MARKETING OF AGROFORESTRY PRODUCTS IN SINDH
PROVINCE
OF PAKISTAN
THESIS
M.Sc. (Agri) Hons Agricultural Economics
BY
HABIBULLAH MAGSI
REG.NO. 2K5-AE-315
Supervisory committee:
Dr. Heman D. Lohano (Economist) Supervisor Mrs. Tahmina Mangan
(Economist) Co-supervisor
Mr. Aijaz Aali Khooharo (Statistician) Co-supervisor
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
FACULTY OF
AGRICULTURAL SOCIAL SCIENCES
SINDH AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY TANDOJAM
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter
1
|
|
Particulars
List of Tables
Acknowledgements Abstract
Introduction
|
Page 1
|
|
1.1
|
Objectives
|
3
|
2
|
|
Review of Literature
|
4
|
3
|
|
Materials and Methods
|
8
|
|
3.1
|
Sampling procedure
|
8
|
|
3.2
|
Data gathering Technique
|
9
|
|
3.3
|
Marketing Margin
|
9
|
|
3.4
|
Marketing Cost
|
10
|
|
3.5
|
Net Margin
|
10
|
|
3.6
|
Limitations of the study
|
11
|
4
|
|
Results
|
12
|
|
4.1
|
Marketing System
|
12
|
|
4.2
|
Marketing System of Agroforestry Products
|
12
|
|
4.3
|
Marketing Structure Analysis
|
14
|
|
4.4
|
Marketing Channels of Agroforestry Products
|
15
|
|
4.5
|
Marketing Margin Analysis for Agroforestry wood products
|
19
|
|
4.6
|
Agroforestry Marketing Issues in the Study Area
|
|
4
|
|
Discussion
|
24
|
5
|
|
Conclusion and Suggestions
|
27
|
|
|
References
|
30
|
|
|
Questionnaire
|
32
|
LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS
TABLE
|
PARTICULARS
|
PAGE
|
4.1
|
Marketing Channels of Agroforestry Wood Products at Private
|
16
|
|
Farm Lands in Sindh
|
|
4.1
|
Wood Product Percentage from Agroforest Trees
|
19
|
4.2
|
Marketing Margins of Acacia nilotica (Babul) Products
|
20
|
4.3
|
Marketing Margins of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Products
|
22
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First and the foremost, I offer my humble thanks to Almighty
Allah Who enlightened me to achieve this academic goal. The data for this
thesis were funded by ALP project on Agroforestry entitled as «Economic
Analysis on Agroforestry Plantations in Sindh Province Pakistan». I would
like to express sincere gratitude to my honourable supervisor and Principal
Investigator of the project Dr. Heman D. Lohano, Associate Professor and
Chairman, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Social
Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam for his invaluable support and
supervision both during the preparation of the proposal and the write up of the
thesis, including data analysis, interpretation of results, the proof reading
and constructing professional scientific papers.
My sincere gratitude also goes to my co-supervisors, Mrs.
Tehmina Mangan, Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Economics and Mr. Aijaz
Ali Khooharo, Assistanat Professor, Department of Statistics, Faculty of
Agricultural Social Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam for their
support and serving on my supervisory committee.
I am thankful to my all friends who facilitated me in conducting
field survey. Finally, I thank my parents for their never-ending love and moral
support.
ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF
For Master of Science (Agriculture) Honours
HABIBULLAH MAGSI
Major Agricultural Economics
TITLE: MARKETING OF AGROFORESTRY PRODUCTS IN
SINDH
PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN
Pakistan is a forest poor country with very low cover of five
percent of the total land as compared to the recommended level of 20-25
percent. Thus, agroforestry can help in achieving the national target of forest
cover and in meeting the rising demand for wood and wood products. It is
referred as plantation of trees on private agricultural land with main
products; timber, mining-timber, fire-wood, pods, flowers, gum, forage etc.,
where as the major products are timber, mining-timber and firewood.
Furthermore, it would not only generate additional income to farmers but it
will also reclaim the soil conditions and is the main source of environmental
benefits. In Pakistan, agroforestry contributes 46% of timber and 90% of
firewood requirements whereas 14% of timber and 10% of firewood are being met
from state forest only. Marketing structure and its efficiency determine how
the consumer rupee is distributed among producer and different middlemen. The
lower returns to the producers and high marketing margins to middlemen may
result in inefficient agroforestry production system.
Key words: Sindh, Agroforestry, Marketing system,
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The share of forest in gross domestic products (GDP) of
Pakistan was only 0.6 percent in the year 2004-05. In this period, the forest
area was 4.04 million hectares out of total land area of 79.61 million
hectares. The forest cover in Pakistan, thus constitutes only 5.07 percent of
its total land area, and is relatively low as compared to other Asian
countries. For example in Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Japan and India, natural forest
area is, 50.4, 42.2, 36.4 and 24.2 percent of the total land area in these
countries. Pakistan is a forest-poor country with only 0.03 hectares of forest
per capita as compared to the world average of 1.0 hectares (Government of
Pakistan, 2005).
Due to rapid growth in population, demand for wood and other
forest products is increasing. The state forest in this country is thus,
insufficient to meet the timber and fire-wood requirements for growing
population of the country. In the domestic production of forest products, these
requirements are met through agroforestry, which refers to the plantation of
forest trees on agriculture land. Collective name for land use systems and
technologies where woody perennials (trees, shrubs, bamboos, etc.) are
deliberately used on the same land management unit as agricultural crops and/or
animals, either in some form of spatial arrangement or temporal sequence
(ICRAF, 2006).
In Pakistan, the state forests contribute only 14% of timber
and 10% of firewood whereas 46% of timber and 90% of firewood requirements are
being met by agroforestry (Government of Pakistan, 2005). Acacia
nilotica (Babur) is the most common forest tree species grown under
agroforestry in Sindh. The other tree species include Eucalyptus
camaldulensis, Neem, Talhi and Kandi etc. Acacia nilotica
provides timber,
mining-props, and fire-wood. Its timber is commonly used for
manufacture of low cost furniture, doors, windows, carts and other household
articles. Its fire-wood is used by rural households and firms. Eucalyptus
camaldulensis is mostly used as a low cost timber, chipboard manufacture
and pulp making.
