3-Results and discussion
Morphological identification
Length
For aged samples, the total length shows an average of 167.5
cm and 56.6 cm respectively for aged and young leaves. This
considerable length is proven by Nobel (1976) and Bertrand (1959). For young
samples, it is 85.32 cm and 50.2 cm for aged and young leaves. The significant
difference is probably due to meristematic activity which is yet not optimum
for young samples (Nobel, 1976).
For an aged sample, the basal segment is about 26.69% of the
leaf's length; 44.71cm high from the bottom bow. The medium part is about
23.62% and
measures 39.57 cm. The apical segment is about 43.35% and
measures 72.62 cm. for a young sample, the basal part rises 28.9 cm from the
bottom which is nearly 51.06% of the leaf, medium part is 30.86% as 17.47 cm
while apical part is 18.07% about 10.23 cm. Aged samples can reach 217 cm and
young ones 98.17 cm. by aging, this is because of meristematic activity of
leaves and the specie's nature; it is succulent, rising and stretch out
(Bertrand, 1959). The fibers contained in Agave are long ones and can reach 2mm
each (Han and Rowel, 1995).
Table1: Total and maximum average length of
Agave americana L. in Kasserine, Tunisia
Sample
Length (cm)
|
Total
|
Maximum
|
Young
leaf
|
Aged
leaf
|
Young
leaf
|
Aged
leaf
|
Young
|
50.2
|
85.32
|
|
|
Aged
|
56.6
|
167.5
|
98.17
|
217
|
Table2: Partial average length of Agave
americana L. in Kasserine, Tunisia
|
Top
|
Medium
|
Bottom
|
Length (cm)
|
%
|
Length (cm)
|
%
|
Length (cm)
|
%
|
Young
|
10.23
|
18.07
|
17.47
|
30.86
|
28.9
|
51.06
|
Aged
|
72.62
|
43.35
|
39.57
|
23.62
|
44.71
|
26.69
|
Thickness
Table 3: average thickness of Agave americana
L. in Kasserine, Tunisia
Length (cm)
|
At bottom row
|
At the apex
|
Young sample
|
30.82
|
20.85
|
Aged sample
|
66.45
|
32.05
|
The bottom is much thicker, it's where happens water
accumulation as hydro potential low (Down, 1976). The thorn of the apex shows
the limited transpiration of this specie so keeps water. The leaf is also
highly concentrated in fibers. It's so recommended to use the bottom for any
economic and industrial use because of the better efficiency.
Weight
The average weight of young samples' leaves is about 1968 g
and 974 g respectively for aged and young leaves that rise to 2945 g and 1479 g
for aged
samples. Despite the equal age of young leaves extracted from
young and aged samples, they don't
have the same weight. This can be explained by the fact of
vegetative growth and photosynthetic activity aren't optima for young samples.
Their fibers aren't well constructed and concentrated in cellulose. It's more
efficient to use aged samples in industries that relies on vegetative
biomass.
Biochemical identification
Data reported on the chemical properties of nonwood fibers and
especially Agave americana are few. This data vary greatly, studies have varied
in fiber (source, age) growing time and methodology.
Dryness
The three segments of the leaf show average rates respectively
from bottom: 13%; 20.49% and 28.34%. It is a significant criteria to be
considered to judge the efficiency of Agave in several uses; especially
industrial one. It could have a bad influence on Agave's economic
profitableness. In deed, Agave's profitablessness is estimated, for 1 tonne of
dry material, by nearly only 206 kg of useful one.
Humidity
The distinct parts of Agave's leaves show respectively an
average of humidity 86.99%; 71.65%; 79.50%. The anatomy of the whole leaf is
behind its important amount of water (79.38%). It contains few stomas, is
covered by an impermeable wax and has thorn all along its circumference which
diminishes transpiration so much. Every possible industrial use requires
dehydration, this humidity rate can be a serious handicap but his juicy plant
(2.5l) is so useful in human alimentation (tequila drink). Its moistness allows
the high populations in arid climate as the field site. So, It gains a
tolerance even desert one.
Mineral ashes contain
The leaf contains an average of 0.46% of ashes. The contain is
for bottom 0.66%, medium part 0.4% and apex 0.34%. Ashes, which are micro and
macro-elements, aren't essential components of Agave. This poor proportion is
so recommended in industrial uses especially in paper mill.
pH
From bottom to apex, pH is respectively
5.01; 5.05; and 5.96. The leaf's pH is about 5.34. its acidity causes a
cutaneous irritation within manipulations. Despite its high sugar concentration
(Digest, 1980), it is not recommended in livestock alimentation. Even if it
provides alcoholic drinks, its acidity can be harmful for health.
Raw cellulose contain
Table 4: raw cellulose contain
Cellulose rate (%)
|
Vegetal material
|
Bottom
|
Medium
|
Apex
|
Leaf
|
NaOH method
|
74.9
|
57.8
|
34
|
55.56
|
Alcohol method
|
68.42
|
51.15
|
35
|
51.52
|
Average
|
7.66
|
54.47
|
34.5
|
53.54
|
The cellulose rate shows a significant difference between the
three parts of the leaf. Basal segment is the most concentrated. In deed, it's
related to the change of chemical properties associated to fibers number and
growth (Han and Rowell, 1997). Polysaccharides synthesis is optimal at bottom;
the fiber's growth begins by getting its definitive length then it gets thicker
and cellulose charged (Person, 1987). In the industries based on cellulose
extracts, it's important to avoid the apex highly lignin concentrated that
disturbs.
The average rate 55.56% is considerable and is even higher
than other fiber species exploited in industrial uses. From Agave, cellulose
pulps can be manufactured safely.
Lock G.W. (1962) thirty years's sisal research in Tanzania
Longmans, Breen and Coltd.
Mauset J.D., Kesling R. (1997) comparative anatomy of
Neoraimondia roseiflora and Neocardenasia berzogania(Cactaceae) : Haseltonia,
vol 5 : 37-50.
Msahli (2002) étude du potentiel textile des fibres
d'Agave Americana L., thèse pour l'obtention du titre de Docteur en
sciences d'ingénieur an ENSITM.
Nobel (1976) water relations and photosynthesis of a desert
CAM plant, Plant physiology. Vol 58: 576-582.
Nobel P.S. (1977) water relations of flowering of Agave
desrti. Botanical Gazette, vol 138: 1-6.
Person, C.J.(1987) Agronomy of grass land systems Cambridge
University press,169 p.
Pfaffli I, Sisco M.,(1995). fiber Atlas Identification of
Papermarketing Fibers. Springer: 290-299.
|