurity) and powerlessness.
Jazairy et al cited in Shepherd, (MEMIEIEI1 1;GEYLEImMI\E definition by
identifying four types of poverty: interstitial poverty (pockets of poverty
surrounded by wealth), material deprivation combined with isolation and
alienation (peripheral poverty), overcrowding poverty in areas of population
pressure, and traumatic/sporadic poverty - temporary poverty into which the
non-poor may be thrown by crisis (e.g. war, drought and famine). One may
suggest that, these categories, however, do not seem to encompass those who are
chronically poor and those in absolute poverty, neither do they focus
specifically on poverty in a rural setting such as part of Gasabo district.
Ribas and Machado (2007) further observe that chronic poverty
can be analyzed in terms of absolute or relative deprivation. In pursuit of a
plausible definitional view, Mickay and Lawson (2002) provide characteristics
of chronic poverty which include, inter alia, lack of human capital,
the demographic composition of households, location of residence, lack of
physical assets and low paid labour. On the other hand, transient poverty is
characterized by family size, government transfers, and seasonality of economic
activities, migration and life cycle events. As a matter of fact the
distinction between the two implies that public policies cannot be uniformly
applied (Gaila and Deolalikar, 1993; Barrientos et al 2005). Similarly, Kurien
(cited in Chambers S.EEI\EGeIVARQERIESRYIBWEI\: EEKEE\RF1R-economic
phenomenon whereby the resources available to a society are used to satisfy the
wants of the few while the many do not have even WILEba\IFEKTeG\ Emet?.
ETKI\EGIIIMIRnEi\Eal\R EIMatiYIEinEMMI.
2.3 History of Foreign Aid in Rwandan Economy
Rwanda is generally an extremely poor country with few natural
resources and little industrial production. For 1999, Rwandan GDP is estimated
to have been RwF 641.0 billion, or US$ 1.92 million, and RwF 712.2 billion for
2000, or US$ 1.83 million. The real change in Rwandan GDP is estimated by the
Economist Intelligence Unit to have been 5.3% for 1999. In 1999, annual per
capita income was US$ 189. Debt servicing has since 1994 been a major cause for
a balance-ofpayments deficit, but the most recent figures available seem even
more aggravating. (André et al., 2001). In this respect it
follows that this should be supported by foreign aid in order to realise
socio-economic development.
Similarly, based on IMF, World Bank, and national data, the
Economist Intelligence Unit estimates the latest available debt figures as
follows: the total debt had risen to US$ 1.3 billion in 1999, and debt
servicing to US$ 48.2 million, representing 69% of the value of the US$ 70.8
million merchandise exports. Foreign investments account for more than 90% of
total gross fixed investments, and due to the huge inflow of hard currency from
donors, the Rwandan Franc has been reasonably stable despite the low exports.
(Economist Intelligence Unit, 2000). One may observe that, there is a huge
economic and social divide between the countryside and the urban areas.
Economically, as well as seen from a wider developmental point of view, the
urban areas-in particular the capital Kigali - are far better off in all
respects. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit, Kigali is thus
«home to 94% of Rwanda's banks, 96% of its industry, 65% of the civil
service, 80% of the informal sector and 90% of the hotel space. The city also
has the most reliable supplies of water, electricity and telephone lines.»
About 90% of the Rwandan work force is employed in the
agricultural sector, and the productivity in this sector is generally low.
Agricultural production collapsed with the Genocide in 1994 and only started to
recover two years later, although much of the improvement is because more areas
are being cultivated. Also, the south-western part of the country has
experienced drought and famine. Formal and informal unemployment is widespread
all over the country, which is reflected in the fact that an estimated 70% of
the population lives below the poverty line, and the vast majority of this
group are from the countryside. Tea and coffee are the main export items,
comprising 80% of the value of total exports in 2000.
Rwanda earned US$ 68.4 million from exports in 2000, up by US$
7.2 million from 1999, in spite of a drop of nearly US$ 4 million in the value
of its main export, coffee. Tea accounted for this improvement, since tea
exports were US$ 8.5 million higher in 2000 than in 1999 because of increased
production. The commodity export from Rwanda is essentially made up of
agricultural goods and natural resources. The total amount earned is around one
million dollar per year Rwanda is not really integrated into the global
economy. Rwanda earned 219 million US$ in 2002 from export of goods and
nonfactor services. This export revenue only constituted 7.65% of GDP in 2002.
Little hope is in sight in this regard, since Rwanda?s export capacity and
ability to attract foreign investment capital is generally regarded as low and
likely to remain so for at least a decade. However, imports reached US$ 245.9
million in 2000 and thus by far outweighed exports, and the balance of payments
situation has not eased in the last few years (Ibid). The present focus on the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) has reignited the debate on the need for
more aid to developing countries to help them meet the MDGs by 2015.
However, this has inevitably rekindled the parallel debate as
to whether more aid is really the answer. Will extra money simply shore up
inefficient governments and feed government corruption? One response to this is
to say we must bypass government and make money available directly to NGOs and
other organizations. At the same time, others claim that what is needed is not
more aid, but a fundamental transformation of international power
relationships, especially reform of international trade and finance rules to
allow African and other developing countries to sell their goods and services
at a fair price.
Private and public transfers, which in 1999 covered 64% of the
current deficit, are also diminishing. As a result, the balance of payment
deficit in 1999 went beyond US$ 100 million for the first time after 1994
power-takeover and the trend is forecast by the IMF to continue. However, net
foreign assistance has been declining and is unlikely to exceed US$ 180 million
in 2001 and US$ 170 million in 2002, according to the Economist Intelligence
Unit, partly due to the Rwandan presence in the Congo and partly due to the
termination of the ?emergency period? following the 1994 Genocide.
2.3.1 Aid Effectiveness in Rwanda
During the last decade there has been a heated debate about
the relationship between economic growth and foreign aid. Knack found that
there was an adverse effect of aid in so far as during the period 1982-95 it
increased corruption and lead to a deterioration of bureaucratic quality and
the rule of law. Aid thus seems to be a weak policy to reduce corruption
(Knack, 2000). So while aid has little impact on governance, governance has a
large impact on the effectiveness of aid.
Aid effectiveness has been seen the return to favour of
programme aid instruments, and particularly the rise of budget support. There
has been a shift from discrete projects to much greater coherence of aid
instruments, whether programme or project, around a government-owned policy.
The Rwandan experience raises a wide range of questions about new?
programme aid and in particular budget support which is inherently tied up with
the concept of recipient ownership and has been the stated preferred aid
mechanism of the GoR for many years. Only a limited number of donors provide
general budget support in Rwanda, namely the IFIs, the European Commission, the
UK and Sweden. (Hayman, 2005)
The majority of bilateral donors continue to favour the
project mechanism, which raises quite different effectiveness issues. The
conditionality of projects is more technical; they induce higher administrative
burdens and are not necessarily tied to GoR priorities. Hence, it is too
simplistic to consider projects to be a poor instrument and budget support a
better one; what matters for both instruments is the behaviour of donors and
how they interact with and respect the GoR as recipient (ibid.). Development
Partners have made strong progress in their efforts to reduce transactions
costs in 2007: The Netherlands is phasing out cooperation in health and social
protection; Sweden and the Netherlands are acting as silent partners in
education; and Germany, the Education for All Fast Track Initiative and the
Netherlands are beginning to disburse sector budget support. However,
development assistance remains highly fragmented with some Development Partners
active in 5 (of 15) sectors and each sector hosting an average of 9 Development
Partners. The health sector, for example, hosts 16 Development Partners and
receives 12% of ODA, while infrastructure has 11 Development Partners (across
energy, transport, and water) but also 12% of ODA. Education, on the other
hand, only receives 5% of ODA and hosts 15 Development Partners, not including
silent partners. (Willium, 2001)
The present Rwanda government seems to be committed to the
reform process, and the government would by this criterion be a good candidate
for aid, (SIDA, 2005). As the Government?s development priorities evolve it
will be important to have an even distribution of donor activity across sectors
and to take full advantage of donor comparative advantage. Comparative
advantage refers to those areas in which a particular Development is activated.
Partner is considered to be most effective in relation to other areas where
that Development Partner is engaged. All these, because there is a need to
accompany the 2008 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey, as a first-step to
determine where Development Partners are, or could be, most effective.
(MINECOFIN, 2007)
2.3.2 The Politics of Official Development Assistance on
Rwanda
The OECD?s general definition of official development
assistance (ODA) applies here: aid as grants and loans with at least a 25%
grant element, provided by OECD and OPEC member countries and multilateral
agencies, and which are administered with the aim of supporting development and
welfare in the recipient country. It is important to stress that the OECD
definition of ODA does not include military assistance although Donors view aid
as having a positive effect on both economic development and the political
level. Economically, in particular the Bretton Woods Institutions argue that a
structural adjustment programme, including a slimming of the public
administration, privatization of public companies and a reduction in military
spending, will benefit the economy as a whole and thereby also the poor people
in Rwanda. Politically, donors argue that the economic reforms are an essential
element to stabilize the socio-political environment in Rwanda and the Great
Lakes Region. (OECD, 2000).
In other words, aid is seen as a means to bring lasting peace
to the region. The EU has followed the line set out by the Bretton Woods
institutions and is a major donor of development aid, despite official protests
against the continued war in the Congo. For instance, the European Commission
in June 1999 issued a communication to the EU Council of Ministers and the EU
Parliament reviewing the EU's economic cooperation with countries at war in the
Congo. The report was intended to avoid the misuse of development funds
provided by the EU for military purposes. (André, Catherine, and
Tierens, Michel, 1999).
Rwanda is generally highly dependent on aid in virtually all
sectors. For instance, the country received US$ 372.9 million in Official
Development Assistance (ODA) during 1999, most of which (287.4 mil US$)
comprised grants provided by bilateral donors. However, net foreign assistance
has been declining and is unlikely to exceed US$ 180 million in 2001 and US$
170 million in 2002 (Economist Intelligence Unit, 2001). Donors appear to have
decided to refrain from investigating whether conditions are being respected,
instead quietly ?believing? in the good intentions of the Rwandan
government? all because the local leaders pander to the whims of the
unofficial agenda of the West. This explains why the Bretton Woods institutions
have steadfastly backed questionable statistics put forward by the
Government of Rwanda? and even continued to publish manipulated and
incompatible figures by the Government of Rwanda?.
2.3.3 The World Bank and UNDP Poverty
Indicators-Indices
According to the World Bank (2006), since 1990 extreme poverty
in developing countries has fallen from 28% to 21%. However, over the same
period the population grew by 15% to 5 billion, leaving 1.1 billion people
in extreme poverty. The World Bank also estimates that if
economic growth rates are sustained, global poverty will fall
to 10%, but millions of people will still be trapped in poverty especially
Sub-Saharan Africa due to: lack of employment, depletion of environmental
resources, corruption, conflict and mis-governance (waste of public
resources).
The UNDP on its hand has characterized poverty in a similar
way but measures the various dimensions of deprivation using a series of
composite measures. It has produced the Human Development Index (HDI) and a
number of variants. The basic HDI is an average of indices of what the UNDP
considers to be uppermost aspects of human development: health as measured by
life expectancy at birth and maternal mortality, educational attainment as
measured by adult literacy, material standard of living measured by GDP per
capita (in dollars), unemployment, crime (to some extent), and freedom and
human rights. WB Poverty Reduction Handbook (1983), notes that «poverty is
conventionally measured by the income or expenditure level that can sustain a
bare minimum standard of living. Poverty can be measured in relative or
absolute terms. However, poverty is not just measured by income and consumption
above: Health, life expectancy, access to clean water, and education are
central dimensions of welfare».
On the other dimension, the World Bank Report of 1991 focuses
on income and social indicators. The World Bank indicators are identified from
a general analysis of country characteristics combined with the poverty
profiles. One may suggest that they show incomes and living standards of the
poor. They are based on the income-earning opportunities of the poor as
producers and employees and the availability and prices of pertinent
consumption goods. Smallholder farmers are the major targeted poverty group.
Their main source of income is the sale of agricultural produce. Their incomes
depend on the prices of the crops compared with the
prices of the goods they consume. Social sector expenditures,
broken down to show expenditures on services used by the poor are deemed
important poverty indicators. The assumption is that «there is an overall
positive relationship between levels of social indicators and social
expenditure shares». However, the problem with this analysis is that it is
teleological - expenditure in developing countries particularly in Rwanda is
not necessarily an objective response to an objectively observed need to
alleviate poverty. For this reason to assume that government expenditure on
social amenities is in relation or response to an objectively assessed need for
poverty alleviation is to be naïve. In reality government expenditure has
more to do with its own affordability rather than a reaction to a
well-researched poverty need.
The World Bank values children?s health and
nutritional status as a key indicator. It uses three leading indicators:
the under-five mortality, immunization, and malnutrition. The under-five
mortality rate is seen as the best indicator of «changes in health
status»; more so because it is not susceptible to cultural biases.
However, there is a problem of the availability of such data. Some communities
hardly visit hospitals due to religious beliefs and others do not have any
community health officers who would record such deaths. Lastly, the World Bank
focuses on the critical role women play in the survival strategies of the poor.
Their status and access to services are important indicators of family well-
being. Priority indicators include: female/male life expectancy at birth,
totality fertility rate, and maternal mortality rate. The first category is
based on the assumption that «normally women outlive men» (Ibid
p.26). The second category represents the number of children a woman would bear
if she were to reach the end of her child bearing years. The assumption here is
that there is «a correlation between fertility and poverty».
This assumption requires more scientific evidence to prove.
The last category, though, seems quite obvious - that maternal mortality is an
indication of poor women?s access to basic health services. In patriarchal
societies female literacy could also be a measure for it is directly linked
with welfare benefits. One may say that the World Bank indicators of poverty
can therefore be summarized as follows: income and consumption, employment,
health and nutrition, life expectancy, mortality rate and literacy. All these
can be further collapsed into income, health and social indicators. In the
final analysis Mkandawire (1999) defines poverty in more embracing terms than
Chambers and Kurien, and his definition can thus be used as a standard
definition for this research. For his perspective, poverty is «a condition
characterized by serious deprivation of basic needs in terms of food, water,
health, shelter, education; and a lack of means and opportunities to fulfil
these basic needs.
In his study of rural poverty in Malawi in 1993, he identified
the following as the indicators of poverty: low income levels, unequal
distribution of incomes, high unemployment rate, household food insecurity,
high mortality rate, poor water and sanitary facilities, low literacy rate and
environmental degradation Mkandawire?s study is a basic needs approach to the
understanding of poverty which clearly combines the UNDP and World Bank
indicators of poverty.
These Organizations? list of indicators serves as a convenient
point of entry into the discussion of foreign aid and impact on poverty
alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa; but before such a detailed discussion there
is need first to analyze various theories attempting to explain the motivations
and nature of foreign.
2.4 Foreign Aid and Economic Development in LDCs
2.4.1 General Global Trends
Foreign aid is usually associated with official trend
development assistance, which in turn is a subset of the official development
finance, and normally targeted to the poorest countries (World Bank, 1998). One
may present a question then: How does foreign aid affect the economic
growth of developing countries? This is a question which has always drawn
the attention of many scholars over time may not be answered to universal
satisfaction. Papanek (1972) finds a positive correlation between aid and
growth. Fayissa and El-Kaissy (1999) show that aid positively affects economic
growth in developing countries. Singh (1985) also finds evidence that foreign
aid has positive and strong effects on growth when state intervention is not
included. One may suggest that foreign aid has an effect in eradicating poverty
in general.