Marketing structure and its efficiency determines how the
consumer rupee is distributed among producers and different middlemen. The high
marketing margins to middlemen may result in inefficient production due to the
lower returns to the producers and/or higher consumer expenditure on the
products. For improving the production efficiency and lowering the consumer
expenditure, there is need of detailed investigation of marketing structure and
margins of agroforestry products.
Marketing structure and channels of agroforestry products are
totally different from other agricultural products due to bulkiness and high
weight of wood and other forest products. The previous studies in Pakistan have
focused on marketing of vegetables, poultry and fruits. Khair et al.
(2002) found that apple producers were merely getting 31% of consumer
rupee, while the rest was going to different middlemen, thus showing an
exploiting and inefficient marketing setup. Further they indicated that reasons
for these high marketing margins include large number of market intermediaries,
expensive packaging material, and high cost of transportation, illegal import
of apples, and the lack of capital. In previous studies, no attempt had been
made to study agroforestry marketing channels and margins earned by each
intermediary. Therefore, this study conducted for detailed investigation of
marketing of agroforestry products in Sindh.
Objectives:
The main goal of the study was to explore market structure and
marketing margins of agroforestry products in four districts of Sindh, namely:
Hyderabad, Matiari, Sanghar and Badin. The specific objectives of the study
were:
· To investigate the market structure and marketing
channels of agroforestry products in Sindh.
· To estimate marketing costs, marketing margins, and price
spread of major agroforestry products in the selected districts of Sindh.
· To identify marketing issues and suggest policy measures
for agroforestry products in Sindh.
Although this study was limited to four districts of Sindh,
namely Hyderabad, Matiari, Sanghar and Badin but the results of this study
would be helpful for the government to design policies that will increase well
designed and perfect marketing system in Sindh as well as in Pakistan, and will
encourage farmers to plant more forest trees on their land.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The available literature indicates that very limited research
studies have been conducted in the field of agroforestry products and marketing
analysis. Therefore, the present study will be one of the basic studies helpful
for the policymakers and researchers with the subject area. However, the
available literature reviewed here, are as under:
FAO (1993) found that marketing of fire-wood and charcoal in
Peshawar was characterized by high cost when compared with other commercial
energy sources like natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and kerosene.
This study concluded that out of the estimated total number of 126,750
households in Peshawar, about 17,000 used firewood for household activities
such as cooking, water heating and space heating. In addition the domestic
sector, a large number of commercial establishments also used firewood. The
annual consumption of fire-wood and charcoal were estimated at 44,600 and 3,500
metric tons, respectively.
Gangadharapp et al. (2004) investigated that 37
percent of the agroforestry growers cut the tree in the age group of 20-30
years followed by 25 percent between 30-40 years and only 17 percent of farmers
harvested above 40 years old trees. Further they revealed that 62 percent of
the farmers sold their products through forest contractors, 27 percent through
saw-mill owners and 11 percent directly to consumers. Finally they explored
that 58 percent of the farmers were not aware of the market price of their
products.
Holding et al. (2006) discovered that tree
cultivation for reasons like windbreaks, soil and water conservation had become
a secondary objective of agroforestry growers, while the current primary
objective of tree planting was for cash and investment.
Hollington et al. (2001) explored that wood
industries can be established around growth of salt tolerant trees and
establishment of agroforestry markets and processing facilities will allow
saline lands to make a significant contribution to the economy.
Jayasankar et al. (2000) found that the
inefficiencies in the functioning of wood marketing is due to exploitative
trade practices arising out of the legal restrictions, and bureaucratic
procedures are the main bottlenecks in the functioning of the bamboo markets in
Kerala (India) which often tends to reduce the share of the farmers.
Kanowski (1997) suggested that simple plantation forests, with
aim that in meeting the wood needs of societies to increase and satisfy
sustainability criteria. This plantation forestry for commodity production
benefits considerably from economies of scale and integration with industrial
processing; it is also under strong cost and profit pressure, thus both
demanding and permitting relatively high levels of resource inputs.
Kärnä et al. (2003) concluded that
environmental issues had a significant impact on the forest industry. It is
natural that companies seek to address environmental concerns of customers and
other stakeholders. Further, results showed that majority of surveyed companies
had at least partially integrated environmental issues into their marketing
strategies and practices. They suggested forest certification as a necessary
tool for marketing of forest products.
Keerio (1997) estimated that 67 percent of mining timber and
33 percent fire-wood had been produced from Acacia nilotica Hurry or
block, he further investigated that Acacia nilotica fire-wood had been
preferred in the market and fetched a higher price than other species.
Kella and Sangi (2000) investigated that agroforestry meets the
nation's requirements of timber and fire-wood which is also principle source of
revenue.
Khair et al. (2002) explored that apple producers
were merely getting 31% of consumer rupee, the rest of it going to different
middlemen, thus showing an exploiting and inefficient marketing setup. The
results of this study further indicated that reasons for these high marketing
margins were large number of market intermediaries, expensive packaging
material and high cost of transportation, illegally imported apples and lack of
capital.
Negussie et al. (2004) explored that income from
eucalypt woodlots constituted about 28.5% of the total cash revenues generated
from sales of tree/shrub products, where large farmers made only 2.5% and 0.2%
of the total cash profit from eucalypt poles of respectively the two dominant
intermediate brokers. They suggested that poor marketing infrastructure, weak
institutional support, and biophysical limitations still undermine the
financial benefits of eucalypt woodlots and other tree/shrub plantations. They
also recommended that expansion of market-oriented eucalypt woodlots on
marginal lands is expected to improve farmers' financial income and thus
increases access to modern farm inputs.
