WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Les déterminants de la structure financière des entreprises marocaines cotées: cas des secteurs agroalimentaire et chimie et parachimie

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Salah Eddine Kartobi
Université Cadi Ayyad Maroc - Master en finance appliquée 2008
  

précédent sommaire

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

ANNEXES

Annexe 1 : Evolution des variables étudiées A 1.1 Variation de l'endettement (en milliers de dirhams)

Secteur

Entreprise

2003

2004

2005

2006

Agroalimentaire

CENTRALE

-14 623

-12 059

57 761

132 890

LESIEUR

-11 275

46 937

-62 819

206 884

BRANOMA

-

-6

-9

3 426

OULMES

160 278

-

65 901

168 607

BRASSERIE

17 494

-21 148

-2 540

-2 911

LGMC

671

-671

-

-

Chimie et
parachimie

SCE

5 779

-1 492

-2 000

-1 434

SONASID

-

-

119 651

106 500

CIMENT

1 350

5 891

-1 850

11 572

PAPELERA

-24 421

52 337

-22 612

44 881

PROPHARM

-

-48 167

4 273

-46 708

ALUMINUM

-23 833

-4 348

80 238

57 276

A 1.2 Ecart entre l'endettement effectif et sa valeur cible (D*- Dt-1) (en milliers de dirhams)

Secteur

Entreprise

2003

2004

2005

2006

Agroalimentaire

CENTRALE

57 221

71 844

83 903

26 142

LESIEUR

106 685

117 960

71 023

133 842

BRANOMA

1 927

1 927

1 933

1 942

OULMES

215 562

55 284

55 284

-10 617

BRASSERIE

-1 546

-19 040

2 108

4 648

LGMC

168

-503

168

168

Chimie et
parachimie

SCE

2 753,4

-3 025,6

-1 533,6

466,4

SONASID

96 211

96 211

96 211

-23 440

CIMENT

9 980

8 630

2 739

4 589

PAPELERA

20 822

45 243

-7 094

15 518

PROPHARM

-

-57 996

-9 829

-14 102

ALUMINUM

27 344

51 177

55 525

-24 713

A 1.3 Deficit de financement (en milliers de dirhams)

Secteur

Entreprise

2003

2004

2005

2006

Agroalimentaire

CENTRALE

-13 198

594 025

316 345

6 938

LESIEUR

13 393

77 653

-54 402

202 576

BRANOMA

1 733

-22

-1 958

5 107

OULMES

22 223

58 210

79 186

100 557

BRASSERIE

-193 233

206 842

-7 325

16 842

LGMC

7 884

2 978

- 13 091

606

Chimie et
parachimie

SCE

-71 455

15 492

-5 066

-14 749

SONASID

-3 528

-27 078

32 402

37 560

CIMENT

5 729

-10 295

6 577

29 671

PAPELERA

-25 314

47 346

93 176

25 133

PROPHARM

6 494

-81 604

31 533

3 750

ALUMINUM

-11 486

-16 390

92 718

19 644

Annexe 2 : Résultats de la régression a partir du logiciel EVIEWS. A 2.1 Modèle sans effets individuels

Dependent Variable: VAR

Method: Panel Least Squares

Date: 01/23/09 Time: 18:20

Sample: 2003 2006

Cross-sections included: 12

Total panel (balanced) observations: 48

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

ECART

0.486058

0.150194 3.236201

0.0032

C

7914.767

8659.084 0.914042

0.3841

R-squared

0.185451

Mean dependent var

21784.81

Adjusted R-squared

0.167744

S.D. dependent var

57140.18

S.E. of regression

52127.89

Akaike info criterion

24.60156

Sum squared resid

1.25E+11

Schwarz criterion

24.67953

Log likelihood

-588.4375

F-statistic

10.47300

Durbin-Watson stat

1.554307

Prob(F-statistic)