Snyder (1993) shows a positive relation between aid and growth
when taking country size into account. Burnside and Dollar (2000) claim that
aid works well in the good-policy environment, which has important policy
implications for donors community, multilateral aid agencies and policymakers
in recipient countries. Developing countries with sound policies and
high-quality public institutions have grown faster than those without them,
2.7% per capita GDP and 0.5% per capita GDP respectively (World Bank, 1998).
By contrast, other people find foreign aid has negative impact
on growth. Knack, (2000) argues that high level of aid erodes institutional
quality, increases rent-seeking and corruption, therefore, negatively
affects growth. Easterly, Levine and Roodman, (2003), using a larger
sample size to re-examine the works of Burnside and Dollar,
find that the results are not as robust as before. Gong and Zou, (2001) show a
negative relation between aid and growth. Pedersen, (1996) argues that it is
not possible to conclude that the foreign aid has a positive impact on growth.
Morrisey, (2001) claims that aid works well conditional on other variables in
the growth regression; while other authors find no evidence that aid affects
growth in developing countries. By and large, the relation between aid and
economic growth remains inconclusive and is worth being studied further.
According to the Modernization theory, aid is found to have a
positive impact on economic growth through several mechanisms in that, aid
increases investment , aid increases the capacity to import capital goods or
technology , aid does not have an adverse impact on investment and savings, aid
increases the capital productivity and promotes endogenous technical change
(Morrissey, 2001). Papanek (1973), in a cross-country regression analysis of 34
countries in the 1950s and 51 countries in the1960s, treating foreign aid,
foreign investment, other flows and domestic savings as explanatory variables,
finds that foreign aid has a substantially greater effect on growth than the
other variables. He explains that «aid, unlike domestic savings, can fill
the foreign exchange gap as well as the savings gap. Unlike foreign private
investment and other foreign inflows, aid is supposed to be specifically
designed to foster growth and, more importantly, is biased toward countries
with a balance-of-payment constraint». He also finds a strong negative
correlation between foreign aid and domestic savings, which he believes
co-contribute to the growth performance.
Fayissa and El-Kaissy, (1999) in a study of 77 countries over
sub-periods 1971-1980, 1981-1990 and 1971-1990, show that foreign aid
positively affects economic growth in developing countries. Using modern
economic growth theories, they point out that foreign aid, domestic savings,
human capital and export are positively correlated with economic growth in the
studied countries. This is consistent with the economic theory of foreign aid,
which asserted that overseas development assistance accelerates economic growth
by supplementing domestic capital formation (Chenery and Strout, 1966). Between
1980 and 1989, the World Bank and the IMF gave an average of six adjustment
loans to each country in Sub-Saharan Africa, and almost as many to the
countries of Latin America, Asia, Eastern Europe, North Africa and the Middle
East. A similar strategy would be tried again in the 1990s during the second
Mexican debt crisis of 1994-1995 and then again two years later, after the East
Asia crisis of 1997-98. The operations were successful for everyone except the
patient. There was much lending, little adjustment, little growth and little
poverty reduction in the 1980s and 1990s. As the World Bank President Barber B.
Conable noted in his Foreword? to the World Development
Report of 1990?253 (WDR1990): «...for the poor in the poor countries
the 1980s was a lost decade». Easterly (2001). In this respect it
follows that foreign aid can be subjectively construed and this confirms the
interactionist view.
Snyder, (1993), taking country size into account, finds a
positive and significant relationship between aid and economic growth. He
emphasizes that «previous econometric analysis has not made allowance for
the fact that larger countries grow faster, but receive less aid». He also
claims that donors favour small countries for a number of reasons.
First, donors who are seeking support from recipient countries
find it better to provide aid to many small countries than to focus on just few
large countries. With the same amount of aid, the proportion of aid over GDP
will be bigger in small countries compared to that of larger countries and as a
result, give them more credits. Second, there is pressure on multilateral
donors to deliver aid to all member countries and due to their feasible project
size, small countries tend to receive more aid than they expected. Third, small
countries tend to have historical colonial relations with donor countries,
which are somewhat influential to donors? aid giving decisions. The last reason
is that trade normally has larger fraction of GDP in small countries than in
big ones and therefore, these countries may be gaining more weight in donors?
assessment.
On the other hand, persuaded by the Dependency Theory, Knack
(2000), in a cross-country analysis, indicates that higher aid levels erode the
quality of governance indexes, i.e. bureaucracy, corruption and the rule of
law. He argues that «aid dependence can potentially undermine
institutional quality, encouraging rent seeking and corruption, fomenting
conflict over control of aid funds, siphoning off scarce talent from
bureaucracy, and alleviating pressures to reform inefficient policies and
institutions». Large aid inflows do not necessarily result in general
welfare gains and high expectation of aid may increase rent-seeking and reduce
the expected public goods quality. Moreover, there is no evidence that donors
take corruption into account seriously while providing aid (Svensson, 1998).
The aid conditionality is not sufficient and the penalties are not hard enough
when recipient countries deviate from their commitments. In fact, there are
incentives for aid donating agencies to disburse as much aid as possible. This
hinders the motivation of recipient countries and raises the aid dependency,
which in turn distorts their development. Other scholars believe that different
types of aid have different impacts on growth.
In a country analysis of Cote d?Ivoire from 1975 to 1999,
Ouattara (2003) categorizes foreign aid into project aid, program aid,
technical assistance and food aid. Using a disaggregation approach with auto
regressive techniques, he finds that (i) project aid displaces public savings,
impact of program aid is almost neutral while technical assistance and food aid
increase public savings and project aid and (ii) to a lesser extent, program
aid, worsen the foreign dependence of Cote d?Ivoire while technical assistance
and food aid reduce the gap. However, the region is still facing economic and
social problems, among which the most serious one is the unemployment,
estimated at about 15% of the workforce.
There are twice as many jobless young people as in some
countries compared with regional average, requiring the creation of 4 million
jobs a year in the next few years in order to accommodate new entrants into the
labor market. The Iraq war and the ongoing Palestine-Israel conflict also had a
negative impact on the economic performance of the region in 2002. As a result,
regional economic growth fell from 3.2% in 2001 to 3.1% in 2002 with continuing
declines of investors? confidence, exports and tourism.
2.4.2 Foreign Aid and Economic Development in Sub-Saharan
Africa
World Bank records (2000), show that Africa has continued to
make progress in many areas. Sixteen out of 47 countries achieved on average
more than 4% growth over the last decade. Investment and trade trends have been
steady. Net foreign direct investment
(FDI) to Africa rose to $6.8 billion in 2001 but was heavily concentrated in
oil-exporting countries and South Africa. Africa had the highest returns on
FDI, in the world, and the flow of workers? remittances back to
the continent doubled in only two years, reaching $4 billion
in 2002. Nevertheless, the continent continues to face enormous development
challenges. Half the population lives on less than $1 a day. The share of poor
population remains unchanged over the period 1987-1998. This is the region with
lowest income per capita and highest population growth. Lack of safe water, HIV
and AIDS and political conflicts are the burning issues of the region. Overall
GDP growth is roughly 3%, almost equalling to the population growth. Even
though the donor community has been providing huge aid amount to this region,
its economic performance is still very poor.
As the matter of fact, the aftermath of colonialism is more
serious in Africa than anywhere else. Sub-Sahara Africa is especially hindered
by its tropical location, high prevalence of malaria, small portion of people
living near the coast, and low coastal population density (Gallup, Sachs and
Mellinger, 1999). Weak institutions, poor economic endowment, widespread
corruption and various ethnic, political and religious conflicts are holding up
this region for long time.
Africa is especially vulnerable to terms of trade shocks,
famines, political conflicts, drought and floods (Morrisey, 2001). It is found
that African nations have aid-to-GNP ratios more than ten times that of Latin
America or East Asia, but still suffer inferior economic performance.
Ironically, within Africa, countries with poor economic policies have received
more aid per capita than those with responsible policies (Graham and O?Hanlon,
2001). In a distorted environment of Africa, if donors just simply provide aid
with the same uniformed conditionality like elsewhere, the failure is
inevitable. Zambia has received such a huge amount of aid, yet the income per
capita is only around US$600, not US$20,000 as expected (World Bank, 1998).
Nigeria, Tanzania may also be examples of failures. Even
though there some success stories, namely Botswana, Mauritius, Ghana, Ethiopia,
Rwanda, Mali and Uganda, they account for such a small number out of aid
recipient countries in the continent. The major cause is that donors do not
favour good policy countries and penalize the poor performers. Consequently,
the aid dependency is getting more and more serious. Widespread corruption and
fungible aid also make the situation worse. Obviously, the question lies not in
the quantity of aid but in its effectiveness, which remains ambiguous. As Mushi
(1982:09) says about aid in Tanzania, that aid is true developmental
only if it lays the foundation for its future rejection?, aid in Sub-Saharan
Africa can hardly be called so given the myriad politics around aid which
invite greater concern than arouse interest in the positive claims that donors
heap on aid. The Arusha Declaration sums up the Tanzanian experience with aid.
The Declaration unequivocally warns that it is stupid for Tanzanians
to imagine that they would rid themselves of their poverty through foreign
financial assistance rather than their own resources?. (ibid: 13).
The message is loud and clear: that foreign aid does not lead
to sustainable development as it serves the interests of the donor more than
the recipient. However, this does not mean that NGOs and other donor
institutions cannot bring anything positive. Many governments acknowledge the
significance of donor assistance. For instance the Ethiopian economy is a
typical donor economy, so is the economy of Lesotho, Botswana and to some
extent Rwanda. The poverty reduction strategies of Lesotho and Botswana (2000,
2000) acknowledge the role that NGOs can play in the entire process; but the
point perhaps needs emphasis is that Africa, being the richest continent in
terms of resources should eventually desist from aid dependency and that if
donors are really modest in their help, they must provide sustainable skills
for future self-reliance
otherwise it will be difficult to dispel the conspiracy
surrounding donor assistance, more so when Africa is still smarting from
colonial oppression by the same samaritans?. A closer look at Rwanda
should illustrate the impact of foreign aid in Africa.
2.4.3 Challenges Experienced by Government in Making
External Aid Effective
The post genocide government was new with little experience
and resources; the coordination office lacked enough staff, funds, logistics
and all resources necessary to perform all the coordination duties. The
Regional Director of IRC suggests that NGOs did not respond promptly to support
government directly, because most of them received funds from donors and could
not spend the funds as they wished. For example, the American Office Foreign
Disaster Assistance (OFDA) was the biggest donor but because it is not a
development agency, it does not deal with government directly. Funds from OFDA
to NGOs were not supposed to be used to support government (Keys, 1999). Donors
were not supporting government directly, and their policy did not allow NGOs or
other boundary partners to support government directly. Unlike areas like
Somalia where agencies supported activities in a kind of vacuum, with no
authority, Rwanda was different because the RPF had defeated the criminals,
halted the genocide and installed a new government. It was still new with few
resources but it was present with very dedicated people eager to make things
work and to put Rwanda back on the road to development (ibid).
After the war and genocide when a new Government was set up
there was competition among different government ministries each wanting to
co-ordinate. In fact there was no clear coordination authority. Procedures in
the department were long and bureaucratic, ministries took long to provide
policy guidelines and they delayed to show needs, and priority concerns to
partners. In this regard, this lack of clear government
policies and guidelines resulted in a situation where some important areas were
not well covered e.g. agriculture (food production and food security) and
education sectors. Local community leaders were not trained in project
planning, management, and sustainability. Therefore they were not able to
direct development partners sufficiently. This delayed work and led Donor
Community to work on their own because they had their own deadlines.
There was little of coordination between line ministries and
between local and national levels. Provinces and Districts co-ordination
committees that include representatives of NGOs did not operate well in a
number of areas or tended to be slow. This made NGO work difficult. NGOs
complained that they were not consulted during the evaluations, and suggested
that the basic agreement should be reviewed and updated to improve relations
with the different partners (Report of the Workshop on NGO/Government
Collaboration, 1996). Since both sides (GoR and its Development Partners)
agreed on increasing the effectiveness of aid in November 2006, successful
development, in terms of broad-based economic growth and sustained poverty
reduction, is best achieved within an enabling environment, characterised by
peace and security, good governance, effective rule of law, respect for human
rights and full participation of civil society and the private sector as
stakeholders in the country?s development. Aid effectiveness is also built on
these sure foundations. (MINECOFIN, 2007). But currently, different findings
dramatically illustrate the bigger problem that Rwanda faces today, namely the
low quality of aid. Rwanda is already one of the most aid dependent countries
in the world at US$55 per capita per year in ODA. Yet, we see mitigated impact
on economic growth and disappointing results in terms of poverty reduction.
This is because much of the US$497.6 of aid reaching Rwanda
today is neither on budget, nor on plan, let alone being aligned with the MDGs.
(HDR-UNDP, 2007). The United Nations Development Programme 2005, Baseline
Survey estimated that more than two-thirds of all aid coming in to Rwanda comes
in the form of projects and is, for the most part, neither on budget nor on
plan. There is a real risk that a rapid scaling up of aid flows could lead to a
further deterioration in the quality of aid and, hence, to an increase in
wastage, duplication and inefficiency. Basing on these government and donors
different publications, one may argue that aid may have a little bearing or
impact on eradicating the so-called domesticated poverty at family level; hence
this affects development, since Seers, (1980) views development as eradication
of inequality and poverty. Thus the change in poverty is a function of growth,
initial distribution, and change in this distribution which also will depend on
policy?s pursuance.
2.5 Implications of Literature Review
The negative relation between aid and growth dominates aid.
Nonetheless, it remains paradoxical that aid is still highly significant across
regressions. This prompts researchers us to continue thinking about how to
improve the effectiveness of aid. Reforms are certainly necessary, not only for
recipients but also for donors, especially multilateral aid agencies.
It is widely accepted that aid works well in good-policy
environment and in reality there are many good examples of success, for
instance Ethiopia, Uganda, Viet Nam, India etc (World Bank, 1998).
The implications are therefore obvious: Aid is more
effective when it is used to facilitate timely and efficiently the reforms
initiated by the local governments, not to condition the reforms. Put it
another way, the reform should be internalized, not imposed by outsiders. What
aid does is «to help good governments to survive long enough to solve the
problems» (World Bank, 1998). Countries may learn from the successful
experiences of others, but need to tailor appropriately their own action plans.
Aid is more effective and viable if it finances government bureaucrats training
or policymakers? overseas education and then nurture the reforms initiated by
them.
In reality, the World Bank structural adjustment programs and
IMF stabilization programs failed in many cases due to the lack of
appropriateness and strict penalty upon bad performance. Conditionality is
unlikely to bring about lasting reform if there is no strong domestic movement
for change (World Bank, 1998). Therefore, conditionality should work in the way
that ensures the effectiveness of loan where the reforms are in place.
Rewarding good performers in aid allocation is a good way to encourage other
recipient countries to learn from them. More importantly, the penalty should be
implemented strictly upon the violation of conditional terms. Loans should be
postponed or even terminated unless further positive evidence is accorded. The
current patterns of channelling aid through centralized governments in
recipient countries may reduce the timeliness and efficiency of aid. It is
found that the aid is more effective if it is delivered directly to the working
level local authorities. Hence, the emerging role of NGO community is widely
attracting attention (World Bank, 1998). The present coordination and
cooperation among donors is problematic. Most of donors and aid agencies have
their own objectives and different plans in providing aid. «Raising
flag» is a common phenomenon among donors and aid agencies.
Therefore, instead of cooperating, they are normally stepping on
each other?s toes by undertaking different approaches. As a result, the
overall aid effectiveness on the growth of the
nation most of the time fails to succeed, even though many aid
projects are assessed effectively.