Sharif (2004) investigated that case of citrus the duration of
contract is almost one year, the producer share in consumer rupee was 35%,
followed by contractor was 32%
and retailers was 20%. Similarly, the marketing margin
analysis showed that major beneficiaries in the marketing were contractors and
retailers. The underlying reasons for the major share of contractors and
retailers were that the formers bring the product into the major markets of
Pakistan while the latter takes the commodity in the easy reach to the
consumer. Both bear the risk of post-harvest losses in case of contractors,
major losses take place during transport, loading and unloading while in case
of retailers the losses are in the form of deterioration of quality due to
delayed sale, by pressing due to over-packing, and malpractices in crates
filling.
CHAPTER III
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The chapter describes how the data was collected and analyzed
for production, and marketing of agroforestry products in the study area. In
view of objectives the following methods of study were adopted.
3.1 Sampling procedure
The aim of this study was to assess the existing production
and marketing system of agroforestry in Sindh. However, in an empirical
investigation it is impossible to collect information from the whole
population. Therefore, researchers are often forced to make inferences based on
information derived from a representative sample of the population. The size of
the sample, and amount of variation, usually affect the quantity and quality of
information obtained from the survey. The aim is to devise a sampling scheme,
which is economical and easy to operate and provides unbiased estimates with
small variance. The main characteristics of sampling theory applied in this
study are discussed below.
The selection of a sample from the population is commonly used
in economics, marketing and other disciplines because of limitations of
covering the whole population. Barnett, (1991), considers that cost is the main
constraint in carrying out interviews of the whole population. Given
limitations in terms of money, time, efforts and data management, a sample is a
more appropriate method. They argue that sampling not only saves cost and time
but also gives more accurate results than a census. Given limitations of time,
finance, data management, and traveling a decision was taken to interview 30
agroforestry farmers, 30 Wholesalers, 30 Saw-mill owner and 10 Retailers.
The sample size was considered adequate in terms of depth and
accuracy required and in terms of the time and resources available for the
research study; the respondents were selected through stratified random
sampling technique in the study area. Stratified random sampling is one in
which the population is divided in strata and from each stratum the population
has an equal chance of being selected (Chaudhry, 2002).
3.2 Data gathering Technique
Primary data were collected during 2006 a comprehensive set of
questionnaire was prepared (pre-tested before finalization) to record the
interviews of the selected respondents, the questionnaire comprised the queries
about marketing organization of agroforestry products, marketing cost incurred
by various agencies, price of wood paid and received by various middlemen in
the system and problems faced by various sellers and buyers. Secondary data
were collected from various sources of government publications, from internet
as well as from other literature, for finalization of the objects.
3.3 Marketing Margin
Marketing margin is the difference between sale prices
(selling price and buying price) of two or more than two agencies for
equivalent quantity of a specific commodity. The following formula was used to
calculate the marketing margins,
Mm = Ps - Pb
where, Mm stands for marketing margin, Ps
indicates sale price Pb represents buying price.
3.4 Marketing Cost
In Pakistan, producers of agricultural products believe that
benefits of the value added due to marketing costs are mainly availed by the
intermediaries, due to the time, place and form, must be equivalent to the
corresponding differences in costs. Prices of particular commodity, at one
time, therefore must be uniform over geographical areas plus or minus the cost
of getting supplies from the area of surplus. Therefore, per unit marketing
cost incurred by various agencies were estimated for agroforestry products to
examine the pricing efficiency.
Marketing cost is referred as designate expenditure incurred
by various marketing participants from the time as the commodity leave the
farm-gate to reach marketing agents for processing. Marketing costs were
incurred by the producers as well as all the intermediaries participating
between producers and consumers in the flow of commodity. The principle
components of marketing cost included loading, unloading, transportation,
commission charges, processing, grading and marketing tax. These costs were
computed on per 40 kg of wood. Each functionary was enquired about the amounts
it spent on each 40 kg.
3.5 Net Margin
The net margin of a specific agency is the net earning, which it
earns after paying
all marketing
costs. Net earnings of various market
agencies involved in the marketing of agroforestry products were computed with
the following formula.
Nm = Ps - Pb - Cm
where, Nm stands for net margin, Ps indicates
sale price, Pb represents buying price and Cm represents
marketing costs incurred by the same agency.
3.6 Limitations of the study
The study was based on the primary data, collected through the
field survey. Due to the shortage of time and financial constraints, the sample
size was kept limited. During collection of data, many problems were faced. Due
to the low literacy rate among the respondents, no written records regarding
their costs and income etc were available. They hesitated to provide
information about personal questions and incomes from trees/wood/wood-products
they were doubtful about the purpose of the study despite of the fact that they
were explained about the study, yet great care was taken to collect reliable
information. All the information collected is based on the memories and
estimates of the respondents.
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
This chapter presents the survey findings, including marketing
system, structure, channels and marketing cost and margins of agroforestry
products from the study area.
4.1 Marketing System
Awareness of marketing as a concept or vital and dynamic
element in economic development has greatly increased in the developing
countries during the last three decades. The improvement in the functioning of
commodity markets as well as the improved performance of the marketing system
is now generally recognized as important, strategic elements in agricultural
and economic development. Changes of attitude to marketing have come about
particularly during the last decade, when many developing countries had to
undergo stringent economic reforms. In most developing countries, government
policies and programs directed at agricultural marketing have been based more
on preconceived ideas about the nature of the existing marketing system than on
accurate information and economic analysis.
4.2 Marketing System of Agroforestry Products
Thorough research into the markets available for each type the
product is absolutely essential before committing to any forestry enterprise.
For most forestry products, the buyer must be relatively close to the site.
Otherwise, the transportation costs will eat up potential profits. Although
short-rotation woody crops are a relatively new type of agroforestry without
established markets, it is likely that regional markets will
develop over time where there are customers such as vegetable
producers, fruit growers, and the fiber industry.
Regions where agroforestry is a longstanding tradition are
likely to have markets for all types of forest products (non-wood and wood).
