ANNEXE
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(Inflation) 
 | 
 3.126940  (0.9992) 
 | 
 2.817952  (0.9983) 
 | 
 -4.023243* (0.0002) 
 | 
 -4.026130* (0.0002) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(M2) 
 | 
 -2.341950  (0.4015) 
 | 
 -2.065948  (0.5455) 
 | 
 -6.409034* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -6.447348* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(P_Pétrole) 
 | 
 -0.103299  (0.6409) 
 | 
 -0.096275  (0.6433) 
 | 
 -5.619016* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.637507* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -0.769894  (0.3752) 
 | 
 -0.595629  (0.4519) 
 | 
 -5.441368* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.569655 * (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Transferts et Subventions 
 | 
 -0.508019  (0.4879) 
 | 
 -0.508019  (0.4879) 
 | 
 -5.303716* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.303077* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Droits et Taxes 
 | 
 -2.679744  (0.2506) 
 | 
 -2.679744  (0.2506) 
 | 
 -5.771481* (0.0002) 
 | 
 -5.781655* (0.0002) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Tableau 2: Test de
stationnarité (BENIN) 
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%  Tableau
2 (suite) : Test de stationnarité (BURKINA FASO) 
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(Inflation) 
 | 
 3.126940  (0.9992) 
 | 
 2.817952  (0.9983) 
 | 
 -4.026130* (0.0002) 
 | 
 -4.023243* (0.0002) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(M2) 
 | 
 -2.458955  (0.3450) 
 | 
 -2.503425  (0.3246) 
 | 
 -6.339080* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -7.200314* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(P_Pétrole) 
 | 
 -0.046266  (0.6603) 
 | 
 -0.055518  (0.6572) 
 | 
 -5.619016* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.637507* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -1.771337  (0.0728) 
 | 
 -1.765059  (0.0738) 
 | 
 -6.171274* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -6.317601* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Transferts et Subventions 
 | 
 -3.196098  (0.1021) 
 | 
 -2.962325  (0.1571) 
 | 
 -6.292512* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -6.612084* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Droits et Taxes 
 | 
 -1.550862  (0.1121) 
 | 
 -2.506685  (0.1228) 
 | 
 -6.112052* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -6.119010* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%   
Tableau 2 (suite) : Test de
stationnarité (Côte d'Ivoire) 
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(Inflation) 
 | 
 5.026878  (1.0000) 
 | 
 4.343481  (1.0000) 
 | 
 -2.857237* (0.0057) 
 | 
 -2.740180* (0.0077) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(M2) 
 | 
 3.845529  (0.9999) 
 | 
 3.845404  (0.9999) 
 | 
 -5.405536* (0.0001) 
 | 
 -5.406309* (0.0001) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(P_Pétrole) 
 | 
 -2.061336  (0.5480) 
 | 
 -2.036116  (0.5614) 
 | 
 -5.187667* (0.0010) 
 | 
 -5.192925  (0.0010) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -1.808000  (0.0676) 
 | 
 -1.823891  (0.0654) 
 | 
 -3.577097* (0.0008) 
 | 
 -3.243947* (0.0020) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Transferts et 
Subventions 
 | 
 -2.911368  (0.1717) 
 | 
 -2.916887  (0.1700) 
 | 
 -5.656941* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.654908* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Droits et 
Taxes 
 | 
 0.166979  (0.7283) 
 | 
 0.450754  (0.8064) 
 | 
 -6.723171* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -7.011993* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%   
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(Inflation) 
 | 
 -3.351110  (0.0758) 
 | 
 -2.688663  (0.2472) 
 | 
 -4.083755* (0.0002) 
 | 
 -3.987921* (0.0002) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(M2) 
 | 
 -2.024560  (0.5675) 
 | 
 -2.177403  (0.4863) 
 | 
 -5.345860* (0.0001) 
 | 
 -5.345860* (0.0001) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(P_Pétrole) 
 | 
 -0.103299  (0.6409) 
 | 
 -0.096275  (0.6433) 
 | 
 -5.619016* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.637507* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -4.700013* (0.0033) 
 | 
 -5.015396* (0.0015) 
 | 
   | 
   | 
 I(0) 
 | 
 