In the final analysis most of the literature on the impact of
foreign aid is highly generalized and
guided by the statistical interpretations of World Bank and other
Bretton Woods institutions.
There is hardly any literature based on the local representations
of the impact of aid on economic
and social development. This study is situated in this niche,
with special focus on the responses of the actors in the aid matrix in
Gasabo District, Rwanda.
2.6 Chapter summary
This chapter has presented a detailed analysis of the issue under
investigation against
he review
fight poverty. The next chapter presents a detailed description
of the methodology.
CHAPTER TRHEE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
This chapter deals with the research methodologies that were
employed in this study. Initially, the general research designs shall be
briefly discussed and thereafter the selection of research methods applicable
to this study shall also be explained. The major thrust of the study shall
focus on upholding principles of validity and reliability/credibility and
trustworthiness.
3.1 Research Design
3.1.1 Research Design - An overview
A research design lays the foundation for conducting the
research in an effective and efficient manner. Like a good plan, it provides
the specific details that guide the researcher. Bryman and Bell (2007) define a
research design as a framework for the collection and analysis of data.
Coolican (1994:4) refers to research design as a method for gathering empirical
data with which to test a hypothesis or develop a theory. Bless and
Higson-Smith (1995:63) say that a research design specifies the most
adequate operations to be performed to test specific hypothesis under given
conditions?. In another dimension Monetle, Sullivan and Dejong (1990) maintain
that a research design is a detailed plan utilizing how observations will be
made. In other words it says who is to be studied and how the subject/object of
study is to be studied; for example it spells out the methods of data
collection, instruments by which data is collected and how that data are to be
analyzed as well as the techniques of data analysis.
The process of designing a research study involves many
interrelated decisions and it is an inherently iterative process in which
earlier decisions are constantly being considered in the light of subsequent
decisions (Aaker, Kumar and Day 2004: 73). The choice of the approach depends
on the type of the research that one intends to carry out. In light of this,
this study adopted the case study approach in view of its advantages.
3.1.2 Exploratory and Descriptive Phases of the Research
Project
One important decision that needs to be made when developing a
primary research plan is whether to conduct a qualitative or a quantitative
survey (Palmer 1994: 108). The research approach selected in this instance a
case study of Gasabo Distict of Rwanda. The approach acknowledges the argument
put forward by Malhotra (1996: 164) that it is a sound principle to view
qualitative and quantitative research as complimentary, rather than in
competition. Bryman and Bell (2003: 15) define a case study design as the
detailed and intensive analysis of a single case. They further argue that case
study research is concerned with complexity and particular nature of the case
in question.
Coolican (1999: 27) concurs that case studies are in-depth
investigations of one person or group of persons usually over a long time. A
great deal of qualitative and quantitative data is gathered to illuminate a
particular, perhaps unique set of conditions or experiences. This research
project sets out to explore the impact of foreign aid on the socio-economic
development of Rwanda in Gasabo district. In the process it seeks to assess the
reactions of various parties in the aid development nexus.
Chisaka and Vakalisa (2003) credit the case study strategy
with the chief advantage of being applicable to both qualitative and
quantitative research paradigms. In this respect a research technique that
includes questionnaires, interviews, documentary analysis and observations were
used in this study. Case studies give the researcher an opportunity, to
contextually study a given situation thereby adopting principles of both
ethno-methodological and phenomenological paradigms. Findings are reported
through in-depth reporting and description of data (Nyawaranda 2004). In this
respect a case study offers the researcher an opportunity to view issues from
the perspective of an insider (emic perspective) as well as an outsider (etic
perspective).
3.1.3 An overview of the existing situation of the Gasabo
District as the case study
The Gasabo District presents opportunities for economic
development which have not yet been exploited. Its geographical location
between the Kigali City and Lake river of Muhazi and the Gasabo plateau offers
abundant investment opportunities in agriculture, hotel and tourism sector and
has high potentiality for investment. Historical sites which form the cradle of
ancient Rwanda such as the four goddesses of Bumbogo, the foot imprints of the
legendary king Ruganzu at Jali, the vestiges of the royal palace on the hill of
Gasabo, the burial sites of princes are some of the unparalleled touristic
potentialities for investment. There is also the panoramic view of the plateau
overlooking Lake Muhazi. The District has trading centres scattered all over
Sectors and intermediary Centres which constitute points of attraction for
economic activities, small industries and crafts. Some mobile traders,
retailers and wholesalers need training and mobilisation to kick-start economic
development in the Sectors. To this effect, the role of foreign
aid in enhancing socio-economic development can not be
underestimated with a view to harness the potential growth development that may
seem inherent. The level of industrialisation remains low with only four
factories: UTEXRWA, RWACOM, Kabuye Sugar Works and SORWATOM operating in the
District. The development of this Sector shall move along with the development
of the industrial park which fulfils the environmental norms. (PDD, Gasabo
2007)
Below is the new administrative map of Gasabo District, showing
all the 15 sectors from which data were gathered for the purpose of this
study.
Figure 3.1: New administrative Map of Gasabo
District
In terms of demographic data the District has a population of
approximately 410 485 people. The study population was therefore extracted from
this approximate gross/total population of entire district.
3.1.4 Sources of Data
This study is principally guided by two major sources of data.
According to Howard and Sharp (1983) primary data refers to data which the
researcher gathers while secondary data is that data which is gathered by
others. In this regard the researcher will use information gathered from
interviews, questionnaires and focus group discussions as primary data. In turn
the secondary sources include written organizational literature and published
books and journal articles on foreign-aid-development and MDGs nexus.
3.1.5 Types of data
The study relies on two types of data namely quantitative and
qualitative data. Dooley, (1995) argues that qualitative research refers to
sound research based on field observations analyzed without statistics.
Similarly, Nyawaranda (2004) maintains that qualitative research seeks in-depth
insights rather than statistical analysis. Interviews and focus group
discussions will provide the bulk of qualitative data. Sheila and Mwiria
(1995:42) say that quantitative research involves a research in which the
researchers «assume that behavior of humans like that of matter can be
objectively measured through the construction of appropriate research
instruments.» In this respect, questionnaires are designed to generate
objective responses from respondents. The bulk of calculable data will come
from questionnaires and statistical records from the organizations under
study.
3.1.6 Target Population, Sampling and Sampling
Procedures
Moonie, (2000) defines population as the entire group of
persons having the same characteristics that are of interest to the researcher.
Ringrose (1986) postulates that population denotes all the potential
participants from which the sample is drawn. This study targets a population of
four hundred and fifty (450) respondents. According to Best and Khan (1993:13)
a sample refers to a small proportion of a population selected for observation
and analysis. In this study the researcher will sample 150 participants for
detailed study.
In this research study, the sampling processes will be carried
out at two levels. Firstly, the identification of Gasabo District, Donor
organizations and boundary partners will be done purposively. In Gasabo
participants will come from 30 beneficiary cooperatives and 15
imirenge (sectors) coordinators representing the 15 sectors in the
district. Selected donor communities include UNDP, USAID, DFID, Belgian
Technical Cooperation (BTC) and WORLD VISION. Boundary partners purposively
selected will include His Excellency the President of the Republic of Rwanda or
his spokesperson, and officials (preferably permanent secretaries) from the
Infrastructure, Education, Health, Commerce and Trade, Finance and Economic
Development, Local Government, Gender and Foreign Affairs Ministries. All these
are selected purposively as key informants. Sullivan et al., (1990) say that
purposive or judgmental sampling specifically excludes certain types of people
because their presence might confuse the research findings. Bailey, (1987)
credits this technique with the advantage of being more representative and has
the ability to be generalized over a larger population. However, because this
technique does not give equal opportunity for all elements to be included
(being non-probability sampling technique) other sampling techniques need to be
employed to cater for the limitation.
Simple random sampling (SRS) technique is the natural
alternative. Aldridge and Levine (2001) define it as a design in which the
cases that will make up the sample are chosen in a single process of selection
from the sampling frame that covers the entire target population. In this
regard each element has an equal chance of being chosen. The questionnaire will
be administered on randomly selected members of the target community. The total
number of members of the target community will constitute the sampling frame.
Systematic random sampling will then be employed to ensure that all the 15
sectors of the Gasabo district will be represented. Sullivan et al. (1990)
credits this technique with the exceptional advantage of treating the target
population as a unitary whole. In this regard, its attempt to guarantee an
equal opportunity may in a way minimize bias and prejudice. Nonetheless some of
the key district officials will be purposively chosen for in-depth interviews.
Below is a summary of sampling frame, subgroups and the final sample size.
Table 3.1: Sampling systems
STRATUM
|
SUB-GROUP SIZE
|
SAMPLE SIZE
|
Rwandan Population
|
1 representative (head of state), 8
officials from 8 ministries
|
9
|
Donor Community
|
2 officials from the 5 chosen
organizations
|
10
|
Gasabo District
|
2 district officials (mayor & town clerk), 15
imirenge Coordinators, 10 members from each of the 15 cooperatives or
associations
|
131
|
TOTAL
|
|
150
|
(Source: own design)
Below is an overview of sample size in relation to the study
population and data gathering tool used.
Data collection method
|
Study population
|
No. of respondents
|
Questionnaires
|
120
|
40
|
Interviews
|
27
|
9
|
Focus group discussion
|
180
|
60 (5 sessions of 12 each)
|
Observational
|
123
|
41 (4 sessions of 10 each)
|
Total
|
450
|
150
|
N.B The researcher took heed of recommendations
by Frankel and Wallen (1996) that a representative sample should be at least a
third of the entire study population.
3.2 Data gathering instruments
3.2.1 An Overview
Denscombe (2000:85) advocates the use of two or more methods
of data collection to enhance the validation and reliability of data, arguing
that the use of multi method approach allows findings to be corroborated or
questioned by comparing data produced by different methods. Determining the
impact of the results of any research work is dependent upon two concepts:
validity and reliability (Last 2001). Essentially, validity entails the
question, «Does your measurement process, assessment, or project actually
measure what you intend to measure?» Best (1989) defines validity as that
quality of data gathering instrument that may enable it to measure what it is
supposed to measure. Aldridge and Levine (2001; 183) define validity as
whether a measuring instrument indicates success in measuring what
it is designed for. Content validity is defined as an approval to establish the
validity measurements including assessing the logical relationship between the
proposed measure and the theoretical definition of the variable (Sullivan et
al.1989). Reliability, on the other hand, addresses whether repeated
measurements or assessments provide a consistent result given the same initial
circumstances (NATCO, The
Organisation for Transplant Professionals: 2009). Sullivan et
al. (2000:218) say reliability refers to the ability of a measure to
yield consistent results each time it is used?. Similarly Aldridge and Levine
(2001) define it as a measure of the extent to which the results of an
indicator or test are consistent over time. Internal validity encompasses
whether the results of the study are legitimate because of the way the groups
were selected, the data was recorded or the analysis was performed. External
validity, often called generalizability?, involves whether the
results given by the study are transferable to other groups (i.e. populations
of interest) as postulated by Handley (2009:1). This research intends to
achieve both internal and external validity of results through following a
proper study design and strict protocol execution.
A common threat to internal validity is reliability. Russ -
Eft (1980: 37) defined reliability as the degree to which the results are
attributable to sources of variance. This research tries to overcome the risks
associated with reliability by reviewing and thoroughly checking the research
instruments and employing consistency checks. The instruments of data
collection to be used are interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires
documentary analysis and observational schedules.
3.2.2 Structured in-depth Interviews
Bryman and Bell (2003: 115) define an interview as the
soliciting of information by the interviewer from the interviewee. Saunders et
al. (1997) citing Kahn and Cannell (1957) describe an interview as a
purposeful discussion between two or more people. Interviews are meant to
elicit primary data responses through direct questioning, (Wegner, 1993).
It is the most common form of data collection in any social
survey such as elicit different people?s opinions on a subject such as the
socio-economic impact of foreign aid on development. According to Fraenkel and
Wallen (1996), the advantages of using the interview technique approach are
that the respondents can expand on areas of interest and can use non-verbal
cues such as expression to emphasize their responses. In this study, several
respondents were lined for interviews. These include: the Head of State (or his
spokesperson), donor representatives, relevant ministry officials, sector
coordinators and community leaders.
3.2.3 The Questionnaire method
Questionnaires are used to investigate attitudes, beliefs,
feelings, opinions, knowledge and some aspects of behaviour (British
Educational Research Association, 2006 - 2009
http://www.bera.ac.uk/questionnaire/#use).
This method, if expertly designed, can give the researcher reliable data.
Denscombe (1998: 88) argues that the questionnaire works on the premise that if
you want to find out something about people and their attitudes you simply go
and ask them what you want to know, and get the information straight from the
horse?s mouth?. Using questionnaires to collect data is a relatively
quick way of gathering such information with relatively good response rates, in
addition to preserving respondent confidentiality. It consists of open-ended
and closed-questions. According to Harzadon (1981) open-ended questions are
advantageous because they give the respondents the opportunity to answer
adequately applying the detail they like to qualify and clarify issues as well
as giving them an opportunity for self-expression.
Labovitz and Hargedon (1988) highlight that the serves time
and financial resources since it can be locally administered. Frankel and
Wallen (1996) maintain that the questionnaire can cover a large sample and also
ensures anonymity and greater detail in as far as the handling sensitive issues
is concerned. In view of the delicate nature and controversy of the subject,
the questionnaire is deemed to be an effective instrument. In this context,
objective responses will be obtained through closed questions while subjective
responses will be obtained through open-ended questions. The attempt by the
instrument to combine some aspects of quantitative and qualitative data makes
it an effective instrument (Sheila and Mwiria 1996). However, the research
takes note of some of the limitations of the questionnaire. For instance
according to Frankel and Wallen (1996) the distance between the researcher and
the respondents\researched leads to lack of rapport. Probing is not possible
with closed questions hence there is no room to attach meanings in such
questions (Dooley 1995).
The questionnaire is a rigid form hence rephrasing questions
may not be possible (Haralambos and Holborn 1995). In this respect the
questionnaire only relies on intellectual and literacy competence of the
respondents as opposed to the interview method. The researcher will not post
any questions but will physically be distributed them with the help of research
assistants. A total of forty (40) questionnaires were administered to various
categories of respondents.
3.2.4 Focussed Group Discussions
According to Shumba and Kaziboni (2005), the Focused Group
Discussion (FGD) is a new approach / technique in which some discussion
schedules are used to interview 5 to 10 respondents simultaneously. It is an
effective tool for gathering public opinion. Against this
background issues that are considered sensitive, controversial
and delicate can be effectively debated. In applying this technique, the
researcher categorically placed respondents into groups. Any four (4)
communities were selected randomly for the aid impact assessment debate. The
focused group discussion falls in the realm of qualitative research paradigm
(Lincoln and Guba 1985). This method is credited with the principal advantage
of saving time as well as the ability to discuss issues democratically on an
open debate forum (Shumba and Kaziboni 2005). It allows the in-depth-study of
issues and enhances cross-pollination of ideas and views (Ngoepe, 2006).
Focused group discussions usually stimulate interest among respondents through
debates (Ngulube, 2006). For it to yield valid results, the following
limitations need to be guarded against: Such discussions only generate
qualitative data hence there is over reliance on subjective rather than
objective conclusions. As observed by AVERT (2007) that other respondents may
be dominated by others in the debate and if not guided and controlled, the
focus and objective may be defeated.