Without such a forestry infrastructure already in place, it is risky to commit
to an agroforestry system. However, because private lands are becoming a more
important source of tree products, new markets will develop in those regions
where agroforestry is established. It is, of course, difficult to predict
where, especially when planning for harvests ten years or more in the future.
Careful consideration must be given not only to the marketing plan, but also to
the harvest plan as well.
Thinning and pruning of trees may generate sales of pods and
forage (non-wood products) if wisely marketed. This part of the planning
process requires the advice of a forest professional, whether a government
agent or a private consultant. Remember that timber buyers are likely to have
their own best interests in the mind, but landowners who want to add value to
their forest products have some choices. One way is to certify that the forest
and its harvest have been managed according to specified ecological
standards.
In some cases, landowners can add value themselves, for
example by cutting and selling fire-wood, access to a portable saw-mill can
enable landowners to saw their own logs into lumber, air dry it, and sell it
directly to specialty woodworkers.
Climatic, biological and socioeconomic factors are all
available in Sindh to develop wood based industries through increasing
agroforestry production. Yet wood business is not carried out on scientific
lines and supply of wood and wood products does not adjust ever increasing
demand for these products. Increasing growth rate in
population has resulted in lower per capita consumption of wood
products which refers as timber, mining timber fire-wood, and other non-wood
products.
4.3 Marketing Structure Analysis
Market structure lays on organization of a market, nature of
competition and price behavior within market. Similarly, «market
conduct» studies price policy of firms, aims to pursue and methods applied
to charging price quantity to be produced and sale promotion cost incurred.
Scherer and Ross (1990) added research and development commitment, investment
in production facilities and legal tactics «market performance»
mostly depends on behavior of sellers and buyers taking into account the
parameters like price, output, production, selling cost etc. Market structure
refers to the organizational characteristics of a market for the particular
purposes, to those characteristics which determine the relationship of sellers
and buyers in market to each other (Mohyu-ud-Din, 1998).
4.3.1 Marketing of Non-wood Forest Products
There are numerous agroforestry products depending on the tree
species. The most common forest tree species planted in Sindh were Acacia
nilotica (Babur) followed by other species including Euclaptus
camaldulensis (Sufeda), Azadirachta indica (Neem), Talhi, Kandi,
and other forest trees.
The non-wood forest products are pods, forage, boori, glue,
Lac, Khnour and other indigenous products, generally marketing system for
non-wood forest products was found fully non commercialized in the study area,
it also seemed that these products were locally sold on cheep rate or gifted to
some one. The producer didn't know value of their product because of imperfect
marketing system.
4.3.2 Marketing of Agroforestry Wood Products
Wood and wood products are basic necessities of life weather
people belong to rural as well as urban areas. Major portion of forest wood
product is fire-wood, which is wastage or small pieces of wood, sold to bakers,
restaurants and households while remaining products are Timber, is simply wood,
that serves as raw material for various wood based industries like saw-mills
and chip-board factories from which furniture is made that is used in household
articles as well as for office appliances, and other wood product is Mining
props, that is trunk of trees almost used as supporting pillars in coal mines,
mainly Acacia nilotica props were traded to coal mines at Lakhra in
Sindh and Quetta in Balochistan.
Marketing of agroforestry wood products is found inefficient
due to the bulkiness or unawareness among producers or growers, because there
were decentralized marketing channels prevailed in the study area, which refers
as producers/ farmers do not bring their products in market, like other
agricultural products, instead of that the product is sold directly to local
assemblers, saw-mill owners and other intermediaries on the farm gate.
4.4 Marketing Channels of Agroforestry Products
Channels may be defined that flow of goods from producer,
assembler or manufacturer to consumer. Marketing channels are identical in some
cases but differ in other cases. When a commodity passes directly from the
producers to the consumers, the route is known as direct channel, but when
several agencies operate between producers and consumers, the route is referred
as indirect channel of marketing. Marketing channels of agroforestry wood
products are illustrated in Figure 4.1
Coal Mines
(Mining
Props)
Contract
Agent
(Mining Props)
Firms
(Firewood)
e.g. Bakers
Local
Assembler
(Logs)
Saw Mills
(Logs)
Farmer
(Trees)
Wood-based
Firms
(Timber)
Households
(Furniture)
Households
(Firewood)
Retailer
(Firewood)
Figure 4.1 Marketing Channels of Agroforestry Wood
Products at Private Farm-Lands in Sindh
Figure 4.1 indicates that agroforestry wood products flow
towards marketing agents, wood products are totally different from other
agricultural products because shape of this product changes when it reaches to
other marketing agent, movement of wood products and marketing agents are given
bellow,
4.4.1 Producer
A large number of producers of agroforestry wood products
geographically dispersed in various locations in the study area. Farmer deals
with numerous agroforestry tree species, but mostly Acacia nilotica,
and Eucalyptus camaldulensis, whole trees were sold by him. In
Sindh Acacia nilotica trees were grown by two ways, Blocks and
Shelterbelts and Scattered, Blocks of Acacia nilotica were designed
for purpose of mining props and cut down at the age of 5-6 years and sold per
acre bases, while shelterbelts and scattered trees of Acacia nilotica
rotation is 10-15 years and whole trees are sold to Local Assembler.
Eucalyptus camaldulensis trees cut at age of 8-10 years and whole
trees were sold. Producers have no control on marketing of their products but
they depend upon intermediaries.
4.4.2 Local Assembler
Local Assembler purchases whole trees from producers, after
processing he deals with three distinct type products namely mining props,
timber and fire-wood. Mining props supplied to contract agents of mining pits,
timber supplied to the Saw-mill owners as well as to factories, and they supply
fire-wood to retailers. The customs wood belonging to small private forest
farms and individual villagers who might have brought fallen or cut trees from
their own sources, thus act as agent to these timber owners.