| 
 Transferts et 
Subventions 
 | 
 -2.819212  (0.2014) 
 | 
 -2.207281  (0.4706) 
 | 
 -2.875365* (0.0054) 
 | 
 -6.848426* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Droits et 
Taxes 
 | 
 -3.558293* (0.0490) 
 | 
 -3.522656  (0.0528) 
 | 
 -8.072965* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -9.689110* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Tableau 2 (suite) : Test de
stationnarité (MALI) 
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%   
Tableau 2 (suite) : Test de
stationnarité : NIGER 
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(Inflation) 
 | 
 2.030200  (0.9882) 
 | 
 1.728943  (0.9774) 
 | 
 -4.676050* 
(0.0000) 
 | 
 -4.742107* 
(0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(M2) 
 | 
 1.035567  (0.9177) 
 | 
 1.894184  (0.9841) 
 | 
 -5.041522* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -8.057901* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(P_Pétrole) 
 | 
 -0.103299  (0.6409) 
 | 
 -0.096275  (0.6433) 
 | 
 -5.619016* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.637507* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -3.029289* (0.0422) 
 | 
 -3.041202* (0.0411) 
 | 
   | 
   | 
 I(0) 
 | 
 
| 
 Transferts et 
Subventions 
 | 
 -2.380162  (0.1546) 
 | 
 -2.381602  (0.1542) 
 | 
 -5.449642* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.449642* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Droits et 
Taxes 
 | 
 0.233365  (0.7479) 
 | 
 0.333829  (0.7761) 
 | 
 -6.032589* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -6.050058* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%   
Tableau 2 (suite) : Test Stationnarité
(Sénégal) 
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(Inflation) 
 | 
 -3.082803  (0.1264) 
 | 
 -3.082803  (0.1264) 
 | 
 -3.838745* (0.0004) 
 | 
 -3.773298* (0.0004) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(M2) 
 | 
 6.346774  (1.0000) 
 | 
 7.328248  (1.0000) 
 | 
 -6.753836* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -6.654826* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln(P_Pétrole) 
 | 
 -0.103299  (0.6409) 
 | 
 -0.096275  (0.6433) 
 | 
 -5.619016* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.637507* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -3.368341  (0.0727) 
 | 
 -3.338714  (0.0772) 
 | 
 -8.339700* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -8.980951* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Transferts et 
Subventions 
 | 
    -1.797897 
(0.0690) 
 | 
 -1.870185 
(0.0594) 
 | 
 -5.253104* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.233068* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Droits et 
Taxes 
 | 
 -0.229898  (0.5960) 
 | 
 -0.229898  (0.5960) 
 | 
 -5.972374* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.972659* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%   
Tableau 2 (suite): Test de stationnarité
(TOGO) 
 
| 
 Variables 
 | 
 Niveau 
 | 
 Différence première 
 | 
 Décision 
 | 
 
| 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 ADF 
 | 
 PP 
 | 
 Ordre d'intégration 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln_INF 
 | 
 2.226335  (0.9925) 
 | 
 2.052394  (0.9888) 
 | 
 -4.364698* (0.0001) 
 | 
 -4.352628* (0.0001) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln_MM 
 | 
 4.047043  (0.9999) 
 | 
 4.242125  (1.0000) 
 | 
 -5.644784* (0.0003) 
 | 
 -4.685085* (0.0007) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 Ln_PP 
 | 
 -0.103299  (0.6409) 
 | 
 -0.096275  (0.6433) 
 | 
 -5.619016* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -5.637507* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 SBG_HD 
 | 
 -2.811774  (0.0672) 
 | 
 -2.787191  (0.0707) 
 | 
 -7.256459* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -10.42678* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
| 
 TR_SUB 
 | 
 -3.687544  (0.0370) 
 | 
 -3.604148* (0.0444) 
 | 
   | 
   | 
 I(0) 
 | 
 
| 
 DR_TAX 
 | 
 -0.955206  (0.9372) 
 | 
 -1.115059  (0.9115) 
 | 
 -4.654303* (0.0000) 
 | 
 -4.696749* (0.0000) 
 | 
 I(1) 
 | 
 
