WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Deterrence measures as response to potential threats to the host country: the case of the United Kingdom

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Serge Lattoh
London South Bank University - Master of Science 2007
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy
C) REFUGEE TRADITION

The United Kingdom is one of the first signatories of the 1951 United Convention on

Refugees. Even before that convention which forbids any contracting state to return

refugee to a country there is persecution but does not compel any state to allow

people in to claim refugee status, England had already opened its borders to people

seeking refuge. Its tradition of welcoming door to refugees is clearly stated in

1853 in the newspaper The Times: «Every civilised people on the face of the earth

must be aware that this country is the asylum of nations, and that it will defend the

asylum to the last ounce of its treasure and the last drop of its blood» (Marfleet, 2006,

p112). The commitment to open door to people fleeing for their live is the motivation

of the coming of at least 120000 Jews fleeing pogroms (massacres) from 1875 to

1914. But this commitment to give shelter finds its roots in the tradition of this

country. Indeed over centuries, England is a state of Liberal democracy which

stresses individual rights such as freedom of religion, of movement, of speech of

assembly etc... The political option of the country since the 18th Century till up to now

has attracted many people in quest of shelter for their life like seven people I

interviewed this year 2007.

Salifu, 27, from Sierra Leone:

I fled my country where my life was in danger. My parents have been killed in

the family house by gunmen, in broad day light, for political reason. I am alive

because I was not at home that day. I am here since 2000. I have friends here

who told me that this country is a democratic one where human rights are

respected and where I will safe.

Stella, 32, from Uganda:

For political reason my husband was killed. I was worry for my life and the

life of my two children. I did not know where to run to when one relative

helped me to come here. He told me that England is a safer place where my

children and I will receive protection. I did not have relative or acquaintance

in this country before coming here in 2002.

Sandrine, 26, from Ivory Coast:

I was a student activist who fled the repressive regime of the late President

Houphouet in 1992 after the militaries came on the student campus to look

for me. I could not go to France because of the political agreements between

France and my country therefore I chose to come to England. I did not know

anything about this country before coming.

Victoria, 22, from Nigeria:

My dad was a politician in my country who was opposed to military

dictatorship. He was shot one night by militaries that were looking for my

family. We all came here in 2000 because it is the only country where we can

find protection.

Gaspard, 35, from Zaire:

My life was in danger when I challenged a candidate of the ruling party. One

night while I was holding a political meeting my friends and I were attacked

by armed men. I was lucky to escape, three were killed. Since that event

I have to flee for my live. I came here in 2001 because of its reputation of

democratic country and respectful of human rights.

John, 40, from Zimbabwe:

I was arrested because I worked with the opposition party, the Movement for

Democratic Change. I was detained two months during which policemen beat

and tortured me. I was accused of plotting against my country by working with

imperialist forces hidden inside and outside the country. I managed to flee the

prison with the help of a policeman who happened to be a relative of my wife.

I went to South Africa where I took a plane for England. I came to this country

in 2002 because it is a democratic country fighting against dictatorship in my

own country and because I think my life will be safe here.

Eduardo, 45, from Equatorial Guinea:

I left my country because of my political activism. I was a member of a

clandestine organisation that opposes the government. One day, coming from a

meeting, I was arrested by the police and detained for five months without

trial. Nobody knew where I was. I suffered abuses, torture and degrading

treatments. I was released and was under police watch. I fled my country

during a regional football tournament. I came here in 2002 because the person

who helped me told me that it is the safest country for politician activists.

In all the stories I listened to, the common denominator is that asylum seekers fled

to this country to save their lives. Even though all the interviewees are from Africa,

human rights violations are not only pertaining to that continent. All the people

seeking asylum in this country are here for the protection of their life.

In this chapter I have tried to see the rationale underpinning immigration in

England. We have seen that asylum was given to people who were opposed to the

government of their country for political or religious reason. Granting asylum also

was used as propaganda during the bipolarisation of the world between Capitalism

versus Communism. At the economical level, people were granting the status of

refugees to fill the shortage of manpower and work to boost the economy. These two

reasons cannot overshadow the fact that people look for shelter in England because

of its reputation of country of asylum.

The mass flow of people seeking either temporal or definitive shelter in this country is

not without consequence upon the host country. The next chapter will deal with the

social and economical impact of the presence of asylum seekers on England.

II) THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ASYLUM SEEKERS' PRESENCE

This chapter will talk about the surge of societal and economic threats among the host

population due to the growing number of asylum seekers. On the one hand English

fears that the organisation of their society, their culture and identity will be diluted if

not will disappear because of the flow of foreigners. On the other hand, they dislike

the financial cost created by asylum seekers.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Nous devons apprendre à vivre ensemble comme des frères sinon nous allons mourir tous ensemble comme des idiots"   Martin Luther King