4.4.3 Saw-mill owner
In order to determine the response of the saw-mill owners, the
saw-mill owner bought timber logs from Local Assembler and engaged in some
types of operations, after processing the timber logs, three product types were
highlighted, Planks, Beams and fire-wood. Mostly planks were going into the
manufacture of furniture of various kinds, doors and windows, wooden crates,
household articles and other miscellaneous uses. Beams largely went to timber
market traders for onward sale as bulk timber further shapeable and saw-able by
the subsequent buyer and finally fire-wood which were wastage or small piece of
the timber went to the retailer near cities.
4.4.4 Retailer
As above figure indicates that, retailers purchase fire-wood
from Local Assembler and Saw-mill according to the demand of the consumer. They
maintain direct contact with consumers (Restaurants, Bakers and Households) and
make transactions according to the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the
products. Large number of retailer working in all over the Sindh, majority of
them were found at roadsides near cities. Retailers purchase that much quantity
of fire-wood, which they could sell in a week, because they haven't facility to
keep them for more than one week.
4.4.5 Consumer
Wood consumers are of different types, they use wood in many
uses generally timber is used for doors, windows and other household articles,
where as fire-wood is used for fire energy purpose, fire-wood consumers are
restaurants, bakers and households.
Table 4.1 Wood Product Percentage from Agro forest
Trees
Wood Types
|
Acacia niotica
|
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
|
Block
|
Scattered & Shelterbelts
|
Mining Props
|
50
|
16
|
12
|
Timber (logs)
|
10
|
38
|
43
|
Fire-wood
|
40
|
46
|
45
|
Table 4.1 indicates that percentage of wood products produced
from wood logs of Acacia nilotica and Eucalyptus
camaldulensis. The Acacia nilotica block plantation yields 50
percent mining-timbre, 10 percent timber logs and 40 percent fire-wood, the
Scattered & Shelterbelt of Acacia nilotica yield 16 percent of
mining props, 38 percent timber and 46 percent of fire-wood, which shows that
blocks were specially cultivated for mining props and yield higher percentage
of mining props as compared to trees grown as shelterbelts and scattered.
Where, Eucalyptus camaldulensis contained 12 percent mining props 43
percent timber, and 45 percent fire-wood.
4.5 Marketing Margin Analysis for Agroforestry wood
products
Marketing margins are the differences between prices at two
market levels. Margins represent the price charged by marketing agencies for
all services provided including buying, transportation, storage and processing.
In order to measure marketing margins, data on wood and wood-product prices
were obtained at different stages in the marketing chain. Marketing margins
depend upon the length of the marketing chain and the extent to which the
product is marketed. It was investigated that marketing chain is not so longer;
only three intermediaries were involved in the marketing of agroforestry
products in the study area.
4.5.1 Marketing Costs
Marketing costs consists of the total costs incurred on
marketing of product by each agency. One way of defining costs is all of the
expenses incurred in organizing and carrying out the marketing process. Another
definition is the charges, which are paid for any marketing activity such as,
loading unloading, transportation, market taxes, storage and assembling. The
most important factors which influence marketing costs are distance between
production and consumption market.
4.5.2 Net Margin
The net margin of a specific agency is the net earning, which
it gains after paying all marketing costs. The net profit margin of the
agroforestry producers was calculated on a per 40 kg basis as the sale price of
the wood, less production costs of wood producers. The net profit margins of
collection Local Assembler/Saw-mill/Retailer were calculated as sale price of
wood in the market minus purchase price and marketing costs.
Table 4.2 Marketing Margins of Acacia nilotica
(Babul) Products (Rs per 40 K
Middlemen
|
Products purchased
|
Products sold
|
Price paid
|
Marketing Cost
|
Price received
|
Net Margin
|
Local Assembler
|
Logs from block plantation
|
Mining props, timber & firewood
|
50
|
17
|
83
|
15
|
Logs from
shelterbelt and
scattered trees
|
Mining props, timber & firewood
|
63
|
17
|
88
|
07
|
Contract agent
|
Mining Pit
props
|
Mining Pit props
|
83
|
15
|
103
|
5
|
Saw mill
|
Timber logs
|
Timber
&
firewood
|
103
|
16
|
130
|
11
|
Retailer
|
Firewood
|
Firewood
|
77
|
6
|
92
|
9
|
Table 4.2 presents that average price Rs 50 paid by Local
assembler per 40 kg of wood logs of Acacia nilotica block owner and it
was estimated that Rs 17 was spent as marketing costs, which included cutting,
loading unloading and transportation, from the block plantation price received
Rs 83 per 40 kg, which was weighted average price based on the percentage of
wood products sold by the Local Assembler, his net margin was Rs 15 per 40 kg,
apart from that he also purchased Scattered and Shelterbelts trees and paid
price Rs 63, where he made marketing costs per 40 kg, including cutting,
loading-unloading and transportation Rs 17, and he received price Rs 88 per 40
kg, which was weighted average price of the product sold and thus he took Rs 7
as net margin per 40 kg. Contract agent of mining props purchased props for Rs
83 per 40 kg and sold to coal mine for Rs 103 per 40 kg, where his expenditure
at transportation only, was Rs 15 per 40 kg, thus his net margin was Rs 5 per
40 kg. Saw mill purchased timber logs for Rs 103 per 40 kg, after processing he
sold processed timber (Essyoon, Pawa Takhta/ Phata etc) and fire-wood
(wastage/small pieces) at weighted price of Rs 130 per 40 kg, his marketing
cost, includes transportation only Rs 16 per 40 kg, where net margin took by
saw mill owner was Rs 11 per 40 kg. From findings of field survey the retailer,
that deals with fire-wood only, purchased fire-wood from Local Assembler as
well as from Saw-mill at Rs 77 per 40 kg and sold to restaurants and households
at Rs 92 per 40 kg, where his marketing cost was Rs 6 per 40 kg, thus his net
margin was Rs 9 per 40 kg.
Note that the prices were calculated on average per 40 kg
basis and only explicit costs of each intermediary were calculated, but labor
working, monthly rent as well as investment costs were not calculated.
