4.3.8.9. Probability of resigning after gaining enough
experience Table 4.34: DUTERIMBERE IMF SA Employees leaving probability
Frequency Percent
Agree 5 25
Strongly agree 15 75
Total 20 100
Source: Primary data
Asked whether they would resign as soon as they have got
enough experience, 25% agreed while 75% strongly agreed. At DUTERIMBERE IMF SA,
almost every body is ready to quit as soon as a better alternative comes by.
Table 4.35: UNGUKA IMF SA Employees leaving
probability
Frequency Percent
Strongly disagree 13 65
Agree 1 5
Strongly agree 6 30
Total 20 100
Source: Primary data
8 Interview conducted at IMF UNGUKA SA
In UNGUKA, on the contrary, 65% are not ready to quit, 5%
would consider exploring new opportunities while 30% strongly agree that they
will quit as soon as they have new opportunities.
IMF UNGUKA seems better than its competitor. Whatever the
case, having 30% of employees ready to resign is not something that a serious
employer should aim at. These figures send a message that microfinance
employees are in most cases there to look for experience and then look for
employment with other organizations. This means that, other factors remaining
constant, MFIs are like nurseries. They are good at attracting employees
without experience, they develop them - in the limits of their meager resources
- and see them adjourning, which is detrimental.
When one looks at the organizational structures of both
companies and asks how many vacancies are there, one tends to think there has
massive resignations, which is not true. Rather, not all the posts are
occupied. For example, currently 8 posts are being advertised at DUTERIMBERE
IMF SA. These posts are HRM, Operations Director, Marketing, Legal Officer and
5 accountants. As for UNGUKA IMF SA, some 5 vacancies are there. These include
the Lawyer, Marketing Director, Research and Product Development officer.
Surprisingly, these posts were never occupied before. This
sends a message that MFIs are still growing. They have not yet reached their
maturity stage. They keep hiring as need arise according to their business
plans which they keep updating to accommodate current realities. To manage
their meager resources, they hire only for urgent posts to meet the current
demands of the organization and market.
The data presented and discussed above show a point of view of
employees who participated in this study. What is the view point of management?
Let us look at the following pages.
4.3. DATA FROM MANAGERS' 4.3.1. Some management
Practices
Table 4.36: Some management Practices in MFIs
STATEMENT
|
IMF UNGUKA SA
|
DUTERIMBERE IMF SA
|
Statement 1
|
5
|
5
|
Statement 2
|
5
|
3
|
Statement 3
|
4
|
5
|
Statement 4
|
3
|
4
|
Statement 5
|
5
|
4
|
Statement 6
|
5
|
5
|
Statement 7
|
2
|
1
|
Statement 8
|
4
|
4
|
Statement 9
|
1
|
1
|
Statement 10
|
5
|
4
|
Statement 11
|
1
|
2
|
Statement 12
|
2
|
3
|
Statement 13
|
5
|
1
|
Source: Primary data
Various statements were written and managers were asked to show
to which extent they agree or disagree with them.
Statement 1: Your institution always recruits qualified
employees
Both institutions strongly agree that they recruit qualified
employees as evidenced by score 5 for both institutions. However, their claims
seem to have no strong basis. It has been seen above (in section 4.3.4) that
majority of employees recruited by MFIs are young and majority have no
professional experience by the time they join MFIs as evidenced in section
4.3.2. It seems that being qualified means, among other things, to have the
required degree, but microfinance experience is not an issue.
Human capital management in Rwanda: Challenges and prospects
for Microfinance Institutions Statement 2: Your institution always
motivates its employees
In IMF UNGUKA SA, they claim to always motivate employees as
evidenced by score 5, while in DUTERIMBERE management seems to be honest they
do not motivate to their best as evidenced by score 3. This may be backed by
the information from employees. In fact, when one compares information from
employees, levels of satisfaction in IMF UNGUKA SA are better than in
DUTERIMBERE IMF SA.
How do MFIs motivate? These companies have different ways of
motivating their employees: At UNGUKA, there is a claim that managers are good
coaches. While it is agreed that «paycheck is not good, they offer the
«13th month» bonus as decided by the general assembly.
This is done only when they make good profits. So, employees do not want to
miss it9»
They offer other advantages as well. For example,
«each employee has a medical insurance with RAMA. We may also offer
preferential loans to our employees. Above all, top management is transparent
in all the endeavors. Employees know about every thing being
planned10».
At DUTERIMBERE IMF SA, they also motivate employees through
«performance based bonus. While this was started with loan officers,
management reported that there are plans to extend this to everybody and that
there was software which was going to help track individual
performance11».
Statement 3: Your institution always trains its
employees
IMF UNGUKA SA agrees they train to their best as evidenced by
score 4 while in DUTERIMBERE IMF SA management strongly believes that they
train their employees as evidenced by score 5. However, «their
training is limited by a lack of availability of resource people and their
financial capacity»12.