  
Source: sortie de Eviews            (*) = significatif au
seuil de 1%, (**) = significatif au seuil de 5%   
Tableau 3:
Détermination du nombre de retards optimal 
 
| 
 PAYS 
 | 
 CRITERE DE AKAIKE (AIC) 
 | 
 CRITERE DE SCHARZ (BIC) 
 | 
 NOMBRE DE RETARS OTIMAL RETENU 
 | 
 
| 
 BENIN 
 | 
 1 
 | 
 1 
 | 
 1 
 | 
 
| 
 BURKINA FASO 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 
| 
 CÔTE D'IVOIRE 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 
| 
 MALI 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 
| 
 NIGER 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 
| 
 SENEGAL 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 
| 
 TOGO 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 
  
Source: Auteur  
Tableau 4:Test de
cointégration 
 
   | 
 NOMBRE DE RELATION DE COINTGRATION 
 | 
 
| 
 Trace test 
 | 
 Test de Engle et Granger 
 | 
 
| 
 BENIN 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 confirmation 
 | 
 
| 
 BURKINA FASO 
 | 
 1 
 | 
 confirmation 
 | 
 
| 
 CÔTE D'IVOIRE 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 confirmation 
 | 
 
| 
 MALI 
 | 
 1 
 | 
 Pas de test 
 | 
 
| 
 NIGER 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 Pas de test 
 | 
 
| 
 SENEGAL 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 confirmation 
 | 
 
| 
 TOGO 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 Pas de test 
 | 
 
  
Source: Auteur 
Tableau 5: Test de bruit
blanc 
BENIN                                                 
          BURKINA FASO 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 10:31 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 23 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  41.52456 
 | 
  0.2425 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  40.15433 
 | 
  0.2912 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  26.95815 
 | 
  0.8622 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  49.75634 
 | 
  0.0633 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 36 df. 
 | 
 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 10:41 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 32 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  27.26262 
 | 
  0.8524 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  29.48463 
 | 
  0.7703 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  14.75828 
 | 
  0.9993 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  49.61341 
 | 
  0.0650 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 36 df. 
 | 
 
  
   
  
Source: sortie de Eviews             
CÔTE D'IVOIRE                                   
                MALI 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 10:50 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 32 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  25.34349 
 | 
  0.9076 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  40.42454 
 | 
  0.2812 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  33.44856 
 | 
  0.5906 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  49.29684 
 | 
  0.0689 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 36 df. 
 | 
 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 10:53 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 32 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  21.84927 
 | 
  0.9696 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  47.49462 
 | 
  0.0952 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  30.33111 
 | 
  0.7347 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  34.86753 
 | 
  0.5223 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 36 df. 
 | 
 
  
  
  
  
Source: sortie de Eviews             
SENEGAL                                 NIGER 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 11:05 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 32 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  46.37613 
 | 
  0.1153 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  63.54783 
 | 
  0.0031 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  51.78883 
 | 
  0.0429 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  41.73802 
 | 
  0.2355 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 36 df. 
 | 
 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 11:16 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 31 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  46.15273 
 | 
  0.1197 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  42.69493 
 | 
  0.2054 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  44.50116 
 | 
  0.1563 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  44.23492 
 | 
  0.1630 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 36 df. 
 | 
 
  
  
  Source: sortie de Eviews             
TOGO 
 
| 
 VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests 
 | 
 
| 
 Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h 
 | 
 
| 
 Date: 08/23/16   Time: 14:51 
 | 
 
| 
 Sample: 1981 2015 
 | 
   | 
 
| 
 Included observations: 31 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Lags 
 | 
 LM-Stat 
 | 
 Prob 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 1 
 | 
  22.16860 
 | 
  0.6260 
 | 
 
| 
 2 
 | 
  23.05740 
 | 
  0.5742 
 | 
 
| 
 3 
 | 
  32.37517 
 | 
  0.1474 
 | 
 
| 
 4 
 | 
  25.54028 
 | 
  0.4324 
 | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
   | 
   | 
   | 
 
| 
 Probs from chi-square with 25 df. 
 | 
 
  
Source: sortie de Eviews             
 |