WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

The role of the african union in the resolution of the conflict in mali

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Akizi-Egnim AKALA
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya / UNITAR - Master in conflictology 2018
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

1.2.2.2- The realist theory

Contrary to the idealists, the realists argue that democratic institutions are identified with limited capacity to deal with risk of conflict recurrence in a divided society since they are vulnerable to lingering disagreements about power sharing arrangements and hence rendering opportunities for continued insurgency to take place (Hegre & Fjeld, 2010). They hold the view that the first priority in the peace building and reconstruction process following an internal conflict is state-building designed to expand governance capacity and establish conditions of social cohesion, order and stability, national unity, the rule of law, and the exercise of effective authority. For the proponents of the theory, «State-building» is understood as an essential pre-condition for subsequent developments towards democracy, through the

12

usual mechanisms of holding competitive elections, strengthening legislatures, and establishing independent checks and balances upon the executive. Proponents of the realist view were motivated by the political experiences of states beginning from the post-colonial African nations up to the recent cases of civil unrest in states like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and some states in Africa. Fukuyama (2004) emphasizes that state building specially in multicultural societies require authorities to use force to disarm the militia and establish legitimate control over national territories. If elections are held prior to accomplishing such processes, internal conflicts may be frozen prolonging instability. More over Toft (2010) argues even to the extent of the fact that civil wars ending with military victories, where one side maintains control of the military and police, generate more durable order and stability. Particularly they claim that elections are especially dangerous if held early in any transition process, before the mechanisms of political accountability, institutional checks and balances, and a democratic culture have had time to develop (Edward & Jack, 2007).

Finally with regard to the current Malian crisis, there is fair deal of practical experiences representing the realist view as most of the initiatives to deal with the turmoil were inclined to the military option as priority measure in state reconstruction. The government with the support of forces from the French and the African led Support Mission to Mali (AFISMA) and later on MINUSMA, the G5 forces perused a military campaign to curb the rebel forces.

As a conclusion, each theory offer useful tools and insights in the study of intra-state conflict analysis and conflict settlement. Yet, with regard to the complexities of armed conflicts, in particular the armed conflict in Mali, no single theory exits that can comprehensively explain them by itself. So, this accounts for why I have integrated all these theories that I consider to be complementary for a better understanding and settlement of the armed conflict in Mali.

1.3- The African Union and the conflict intervention framework.

Prior to the birth of the AU, the OAU Heads of State and government recognized in their declaration in 1990 that the prevalence of conflicts in Africa was seriously impeding their collective and individual efforts to deal with the continent's economic problems. Consequently, they resolved to work together toward the peaceful and rapid resolution of conflicts. During the OAU Summit held in Cairo in 1993, African leaders established the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, and Resolution (MCPMR). In doing so, they recognized that the resolution of conflicts is a precondition for the creation of peace and stability, and a necessary precondition for social and economic development (UN, 2004:1). However, while this initiative thrust the OAU into the center of conflict management efforts in Africa, the reality is that the pan-African organization never became a principal player in the peace processes

13

in Africa (CSIS, 2004:2). This is why it was found necessary to transform the OAU in African Union with new policies and perspectives.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Il faut répondre au mal par la rectitude, au bien par le bien."   Confucius