9 Interview with Personnel officer at UNGUKA
10 Interview with the Director of Operations and
Banking transactions
11 Interview with the DUTERIMBERE DAF
12 Interview with MFI consultant
Statement 4: Your institution has good customer
care
IMF UNGUKA SA is not satisfied by the level of customer care
(score 3) they extend to their clients while DUTERIMBERE IMF SA agrees they do
their best (score 5). How does customer care link with human capital
management? Employees are the first customers of any organization. Front office
employees send more messages to customers than CEOs. The fact that IMF UNGUKA
SA honestly is dissatisfied with the level of customer care may mean that they
are not satisfied by the level of professionalism among their employees, they
need more from their employees and management tries their best.
The same applies to DUTERIMBERE IMF SA but in a different
degree of dissatisfaction. Linking this to strategic goals; may be its
management believes that their customer care is enough considering the
competitors' in real microfinance.
Statement 5: Your company has a clear strategic
plan
In IMF UNGUKA SA, management was in a strong agreement with
the statement (score 5) while in DUTERIMBERE IMF SA management was in agreement
(score 4). The reason why DUTERIMBERE IMF SA was just in agreement might be
that by the time interview was conducted there, the strategic plan was still a
draft pending to be validated by the general assembly in the near future. In
any case, business planning done in microfinance sector, implying that they
plan for the future of their business.
Statement 6: Your company has a good human resources
management policy
In both cases, MFIs strongly believe they have good human
resource management policy as evidenced by score 5. This implies that, MFIs
understand the importance of the HR manuals. This is a good starting point for
employers who want to systematically manage their resources. The challenge is
to translate them into real action.
Statement 7: Your Company values unsolicited
applications
IMF UNGUKA SA is in disagreement (score 2) while DUTERIMBERE
IMF SA is in a strong disagreement (score 1). This implies that MFIs level
to attract many employees is low or at least
non - existing. That is the reason why management thinks it is
not worthwhile accepting unsolicited applications.
Statement 8: You target candidates who are still at
university/ fresh graduates
In both cases, employers agree that their target potential
employees are fresh graduates as evidenced by score 4. This implies their low
capacity to attract employees with many years of professional experience.
Statement 9: You employ people with experience in
microfinance
In both cases, MFIs strongly disagree with the fact that they
employ people with experience in microfinance. When asked why, one manager at
IMF UNGUKA SA had this to say «We do not require employees with
previous experience. After all, there are none in the Rwandan labor market,
expect those from the bankrupt microfinance institutions. We do not need such
experiences since they did not help their former
employers13».
This implies that MFIs do not have people with the specific
skills and experience to contribute to their mission and vision. They hire
people with some generic experience to be trained as they are doing their jobs.
If there were some few people with these skills, MFIs would not be able to
attract them since they would charge high salaries and benefits for their
scarcity.
Statement 10: You use on - the - job training
In IMF UNGUKA SA the statement is strongly agreed with (score
5) while in DUTERIMBERE IMF SA it is agreed with as evidenced by score 4. MFIs
often use on - the job training rather than off - the job training since the
latter are expensive. Some exceptions happen, however, when training is
sponsored by partners.
13 Anonymous Manager at IMF UNGUKA SA
Statement 11: You train outside your work premises / off
- the - job training
In IMF UNGUKA SA, the statement is strongly disagreed with
(score 1) while in DUTERIMBERE IMF SA it is disagreed with as evidenced by
score 2. In any case, it implies that MFIs capacity to train off the job is
very low. That explains why they train more on -the - job (Statement 10).
Statement 12: You experience high rates of labor turnover
(resignations)
The issue of labor turnover was worth investigating. At IMF
UNGUKA SA, management thinks it is not remarkable (score 2) while at
DUTERIMBERE IMF SA management is indifferent as evidenced by score 3. However,
as can be read from what employees feel, microfinance are likely to experience
high rates of turnover after employees have had good professional
experience.
Statement 13: You often lose customers to commercial
banks
IMF UNGUKA SA strongly agrees (score 5) while DUTERIMBERE
strongly disagrees with the statement as evidenced by score 1. This means that
though both companies are in microfinance and enjoy the same legal status,
either their target customers are not necessarily the same or DUTERIMBERE IMF
SA does not face competition in its areas of intervention because its clients
need typical micro loans or these companies are not targeting the same
customers because they are at different levels of growth.
Lack of enough capital was reported to be «one of
reasons as to why MFIs may loose customers to commercial banks in some
instances since they cannot satisfy the big amount of loans they require when
they grow their businesses14
14 Interview with the Director of Operations and
Banking Transactions at UNGUKA
Human capital management in Rwanda: Challenges and prospects
for Microfinance Institutions 4.3.2. Why employees resign from
MFIs
Table 4.37: Why do MFI employees resign?