Table 4.3 Marketing Margins of Eucalyptus
camaldulensis Products (Rs per 40 K
Middlemen
|
Products purchased
|
Products sold
|
Price paid
|
Marketing Cost
|
Price received
|
Net Margin
|
Local Assembler
|
Logs from
shelterbelt and
scattered trees
|
Mining props, timber & firewood
|
61
|
17
|
85
|
7
|
Contract agent
|
Mining Pit
props
|
Mining Pit props
|
83
|
15
|
103
|
5
|
Saw mill
|
Timber logs
|
Timber
&
firewood
|
95
|
16
|
121
|
10
|
Retailer
|
Firewood
|
Firewood
|
77
|
6
|
92
|
9
|
The information on the margins of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
products are presented in Table 4.3. The results show the average price of
Rs 61 per 40 kg was paid by Local Assembler to the Eucalyptus
camaldulensis producer, where he made marketing costs Rs 17 per 40 kg,
that included cutting, loading- unloading and transportation, he received price
Rs 85 per 40 kg, which was weighted average price of the product sold (mining
props, timber and fire-wood), thus his net margin was Rs 7 per 40 kg. Mining
props purchased by contract agent for Rs 83 per 40 kg and sold to coal mine for
Rs 103 per 40 kg, where his expenditure on transportation only, was Rs 15 per
40 kg, thus his net margin calculated was Rs 5 per 40 kg. Saw mill purchased
timber logs from Local Assembler for Rs 103 per 40 kg, after processing saw
mill owner sold processed timber (Beams, Wooden crates, Takhta etc) and
fire-wood (wastage/small pieces) at weighted price of Rs 121 per 40 kg, his
marketing cost, including transportation and processing was Rs 16 per 40 kg,
where net margin took by saw mill owner was Rs 10 per 40 kg. In case of wood
retailer, he dealt with fire-wood only, from findings of field survey the
retailer purchased fire-wood from Local Assembler as well as from Saw-mill at
Rs 77 per
40 kg and sold to bakers, restaurants and households at Rs 92 per
40 kg, where his marketing cost was Rs 6 per 40 kg, thus his net margin was Rs
9 per 40 kg.
Note that the prices were calculated on average per 40 kg
basis and only explicit costs of each intermediary were calculated, but labor
working, monthly rent as well as investment costs were not calculated.
4.6 Agroforestry Marketing Issues in the Study Area
In the analysis of wood prices it was difficult to compare the
prices in different seasons and wood products. There were some complications in
formulating the standard price of wood, problem was day-to-day variation of
prices of agroforestry product per 40 kg (mound) basis.
The workers engaged in the production, processing and
marketing of agroforestry products were generally from the weaker sections of
the society. They used simple skills acquired either from their elders or doing
job without experiences.
The wood market was governed by a complex set of internal as
well as external factors. Those included the availability of financing credit,
skilled manpower and economic conditions of consumers, etc. The producers of
agroforestry faced troubles due to the low rates of their products, Local
Assemblers required cash to pay wages to the laborers for stacking of wood, pay
rent for the wood depots, other overhead expenses, etc.
CHAPTER V
DISCUSSION
This chapter discusses the results of the study and compares
them with previous studies. The main aim of this study was to examine existing
production and marketing system of agroforestry products in Sindh. For this
purpose primary data were collected on prices paid and purchased for wood and
wood products and their costs. The data were analyzed in order to assess the
marketing structure, margins and net margins. Data revealed that inefficient
marketing channels were found for agroforestry non timber forest products,
because of unawareness among producers. Results also revealed that agroforestry
farmers were engaged in transaction of whole trees, which consist of wood logs,
fire-wood and mining props for generation of their income. Results also
estimated that percentage of wood products produced from wood lags of
Acacia nilotica Block plantation were calculated 50 percent
mining-timbre, 10 percent timber logs and 40 percent fire-wood, where, the
scattered and shelterbelt trees of Acacia nilotica yield 16 percent of
mining props, 38 percent timber and 46 percent of fire-wood. Eucalyptus
contained 12 percent mining props, 43 percent timber and 45 percent
fire-wood. Keerio (1997) also reported that wood material produced from
Hurry or block of Acacia nilotica, of which about 67 percent
is mining timber and the remainder 33 percent is fire-wood. Keerio reported
higher percentage of mining-timber, because his study was based on entire Sindh
province while, this study was limited to four districts.
Results exposed that average price Rs 50 paid by Local
assembler per 40 kg of wood legs of Acacia nilotica block owner, which
was estimated that Rs 17 spend as marketing costs, including cutting, loading
unloading and transportation, price received
Rs 83 per 40 kg, which was weighted average price based on the
percentage of wood products sold by the Local Assembler, net margin was Rs 15
per 40 kg, apart from that he also purchased Scattered and Shelterbelts trees
and paid price Rs 63, where marketing costs per 40 kg, including cutting,
loading- unloading and transportation Rs 17, he received price Rs 88 per 40 kg,
which was calculated on weighted average price of the products sold and thus he
took Rs 7 as net margin per 40 kg. Contract agent of mining props purchased
props for Rs 83 per 40 kg and sold to coal mine for Rs 103 per 40 kg, where his
expenditure at transportation only, was Rs 15 per 40 kg, thus his net margin
was Rs 5 per 40 kg. Saw mill purchased timber logs for Rs 103 per 40 kg, after
processing he sold processed timber and fire-wood at weighted average price of
Rs 130 per 40 kg, where marketing cost was only Rs 16 per 40 kg, where net
margin took by saw mill owner was Rs 11 per 40 kg. From findings of field
survey the retailer, purchased fire-wood from Local Assembler as well as from
Saw-mill at Rs 77 per 40 kg and sold to consumers at Rs 92 per 40 kg, where he
made marketing cost Rs 6 per 40 kg, thus his net margin was Rs 9 per 40 kg.
Siddiqui (1993) estimated that retailers purchased fuel-wood at Rs 36 per 40 kg
and sold at Rs 64, where marketing costs per 40 kg were Rs 21, thus his net
income was Rs 7 per 40 kg. Siddiqui estimated Rs 7 as net earnings for retailer
on fire-wood in Peshawar area, where in this thesis net margin of Rs 9
estimated for retailer, which based in Sindh province, the disparity may be due
to regional differences or nature of trade.