3.2.5 Documentary analysis/content analysis procedures
Content analysis is a systematic research technique that
focuses on the analysis of both quantitative and qualitative manifest or latent
meanings of words, ideas, phrases, postures, objectives and artefacts (Achola
1995). Against this backdrop it follows that documentary analysis procedure
will generate natural data for analysis. It is further assumed that it saves
both money and time. Shumba and Kaziboni (2005) credit this method, an
advantage to the researcher that she/he interacts with printed materials which
are non-human in nature. To this end, attempts by respondents to deliberately
lie or seek refuge behind secretaries in the case of questionnaire are well
catered for.
In view of the merits, textual data and all forms of materials
related to the foreign aid, MDGs and poverty alleviation, the context of
socio-economic development programmes were scholarly scrutinized in an effort
to see whether they have a bearing to the topic under study. As such this
particular study made reference to registers of NGOs and some policies on
Government development assistance at ministerial levels.
3.2.6 Observational schedules (Participant and
non-participant
observation)
The study also used some principles of Observational schedules
in gathering data for analysis. Observation is hailed by Dooley (1995) as a key
qualitative data gathering tool because of its ability to generate first hand
data. In this regard it follows that there is need to use a method that appeals
to the needs and interest of respondents/informants. Haralambos and Holborn
(2006) credit this approach for its ability to involve the researcher as a key
participant particularly through participant observation. However the method
may have a limitation that there is a possibility of the researcher to fail to
bracket his or her own experience hence leading to ultimate bias.
Non-participant observation may make researcher all off and may make the
informants become suspicious and behave artificially. In this case, the
researcher intertwined both the principles of non-participant and participant
observation to suit different situations and overcome the constraints and
limitations she was coming across.
3.3 Data presentation and analysis
Borgdan and Biklen (1992) define data analysis as a process of
systematically searching and arranging the interview transcripts and other
materials that the researcher accumulates to increase his/ her understanding
of them and enable him/her to present what he/she would have discovered
to them. The data collected using questionnaires will be
analysed using a statistical computer package. For sorting purposes,
questionnaires will be coded by way of giving each completed one a unique code
on receipt from the respondents. All responses will thus be considered
pre-coded since the computer package (SPSS) has the capability to assign codes
and values to each response entry. Frequencies, cross-tabulations, means and
analysis of variances (ANOVA) obtained from the results will be analysed and
summarised into tables and graphs that reflect patterns and relationships. The
qualitative aspects of the questionnaires and other qualitative data from
interviews and focus group discussions will be analysed using thematic content
analysis. Details of the analysis will be presented in Chapter 4 in the form of
graphs, tables and descriptive comments.
3.4 Chapter summary
This chapter has outlined the research design adopted in this
study and has further justified the methodologies used. The research
instruments that were employed have been exposed and efforts have been made to
explain how the data was collected. The next chapter deals with the
categorization, presentation, interpretation and analysis of findings.
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION AND
ANALYSIS
4.0 Introduction
This chapter presents, categorizes, interprets and analyses
the data that was gathered using the questionnaire, interview, focus group
discussions, documentary analysis and observation schedules.
Data obtained from the questionnaires were analysed first
using SPSS version 17.0 and presented in the form of frequency tables and
graphs. Some aspects of the data obtained from open-ended questionnaires were
thematically analysed and supported by information obtained through the
focussed group discussion. The second and third sections constitute the bulk of
the findings from interviews, document analysis procedures and observational
schedules, and like the second aspect of the questionnaire were thematically
analysed. In all cases the research themes were addressed. The recommendations
by Aldridge and Levine (2001), were taken into account in the formulation of
the emerging themes that are going to inform the discussion. The themes were
formulated in order to categorize the data.
This chapter begins with, the findings from the questionnaire
followed by a discussion of findings from interviews and documents analysis
procedures and the overview of the existing situation of Gasabo District. The
last part is a summary of findings merging all the findings from the different
data sources, and demonstrating emerging trends here described as key
findings.
4.1 Discussion of questionnaire findings
4.1.1 Questionnaire Administration
Total questionnaires administered:
|
40
|
Total questions on questionnaire:
|
20
|
Total responses:
|
32
|
Percentage responses:
|
80%
|
Generally the response rate was quite good (80%) and there was
evidence that both women and men were quite comfortable with interacting with
the questionnaire though in some instances blank responses could not be ruled
out for one reason or the other.
4.1.2 Quali-Quantitative Analysis of Questionnaire Data
Below is a quali-quantitative analysis of questionnaire data.
It is quali-quanti in the sense that both qualitative and quantitative data are
analysed given that the questionnaire itself comprised both objective and
subjective sections. As such objective responses are analysed quantitatively
while descriptive (subjectively) data are analysed thematically.
Note, however, that both types of data, because they are corroborative
in that they are responding to the same question, are therefore treated
simultaneously.
4.1.2.1 Gendered perceptions on poverty as Rwanda's
threat to socio-economic development
Figure 4.1:
Research findings reveal that 85% of all male respondents
supported the idea that Rwanda?s socio-economic development was being
threatened by poverty. Even more female respondents (100%) believe that poverty
is a key threat to Rwanda?s prosperity, a negligible average percentage of
about 5% thinking otherwise.
Some of their typical responses were:
The issue of poverty reduction is of great concern for
Rwanda, as Rwanda has its own policies and efforts made by technocrats.
Poverty impacts negatively on the quality of living standards
of Rwandan.
Poverty lowers production of the productive sector, in
particular small scale enterprises with no savings in the banks hence there is
no bargaining power to get credits from the banks.
Based on the findings, it can be noted that the overall
poverty affects the living standards of citizens and all their aspects towards
economic development. Since the genocide Rwanda has been struggling with fiscal
deficit and her efforts have always been directed towards servicing national
debt which has been accumulating exponentially in spite of foreign aid
(Ministry of Finance statistics Department, 2004:134). MeIZITQEEEEE EaQdEIIIE,
E5 ZEQAVESRYHWEIDe decreased from 60.2% to 56.9% of the population (UNDP,
2007).
This trend has continued despite her macro-economic strategy
to decrease excessive dependence on foreign assistance (ibid). On the other
hand the government of Rwanda has directed most of its resources towards
helping people survive instead of investing in developmental activities which
recapitalize the productive sector of the economy (ibid: 135). The
recapitalization of the productive sector enhances employment opportunities for
the citizens, reducing poverty thereby enhancing socio-economic growth which is
key to the attainment of MDGs.
4.1.2.2 Views on whether poverty is a threat to
Rwanda's socio-economic development by organizations
Table 4.1:
Organization
|
|
Frequency (%)
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
Government
|
|
14
|
4
|
|
NGO
|
|
5
|
0
|
|
NA
|
|
9
|
0
|
|
Total
|
28
|
(87.5%)
|
4
|
(12.5%)
|
The study reveals that the majority of the participants (88%)
felt that poverty was a cause for concern to Rwanda?s socio-economic
development. The government position on the contribution of poverty to economic
retardation is overwhelming, with about 88% of government officials concurring
that poverty is a key threat; while about 12% objecting, most probably because
they think that other variables than poverty are more key, yet even this does
not lessen the enormity of poverty as a grave danger to economic
development.
On the other hand the NGOs? reticence on the question speaks
louder than words. One would have expected all donor organizations to
overwhelmingly vote that poverty is indeed a threat, which would have bolstered
their donating efforts; but their silence raises the suspicion that they have
more to hide than give. This point will come to a head when we come to their
responses to interview questions. Nonetheless, the 12% government officials who
indicated that poverty had no bearing on the socio-economic of Rwanda may be
understood in the context of them not entirely dismissing poverty as a variable
to reckon with but that its impact on economic development is perhaps less key
than their other perceived determinants. Otherwise all the participants who
were neither NGO nor Government officials (88%) agree that poverty is a major
threat to the economic well being of Rwanda. Based on the above findings it can
be argued that poverty is a threat to Rwanda?s socio-economic development. This
confirms findings by World Bank (1993) that as long as we have poverty in third
world countries, developmental trends will remain crippled. However, the
perceptions of poverty by different people differ with ages as the table below
illustrates.
4.1.2.3 Views on whether Poverty has functional
benefits to society
Table 4.2:
Organization
|
Frequency (%)
|
Yes
|
No
|
Government
|
2
|
17
|
NGO
|
0
|
7
|
NA
|
0
|
4
|
Total
|
2 (6.15%)
|
30 (93.75%)
|
It emerged from the survey that poverty is generally perceived
in the negative sense. All government officials dismiss it with the contempt it
deserves. Below are the views that were echoed:
Poverty have never benefits the society, it destroy their
standard of living, social welfare, creates malnutrition, conflict and
disaster;
There are no benefits at all but becomes a social problem
instead. Many people become beggars, thieves, prostitutes and idleness;
Essentially it does not but to poor leadership when using for
pro-poor project to promote self interest.
This was supported by information obtained using the focused
group discussion where one respondent remarked that,
«Poverty makes us afraid of talk, taking position in a
meeting, we cannot even give our opinion, we think it will not be taken
seriously. No confidence»
Although findings pointed to the fact that poverty has some
detrimental effects, on the other angle the functionalists would view it as a
functional phenomenon in society. (O?ddInell,IDDI) NGOs are more eloquent by
their reticence; perhaps their mere presence justifies their complete negation
of poverty; logically they would not be here to support or promote poverty. The
only significant response worth some explanation is 6% of participants who
suggest that poverty is not entirely dysfunctional. It may be guessed that they
view poverty as providing an impetus for community and intergovernmental
cooperation, a reason that justifies the need for governance. Although somewhat
far-fetched, this reason is compelling in that if all people were
self-sufficient there would not be any need for government. The general feeling
however is that poverty is a menace that requires the cooperation of all
stakeholders (aid agencies included) to eradicate, but the other question that
arises is: is foreign aid itself wholly functional?
4.1.2.4 Perceptions of the impact of foreign aid on the
Rwandan economy
Figure 4.2:
It was established that (90%) of the respondents indicated
that Foreign Aid contributed significantly to the socio-economic development of
Rwanda indicated so. Foreign Aid helps in the development of the proposed
projects and their implementation.
Some of their typical responses were:
It does, because Rwanda engages itself on partnership
platform not patronage. Many economic growth sectors have been remarkably
developed like infrastructures.
) RUiJQIISiGILelYEiQ 5 ZEQGa1r6RFiR-economic
development because they bring projects, create job for us and develop Rwandan
with those projects
Although the macro-economic strategy of Rwanda aims in the
long run to decrease excessive dependence on foreign aid, at present all
indications point in one direction: that she cannot do without assistance.
Findings reveal that there is a program in place called VUP - Vision 2020
Umurenge programme. It is the second flagship of EDPRS, it accelerates the rate
of poverty reduction by promoting pro-poor components of the national growth
agenda. This will be achieved by releasing the productive capacity of the poor
in rural areas through a combination of public works, promotion of
cooperatives, credit packages and direct support. In the end, these people
graduate and move from one category of poverty to another, that is most poor to
poor and then to rich-to-be. The idea is eventually eradicate poverty among the
people. EDPRS, (2006)
This is part of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness to
which the GoR and its development partners are signatories (Rwanda Aid Policy:
2006: 6). The overall objectives identified by the parties to the Declaration
include aligning donor programs to government, strengthening country reporting
systems and strengthening local capacities (ibid). But the question that
remains is: is poverty itself viewed as entirely negative?
4.1.2.5 Views on whether Foreign Aid creates Dependency
on Rwanda by Organization
Table 4.3:
Organization
|
Frequency (%)
|
Yes
|
No
|
Government
|
8
|
10
|
NGO
|
0
|
0
|
NA
|
6
|
8
|
Total
|
14(43.75%)
|
18(56.15)
|
It emerged from the study that (44%) of the respondents have
negative perceptions about foreign aid. According to some of them it creates
dependency syndrome on the people of Rwanda by providing them with products
(consumables) rather than giving them skills to produce sustainably for
themselves. Naturally spoon-feeding dulls creativity and innovation while
promoting laziness and dependency. This was supported by information obtained
using the focused group discussion where one respondent remarked:
|
«Iby'ubuntu bitera ubwenge buke» this
means free things make you brainless in English. So if the Aid we get
is to help us to improve our lives and get out of poverty yes, otherwise
we don?t need aid which is not prosper
|
The findings may seem to suggest that a wave of dependency can
negatively impact on people if aid is not accompanied by some strategies that
can eventually wean the recipients, much as the wise adage would say, give a
man a fish, teach him/her how to catch the fish so that tomorrow, he/she will
eat them forever. The GoR seems to be aware of this reality as shown by the
significant 44% in the affirmative. The other participants,
though more in number (56%) who argued in the contrary do not necessarily
diminish the impact of their counterparts? observation. If anything it may be
further observed that participants who say aid does not create dependency
betray their levels of literacy and analytical sophistication. Surely the
Rwandan Government would not put a policy in place for monitoring and
evaluating the aid and how it is channelled. According to the Government?s Aid
Policy (2006), all assistance is preferred to be delivered through Rwanda?s
Public Financial Management (PFM) and procurement systems to ensure that it is
controlled and regulated. The graph below further illustrates the gendered
perception on the issue of dependency syndrome.
4.1.2.6 Gendered Perceptions of Foreign aid and
dependency
Figure 4.3:
The study findings reveal that a majority of respondents (52%)
indicated that Foreign Aid leads to dependency syndrome on the part of the
Rwanda Government. The remainder 48% felt people use the Aid for sustainable
development activities. These positions reflect earlier perceptions which have
been attributed to varying levels of literacy and cognitive sophistication.
However, there were more females (56%) compared to 50% males who indicated that
there is no
correlation between donor aid and consumer dependency and this
again buttresses the earlier observation as more women are generally less
literate than their male counterparts, especially in third world countries such
as Rwanda. These varying levels of literacy were again reflected in the
participants? awareness of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). This
corroborates findings by UNDP (2007) who assert that the issue of poverty has
some multiple interpretations; hence the so-called gendered nature or
feminisation of poverty and aid too.
4.1.2.7 Knowledge of the existence of MDGs in
Rwanda
Figure 4.4:
The survey results show that the majority of the respondents
(96%) were aware of the MDGs in
85
Rwanda and nearly all of them had learnt from the Government?s
sensitization and mobilization programs (publications) and open public
discussions on the country?s Vision 2020. On the other hand, a very strong link
(85%) between the Rwanda?s ruling class political ideology and MDGs exists. The
ruling class political ideology of Rwanda has programs and strategies such as
Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS) and Vision 2020 to
address MDGs. It was therefore necessary to find out more about the
participants? awareness of MDGs
by asking them to rank them according to their own priorities.
It can therefore be concluded that the instrumental role of MDGs as a weapon to
fight poverty is overlooked hence the need to acquaint people with critical
issues regarding this concept.
4.1.2.8 Ranking of MDGs according to priority
Figure 4.5:
The study findings indicate that of all the MDGs Rwanda is
prioritizing the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger most with a number
one ranking. A lot of effort is also being put in trying to improve maternal
health and combating HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases in order of priority,
respectively. Findings also revealed that the Rwandan Government is trying to
achieve universal primary education for all its citizens as its fourth
priority. However issues of gender equality, empowerment of women and global
partnership still need greater articulation.
h
This was supported by data from FGD were one respondent
echoed:
Global Parnership Combat HIV/AIDS
Genr qy
«The issue of eradication poverty and extreme hunger has
become a universal priority across all d ty
nations in Third world.»