STATEMENTS
|
IMF UNGUKA SA
|
DUTERIMBERE IMF SA
|
Statement 14
|
3
|
2
|
Statement 15
|
3
|
4
|
Statement 16
|
4
|
4
|
Source: Primary data
Statement 14: Microfinance is not a popular industry
in Rwanda, so employees do not feel proud to be associated with it. At
IMF UNGUKA SA, management is not sure about the truth in this statement as
evidenced by score 3. At DUTERIMBERE IMF SA, management is rather in
disagreement with the statement (score 2). This implies that the popularity of
microfinance sector plays no role either in attracting or in retaining skillful
employees. In fact, this is in agreement with what employees said that they did
not apply for jobs in MFI as a consequence of having dreamt to have such jobs
with current employers.
Statement 15: Microfinance salaries are not
competitive. After employees have gained some banking experience they seek jobs
with classic banks, where salaries are higher. In IMF UNGUKA SA,
management is not sure again (score 5). However, DUTERIMBERE IMF SA' management
is rather in agreement with the statement (4). This implies that among other
factors employees attraction and retention depends on the MFIs' level of
salaries and other benefits. Employees' reasons to resign may
be that the level of pay does not meet the market standard or they feel their
professional experience is not worth what they are earning.
Statement 16: The career path in microfinance is not
clear or is not attractive. Employees seek employment with other organizations
where career path looks clearer. In IMF UNGUKA SA, management is in
agreement with the statement as evidenced by score 4. In the same line of
understanding, DUTERIMBERE management is in agreement. This implies that
clarity of the career path in microfinance is one of factors that play a role
in retaining employees with professional experience. As a consequence employees
who have gotten some professional experience would rather like to join
employers with more challenging positions.
Human capital management in Rwanda: Challenges and prospects
for Microfinance Institutions 4.3.3. Strategic planning in
MFIs
Table 4.38: Strategic planning in MFIs
STATEMENTS
|
IMF UNGUKA SA
|
DUTERIMBERE IMF SA
|
Statement 17
|
4
|
4
|
Statement 18
|
5
|
3
|
Statement 19
|
5
|
2
|
Statement 20
|
5
|
4
|
Statement 21
|
5
|
4
|
Statement 22
|
5
|
4
|
Source: Primary data
Strategic planning is a practice in the microfinance sector. In
fact, in both cases, there are business plans (2010 - 2014). What issues do
their business plans address?
First of all, both companies agree that they address
competition issues (Statement 17) as evidenced by score 4. In
microfinance, two levels of competition may be addressed. For example, IMF
UNGUKA SA believes that its competitors are not MFIs rather commercial banks.
This is the reason why, their business plan reads «We want to increase
our social capital and thus be an intermediary bank15».
This is not the same in DUTERIMBERE IMF SA, after all they
reported not to loose customers to commercial banks. While both recognize the
funding issue, they also are set to attract donors and
investors.
Secondly, they address marketing issues
(Statement 18) at different levels. IMF UNGUKA SA strongly agrees (score 5)
while DUTERIMBERE IMF SA thinks it is just an issue (score 3). Why is it that
UNGUKA wants to market seriously? One of reasons may be that IMF UNGUKA SA' s
management reported «to be competing with commercial
banks16». In DUTERIMBERE IMF SA,
15 UNGUKA IMF SA, Business plan 2010 - 2014, Kigali
16 Interview with the Director of Operations and Banking
transactions
however, they do not think it is a serious issue. After all
management reported to be «loosing no customers to commercial
banks17»
Thirdly, in the studied, it was revealed that business plans
do not address the human resource issue at the same extent
(Statement 19). IMF UNGUKA SA takes this with a serious note as evidenced by
score 5 while at DUTERIMBERE IMF SA they do not think it is an issue as
evidenced by score 2. This again may explain what their «human capital
mindset is» and who their competitors are.
Fourthly, strategic plans address funding
issues (Statement 20). IMF UNGUKA SA, with a target to be an intermediary bank
seems to be in a more acute need as evidenced by score 5. However, DUTERIMBERE
IMF SA agrees to be in need of funding too (score 4). This implies that
microfinance institutions are in need for more funding. This means that their
way of doing business today and their human capital management in particular is
affected by availability of enough funds.
Fifthly, their strategic plans address shareholders
attracting issues (Statement 21). UNGUKA, with a target to be an
intermediary bank seems to be in a more acute need of more shareholders (score
5) while DUTERIMBERE IMF SA agrees to be in need of shareholders too (score 4).
This implies that microfinance institutions are in need for more shareholders
to respond to their funding needs.
Sixthly, their strategic plans address donor
attracting issues (Statement 22). Like in Statement 21, UNGUKA is
needier than DUTERIMBERE. The difference in the seriousness of their needs has
a link with their different strategic goals.
|