WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

The role of civil society in promoting greater social justice for forced migrants living in the inner city of Johannesburg

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Dieudonné Bikoko Mbombo
University of the Witwatersrand of Johannesburg, South Africa - Master of Science in Development Planning 2006
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

4.3.2. Economic Initiatives

Apart from the right to work and to open bank accounts, CSOs frequently question the

government, through its Ministry of Public Works, about the refusal of some companies and organisations to hire FMs because of their status. Sometimes, they take the initiatives, as Sr. Sandra said (see Chapter Three), of providing recommendation letters to those looking for job opportunities. It is important to note that many FMs, especially in the security industry, got jobs due to the influence and under the recommendation of CSOs; and now they can take care

of themselves and feed their family members.

This chapter has highlighted the Johannesburg's civil society strengths, focusing on their potential for bringing social and economic transformation in favour of the FMs, through a range of services in sectors such as health and education. The next subsection will talk about some of their weaknesses.

4.3.3. Weaknesses of the Inner City CSOs

The most important weaknesses of the inner city's CSOs may be seen through the statements

expressed below.

- They are unable to mobilise South Africans in their awareness campaigns for a greater social justice for FMs, in the sense that they have never thought about encouraging them to sympathise and be supportive of FMs, as a sign of solidarity.

- There is a lack of radical (rebellious) attitudes (as Sandercock suggests) in the way they address FMs challenges to the local and national governments. For example, they do not

organise protest marches, inviting South Africans as well as FMs to participate, to exert

pressures on these two spheres of government, asking them to improve the conditions of FMs, like social movements did in the US state of Tennessee where American citizens sympathised with the undocumented immigrants to force authorities to give the undocumented immigrants

the right to apply for a driver's license.

- Some of these organisations are financially dependent of the state subsidiaries. This may compromise their autonomy vis-à-vis the state and may also prevent from challenging the government on issues affecting FMs.

4.4. Conclusion

The chapter focused on the analysis of the findings of my fieldwork. It examined the opinions

of both FMs and members of the CSOs on the challenges facing FMs, as well as on the different initiatives undertaken by CSOs to facilitate a greater social justice for FMs, bring social and economic transformation, and make Johannesburg a just city. It also gave an overview of the strengths and the weaknesses of these organisations. But the most important thing that should be noted is that, since the abolition of apartheid in 1994, the Johannesburg CSOs have contributed a great deal to the social transformation of the City, and have played a major role in the integration of FMs in the inner city. At the national and local levels, they contributed to the publication of the 1998 Refugees Act, and to the government decisions to allow FMs to work and study, to open bank accounts, as well as to access public health care

freely.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"I don't believe we shall ever have a good money again before we take the thing out of the hand of governments. We can't take it violently, out of the hands of governments, all we can do is by some sly roundabout way introduce something that they can't stop ..."   Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) en 1984