Based on this, it can be interpreted that the issue of
prioritising MDG 1 may seem to go along the assumptions of modernisation
theorists who insist «in order to develop, third world nations must copy
western models of development (Sanderson, 1991)
4.1.2.9 Rating of Poverty Eradication
Strategies
Figure 4.6:
The study findings of the above pie-chart reveal fact that
EDPRS is mostly used in Rwanda as a strategy to eradicate poverty. Based on
the findings, it can be argued that strategies as means to
an end are always critical in as far as eradicating of poverty is
concerned, thus without user-8%
friendly strategies poverty cannot be ameliorated. The
Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS), adopted in 2007
together with Rwanda?s Vision 2020 and Constitution, provides a clear statement
of the government?s high level priorities and a consistent set of principles.
The EDPRS grew out of the Rwanda?s first Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
(PRSP), adopted in 2002 and agreed with donor partners as a
necessary step towards receiving PRSP EDPRS N
debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries initiative.
ODI, (1999)
85
4.1.2.10 Sustainability of Foreign Aid in Rwanda's
Socio-economic development
Table 4.4:
Sex
|
|
|
|
Frequency %
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Male
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
10
|
Female
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
2
|
Total
|
|
20
|
(62.5%
|
|
12
|
(37.5%)
|
The study findings show that foreign aid could be sustainable
in Rwanda?s Socio-economic development from the males? point of view. The point
of concern is the perceptions of females whose majority, 80% tended to differ.
Aid is not sustainable because the Rwandans feel that they are self-sufficient
in spirit and are hard-working to produce enough for themselves and for export,
rather than depending on Foreign Aid. This is supported by one male
participant?s proverb in Kinyarwanda «akimuhana kaza imvura
ihise». This translates to «something from out comes after the
rains» in English. In addition Rwanda has an abundance of resources to
sustain itself as almost 60% of its budget is not supported by Foreign Aid.
The subjectivity impact of foreign aid in Rwanda may seem to
confirm findings from a regional survey by Baker et al (2003) who concluded
that the relativity nature of foreign aid and its impact has generated heated
debates across the development spectrum, hence the assertions by
interractionist scholars who maintain that subjective meanings are attached to
social happenings (Palen, 2000).
4.1.2.11 Perceptions of Beneficiaries of Foreign Aid in
Rwanda
Figure 4.7:
Current findings show that the majority of the participants
(96%) appreciated the impact foreign aid has had in their country. 6RP MsIjd
310I31V310e AID provided directly benefits the FRP P )1j3jes? projects and
hence improve their lives and accelerates development in their area. As
explained by Todaro (1981) foreign aid is understood as a means to improve the
conditions of life in underdeveloped nations, is couched within modernist
thought.
4.1.2.12 Relations of the Government of Rwanda and the
Donor Community Figure 4.8
The study findings of figure 4.8 above indicate that Rwandan
Government has good relations with the international donor community since
2000-2009, as supported by the 0% bad to extremely bad response rate.
Development Partners have played a fundamental role in the recovery of the
Rwandan economy, and their continued support as Rwanda?s GDP exceed prewar
levels will be integral for the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals
and national strategies, such as the EDPRS and Vision 2020. (MINECOFIN 2007).
This is also supported by the answer of one Government authority who said that
«In general I can say even in 10 years ago that our relations with the
Development Partners are good. They are involved in different forums for
dialogue on aid coordination at different levels where we plan together, we
implement together, and where we Monitor and evaluate together»
4.1.2.13 Beneficiaries of Donor Community from
2000-2009 Figure 4.9:
The survey results indicate that the Health Sector was the
greatest recipient of Donor community support in the years 2000 to 2009. The
educational sector (62%) and agricultural sector (54%) were the second and
third beneficiaries respectively. However local government was least
ealth sector
funded (38%).
Gov
Strategies and policies in place in Rwanda such as EDPRS and
Vision 2020 focus on human development at all cost. For their implementation
the GoR emphasis on the partnership with the donors and establish priorities
assuming responsibility for aid coordination in different sectors. Like the
Strategic Partnership with Africa notes, budget support instruments can be a
particularly effective way of promoting African ownership and development in
countries with well-designed poverty reduction strategies and reasonable levels
of fiscal accountability.... (SPA 2002a: 13).
4.1.2.14 Availability of Technical Challenges with
regards to Implementation of MDGs
Table 4.5:
Response
|
Frequency
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
24
|
75.0
|
No
|
8
|
25.0
|
Total
|
32
|
100.0
|
The study reveals that it is the view of the majority, 75% of
the participants that the Donor Community could be facing technical challenges
with regards to the implementation of MDGs. These include attitudinal
constraints and other socio-economic constraints. The specific challenges are
further shown by the diagram below.
Figure 4.10: Challenges with regards to
Implementation of MDGs
According to ECA (2005) provided development partners
appropriately harness existing resources, most of the MDGs are achievable. Part
of the challenge is making sure that programmes are interconnected, so that
when addressing primary education, for example, a comprehensive development
strategy would also incorporate natural resource management and health
education.
4.1.2.15 Ranking Rwanda's main Resources in order of
importance
Figure 4.11:
It emerged from the survey that agriculture is the backbone of
the people and government?s needs, 96% of the participants indicated so.
Mining, services and industry in that order are important to a lesser extent.
Koster (2008), shows that in July 2006, the population was estimated at
8,648,248, of which the large majority (93.4 percent) lives in the rural areas
and that large majority of people (over 90 percent) depends on agricultural
subsistence production.
4.1.3 Overall synthesis of findings from the
questionnaire
The results obtained from then open-ended questionnaire concur
with the focus group discussion/interview results. All of them showed that
poverty was a phenomenon so real that its negative impact on the national
economy cannot be contested. This picture was shown more vividly at village
level. The case of Kimironko Sector deserves special mention. It is one of the
3 urban sectors of the District and accommodates «Centre
Cesar» which takes care of Genocide survivors to develop themselves
socially and economically. According to the results from the discussions with
the villagers, poverty is all about failing to avail the basic necessities of
life to oneself or the family. This group was partially aware of MDGs but as
captured earlier, none of them really bothered about poverty at national
level.
4.2 Qualitative Analysis of Findings
In-depth structured Interviews Observational schedules
Documentary analysis procedures
This part presents a synthesis of major findings from
interviews, documentary analysis and researcher observation. It begins with an
overview of aid coordination background followed by responses from the three
major respondents: non-governmental organisations, government officials and the
public representing the target beneficiaries of donor aid.
4.2.1 Interview data from administrators
Several respondents were for interviewed. These include: the
donor representatives, relevant ministry officials, sector coordinators and
community leaders. Following recommendations by Chisaka and Vakalisa (2003),
the findings from the interview method are presented thematically with emerging
or recurring themes identified. Substantiating evidence in form of people?s
real words are also given since it is a qualitative inquiry (Frankel and Wallen
1996).
Table 4.6 below presents data that was gathered using
the interview method
EMERGING THEME
|
SUBSTANTIATING EVIDENCE
|
How have been the Relations between
|
In general I can say even in 10 years ago that our
|
Government of Rwanda and the Donor
|
relations with the Development Partners were good.
|
Community since 2000-2009?
|
(Donors are no longer called Donor Community but
|
|
Development Partners because they are helping us to build
our country.) I was saying our relationship is fine in terms of development
issues. They are involved in committees where we plan together, we implement
together and we Monitor and evaluate together
|
|
(MINECOFIN).
|
|
In general our relationship with the donor community is
good. In our 15 sectors, 7 in town and 8 in rural area, we have NGOs and
working closely with the community of these sectors in their different
development activities.
|
|
Here I am talking about their socio-economic
development activities, as you can see it on this chart,
(refer to table 4.11), Mayor of Gasabo.
|
Which sector(s) benefited from foreign
|
In 2000 our economy was worse than in 1990s because
|
aid from 2000-2009?
|
of Genocide. This was the time of reconstruction and
|
|
Rehabilitation, the PRSP was the guidance as poverty
strategy. From 2003-2005 things changed: socio life, enrolment of students,
gender equality also quite good but with a bit need of change in economic
empowerment.
|
|
Service sector was also high, but we realize that all of
these are not pro-poor programs. The poverty remains.
|
|
From 2006, the agriculture was the one to be focused in to
contribute to the growth; the industry, investment... were too slightly
contribute to the economy
|
|
(MINECOFIN).
|
MDGs are principles that only serve a
|
No. If you know well the history, MDGs come later
after
|
political ideology and are serving
|
our Vision 2020, which means that when we saw or
|
cosmetic and window dressing purposes.
|
heard about the September 2000 UN declarations on
|
Do you agree?
|
MDGs, we said excellent, we are in a right way and
|
From your own point of view what other effects can you
highlight which are caused by poverty and hunger on 5 Zanda?\1\RFiR-economic
development?
|
|
also high in our district; it is another effect of poverty.
(Mayor Gasabo District)
|
Does Rwanda face technical challenges
|
Yes we account some challenges here and there with
|
with regard to implementation of MDGs?
|
regard to the implementation of MDGs. Rwanda have a
|
What about your Organization?
|
good Political will even good programs and plans, but we
have also the challenge in Monitoring and Evaluation of these to attain MDGs
targets...( MINECOFIN)
|
There is a general consensus that poverty
|
Yes it is, but if I have first to start by explaining
what
|
is a threat to Rwanda?s socio-economic
|
poverty is:
|
development. What is your reaction?
|
- first, there is poverty or being poor in mind;
|
|
- second to be poor by lack of means of production
|
|
(financial material).
|
|
Rwanda had to change its population mind, because since
the time we have got foreign aid with a new way of thinking, educated,
empowered mentally, economically and financially we could be developed. The
tied aid was there but we could not see or understand those conditionalities
because of our extreme poverty; or even if we knew that this Aid is going back
to their country somehow, we could not accept that in these past
decades.
|
|
Poverty is a threat to Rwanda?s socio-economic
development; let even go through our history,
people killed each other, Rwandans to Rwandans this was a lack
|
of development, instead of developing ourselves we killed
each other, so we really need a new mindset and look at our future, plan for
poverty alleviation, not for poverty stagnation.
(MINALOC)
Yes, poverty is a threat to Rwanda?s socio economic
development. You can not be developed economically or socially, when you lack
of the living necessities. Poverty for me is in our mind and in the lack of
means. We need our population being educated and empowered with means of
productions. Education will change our mind and with those means we will use
them properly to develop ourselves socially and economically. (Mayor
GASABO).
Do you agree that instead of promoting 5
ZEndE?hThRFiR-economic development, foreign aid creates a dependency
syndrome?
|
This can happen in some countries but not generally. For
example our country is Independent hundred per cent in education area, we are
injecting our own money, the basic education in for free 9 years education and
in Health, there is "Mutuelle the Sante" medical insurance where a person is
only contributing 1000RwF/almost 2$ per year for medication, and the rest is
the Government's subsides. (MINALOC)
So if you can see, we need aid in economic development and
sustainable one, not something we do today and not
|
having it tomorrow. In general I can say we still need Aid
today. ...( MINECOFIN)
|
Some Schools of thought argue that «poverty and hunger
are functional». Do you agree in relation to Rwanda?s socio- economic
development?
|
Yes I agree, these are function in our society. This is a
retroactivity of poverty. It changes from a place to another. If we knew that
we are poor, we could take care and plan for tomorrow. ...(
MINECOFIN)
|
What are Rwanda?s main resources in terms of importance? Do
any of these contribute to Rwanda?s GDP?
|
The main resources of the district are different taxes
from our taxpayers and services offered by the district. (Mayor of
Gasabo District).
Yes, especially taxes contribute to Rwanda's GDP.
Mining, Agriculture, Industry and
Manufacturing, services...( MINECOFIN, MINALOC)
|
Can Rwanda do without «Vision
Umurenge Programme» in its attempt to fight poverty
and hunger?
|
The Vision Umurenge Program is very effective; its content
is the population will. The results are clear, positive... We
can do without it if something new emerges in a positive way.(
MINECOFIN)
|
How sustainable is foreign aid in the mainstream of Rwanda?s
socio-economic development?
|
Foreign Aid is not sustainable at all. For now, we can say
we need Aid in technology (ICT sector). Technical assistance yes, because we
don?t have the capacity, but we need them to teach us when they are in mission
for developmental projects so that our development sector could sustain. We
need aid on Infrastructure sector and
|
|
ICT and good Management of what we have settled...
(MINECOFIN)
|
|
We need Aid and we steel need Aid and I can see in 10
years of driving. Why do I say so? Because when you look at our low growth
economy, if you look in terms of our population income, we will get our own
capacity
|
|
(domestic resources) in those 10 years. I am not
seeing
|
|
Foreign Aid after that time. We are planning for
employment creation, creating SMEs and our
priorities are in rural area where we plan for rural transformation.
|
|
All of these are the pillars of our mid and long
human development strategies, EDPRS and Vision 2020
|
|
MINALOC.
|
Are you aware that Rwanda has MDGs?
|
Yes we have MDGs. I can not name them but we have a
|
If yes can you name them?
|
baseline, where we mark our achievement concerning
|
|
MDGs data. ...( Mayor of Gasabo)
|
|
Yes, I am aware of MDGs as one of Government? planners
(MINECOFIN, MINALOC)
|
4.2.1.1 Interpretation and Analysis
Based on the above views, it can be noted that poverty is a
threat to Rwanda?s socio economic development. Rwanda?s economy is facing
some challenges including low agricultural productivity; famine and cyclical
droughts; low human resource development; limited
employment opportunities; high population density and growth;
high transport costs and environmental degradation. These microeconomic
problems give rise to the following macroeconomic difficulties: structural
trade deficit; high vulnerability to terms of trade shocks due to heavy
dependence on two export crops - coffee and tea; structural imbalance between
Government revenues and expenditures; negative savings; and low level of
private investment.
As it has been explained by one GoR?s planner, a lot has been
done to eradicate poverty and increase socio economic development. He said:
«Rwanda?s needs must be accompanied by a change in the way in which
both the Government and its development partners conceptualize aid, so that
together we ensure that assistance to Rwanda has maximum impact on the lives of
the Rwandan citizen». The rest of the officials (interviewees and
questionnaire respondents) were indeed aware of MDGs and were able to think of
poverty and foreign aid at macro-level. They gave the overall impression that
poverty was indeed a threat to the socio-economic development of Rwanda; and
that indeed foreign aid was an indispensable facility.
However, others felt that much as foreign aid was vital, there
was need to couple aid with training programs which would leave the
beneficiaries self-reliant in the end so as to avoid dependency syndromes.
Government officials actually hammered that donors need fall in line with
development priorities of Government rather than pursue own agendas. The
findings may seem to be consistent with what was obtained through the
questionnaire method. However, it can be concluded that a number of challenges
that affect the effectiveness of Aid lies directly or indirectly with the
negative attitudes held by different partners. These include the donor, the
boundary partners in the middle and the recipient at the end of the
continuum.
The fact that the community appreciates the impact of foreign
aid in a positive manner is worthy. However confirms the functionalist?s view
that society has interdependent parts that must work together and meet the
societal basic needs or functional prerequisites (Meena 1992).
4.2.2 Data from Observational schedules
The target group/s were Donor Community and beneficiaries as
depicted in the pictures below that were taken at Kimironko and Rutunga sectors
respectively.
Source: photo by the Researcher
In light of the limitations that were experienced in order to
gain entry into some specific groups of respondents, the researcher resorted to
using the observational method which is hailed by Dooley (1995), for its
ability to generate first hand data. Several Donors were approached in advance
to avail time for an interview on the effectiveness of their operations and
they accepted in principle (Please see annex). However, when the time came for
them to be interviewed they were almost conspiratorially mum? about.