The results on margins of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
wood products presented as the average price Rs 61 per 40 kg paid by Local
Assembler whole trees, where he made marketing costs Rs 17 per 40 kg, which
included cutting, loading- unloading and
transportation, where he received price Rs 85 per 40 kg, was
weighted average price of the products sold, thus his net margin was Rs 7 per
40 kg. Mining props purchased by contract agent for Rs 83 per 40 kg and sold to
coal mine for Rs 103 per 40 kg, where his expenditure on transportation only,
was Rs 15 per 40 kg, thus his net margin calculated was Rs 5 per 40 kg. Saw
mill purchased timber logs from Local Assembler for Rs 103 per 40 kg, after
processing sawmill owner sold processed timber and fire-wood at weighted price
of Rs 121 per 40 kg, his marketing cost, included transportation and processing
was Rs 16 per 40 kg, where net margin took by saw mill owner Rs 10 per 40 kg.
In case of retailer, he purchased fire-wood from Local Assembler and Saw-mill
at Rs 77 per 40 kg and sold to bakers, restaurants and households at Rs 92 per
40 kg, where his marketing cost was Rs 6 per 40 kg, thus his net earnings was
Rs 9 per 40 kg. Akbar (1997) resulted that fresh fuel-wood of Acacia
nilotica, Dalbergia sisso, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Tamarix
aphylla in surrounding towns sold at the rate of Rs.35 per 40 kg, where
dry wood sold at the rate of Rs. 65 to 70 per 40 kg. Akbar estimated that dry
fir-wood sold in Punjab at Rs Rs. 65 to 70 per 40 kg, but for this thesis it
was calculated that on average sale price of fire-wood was Rs 92 per 40 kg, the
great disparity may be due to time and regional differences.
CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
This chapter illustrates the conclusion of results and
provides suggestions on the basis of conclusion. Agroforestry referred to as
plantation of forest trees on private agricultural land. Marketing system for
agroforestry wood and non-wood products was not identical, fully non
commercialized marketing structure was found for non-wood forest products,
these products were either sold on the farm get or gifted to others. The
marketing channels of wood logs were found different from product to product;
the products were mining props, timber and fire-wood. Farmers sold the whole
trees or the block of trees to a contractor, who is also local assembler. The
local assembler estimated the weight of the products from these trees and
offered price to farmers. It was observed that in locations, there were one or
two local assemblers only and market exploitation situations were prevailed,
and they offered fewer prices. This situation may lead lower profits to farmers
and may discourage forest tree plantation. Saw mills were engaged in distinct
types of operations: they purchased timber logs, after processing were sold to
wood-based industries, retailers and consumers and retailers of fire-wood
finally sold fire-wood to local households, bakeries, and restaurants. Further
it concluded that for Acacia nilotica tree species net earning of
local assembler from blocks was Rs 15 and from shelterbelts and scattered trees
Rs 7 per 40 kg, net earning of contract agent of mining props was Rs 5 per 40
kg, net margins of saw mill owner calculated as Rs 11 and net margin of
retailer was Rs 9 per 40 kg. For Eucalyptus camaldulensis tree species
net earning of local assembler was calculated Rs 7 per 40 kg, net margins of
contract agent of mining props was Rs 5 per 40 kg, net margins of saw mill
owner calculated as Rs 11 per
40 kg and net margin of retailer was Rs 9 per 40 kg of wood
sold. This may be concluded that, in general the local assembler was earning
higher margins because transaction of local assembler was found higher as
compared to other intermediaries.
On the basis of conclusion drawn from primary data analysis
and qualitative inferences, this may be suggested that climatic, biological and
socioeconomic factors are all available in Sindh to develop wood based
industries through increasing agroforestry production. Yet wood business is not
carried out on scientific lines and supply of wood and wood products does not
meet ever increasing demand for these products. Increasing growth rate in
population have resulted in lower per capita consumption of wood products which
refers as timber, mining timber, fire-wood, and other non-wood products. Poor
marketing infrastructure, weak institutional support, and biophysical
limitations still undermine the financial benefits of woodlots and other
tree/shrub plantations.
The government should provide financing facilities to promote
wood-based industries, approved timber markets should be established, profit
should be ensured, and means of transportation of timber should be made
adequate.
Tree plantation techniques should be introduced at school
level, training and tree plantation services and plants should be available to
tree growers, and expansion of market-oriented woodlots on marginal lands is
expected to improve farmers' financial income and thus increases access to
modern farm inputs.
The improvements in the functioning of commodity markets as
well as the improved performance of the marketing system are now generally
recognized as important strategic elements in agricultural and economic
development.
There is lack of comprehensive information on the agroforestry
products. Market orientation training should be provided to market operators by
researchers. Specialized marketing system should be enhanced on the basis of
market place and the nature of trade activities.
References:
Akbar, Ghulam. 1997. Production, Utilization and Distribution
of Fuelwood in
the Deserts of Punjab, National Workshop proceeding on Wood
fuel Production
and Marketing in Pakistan, Faisalabad, Pakistan, Pp: 94-102,
28-30 October 1997.
Azhar, B. A. 1996. Forest Resources, Pakistan Agricultural
Economics, National Book Foundation, Islamabad, Pp: 311-330.
Chaudhry, Sher Muhammad. 2002. Introduction to Statistical
Theory, Part-II, Ilmi Kitab Khana, Urdu Bazar Lahore, 2002.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1993. Marketing of
woodfuel in Peshawar city, a case Study, June 1993.
Gangadharapp, N. R., B. M. Shashidhar, J. Raguraj and S.
Ganesamoorthi. 2004. Marketing Behavior and Information Source Consultancy
Pattern of Farmers Practicing Farm Forestry: Case Study of Teak Producers in
Karnataka State, India, 1st World Congress of Agroforestry, Florida,
USA, 27 June - 2 July 2004.