0.002248

Dependent Variable: VAR

Method: Panel Least Squares

Date: 01/23/09 Time: 18:24

Sample: 2003 2006

Cross-sections included: 12

Total panel (balanced) observations: 48

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

DEF

0.102395

0.073358 1.540224

0.1702

C

18350.04

8493.906 2.118542

0.0545

R-squared

0.049042

Mean dependent var

21784.81

Adjusted R-squared

0.019403

S.D. dependent var

57140.18

S.E. of regression

56323.83

Akaike info criterion

24.75640

Sum squared resid

1.46E+11

Schwarz criterion

24.83436

 
 
 

1.929986

Log likelihood

-592.1535

F-statistic

 

Durbin-Watson stat

1.668227

Prob(F-statistic)

0.171449

Dependent Variable: VAR

Method: Panel Least Squares

Date: 01/23/09 Time: 18:26

Sample: 2003 2006

Cross-sections included: 12

Total panel (balanced) observations: 48

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

ECART

0.451469

0.156702 2.881068

0.0085

DEF

0.057325

0.070835 0.809267

0.4433

C

6978.870

8768.347 0.795916

0.4508

R-squared

0.197136

Mean dependent var

21784.81

Adjusted R-squared

0.161453

S.D. dependent var

57140.18

S.E. of regression

52324.52

Akaike info criterion

24.62878

Sum squared resid

1.23E+11

Schwarz criterion

24.74573

Log likelihood

-588.0907

F-statistic

5.524672

Durbin-Watson stat

1.585384

Prob(F-statistic)

0.007152

A 2.2 Modèle avec effets individuels fixes

Dependent Variable: VAR

Method: Panel Least Squares

Date: 01/23/09 Time: 18:12

Sample: 2003 2006

Cross-sections included: 12

Total panel (balanced) observations: 48

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

ECART 0.143486 0.241560 0.593996 0.5563

C 17690.33 10428.61 1.696327 0.0987

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.329545 Mean dependent var 21784.81

Adjusted R-squared 0.099675 S.D. dependent var 57140.18

S.E. of regression 54217.71 Akaike info criterion 24.86522

Sum squared resid 1.03E+11 Schwarz criterion 25.37200

Log likelihood -583.7652 F-statistic 1.433615

Durbin-Watson stat 2.181366 Prob(F-statistic) 0.197407

Dependent Variable: VAR

Method: Panel Least Squares

Date: 01/23/09 Time: 18:17

Sample: 2003 2006

Cross-sections included: 12

Total panel (balanced) observations: 48

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

DEF 0.052502 0.085849 0.611558 0.5448

C 20023.68 8336.496 2.401930 0.0218

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.329947 Mean dependent var 21784.81

Adjusted R-squared 0.100214 S.D. dependent var 57140.18

S.E. of regression 54201.49 Akaike info criterion 24.86462

Sum squared resid 1.03E+11 Schwarz criterion 25.37140

Log likelihood -583.7508 F-statistic 1.436220

Durbin-Watson stat 2.331977 Prob(F-statistic) 0.196299

Dependent Variable: VAR

Method: Panel Least Squares

Date: 01/23/09 Time: 18:18

Sample: 2003 2006

Cross-sections included: 12

Total panel (balanced) observations: 48

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

ECART 0.133852 0.244535 0.547376 0.5877

DEF 0.049189 0.086932 0.565828 0.5752

C 16315.23 10808.16 1.509529 0.1404

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.335800 Mean dependent var 21784.81

Adjusted R-squared 0.081841 S.D. dependent var 57140.18

S.E. of regression 54752.07 Akaike info criterion 24.89751

Sum squared resid 1.02E+11 Schwarz criterion 25.44328

Log likelihood -583.5403 F-statistic 1.322260

Durbin-Watson stat 2.183774 Prob(F-statistic) 0.248370

précédent sommaire






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Je ne pense pas qu'un écrivain puisse avoir de profondes assises s'il n'a pas ressenti avec amertume les injustices de la société ou il vit"   Thomas Lanier dit Tennessie Williams