They all kept their cards close to their chests, citing one reason or the other
as excuses. Some Donor officials referred all matters to higher officials
who would in turn refer the researcher to other higher
officials until it became impossible; thus politely denying the researcher
access to their operations. Upon further pressing for access, the researcher
was then advised by some officials who vowed to remain anonymous as a condition
for disclosure that all Development Partners officials were made to sign an
oath of secrecy upon entry as a critical precondition for employment. It would
seem therefore, judging from their unprecedented reservations that this oath of
secrecy is stronger than the Official Secrecy Act.
On second analysis it would seem that this reticence is
deliberate: to shut off the public from the internal operations of the
organisations. Some of the government officials who work with the Donors
pointed out that the organizations declared their intentions and were helped by
Government to channel their aid to particular areas but they never really
disclosed the sources of their finance, the amounts and how those amounts were
broken down among the organisations employees, the boundary partners and the
intended beneficiaries. Because of this information blackout it becomes
difficult to dismiss some of the arguments by pessimists? who claim
that some of the NGOs are created to ease unemployment in their homelands so
that the bulk of the monies disbursed benefit directors (who are almost always
citizens of guest countries), and also that the intended beneficiaries receive
only but a trickle, thus making aid merely a façade hiding ulterior
motives which are never disclosed to host governments.
Some critics take the argument even further, stressing that
the majority of such NGOs are essentially political institutions working to
effect regime changes in host countries in line with foreign policies of guest
countries to keep subordinate countries under perpetual dependency, thus
sustaining the horse-rider relationships between them.
If the above observations are anything to go by, NGOs then
cease to angels of mercy; rather they become messengers of doom. It then
explains why their activities are shrouded in secrecy, thus also buttressing
reservations by some government officials that foreign aid does not in the long
run improve the socio-economic development of Rwanda, but that, rather it
encourages dependency. A brief analysis of the responses of target
beneficiaries may prove the contrary.
Kimironko Sector is one on the Sectors constituting the
District of Gasabo which forms a part of the urban Section of Kigali City. This
Sector has Centre Cesar; a women cooperative involved in various
economic activities that include tailoring, handcrafts as well as an internet
café. The artisans, about 86 in total, create key chains, pen, USB key
and cell phone holders from beadwork. During the school vacation, they are
joined by around 70 secondary students to continue their work. There are
another 12 artisans who embroider various motifs for greeting cards and wall
hangings, and more than 14 tailors who produce dresses, shirts, pants, school
uniforms and a really nice line of sleep wear for sale in Canada and Rwanda.
The school aged children of the widows receive sponsorship from Canadians to
continue their primary and secondary educations, infants come to the center
with their mothers during the day, and toddlers too young to attend school go
to the daycare built by the center (
http://www.in2eastafrica.net).
One may observe that after 1994, Rwanda? socio-economic development was to be
taken into account by all stakeholders.
One of the group member described poverty as something bad
which happen to people whereby one is in a situation where you have No
clothes, no food, no body oil, where he/she is afraid of others, hopeless
and no confident of yourself. «Poverty destroys our welfare, one
cannot sit and
chat with others comfortably; you feel empty when you are
poor even if you have been to school. You cannot even talk in public, leave a
life without future, without objectives; with poverty you don?t even think, no
constructive ideas».
More information given by one respondent aptly was that
poverty for a Rwandan especially the genocide widow is the strength you got to
work and do whatever possible to get something for your family (mean to get
food and other living necessities in need). «Even if I am poor, I want
to work hard and change the welfare of my family, all my household for the
better», she said. Another went further to claim, «Poverty
creates bad things, bad habits, I think even genocide was caused by poverty;
people were poor somehow, financially, economically, and mentally.»
Poverty can make people work tirelessly, trying to get something even if is not
enough. The poor always have to think of something to do, even the cheapest
job, which some are shamed to do for example the prostitution.
Given this background, the Sector of Rutunga occupies the
rural section of Gasabo District. The villagers generally agreed that any aid
including foreign aid is welcome. Notably, all of them never seemed to think of
aid in terms of development at national level. They conceived aid only in terms
of their local poverty, leaving this impression to the researcher that only
those who are well up have the indulgence of analysing whether aid came with
strings, the nature of the strings etc; the real poor did not. Such an
impression leaves a feeling of guilt even on the researcher: Perhaps government
needs to do more to raise the standards of living of its people so that they
can be able to see things in a broader light than the castles of their
skins.
4.2.3 Documentary Analysis Procedures
As observed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) that qualitative
evidence is quite critical, it follows that, in this current study a number of
official documents were scrutinized and a particular focus was placed on the
milestones registered so far. This constituted the bulk evidence of desk
research.
Table 4.7: Documentary Analysis
Procedures
Official Document
|
Link with MDGs and
Foreign aid
|
Substantiating evidence
|
Annual reports on progress of MDGs
|
|
|
1. Rwanda Development
|
The documents? preambles and
|
It is reported that institutional
|
Indicators
|
introduction and forewords are
|
reforms were instrumental in
|
|
targeting the eradication of
|
SrRPRWQ I .5 ZEQ3Ir sREIR-
|
|
poverty in the context of
|
economic development hence the
|
|
MDGs as well as
acknowledging the role of the
|
high rise in production levels.
|
|
Donor community
|
|
2. Annual report of the
|
|
The 2008 Annual report reports
|
Government of Rwanda
|
|
that 2008 has been a rewarding
|
and Development partners.
|
|
year and saw implementation of
economic development and poverty
|
|
|
Reduction Strategy (EDPRS)
getting underway. Through aid, Rwanda is no longer a
country burdened by shadows of the past.
|
Documentary evidence on
foreign aid (material and financial)
|
|
|
1. Official Development
|
This is a viable weapon to
|
ODA acknowledges the receipt of
|
assistance (ODA) report
|
fight poverty
|
food aid from UNWFP.
|
2. Donor division of labour in
|
|
The adoption of a donor
|
Rwanda
|
|
performance assessment
|
|
|
Framework (DPAF) was a major milestone in fighting
poverty.
|
Inter-ministerial reports on conduct of
donors
|
|
|
1. Rwanda Vision
|
This is GoR?s instruments in
|
The Vision 2020 is backed by the
|
|
poverty reduction
|
Presidential Decree powers; this evidence makes
researchers conclude that the foreign aid and its link to
socio-economic
development cannot be overstressed.
|
2. Rwanda Aid Policy
|
|
The fact that the policy is endorsed by the Cabinet makes
it a powerful instrument.
|
4.2.3.1 Registers of Donors
A register of foreign aid providers was also seen an
indication that Rwanda?s socio-economic development is being aided.
Furthermore some development assistance databases for quality
assessment were also scrutinized.
Table 4.8: NGOs / 2010 registered in Gasabo
District
egr WA
F H AGE
Name
|
Area of intervention
|
Domain d'intervention
|
Statuts
|
Tel
|
E-mail
|
Action for Health& Integreted development
|
Kinyinya
|
Health
|
INGOs
|
|
|
ACCESS/JHPIEGO RWANDA
|
|
Health
|
INGOs
|
788301311
|
bishamara@vahoo.fr
|
ADRA-RWANDA
|
Jabana, Jali,GIrmro,Nduba
|
Education
|
INGOs
|
0788309281
|
snemanager@adra.org.rw
|
AFRICA ANCHOR OF HOPE INC: AOH
|
ICamatamu Gatabal7
|
Education,Health
|
INGOs
|
0788517715
|
rugira
moses@yahoo.fr
|
AFRICA MUSLIMS AGENCY
|
NDERA
|
Education
|
INGOs
|
0788641984
|
kigali000ama@gmail.com
|
AFRICAN RELIEF FOR DEVELOPMENT
|
Remera
|
Education,Health
|
INGOs
|
0788683270
|
mjabush@gmail.com
|
AFRICARE Rwanda Program
|
Rusorr, Glcmro,Ndera
|
Health,Education(OVC)
|
INGOs
|
0788531699
|
africarerwavahoo.com
|
AKILAH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
|
Kimironko/Hosp
|
Education
|
INGOs
|
0785525881
|
Monique@Akilahlnstitue.org
|
ARDIF
|
ICacyiru
|
Capacity building,
|
INGOs
|
|
|
AQUADEV CENTER AFRICA
|
|
Business& micri finances
|
INGOs
|
|
|
AVOCATS SANS FRONTIERES:ASF
|
Remera
|
Training
|
INGOs
|
0788306719
|
rwa-cm@asf.be
|
BETWEEN FOUR EYES
|
ICacyiru,Gisozi
|
TOT,Health, Education
|
INGOs
|
0783005900
|
irepashiu,@gmail.00m
|
BREAST CANCER
|
|
Health
|
INGOs
|
|
|
Catholic agency for Overseas development,:CAFOD
|
|
Social,
|
INGOs
|
788301378
|
|
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES RWANDA
|
Gasabo
|
Education ,social
|
INGOs
|
|
snzayisenga@rw.caro.crs.org
|
CDI-AFRICA
|
Gasabo
|
Training,research
|
INGOs
|
|
|
CHABHA(Chiklren affected by HIV/AIDS)
|
ICacyiru
|
Health
|
INGOs
|
788454354
|
mutabazirichardavahoo.fr
|
CHF INTERNATIONAL RWANDA
|
Gisozi/FAWE
|
Health, nutrition
|
INGOs
|
788301762
|
info@chfrwandaorg.rw
|
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL
|
ICacyiru
|
OVC
|
INGOs
|
788304856
|
serugambaue@rw.ci.ore
|
Name OPPORTUNITY TRUST
|
Kigali
|
tioneconomic Statuts
|
INGOs
|
E-mail
|
rwanda@dotrustorg
|
ted development INTERNATIONALK
|
He
|
Health
|
INGOs
|
0788302780
|
dcirwanda@dcintorg
|
NDA Development center,inc
|
Hea
|
education
|
311 bis
|
hoofr
|
Jnshimivimanaaedc.ore
|
Ester's AID for needy& abandoned Jabana,
|
Edu
|
INGOs
|
|
281 sne@adra.orgrw
|
esthersaid@excite.com.
|
OPE INC: AOH Kamatam
|
Education
|
HEALTH
|
715 rug
|
@yahoo.fr
|
|
NCY Outreach foundation Rwnda NDERA
|
Education
|
Education INGOs 07
|
984 kig
|
a@gmail.com
|
wmmonladfacs.com
|
In Gasabo District development plan 2008-2012, maintenance of
infrastructure it is a must. The
UTE FOR WOMEN Kimironko/Hosp Education INGOs 0785525881
Monique@AkilhIntituorgTER AFRICA
Associations of the District must participate in all activities
which promote the development of
Business& mri finances INGOs
R EYES
the District. The Government, private sector and development
partners (refer to table 4.11, a lot
KacyiruGisozi TOT,Health, ducatio INGOs 0783005900
irepashizo@gma.com
of them are there for long-time and have to reregister every
year) must assist the District in the
Ovrse pCAO G 7 as Tninar INGOs
technical and financial domains. (PDD, Gasabo District, 2007)
The anticipated interventions in the District of Gasabo have a
value estimated at 132 M US dollars which are equivalent to approximately 72.7
billion Frw which shall be raised as follows:
Table 4.9: Estimates of different budgetary sources
(ibid.)
Potential Source
|
In Millions of dollars
|
Block transfer from MINECOFIN for development projects
|
5
|
|
Earmarked annual transfers
|
4,
|
832
|
Mobilisation of District resources
|
6
|
|
Different donors (partners grouped in JAF)
|
10, 700
|
Based on the content of this table 4.12 shF IIIQGEQJNIKRZ sNds
IRIFIJQ dIGEiQ GdsdER BsrWs?s development activities is prime need and present
almost 50% of the development budget. At the country level development partners
are, as a collective, increasingly providing funds through budget support
mechanisms as illustrates by the figure below:
Figure 4.12 Composition of External
resources
In 2006, total Official Development Assistance (ODA) to Rwanda
reached $603 million, equivalent to roughly 27 per cent of Gross Domestic
Product (GDP), with a very substantial share provided by multilaterals and
global programmes (MINECOFIN, 2007). In 2006, 26 per cent of external grants
took the form of budget support, increasing to about 30 per cent in 2007 as new
partners joined Rwanda?s Budget Support Harmonisation Group (BSHG).
4.2.3.2 Interpretation and analysis
Based on the findings from official documents scrutinised, it
can be interpreted that MDGs in Rwanda are complemented by various strategies
hence the issue of foreign aid cannot be underestimated at all cost .To this
effect it stands to reason that foreign aid is important. Finally, while good
cooperation is characterised by mutual exchange of ideas about methods and
solutions, development partners too frequently continue to promote their own
objectives and methods at the expense of the beneficiary?s ownership. Much of
the cooperation is still offRwanda?s socio economic development and therefore
not aligned with Government?s Strategic Plan and administrative systems. In
order to make the cooperation more effective, modalities must be designed to
reform and simplify donor policies and procedures to encourage collaborative
behaviour and progressive alignment with Government?s priorities, systems and
procedures. In the final analysis it was felt that aid was
still inevitable but that aid programs must be accompanied by national
productive programs which will eventually sustain the economy without aid.
4.3 Chapter summary
The Chapter has focused on data presentation, interpretation
and analysis. It has further explored and exposed the perceptions and attitudes
of society with regard to the impact of foreign aid on 5 ZEndE?\,\RFiR-economic
development as guided by MDG1, basing on the qualitative and quantitative
evidence from respondents and re\0ErFh011\ Rb\0rvEtiRn. The next
chapter presents a summary of major findings, conclusion of the entire study as
well as elaborate recommendations for future attention and study
respectively.
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARIES, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.0 Introduction
This chapter presents a summary of the research findings. It
further makes conclusions and gives recommendations for the study on the basis
of the findings of this study in relation to the major research questions and
objectives set in chapter one of this particular study. The study principally
focussed on the impact of foreign aid on Rwanda?s socio-economic development as
guided by Millennium Development Goal 1 (MDG1). The samples used were also
representative in nature taking into account the principles of generalizability
as observed by Lincoln and Guba (1985). The study was confined to both males
and females from Gasabo District of Kigali City. The study was also conducted
through the use of both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies.
The findings however are generalizable to other District
settings not studied in Rwanda and other developing nations particularly
because of the combination of both quantitative and qualitative research
methods that were employed. The principles of validity and reliability
(credibility and trustworthy) were taken care of in the study. The thrust of
the study revolved around providing answers to the key question:
3«What impact does Foreign Aid have on Rwanda?s
socio-economic development as guided by Millennium Development Goal (MDG)1
«Eradication of extreme poverty and hunger»?
5.1 Summary of the major findings
Following recommendations by Borgdan and Biklen (1992), themes
formulated from the research questions shall guide the summary of major
findings. As such, the major findings in this section are presented in the
order of the research questions set out in chapter one of this study as:
What is the effect of poverty and hunger on Rwanda?s
socio-economic development? Does foreign aid enhance Rwanda?s socio-economic
development?
Do citizens of Rwanda appreciate the introduction of
MDGs as guiding principles for poverty alleviation?
How effective are Rwanda?s strategic policies on poverty
reduction?
How sustainable is foreign donor assistance towards the
reduction of poverty and hunger; and how do the beneficiaries evaluate
the impact of such foreign aid on the local and national socio-economic
development?
It was established that the foreign has an instrumental role
in the promotion of sustainable socioeconomic development in the country. The
results of the investigations comprehensively affirmed this. Although other
respondents had certain perceptions, the general consensus was that the foreign
aid acts as a panacea to the problems that developing countries face and
particularly those that affect their social, economic and political development
respectively. Foreign aid was also hailed for its attempt to cover critical
issues with regard to alleviation of poverty and hunger which are main focus of
MDG1.