Government of Pakistan. 2005. Pakistan Economic Survey 2004-05,
Finance Division, Economic Advisor's Wing, Islamabad, June 2005.
Holding, Christine, Sammy Carsan and Paul Njuguna. 2006.
Smallholder Timber and Firewood Marketing in the Coffee and Cotton/Tobacco
Zones of Eastern Mount, Kenya, Small-scale forestry conference proceedings,
18-23 June 2006.
Hollington, P. A., Z. Hussain, M.A. Kahlown and M. Abdullah.
2001. Saline Report on Pakistan, Pakistan Saline Agriculture Conference,
19-21 March 2001.
ICRAF. 2006. International Center for Research in
Agroforestry. Available on world wide web (
http://www.ciesin.org/IC/icraf/agrodef.html)
accessed on August 2006.
Jayasankar, B. and P. K. Muraleedharan. 2000. Efficiency of
Agroforestry Product Markets in India, Indian Journal of Agricultural
Economics, Vol: 55 Pp: 194-208, 2000.
Kanowski, Peter J. 1997. Afforestation and plantation forestry,
Special Paper for XI World Forestry Congress, 13-22 October 1997.
Kärnä, J., Hansen E. and Juslin H.
2003. Environmental Activity and Forest Certification in Marketing of
Forest Products, case study in Europe. Silva Fennica, Vol: 37(2) Pp: 253-267,
2003.
Keerio, G. R. 1997. Wood fuel in Sindh with reference to
Hurries, National Workshop proceeding on Wood fuel Production and Marketing in
Pakistan, Faisalabad, Pakistan, Pp: 47-50, 28-30 October 1997.
Kella, Lekhraj. and M. A. Sangi. 2000. Management Plan for
Irrigated and Social Forestry Plantations of Sanghar District Vol:I, Progress
Report submitted to Government of Sindh, June 2000.
Khair, Syed, M. Nisar A. Shah and A. Razzaq. 2002. Comparative
Marketing Margins for Kaja (Red Delicious) and Shin Kulu (Golden Delicious)
Apple in Pishin (Pakistan), Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol: 1 Pp:
190-192, 2002.
Mohyu-ud-Din, Qamar. 1998. Agricultural Marketing, A-one
publishers, Lahore, June 1998.
Negussie, Achalu, Holm Uibrig and Ruediger vonder Weth. 2004.
Financial Viability of Eucalypt Woodlots and Revenue Distribution among
Stakeholders: A Case from Guraghe Highlands, South-Central Ethiopia,
1stWorld Congress of Agroforestry, Florida, USA, 27 June - 2 July
2004.
Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross. 1990. «Industrial Market
Structure and Economic Performance», Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Scott, j. Josiah. 2001. Marketing Specially Forest Products, The
National Arbor Day Foundation Journal, University of Nebraska USA.
Shahid, M. I. 2000. Forestry in Pakistan, 4th Edition, Carvan
Enterprises Lahore. 2000.
Sharif, Choudhry Muhammad. 2004. Opportunities and Constraints
in the Production, Marketing and Export of Citrus in Punjab Ph.D. Thesis
submitted to Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology University
of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan. June 2004.
Siddiqui, K. M. and Mohammad Amjad. 1993. Marketing of
Woodfuel in Peshawar City, a Case Study, Pakistan, Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok, June 1993.
Smith, Bob. 2000. Marketing for Wood Products Companies, journal
of Virginia Cooperative Extension Pp: 420-145, Virginia State University
USA.2000.
Sohngen, Brent and Roger Sedjo. 1999. Potential Carbon Flux
From Timber Harvests and Management in The Context of a Global Timber Market,
Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio
State University, USA.
Questionnaire:
This questionnaire was designed especially for the study
marketing of agroforestry products in Sindh.
Respondent's information:
Sample #
Date:
Name:
Age:
Village:
Taluka:
District.
Business information
1. Type of Middlemen/business. Tick [v ]
appropriate?
(Local Assembler, Saw Mill, Retailer, other
(specify) : ).
2. Where from do you purchase wood. Tick [v ]
appropriate? (Farmer, Local Assembler, Saw Mill, other (specify) :
).
3. Trees / wood / wood-products purchased by the
middleman
Tree species
|
Acres if block
|
No. of trees if Scattered
|
Age of tree
|
Dry wood
weight
Per tree / acre
|
Total weight of dry wood
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Purchasing cost of the middleman
No. of trees
|
No. of acres
|
Total weight
|
Age of tree
|
Rate per mound
|
Total amount
|
5. Marketing (direct) Cost paid by the
middleman
Items
|
Unit: lot/tree/mound
|
No. of units
|
Rate per unit
|
Total cost
|
6.
Cutting Loading and un-loading Transport cost
Market tax
Commission
Municipal tax Processing Any other
Ratio between wood and wood products
Tree species
|
Age of tree
|
Total weight
|
Timber logs
weight
|
Mining props weight
|
Fire-wood weight
|
Other products weight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Agroforestry products sold by the
middlemen
Name of products
|
Selling to middlemen
|
Weight (unit) mound / kg
|
Selling price per unit
|
Total amount
|
8. How many employees working with you?
Laborer
|
No. of employees
|
Wage: per day/month/year
|
Total amount
|
Daily wages
|
|
|
|
Permanent monthly basis
|
|
|
|
Permanent yearly basis
|
|
|
|
9. Is your shop/business place on? Tick [v ] appropriate
a= Rent
b= Own
10. If rented, what is the rent?
a= Rs/week :
b= Rs/month:
c= Rs/year:
11. How much volume of Timber do you trade?
a= Rs/day:
b= Rs/week:
c= Rs/month:
12. Is any Organization in the Market? a=
Yes
b= No
13. What are main functions of the
organization?
a=
b=
C=
14. What kind of dispute do you normally face?
Specify.
a=
b=
c=
15. How do you solve the disputes?
a=
b=
c=
16. What are your suggestions for improvement of wood
marketing system?
a=
b=
c=