The study came out with findings similar to those by Gruinseit
et al. (1997) in which foreign aid was described as having an instrumental role
and standing as a "powerful bullet" for the combating of poverty. Respondents
felt that some cultures segregate women?s active participation in developmental
programmes hence they are not beneficiaries some programmes meant to eradicate
poverty through donor /foreign aid intervention. The findings corroborate
Ezewu?s (1983) observations that culture as an index of social identity has an
impact on the day to day live experiences of a people. In this respect, it
varies from place to place hence may dictate the way people may view and
interpret certain issues in society.
The study established that there are a myriad of constraints
associated with the issues of foreign aid and poverty alleviation and this has
ripple effects on socio-economic development. These range from social,
economic, technological and political challenges. However, the findings pointed
to the fact that there are vast prospects with regard addressing the
challenges. Of late, global partnership have as stressed in MDGs Progress
Report for Zimbabwe (2004) been at the core of addressing the challenges. The
global packages and other internationally initiated programs for developing
nations that are associated with globalization are by no means regarded as
prospects in the context of positively promoting socio-economic development in
the context of foreign aid through eradicating extreme poverty and hunger.
Through globalization other practices that were viewed as alien to customary
conventions are increasingly getting accepted.
5.2 Conclusion of the study
The study concludes that citizens of Rwanda studied appreciate
the fundamental role played by foreign aid in enhancing socio-economic
development as guided by MDG1. They further acknowledge its positive impact in
combating poverty among the general populace. The results show that the
socio-economic development and eradication of poverty has been negatively
affecting both social and economic problems at both the district and national
levels. If these challenges are addressed, the results show that there may be
evidence to suggest that socioeconomic development and eradication of poverty
would thus be effective.
The study further concludes that the socio-economic
development and eradication of poverty remains the fulcrum upon which efforts
to promote sustainable development rests upon. The results indicated that
challenges faced by developing nations with regard to perceptions on foreign
aid and poverty eradication ultimately require a prescription in the form of
collaborative engagement by various key stakeholders. Existing policies and
literature relating to foreign aid that systematically excludes females require
rigorous reviews and constant editing to meet the ever changing socio-cultural
lives of the citizens. By and large, the study concludes that the effective
administration of foreign aid and implementation of poverty alleviation
programmes and MDGs require a collective engagement among Government, private
and public organisations and civil society to refine the citizens? perceptions
in an attempt to combat the high prevalence of poverty and promote sustainable
development.
5.3 Recommendations for this study
The following are recommendations offered with respect to the
effective administration of foreign aid and implementation of poverty
alleviation programmes in developing nations in an attempt to improve its
effectiveness in combating poverty and promoting all-encompassing development
through MDGs.
There is need for a collaborative approach where various
stakeholders would actively disseminate information on the effective
administration of foreign aid and implementation of poverty alleviation
programmes in developing nations.
Aid to be effective on poverty eradication, must be given on a
flexible basis and not tied to a rigid criteria. The move to sustainable growth
requires a shift of international financial support from humanitarian
assistance to a long term, flexible and sustainable support for development.
Policy makers and Citizens must be staff-developed, trained or
exposed to some effective administration of foreign aid and implementation of
poverty alleviation programmes in developing nations as key stakeholders so as
to share their expectations in order to put constructive input in the
mainstream of socio-economic development.
The Governments of developing nations have to adopt a human
rights approach to development that pays special attention to equality and
non-discrimination; this to avoid wars and violent conflict which continue to
disrupt livelihoods, destroy infrastructure, reverse gains and damage the
investment climate.
Principal administrators must effectively monitor and evaluate
the effective administration of foreign aid and implementation of poverty
alleviation programmes in developing nations.
The strong partnership between Government and Developement
Partners in many areas such as micro-credit, non formal education and
assistance with social mobilization is required to contributed effectively to
the successful socio-economic performance and poverty reduction of the
country.
This study principally recommends the need for a wider research
on a wider scope to establish if some of the findings raised in this study can
be generalized.
REFERENCES
th
Aaker, D., Kumar, V. and Day, G., (2004). Marketing
research (8 Ed.). John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
Achola, P.P.W. (1995): Content Analysis: Its Meaning, Uses
and Misuses. In Mwiria and Wamahiu, (eds.). Issues in Educational Research
in Africa. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishes. pp 56-66
ActionAid (2005). Real Aid: An agenda for making aid work.
USA
African Development Bank?s (ADB) (2008). Gender Policy,
AfDB Publications.
Alan Aldridge and Ken Levine (2001). Surveying the social
world. Principles and Practice in Survey Research. Open University Press
Buckingham · Philadelphia, USA
Alan Bryman and Emma Bell. (2007). Business Research
Methods, 2nd ed.,Oxford University Press.
André Catherine, and Luzolele Lola, Laurent, (2001).
The European Union?s Aid Policy Towards Countries involved in the Congo:
Lever for Peace of Incitement to War? Unpublished paper, May 2001, p.
26.
André, Catherine, and Tierens, Michel, (1999).
Role de l?aide dans la Relance et la Stabilite Economique
de Procedure du Rwanda?, in Reyntjens, Filip, and Marysse, Stefaan, eds.,
L?Afrique des Grands Lacs. Annuaire 1998-1999 (Paris: L?Harmattan, 1999), p.
94
Andre Gunder Frank (1972). "The Development of
Underdevelopment," in James D. Cockcroft, Andre Gunder Frank, and Dale
Johnson, eds., Dependence and Underdevelopment. Garden City, New York: Anchor
Books
Andrew McKay and David Lawson (2002). Chronic Poverty: Review
of Current Quantitative Evidence. Chronic Poverty Research Center. World
Bank
Andrew, Sikula Sr. (2009). Moral Management
Methodology/Mythology: Erroneous Ethical Equations. Ethics & Behavior
Volume 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 253 - 261
ANSA, (2006). Alternatives to Neoliberalism in Southern
Africa. December 2006, Harare Avert, (2007). HIV/Aids Education. Or
http//:www.avert.org/aidsedu.htm
Bailey, Kenneth D. (1987). Methods of Social Research. New
York. London. The Free Press
Baker T., et al. (2003). Research Policy. Department of
Management, School of Business, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269,
USA, pp 255-276
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J.V. (1989). Research in
education. Englewood cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bless, C and Higson-smith, C (1995). Fundamentals of Social
Research Methods An African Perspective. Cape Town Lunta and Company
Limited.
Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective
and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blumer, Herbert (1962). "Society as Symbolic Interaction".
In Arnold M. Rose. Human Behavior and Social Process: An Interactionist
Approach. Houghton-Mifflin.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, R.C. (1992). Qualitative research
for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston:
Allyn-Bacon.
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2003). Business Research
Methods. Oxford University Press
Burnside A. Craig and David Dollar (1997). Aid, Policies and
Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 569252. World
Bank
Buvinic, M., & Gupta, R. G. (1994). Targeting poor
woman-headed households in developing countries: Views on a policy dilemma.
Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.
Chambers, Robert (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last
First, Longman, Harlow, pp. 108-139.
Chenery Hollis and Strout Alan (1966). Foreign Assistance and
Economic Development. An article in: The American Economic Review, Vol.
LVI. (September).
Chisaka, B,C and Vakalisa, NCG.(2003) Some Effects Of Ability
Grouping In Harare Secondary Schools. A case study. South African Journal
of Education, V 23, pp 176-180.
Coolican, H. (1994). Research Methods and Statistics in
Psychology . London: Hodder and Stoughton. 2 nd edition. Creswell, J. W.
(1994),
Coolican, H. (1999). Research Methods and Statistics in
Psychology, Second Edition. London: Hodder & Stoughton
Dambisa Moyo (2009). Dead Aid: Why Aid is not working and How
there is another way for Africa. Allen Lane, Penguin Group
Denscombe, M. (1998). Risk-taking and personal health in
the context of late modernity. British Sociological Association Annual
Conference, Making Sense of the Body: Theory, Research and Practice,
University of Edinburgh, (April 1998).
Denscombe, M. (2000). Social conditions for stress: young
people's experience of doing GCSEs. British Educational Research Journal,
26(3) pp. 359-374.
DFID (2001). Poverty: Bridging the Gap. Guidance
notes. Department for International Development (DFID) of the
Government of Great Britain. London.
Dina Abu-Ghaida and Stephan Klasen (2002). The Costs of
Missing the Millennium Development Goal on Gender Equity. World Bank.
2002.
Dooley, D (1995) Social research methods .New York.
Easterly William (2001b) The Effect of IMF and World Bank
Programmes on Poverty. Discussion Paper No. 102. World Institute
for Development Economic Research (WIDER).
Easterly, W., R. Levine, and D. Roodman, (2003). «New
Data, New Doubts: A Comment on Burnside and Dollar?s «Aid, Policies, and
Growth» (2000). The American Economic
Review 94(3):774-780.
Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) (2005). The Millennium
Development Goals in Africa: Progress and challenges, DRDU, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia
Economist Intelligence Unit ( 2000), EIU Country Profile
2000..., unpaginated version; and Economist Intelligence Unit, EIU Country
Profile 2001..., p. 28
Ezewe, E (1983) Sociology Of Education : Lagos and
London. Longman.
Fayissa, Bichaka and Mohammed El- Kaissy. (1999).
«Foreign aid and the economic growth of developing countries (LDCs):
Further Evidence,» Studies in Comparative International Development,
37, (September, 1999): 37-50.
Frankel, and Wallen (1996) How to Evaluate Research In
Education. New York. Blackwell Publishers
Gaila, R. and A.B. Deolaiker (1993), «Persistent,
Expected and Innate Poverty: Estimates for Semi Arid Rural South
India», Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17 (4), 409-21.
Gallup, J. L., Jeffrey D. Sachs and Andrew Mellinger (1999).
Heography and Economic development, International Science Review, Vol.
22, pp.179-232. Reprinted from Annual World Bank Conference on developemnt
Economics, 1998 Proceedings
George Ritzer (1996), Classical Sociological Theory,
(McGraw Hill Companies, 1996)
Gong, L. and H. Zou., (2001). Money, Social Status, and
Capital Accumulation in a Cash-inAdvance Model. Journal of Money Credit and
Banking 33, 284-293.
Government of Zimbabwe (1991) Zimbabwe - A Framework for
Economic Reform (1991- 1995) Harare.
Handley, K. and Williams, L. (2009). From copying to
learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and
feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
vol. 34, no. , pp. , October, ISSN 1469-297X.
Haralambos M. Et al. (2000). Sociology: Themes and
Perspectives. 2nd Australian ed. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia.
Haralambos, M and Holborn, M (1995) Themes and
Perspectives . London Collins
Hayman, R. (2005). 'Are the MDGs enough? Donor perspectives
and recipient visions of education and poverty reduction in Rwanda'. Paper
presented at the UKFIET Oxford Conference on Education and Development.
Oxford
Howard, K. and Sharp, J.A., (1983). The Management of a
Student Research Report, Gower, Aldershot.
Humanitarian Aid: Evaluation Report. NGO Co-ordination
Unit. Kigali Rwanda, 1997
International Development Association (1999), Rwanda: Economic
Recovery Credit, Washington
Economist Intelligence Unit, (2001) Country Report Rwanda,
1 February 2001, unpaginated version
Kabeer, Naila 2005. Gender Equality and Human Development:
the Instrumental Rationale. Human Development Report Office Occasional
Paper. UNDP, New York. Available at
http://hdr.undp.org/docs/publications/background
papers/2005/HDR2005 Kabeer Naila 31.pdf
Kabeer, Naila (2003). Gender Mainstreaming in Poverty and the
Millennium Development Goals, Canada: Commonwealth Secretariat
Kahn, R.L and Ch. F. Cannell (1957). The Dynamics of
Interviewing: Theory, Technique and Cases. New York (etc.): Wiley. Chapter
3: Techniques for Motivating the Respondent, pp.65-90
Katherine Marshall and Lucy Keough (2004). Mind, heart, and
soul in the fight against poverty, Washington DC, World Bank
Knack, Stephen, 2000. "Aid dependence and the quality of
governance : a cross-country empirical analysis," Policy Research Working
Paper Series2396, World Bank. Washington, DC
Koster M. (2008). Linking Poverty and Household Headship in
Post-Genocide Rwanda, Yale University, New Haven, USA
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
New York: Sage. Moon, S., Dillon, D., & Sprenkle, D. (1990). Family therapy
and qualitative research.
Lucy Makaza-Mazingi (2009). The feminization of poverty in
Southern Africa. National Coordinator of Youth Empowerment and
Transformation (YET) in Zimbabwe
Malhotra, N.K (1996). Marketing Research. An applied
orientation. Second edition, New York. Prentice Hall
McGillivray, M. and Ouattara, B. (2003). Aid, Debt Burden
and Government Fiscal Behaviour in Cote d?Ivoire. Centre for Research in
Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT), University of
Nottingham.
Meena, R (1992) (ed) Gender in Southern Africa. Harare
SAPES. Educational.
Mikesell, Raymond F. 1983. Foreign investment in mining
projects: Case studies of recent experiences, Oelgeschlager, Gunn &
Hain (Cambridge, Mass.)
Mkandawire M.L.C (1999). Poverty and Macro Economic Management
in Malawi, Sapes Books, Harare
MINALOC (2006). Making Decentralised Service Delivery Work:
Putting the people at the centre of service provision, Policy Note,
Republic of Rwanda, Kigali.
MINECOFIN (2006). «Aid Effectiveness Report,
Rwanda», Kigali.
MINECOFIN (2007a). Joint Donors? Statement of Intent towards
the implementation of the Paris Declaration and Rwanda?s Aid Policy.
Kigali, Rwanda - 23 November 2006
MINECOFIN, (2007b): Strengthening Partnerships: The
Economic Development and Poverty Reduction. Government of Rwanda and
Development Partners Report. MINECOFIN 2007 or see
http://www.devpartners.gov.rw
Ministry of Public Service Labour and Social Welfare (2006).
«Poverty Assessment Study Survey» (Zimbabwe)
Monetle, D. R., Sullivan, T. J., & DeJong, C. R. (1998).
Applied social research (4 th ed.). Fort Worth , TX : Harcourt Brace
College Publishers.
Morrissey, O. (2001). Making Debt Relief Conditionality
Pro-Poor. Paper prepared for WIDER Development Conference on Debt Relief,
Helsinki, 17-18 August 2001.
Mosley Paul (1987). Overseas Aid. Its Defence and Reform.
Wheathsheaf. Brighton. Mukurasi Laeticia. (2008) The African Development
Bank Group, Legal International
Mushi S. S. (1982). «Aid and Development: an Overview
of Tanzania?s Experience» Some Tanzanian Experiences Norwegian Foreign
Policy Studies No. 42, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
Mwiria Kilemi, and Sheila P. Wamahiu.( 1995). Issues in
Educational Research in Africa. (eds) Nairobi, Kenya: East Africa
Educational Publishers, 1995. 199 pp
NATCO (2009). Call for Abstracts, Case Studies and Research
Grants. Las Vegas, N.V. or
www.natco1.org
Neil Moonie (2000). Advanced Hearth and Social Care.
Oxford, Heinemann Educational Publishers
Ngoepe, M (2006). Quantitative and Qualitative research
methods: An inquiry Into Records management. Paper presented at the
2nd annual Conference for KARM. 8-12 May. Limpopo. RSA
Ngulube, P (2007). Social Research methods in archival and
records management Paper presented at the ESARBICA XII Second Annual
Conference. Dar - Lesalam. Tanzania. May 19-23
Nyawaranda, V. A. (2005). Supervising Research Projects/
Dissertations. A Paper delivered at the Zou Workshop in Mashonaland Central
Region. Bindura.
ODI/DAC (1999). Scoping Study of Donor Poverty Reduction
Policies and Practices. A study published by the Overseas Development
Institute (ODI) on behalf of the DAC Informal Network on Poverty Reduction.
Development Assistance Committee (DAC), Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development. London.
OECD-DAC (2000). Statistical Reporting Directives -
http://www1.oecd.org/dac/htm/dacdir.htm
Osvaldo Sunkel (1969). National Development Policy and
External Dependence in Latin America. The Journal of Development
Studies, Vol. 6, no. 1, October 1969, p. 23
Palen, B.(2000). Social problems for the twenty first
(21st ) century. New York.
Paris Declaration (2005). Paris Declaration on Aid
Effectiveness. Ownership, Harmonisation, Alignment, Results and Mutual
Accountability. Adopted at the High Level Forum, Paris, 28 February - 2
March, 2005.
Palmer, D. (1997). Linking theory and Practice: A strategy for
presenting primary science activities. School Science Review
Papanek, Gustav, 1973, «Aid, Foreign Private Investment,
Savings, and Growth in Less Developing Countries,» Journal of
Political Economy: Vol. 81, pp.120-130.
Papanek, Gustav, 1972, «The effect of Aid and Other
Resource Transfers on Savings, and Growth in Less Developing Countries, The
Economic Journal, Vol.83, N.331 pp.934-50.
Pedersen, Karl R. 1996. Aid, Investment and Incentives.
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, pp. 423-37
Republic of Rwanda. (2009). Rwanda Development Indicators.
MINECOFIN. Kigali.
(2008). Rwanda Aid Policy. Kigali
(2002a), «A Profile of Poverty in Rwanda «,
MINECOFINg, National
Poverty Reduction Programme & Statistics Department.
Kigali (2002b). National Program for Strengthening Good Governance for
Poverty Reduction in Rwanda. MINALOC.
Kigali
(2000). Vision 2020. Kigali
(1998). Formulation of the Agricultural Development
Strategy. MINAGRI
Kigali.
Republic of Rwanda, World Bank and IMF. (2004). «Rwanda:
Tracking Poverty Reduction Spending: Second Assessment and Action Plan
(HIPC AAP)», mimeo, November.
Republic of Rwanda and United Nations. (2003). Millennium
Development Goals Status Report. UNDP, Kigali.
Ribas, RP and Machado, AF (2007). Distinguishing Chronic
Poverty from Transient Poverty in Brazil: Developing a Model for Pseudo-Panel
Data», International Poverty Centre Working Paper No. 36, April
2007
Rostow, Walt W. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist
Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
Russ-Eft, D. F. (1980). Validity and reliability in survey
research. American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences
August, 227 151
Shanta Devarajan, David Dollar, and Torgny Holmgren (2001) Aid
and Reform in Africa: Lessons from Ten Case Studies. Development Research
Group, Washington, DC, World Bank Shepherd, Alan (1998). Sustainable Rural
Development. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press
Shumba, O and Kaziboni,T(2005) Sexual Maturation. Zimbabwe
Journal of Educational Research .Vol 10 (6) pp46-50
SIDA(2006). Growth and Poverty Reduction: Evaluating Rwanda?s
First PRS. Country Economic Report». SIDA publication 2006
Swedish International Development Agency (2001). Briefing
paper on the «Feminization of Poverty. SIDA Publications.
Some recent evidence,»3 Kyklos 38,
216-232.
3
Snyder3 Donald. (1993). "Donor3 3 3
Bias Towards Small Countries: 3an 3 3 3 3
3overlooked Factor in the3 Analysis of
Foreign 3 Aid 3and Economic Growth.".
Applied Economics Vol. 25, 481-488.
3
Susanne 3 Bodenheimer (1971)"Dependency and Imperialism: The
Roots of Latin American
Underdevelopment" Politics & Society, SAGE
Journals.
3
Svensson Jakob, 1998. "Foreign aid and rent-seeking"
Policy Research Working Paper Series 1880, The World Bank
Theotonio Dos3 Santos "The Structure of
Dependence" in K.T. Fann 3 and Donald C. Hodges3 33
3 eds., Readings 3 in U.S. Imperialism. Boston:
Porter Sargent 1971, p. 226)
3
Todaro3 33 M., & Smith S. (2006). Economic
Development. Boston: Pearson. 3 333 3
3
Todaro3 33 M. P. (1993). Economic Development.
Longman3333 3333
3
United Nations 3 (2000). United Nations
3 Millennium Declaration. 3 Washington 3
DC
3
U NDP (2003). Human Development Report 2003.
Millennium Development Goals:A compact 3 3 3 3 3 among 3nations
3 to 3end human 3 3 poverty. New 3 York, UNDP.
3
U NDP: (2004). Zimbabwe Millenium Development Goals 2004
Progress Report GOZ Harare33
3
U NDP, (2007). National Human Development Report. Rwanda
2007: Turning Vision 2020 into Reality. From Recovery to Sustainable
Human Development. UNDP, Rwanda
3
Wagner3 3 3 3 Jon 3 (1993). Ignorance 3 3 33 3
3 3 in educational 33 33 3 33 research: 3or
how3 3 3can 3 3 you 3 3 not know
that Educational Researcher 22 (5): 15-23.
3
Willum B. (2001). Foreign 3 Aid to
Rwanda:3 Purely Beneficial or Contributing 3 to
War? Institute 3 of Political Science. 3 33 Copenhagen3 3 3 3
University of Copenhagen.3 3 3 3
3
W orld Bank (2007). «Promoting Gender Equality and
Women?s Empowerment.» In Globa Monitoring 3 Report 2007:
Confronting 3 the3 Challenges 3 3 3 of Gender3
Equality 3 3 and Fragile States 3 Washington 3 DC:World
Bank.World Bank, Washington 3 DC.
--------------- (2006). World Bank. International
Economics Dept. Development Data Group. World Bank?s World Development
indicators. Washington DC. World Bank
--------------- (2005). Global Monitoring Report 2005:
From Consensus to Momentum Washington 3 DC The3
International Bank for Reconstruction 3 3and Development. World
Bank.
--------------- (2002a). Africa Human Development Action
Plan. World Bank Human33 Development Department Africa
3 Region 3 Washington 3 DC.
(2002b). PRSP Sourcebook. Washington, DC:World
Bank.
(2000). Reforming Public Institutions and Strengthening
Governance. World Bank
Public Sector Board Strategy Paper. Available on World Bank
website: Governance & Public Sector Reform Sites.
http//:www1.worldbank.org/publicsector
(1998a). Assessing Aid. What Works. What Doesn't, and
Why. A World
Bank Policy Research Report. New York, Oxford University
Press.
(1998b). Aid effectiveness: A survey of recent empirical
literature. Policy analysis
and assessment. World Bank
(1993a). Poverty Reduction Handbook, World Bank,
Washington DC, April.
(1993b). Tanzania: A Poverty Profile. World Bank.
Population and Human
Resources Division. Report No. 12298-TA. Washington D.C.
(1991). World Development Report 1991. The
Challenge of Development.
Published for the World Bank by Oxford University Press. Oxford,
New York.
ELECTONIC RESOURCES
British Educational Research Association
http://www.bera.ac.uk/questionnaire/#use
Development Partners Website:
http://www.developmentpartners.rw/index.php
Government of Rwanda: http://www.gov.rw/
IRIN News: http://www.irinnews.org/
MDGs:
www.developmentgoals.org
Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning:
http://www.minecofin.gov.rw/
Poverty in Rwanda:
http://www.uk.oneworld.nt/guides/Rwanda/poverty
Quality of Life Index. Economist Intelligence
Unit. Retrieved from
http://www.economist.com
World Bank:
www.worldbank.org
World Bank:
http://www.iresearch.worldbank.org
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 : Map of Rwanda
Appendix 2: Approval letter from WUA, BRD and letter
from DFID
130
Appendix 3: Rwanda Development Partners by
Sector
Appendix 4: Coordination Questionnaires, Interview
and FGDs
QUESTIONNAIRE ON FOREIGN AID, RWANDA'S SOCIO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPEMT AND MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS (MDGs)
A. PRELIMINARIES
My name is MUKARUTESI Claire Marie Michele; I am a student with
the Women?s University in Africa Zimbabwe pursuing a Master of Science Degree
in Development Studies I am carrying out a study on the «Impact of
Foreign Aid on Rwanda?s socio-Economic Development as guided by Millennium
Development Goal I (MDG1).» Your response will be accorded the due
respect
B. BACKROUND INFORMATION
1. Organization:
Government
2. Sex: Male Female
3. Age
4. Qualifications
C. QUESTIONS
5 Is poverty a threat to Rwanda?s socio-economic development?
Y
How
6. Does poverty have functional benefits on society? Yes
No
Inwhat respect
.............................................................................«
..
..
..
..
..
..
7.
Does Foreign Aid help or assist in Rwanda?s socio-economic
development?
Yes
No
Explain......................................................................................................
8.
Does foreign aid create a dependency syndrome on Rwanda?
Yes No
How......................................................................................................«
9. Do you know that Rwanda has MDG
I dont I do
How did you get to know
10. Is there any link between MDGs and Rwanda?s ruling class
political ideology?
Yes
How
11. Can you rank the MDGs in order of priority? (1-8) Indicate
rank position in the box. Example
6
Improve maternal health
Ensure environmental sustainability
Develop a global partnership for development Combat HIV/AIDS,
malaria, and other diseases Achieve universal primary education
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
Promote gender equality and empower women Reduce child
mortality
12.
Which poverty eradication strategy is the best in Rwanda?
PRSP EDPRS None
Why do you say so?
13. Is foreign aid sustainable in purely Rwanda?s socio-economic
development? Yes
No
Inwhat
sense?..................................................................................
..
14. Do the beneficiaries appreciate the impact of foreign aid in
Rwanda? Yes
No
Why.........................................................................................................
15. How have been the relations between Government of Rwanda and
the Donor Community since 2000-2009?
a. Fair
b. Bad
c. Good
d. Extremely good
e. Extremely bad
16. Which sector(s) benefited from Donor community from
2000-2009?
a.
Health Sector
b. Local government
c. Education sector
d. Agricultural sector
e. Others
17. Does Rwanda face technical challenges with regard to
implementation of MDGs? Yes
No Explain
18. Do Donor Community experience attitudinal challenges in their
efforts to assist those in needy?
Yes No
19. What are Rwanda?s main resources in terms of importance?
a.
Mining
b. Agriculture
c. Industry - Manufacturing
d. Services
20. Do any of these contribute to Rwanda?s GDP?
Yes Not
Explain.................................................................................................
..
THE END ! THANK YOU.
INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR DONOR ORGANIZATIONS AND GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Name of Organization (Pseudonym)
2. Respondent/Representative
3. Experience
4. Qualifications
5. Age
Introductory Remarks
This interview is prepared to collect data and essential
information relevant to socio-economic impact of foreign aid on development in
Gasabo - Rwanda. Your participation in this interview will help to achieve the
objectives of the study. The information which you provide will be kept
strictly confidential. Thus; you are kindly requested to give your honest
response. Thank you!
Interview Questions
1. How have been the relations between Government of Rwanda and
the Donor Community since 2000-2009?
2. Which sector(s) benefited from foreign aid from 2000-2009?
3. What are Rwanda?s main resources in terms of importance? Do
any of these contribute to Rwanda?s GDP? (Mining, Agriculture, Industry and
Manufacturing, services).
4. There is a general consensus that poverty is a threat to
Rwanda?s socio-economic development. What is your reaction?
5. From your own point of view what other effects can you
highlight which are caused by poverty and hunger on Rwanda?s socio-economic
development?
6. Some Schools of thought argue that «poverty and hunger
are functional». Do you agree in relation to Rwanda?s socio-economic
development?
7. Some say without foreign Aid, Rwanda?s socio-economic
development would be null and void. Do you affiliate to this view?
8. Do you agree that instead of promoting Rwanda?s
socio-economic development, foreign aid creates a dependency syndrome?
9. Are you aware that Rwanda has MDGs? If yes can you name
them?
10. MDGs are principles that only serve a political ideology and
are serving cosmetic and window dressing purposes. Do you agree?
11. Which MDG would you prioritize if you where among political
planners and why?
12. ,Is Rwanda?s Vision 2020 effective in the process of poverty
amelioration? If yes or not how?
13. Some argue that Rwanda?s EDPRS is not effective in as far as
poverty eradication is concerned? Do you affiliate to this motion?
14. Can Rwanda do without «Vision Umurenge
Programme» in its attempt to fight poverty and hunger?
15. How sustainable is foreign aid in the mainstream of
Rwanda?s socio-economic development? In other words, is Rwanda socio-economic
development sustainable through aid?
16. Do the beneficiaries appreciate the impact of such aid on
local and national socioeconomic development?
17. Does Rwanda face technical challenges with regard to
implementation of MDGs? What about your Organization?
FOCUSED GROUP DISCUSSION: SCHEDULE (FOR
COMMUNITY)
GUIDING QUESTIONS
1. What is your understanding of poverty? Is it functional in
society? Mwumva mute ubukene? Ubukene ni iki? Ese hari icyo
buhindura mu muryango nyarwanda?
2. Do you think that Rwanda?s socio-economic development will
prosper without foreign aid? Muratekereza ko Iterambere ry'ubukungu
n'imibereho myiza y'abaturage ryabaho hatari imfashanyo
y'amahanga?
3. Are you aware of the existence of Rwanda?s MDGs? If yes, how
did you get to know? Ese muzi ko u Rwanda rufite intego
z'Ikinyagihumbi? Ni zihe? Niba ari yego wazimenye ute?
4. Do MDGs meet or address the needs of citizens, socially,
economically and politically? Ese intego z'ikinyagihumbi zaba
zivuga ku bibazo abanyarwanda bafite mu mibereho myiza yabo, mu bukungu ndetse
no muri politiki?
5. If you were among policy planners, which MDG would you
prioritize? Can you rank them? Iyo uza kuba mu bafata ibyemezo mu
gihugu, ni iyihe ntego y'ikinyagihumbi wari kugira iya mbere? Ngaho
zitondekanye.
Improve maternal health
Guteza imebere ubuzima bw'ababyeyi
Ensure environmental sustainability
Kubungabunga ibidukikije ku buryo
burambye
Develop a global partnership for development
Kubaka ubufatanyabikorwa mw'iterambere ku rwego
rw'isi Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases
Kurwanya virusi itera SIDA na SIDA
ubwayo
Achieve universal primary education
Gushyiraho uburezi bw'ibanze kuri
bose
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
Kurwanya ubukene bukabije n'inzara
Promote gender equality and empower women
Guteza imbere ubwuzuzanye n'uburinganire no guha
abagore ubushobozi Reduce child mortality
Kugabanya impfu z'abana
6. Can you defend the following strategies used by Rwanda in
eradication of poverty?Ese hari Ingamba zo kurwanya ubukene u
Rwanda rwaba rwarafashe? Ni izihe? Mwazivugaho iki?
7. Can you comment on the sustainability of foreign aid on
Rwanda?s socio-economic development? Wavuga iki ku burambe
bw'imfashanyo y'amahanga mu iterambere ry'ubukungu n'imibereho myiza by'u
Rwanda?
8. Does foreign aid change your livelihoods for the better?
Ese imfashanyo y'amahanga hari icyo ihindura mu mibereho yanyu?
Hari icyo ibungura, sobanura neza
|